Friday, April 21, 2006 1:32:01 AM
Bush refuses diplomacy with Iran opts for war.
The demented creature is sounding more insane every day. His vision of total war and no attempt at peace through clever diplomacy is sounding very much like Richard Perle another of Bush’s thinkers who is quite insane.
Bush sees his embattled presidency as a throwback to Winston Churchill on the backbenches of parliament surrounded by appeasers. Now it's a world of appeasers trying to blunt America's sword. Bush tells his out of town visitors to think of how history will judge his administration 20 years hence and not to worry about setbacks in Iraq.
Bush's "wild speculation" description is now taken seriously in foreign media as yet another indication America's global imperial hubris is out of control. The damage it is doing to America's image is hard to quantify, but it is at least as serious as the Abu Ghraib "torture" pictures.
One of George W Bush's "thinkers" is Richard Perle.
I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan; and when he spoke about "total war", I mistakenly dismissed him as mad. He recently used the term again in describing America's "war on terror". "No stages," he said. "This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out
there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our
vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs about us years from now." - John Pilger
-Am
The Unravelling Of The Doctrine Of MAD In 2006
by Arnaud De Borchgrave, UPI Editor at Large
Washington (UPI) Apr 21, 2006
At least three unofficial Iranian emissaries have been in Washington this spring with the same recommendation: Send a high-ranking current or former U.S. official to Qom for secret talks with Ayatollah Ali Khameini to explore the possibility of a geopolitical deal before Iran passes yet another nuclear milestone -- e.g., a non-aggression treaty in return for taking Iran's gauntleted hand off the nuclear sword and resheathing it in an IAEA scabbard.
An American exit from Iraq would also be part of the diplomatic mix.
For President Bush, this is rank appeasement. He sees his embattled presidency as a throwback to Winston Churchill on the backbenches of parliament surrounded by appeasers. Now it's a world of appeasers trying to blunt America's sword. Bush tells his out of town visitors to think of how history will judge his administration 20 years hence and not to worry about setbacks in Iraq.
Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh writes a long story for the New Yorker whose gist is Bush is contemplating a tactical nuclear strike against Iran's nuclear installations, now spread in at least 17 different locations. The absurd idea is not denied by Bush. He simply calls it "wild speculation." For the rest of the world this means that the only power in history to have used nuclear weapons -- "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" incinerated almost 200,000 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in less than a second -- is now seriously thinking of doing it again.
Bush's "wild speculation" description is now taken seriously in foreign media as yet another indication America's global imperial hubris is out of control. The damage it is doing to America's image is hard to quantify, but it is at least as serious as the Abu Ghraib "torture" pictures.
Neocon supporters of the Bush Administration are confident the president will order air strikes against Iran between the Nov. 2006 elections and Nov. 2008 when his successor will be elected. The post-strike scenario was put to one of these neocon supporters:
1. Swift minelayers sail from Bandar Abbas, the Iranian naval base at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz and sow a few score mines in the world's busiest oil shipping lane. All tanker traffic stops. U.S. and NATO minesweepers head for Hormuz. Iranian naval commandos in Zodiak rubber speedboats come alongside a supertanker and sink it by sticking limpet mines along the waterline. Oil futures quickly pass $100 a barrel and keep climbing.
2. Saudi Arabia's Shiite minority, employed in the eastern Saudi oilfields, begins blowing oil pipelines. Sabotage is reported at Ras Tanura, the world's largest oil loading port.
3. U.S. air strikes obliterate Bandar Abbas.
4. Iraq's two Shiite militia, armed and funded by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, are ordered into action against Iraq's U.S.-funded and trained army and police forces and against U.S. forces. U.S. casualties mount again. Congress calls for an immediate evacuation of U.S. forces into Kuwait. The Kuwaiti parliament balks and declares its neutrality in what is now the new U.S.-Iran war.
5. Hezbollah and Hamas fire several thousand rockets and missiles over Israel's protective barrier killing scores of Israelis. The IDF is ordered back into Gaza to wipe out the terrorists.
6. Hezbollah's militia goes into action against U.S. interests in Beirut.
7. Shiite and Sunni Arabs close ranks against the U.S.-Zionist enemy. Arab streets erupt in mass anti-U.S. demonstrations. Arab governments recall their ambassadors from Washington.
8. The entire Muslim world closes ranks behind Iran.
9. A "dirty bomb" explodes in lower Manhattan. Casualties are far lower than on 9/11 when the Twin Towers were destroyed. But a 60-square-block area has to be permanently evacuated. It will be uninhabitable for several years due to dangerous levels of radiation.
