News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257660
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 123038
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biocqr post# 185332

Thursday, 01/01/2015 1:50:28 PM

Thursday, January 01, 2015 1:50:28 PM

Post# of 257660
ENTA/ABBV/ACHN—Another misleading statement in Peter Kolchinski’s piece (#msg-109535576):

…by adding a nuc to its next-generation regimen, AbbVie could dilute the royalty it pays to Enanta Pharmaceuticals for a protease inhibitor (in the expanded regimen, the protease inhibitor would represent a third of the combination instead of half, unless it were eliminated altogether); reduced payments to Enanta would partially offset the cost of acquiring Achillion.

Although ENTA’s royalty rate would go down if a third drug were added to the ABT-493/ABT-530 (next-gen) regimen, ABBV would not make this change unilaterally—unless its intention were to eliminate ABT-493 entirely. Rather, the addition of a third drug to the regimen is something that would be negotiated with ENTA.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today