>the license agreement in the 10-k is worded poorly then<
I inferred that there were sales-based milestones from the fact that there are five unspecified milestones (with redacted amounts) specified in the 10K:
(A) Data from a Phase I/IIA Clinical Trial demonstrates US$25 million that NM-283 is safe and effective. (The Parties acknowledge that this amount has been paid prior to the Amendment Effective Date.)
(B) [**] $[**]
(C) [**] $[**]
(D) [**] $[**]
(E) [**] $[**]
(F) [**] $[**] <<
Normally, you don’t see this many milestone steps for regulatory milestones alone for a single compound; however, after rereading IDIX’s 3/29/06 PR, I agree with you that the $455M comes entirely from regulatory milestones. Thank you for pointing out the error.
This doesn’t change my view that the HBV market alone will support a considerably higher stock price and that anything IDIX achieves in the HCV market is icing on the cake. Regards, Dew
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”