The neocon interlocutor smiled, then shrugged his shoulders and called the scenario "wild speculation." White House calculus ignores the fact that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's President and a member of a fanatical sect of Shiite Islam, believes in the apocalypse in his own lifetime. Some people who know him say he thinks global death and destruction is only two years away and that this will be followed by the return of the 12th Imam, known as the Mahdi.
Iran's president, who claims the Nazi holocaust was pure fiction, and that Israel should be erased from the map, only has power over his cabinet. Under Supreme Leader Khamenei come the intelligence services, the armed forces, the revolutionary guards, parliament, broadcasting -- and the government. So the time for secret talks with the real no. 1 was yesterday.
Richard Armitage, a tough Republican who was deputy Secretary of State under Colin Powell, says it would behoove the U.S. to talk to Iran directly -- not simply at the level of the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad to talk about the future of Iraq. So far, the U.S. has resisted direct talks with Tehran about its nuclear aspirations and mandated the EU3 -- the U.K., France and Germany -- to be its surrogate.
The stakes are so high, Armitage says, the situation "merits talking to the Iranians about the full range of our relationship... everything from energy to terrorism to weapons to Iraq. We can be diplomatically astute enough to do it without giving anything away."
When Nikita Khrushchev warned the U.S. that the Soviet Union would bury America, Washington didn't break diplomatic relations but went on talking -- throughout the Cold War -- and the evil empire collapsed.
During the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, with the world poised on the edge of nuclear war, brilliant U.S. diplomacy always left Khrushchev a way out of his geopolitical power play. He was trying to find a shortcut to nuclear parity with the U.S. The Soviet dictator took his missiles home, the U.S. agreed not to invade Cuba, and later took its obsolete Jupiter missiles out of Turkey.
Perhaps Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is not a student of Machiavelli. But Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jim Schlesinger are still among us -- and ready to serve, not a public circus, but a top secret head-to-head with Velayat-e-Faqih, "the Guardianship of the Jurisprudent." That's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Prophet's proconsul in the holy city of Qom.
Source: United Press International
Related Links
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/The_Unravelling_Of_The_Doctrine_Of_MAD_In_2006.html
The demented creature is sounding more insane every day. His vision of total war and no attempt at peace through clever diplomacy is sounding very much like Richard Perle another of Bush’s thinkers who is quite insane.
Bush sees his embattled presidency as a throwback to Winston Churchill on the backbenches of parliament surrounded by appeasers. Now it's a world of appeasers trying to blunt America's sword. Bush tells his out of town visitors to think of how history will judge his administration 20 years hence and not to worry about setbacks in Iraq.
Bush's "wild speculation" description is now taken seriously in foreign media as yet another indication America's global imperial hubris is out of control. The damage it is doing to America's image is hard to quantify, but it is at least as serious as the Abu Ghraib "torture" pictures.
One of George W Bush's "thinkers" is Richard Perle.
I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan; and when he spoke about "total war", I mistakenly dismissed him as mad. He recently used the term again in describing America's "war on terror". "No stages," he said. "This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out
there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our
vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs about us years from now." - John Pilger
-Am
The Unravelling Of The Doctrine Of MAD In 2006
by Arnaud De Borchgrave, UPI Editor at Large
Washington (UPI) Apr 21, 2006
At least three unofficial Iranian emissaries have been in Washington this spring with the same recommendation: Send a high-ranking current or former U.S. official to Qom for secret talks with Ayatollah Ali Khameini to explore the possibility of a geopolitical deal before Iran passes yet another nuclear milestone -- e.g., a non-aggression treaty in return for taking Iran's gauntleted hand off the nuclear sword and resheathing it in an IAEA scabbard.
An American exit from Iraq would also be part of the diplomatic mix.
For President Bush, this is rank appeasement. He sees his embattled presidency as a throwback to Winston Churchill on the backbenches of parliament surrounded by appeasers. Now it's a world of appeasers trying to blunt America's sword. Bush tells his out of town visitors to think of how history will judge his administration 20 years hence and not to worry about setbacks in Iraq.
Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh writes a long story for the New Yorker whose gist is Bush is contemplating a tactical nuclear strike against Iran's nuclear installations, now spread in at least 17 different locations. The absurd idea is not denied by Bush. He simply calls it "wild speculation." For the rest of the world this means that the only power in history to have used nuclear weapons -- "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" incinerated almost 200,000 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in less than a second -- is now seriously thinking of doing it again.
