News Focus
News Focus
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

Re: mas post# 4174

Sunday, 04/16/2006 5:12:41 PM

Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:12:41 PM

Post# of 6903
Re: I am not really assuming any discounts as the 3800+ price hit $300 on 1/23. I believe the averages are weighted heavily to the entry model of each range.

How heavily would you have to weigh a product mix without discounts before the average dips below the lower bound of the range? smile

I suppose you could make an argument that the product lines are bottom weighted, but if you show the work, I think you'll find it to be a highly unlikely scenario. In the Athlon 64 product line, for example, you are assuming a $160 average, but the product pricing starts at $155 for an Athlon 64 3200+ and goes up to $341 for an Athlon 64 4000+. You would have to assume a mix like this:
 
3200+ 95% $155 => 147.25
3500+ 2.50% $205 => 5.13
3700+ 1.25% $238 => 2.98
3800+ 0.75% $288 => 2.16
4000+ 0.50% $341 => 1.71
=> asp of ~$160

Do you think this is realistic? What would be your version of this? Let's try this:
 
3200+ 50% $155 => 77.5
3500+ 30% $205 => 61.5
3700+ 10% $238 => 23.8
3800+ 7.5% $288 => 21.6
4000+ 2.5% $341 => 8.5
=> asp of ~$193

I think this is a lot more realistic, assuming list price. But I'll also agree that an 18% discount could bring these parts inline with a $160 ASP.

Re: As to the 73 vs the 85 that was modified in light of AMD's own data which showed some shifting from the 90% historical average which I had in mind before.

Well, I'm happy to have influenced you to go back and research AMD's own data. smile

Hopefully, your own work with a viable ASP scenario will help to change your opinion further.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today