MSGI:
"Wouldn't want him to give the whole list as I am sure the rest of the crowd that finished in the bottom half are sure glad that we don't have to look at that any more."
You notice when I gave the combined rankings for both the percent gains in PSL1 and PSL2 and the combined rankings for both the rankings of PSL1 and PSL2, I only showed the top 30 originally, then the top 40.
Personally, if it was me, I would not publish anything past 40th place, or maybe 50th at the most. As you know, I think a good deal of it is luck - certainly on any single contest. I don't see any reason for someone's name to be buried at the bottom for 3+ months every single day. Why?
Now, if everyone wanted that, then fine. But, who wants to see their name at the bottom day after day after day just because they picked a couple bad stocks that are killing them? I would be concerned that they would lose interest and not want to compete again for fear of looking bad again.
Obviously, I could be wrong, but I would only publish the top 40 unless, and until, I got pressure from everyone to do all of them. But, SSK can do it however he pleases!
Len
Warren Buffet: 5 minutes and 17 seconds of pure, unadulterated, bulletproof, flawless logic.
____________________________________________
