Friday, October 31, 2014 12:05:18 PM
That did not answer the question of course - or perhaps it did, in a way not intended..........
Frankly - MRIB knew exactly from whom they were borrowing funds, and exactly the terms that would be exacted from those lenders. Toxic financing, from toxic dilution - both of which have been repeatedly denied, and clearly both of which absolutely exist, as validated by references to 'unscrupulous lenders' - your words. Certainly a company with valued, transparent leadership like Margrit & Co. know precisely the terms agreed to for much needed funds - and exactly how it would detract from shareholder value. I didn't make the 'ethical' judgement thereof - just stating the fact that the lending is treacherous for the PPS - proven clearly by the previous months of activity.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM