News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257269
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: Rocky3 post# 182372

Thursday, 10/02/2014 3:40:31 PM

Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:40:31 PM

Post# of 257269
Many investors did expect GILD’s Harvoni approval to come well before the PDUFA date, so the fact that it hasn’t is somewhat bullish for competitors.

…the possibility that the 8 week treatment from GILD's all oral is not approved, which would give ABBV 50% more pricing power?

I’ve discussed this possibility at considerable length; however, John Milligan’s recent presentation at the Morgan Stanley conference made it sound as though GILD thinks it has 8-week labeling (for TN non-cirrhotics) in the bag. GILD doesn’t have a history of spewing BS at investor presentations, so I take Milligan’s remarks at face value.

…the possibility that the drug returned by NVS [EDP-239] is worth more in ENTA’s or someone else's hands?

I don’t see how anyone who has done even a modicum of DD on the HCV landscape could genuinely think that NVS’ dumping EDP-239 was positive for ENTA.

…a rotation from ACHN to ENTA?

Possibly; however, the people who piled into ACHN a few months ago (following the MRK-IDIX deal) were presumably looking for a quick reward, while ENTA is a stock where the bullish story figures to play out more gradually.

…the lack of competitors remaining in the space as take-over possibilities?

This is essentially the same explanation as the above (rotation from ACHN).

…a catch-up from the lack of movement over the last six months - at least compared to GILD?

But why now? I don’t think the timing is completely unrelated to the Harvoni PDUFA date.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today