Justafy7,
I agree with most of what Dr and you said, however I disagree with you and parts of what he said.
This is the exact place for positive and negative discussion/debate, as this is an investment forum. It is the digital version of share-holder meetings and the coffee shops/break rooms on Wall Street.
I write on Benny as he made it clear that he reads these boards. I want him to know his mistakes are noticed and will not go unchallenged by share holders. It is a publicly owned company now, not his. It is just as much yours and mine as it is his. So our opinions do matter.
Do you think Benny would have called for an immediate share holder video or announced the potential partner if investors did not complain on the boards?
Do you think the Murphy Report would have gone public at that same time if Benny didn't know the GSL was messed up. He was mitigating damage and IHub is exactly for those types of discussions. Better here in a declared investment forum then on random blogs and news articles that google and bing will pick up on.
If others and I had not shown our disappointment with the video itself, do you think he would have come out on FB and stated he didn't do the video up to par as you yourself stated? No...
You said it doesn't help the company to have any negative comments. I 100% disagree. If a few small comments now help Benny get in line and run the company like a CEO should, it can only help us in the long run, especially when REAL money is looking at REDG, which it will once the GSL goes online. As I am long, that is what I care about. Not the flippers or soft pumpers as some call them.
There needs to be a balance and I want to make sure Benny knows investors are watching him and listening to his words and actions. When they don't make sense, especially when you compare them to previous statements, we should do our due diligence as investors and let him know.
Penny_Island
