News Focus
News Focus
Followers 23
Posts 3591
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2010

Re: gitreal post# 12475

Monday, 11/17/2014 2:49:43 PM

Monday, November 17, 2014 2:49:43 PM

Post# of 18904
I don't disagree. I was just pointing out to those who continually say Mesa paid for the satellite imaging so as a shareholder, that's all they need, aren't even aware of what USPR has actually stated. There's plenty of misstatements here so I was just correcting them.

The reality is that since the funds are not flowing through USPR, we don't have any audited financial evidence of any money coming in, from whom it came, or how it was spent. So with no financial proof, and without the results being publicly disseminated anywhere, we don't know anything was actually done, how much it might have cost, and what the results were, if any. All we have are the words of the ex-commodities brokers and movie executive.

So USPR's expert geologists said there's insufficient data in 2011 to determine a resource, and it's uncertain there ever will be. USPR has done nothing since 2011 to prove anything at all. The CEO and jv partner are brokers, and the money doesn't flow through USPR so we have no evidence of anything at all. Just words.

I think that sums things up.

This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today