News Focus
News Focus
Followers 8
Posts 328
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2013

Re: kuker4e post# 807

Wednesday, 12/10/2014 9:26:31 PM

Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:26:31 PM

Post# of 13388
Exactly...I agree. That being said I have a feeling that their "intended" model of not charging for the equipment (at all) is flawed as the ROI would be forever. This will change IMO with any real contract and they will get a typical 30% down or something along those lines for it to make sense. I get the model...its to entice potential buyers and prove the tech...but the ROI won't make sense.

On the other hand...looking at current share structure...even if it takes $0.5M to build a large unit(s) we are only talking about 200M shares @ .002 (less if higher which it would be with an award) and this still is pretty low for an OTC traded stock. If they went the borrowing route its the same difference minus the fact that they could potentially pay out over 1-2yrs and offset shares with returns from the customer...limiting O/S growth. Just depnends on their approach.

Not sure what it all means...but an order, in my opinion, would or should send this thing climbing hard from current sp...at least for awhile. Lock up the float and who knows how far it goes.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent PWDY News