Bush's "wild speculation" description is now taken seriously in foreign media as yet another indication America's global imperial hubris is out of control. The damage it is doing to America's image is hard to quantify, but it is at least as serious as the Abu Ghraib "torture" pictures.
Neocon supporters of the Bush Administration are confident the president will order air strikes against Iran between the Nov. 2006 elections and Nov. 2008 when his successor will be elected. The post-strike scenario was put to one of these neocon supporters:
1. Swift minelayers sail from Bandar Abbas, the Iranian naval base at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz and sow a few score mines in the world's busiest oil shipping lane. All tanker traffic stops. U.S. and NATO minesweepers head for Hormuz. Iranian naval commandos in Zodiak rubber speedboats come alongside a supertanker and sink it by sticking limpet mines along the waterline. Oil futures quickly pass $100 a barrel and keep climbing.
2. Saudi Arabia's Shiite minority, employed in the eastern Saudi oilfields, begins blowing oil pipelines. Sabotage is reported at Ras Tanura, the world's largest oil loading port.
3. U.S. air strikes obliterate Bandar Abbas.
4. Iraq's two Shiite militia, armed and funded by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, are ordered into action against Iraq's U.S.-funded and trained army and police forces and against U.S. forces. U.S. casualties mount again. Congress calls for an immediate evacuation of U.S. forces into Kuwait. The Kuwaiti parliament balks and declares its neutrality in what is now the new U.S.-Iran war.
5. Hezbollah and Hamas fire several thousand rockets and missiles over Israel's protective barrier killing scores of Israelis. The IDF is ordered back into Gaza to wipe out the terrorists.
6. Hezbollah's militia goes into action against U.S. interests in Beirut.
7. Shiite and Sunni Arabs close ranks against the U.S.-Zionist enemy. Arab streets erupt in mass anti-U.S. demonstrations. Arab governments recall their ambassadors from Washington.
8. The entire Muslim world closes ranks behind Iran.
9. A "dirty bomb" explodes in lower Manhattan. Casualties are far lower than on 9/11 when the Twin Towers were destroyed. But a 60-square-block area has to be permanently evacuated. It will be uninhabitable for several years due to dangerous levels of radiation.
The neocon interlocutor smiled, then shrugged his shoulders and called the scenario "wild speculation." White House calculus ignores the fact that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's President and a member of a fanatical sect of Shiite Islam, believes in the apocalypse in his own lifetime. Some people who know him say he thinks global death and destruction is only two years away and that this will be followed by the return of the 12th Imam, known as the Mahdi.
Iran's president, who claims the Nazi holocaust was pure fiction, and that Israel should be erased from the map, only has power over his cabinet. Under Supreme Leader Khamenei come the intelligence services, the armed forces, the revolutionary guards, parliament, broadcasting -- and the government. So the time for secret talks with the real no. 1 was yesterday.
Richard Armitage, a tough Republican who was deputy Secretary of State under Colin Powell, says it would behoove the U.S. to talk to Iran directly -- not simply at the level of the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad to talk about the future of Iraq. So far, the U.S. has resisted direct talks with Tehran about its nuclear aspirations and mandated the EU3 -- the U.K., France and Germany -- to be its surrogate.
The stakes are so high, Armitage says, the situation "merits talking to the Iranians about the full range of our relationship... everything from energy to terrorism to weapons to Iraq. We can be diplomatically astute enough to do it without giving anything away."
When Nikita Khrushchev warned the U.S. that the Soviet Union would bury America, Washington didn't break diplomatic relations but went on talking -- throughout the Cold War -- and the evil empire collapsed.
During the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, with the world poised on the edge of nuclear war, brilliant U.S. diplomacy always left Khrushchev a way out of his geopolitical power play. He was trying to find a shortcut to nuclear parity with the U.S. The Soviet dictator took his missiles home, the U.S. agreed not to invade Cuba, and later took its obsolete Jupiter missiles out of Turkey.
Perhaps Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is not a student of Machiavelli. But Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jim Schlesinger are still among us -- and ready to serve, not a public circus, but a top secret head-to-head with Velayat-e-Faqih, "the Guardianship of the Jurisprudent." That's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Prophet's proconsul in the holy city of Qom.
Source: United Press International
Related Links
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/The_Unravelling_Of_The_Doctrine_Of_MAD_In_2006.html
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
