InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 959
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/08/2013

Re: cazual post# 82566

Wednesday, 11/26/2014 10:05:10 AM

Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:05:10 AM

Post# of 91007
Curious...why do these patent links not include this one?

https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP11854049&lng=en&tab=doclist

Could it have anything to do with this?

https://register.epo.org/application?documentId=EV7SWG9J5324FI4&number=EP11854049&lng=en&npl=false

THE EPO has stated that multiple claims lack Novelty and multiple claims are Not Inventive.


Or how about the notification sent to the Company by the EPO on July 10, 2014 stating if the Company wanted to proceed with the application by filing a response to the objections made by the EPO they had six months to do so?

https://register.epo.org/application?documentId=EV92YNQT7470FI4&number=EP11854049&lng=en&npl=false

Only 45 days left to go to respond but unless the Doc has magically re-worked the process to qualify as "Novel" and "Inventive" you can kiss the European patent good bye. And those follow on patents...all based upon the same basic process...yeah they go away too.

If this were such a slam-dunk response to the EPO why hasn't the Doc responded with the appropriate material to "correct" the lack of understanding out of the EPO? The sooner he responds the closer to the patent he gets right? What's he waiting for?

Not to worry...I'm sure he'll send something in just to extend the window and further claims of the patent being issued "anytime now" can be perpetuated for another year.

Thanks for keeping us up to date!



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.