News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257426
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 701
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2005

Re: poorgradstudent post# 27407

Thursday, 04/20/2006 3:57:52 PM

Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:57:52 PM

Post# of 257426
Re: subgroup analysis

>>> If K independent tests are conducted, one way to ensure that the overall chances of a false positive result are no greater than 5 percent (0.05) is for each test to use a criterion of (1–0.95)1/K, or about 0.05÷K, to assess statistical significance. <<<

Thanks for that, PGS. I've always wondered if there was some rule of thumb to interpret subgroup significance in trials and published research , and the one above is simple enough even for me !

It's common to see publications of data where 30 or 40 different measures are examined and a few are labelled "p<.05" , even though it's clear that some of those would be expected due to chance alone.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today