Saturday, November 01, 2014 7:53:29 PM
Publishing PHONY financial information as being FACTUAL? Do you think their was MALICIOUS INTENT in that action to steal from investors on false information? Check the selling when DVC tossed out that CRAP. Shares WERE SOLD higher prices after DVC already had theirs on the cheap.
What about pumping information as to STOCK SHARE SALES in the MILLIONS of dollars??
Was their an untrue accusation of Hanna having acted in a FELONOUS manner here by the NYC AG's office?
Does one's " business acumen " come into play anywhere here since all one can find is almost 9 years of ZERO PROFITS?? Is their HARM OR MALICE in stating the TRUTH???
Now should one of the NATIONAL financial TV stations grab this juicy story, do you think Hanna will have any ammunition then to pursue any legal SLANDER actions against them??? NOPE!
Definition of SLANDER:
slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications.
All most investors here see is possibly a GREEDY CEO that has been arrested and will have her day along with that of several of her OTHER friends in court to explain why they thought it was necessary to SCAM INVESTORS with STOCK SELLING SCHEMES, P&D's and any other illicit activities they could ultimately get away with.
Obviously most agree that their is a RIGHT WAY and a WRONG WAY to conduct business when your a CEO or officer of ANY company, either on the BIG BOARDS or in the PINK SHEETS!
What about pumping information as to STOCK SHARE SALES in the MILLIONS of dollars??
Was their an untrue accusation of Hanna having acted in a FELONOUS manner here by the NYC AG's office?
Does one's " business acumen " come into play anywhere here since all one can find is almost 9 years of ZERO PROFITS?? Is their HARM OR MALICE in stating the TRUTH???
Now should one of the NATIONAL financial TV stations grab this juicy story, do you think Hanna will have any ammunition then to pursue any legal SLANDER actions against them??? NOPE!
Definition of SLANDER:
slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications.
All most investors here see is possibly a GREEDY CEO that has been arrested and will have her day along with that of several of her OTHER friends in court to explain why they thought it was necessary to SCAM INVESTORS with STOCK SELLING SCHEMES, P&D's and any other illicit activities they could ultimately get away with.
Obviously most agree that their is a RIGHT WAY and a WRONG WAY to conduct business when your a CEO or officer of ANY company, either on the BIG BOARDS or in the PINK SHEETS!

