InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253355
Next 10
Followers 840
Posts 120561
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biocqr post# 185332

Thursday, 01/01/2015 1:50:28 PM

Thursday, January 01, 2015 1:50:28 PM

Post# of 253355
ENTA/ABBV/ACHN—Another misleading statement in Peter Kolchinski’s piece (#msg-109535576):

…by adding a nuc to its next-generation regimen, AbbVie could dilute the royalty it pays to Enanta Pharmaceuticals for a protease inhibitor (in the expanded regimen, the protease inhibitor would represent a third of the combination instead of half, unless it were eliminated altogether); reduced payments to Enanta would partially offset the cost of acquiring Achillion.

Although ENTA’s royalty rate would go down if a third drug were added to the ABT-493/ABT-530 (next-gen) regimen, ABBV would not make this change unilaterally—unless its intention were to eliminate ABT-493 entirely. Rather, the addition of a third drug to the regimen is something that would be negotiated with ENTA.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.