Foreign Correspondence

[Amaunet]

That is one of the things I didn’t like about the site. I think they are using a less accepted definition and not sure how accurate.

They got the part about a social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government in this case world government that often plans and controls the economy. But with the CFR plan the distribution as you say would not go to the people but mainly to the elites. This socialism would not be the collectively owned system but rather the centralized or world government type and the distribution would benefit the centralized power brokers. That is the only thing I could come up with as to this site’s socialist reference.

Otherwise the CFR would be aligned with Chavez.


so•cial•ism (sō'shə-lĭz'əm)
n.
2. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.