Tri-Valley Corp (fka TVLYQ)

[jonesieatl]

No recent news found?

Did that 'bullish' spike take place a mere two days before this was announced? Does that sound like, oh, what's the word ... oh yeah ... manipulation?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=105479148

Trading suspended for egregious non-compliance.

Potentially prefacing complete delisting from trading on any exchange.

There's not a business! It's just a shell, that was operating out of a shopping center storefront and who knows what their address is now, and who's involved ... if any. (lol geo)

Or, they could go to the moon.

Let's see, continue as they have been (down, with manipulations along the way, more certainly to come), get delisted, or go to the moon?

Hmmmmmm, how to pick, how to pick, decisions decisions.

LOL

All IMHO of course ;)

jonesie

p.s. "In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be instituted to determine:
A.
Whether the allegations contained in Section II hereof are true and, in connection therewith, to afford the Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such allegations;
and,
B.
Whether it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to suspend
for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoke the registration of each class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of the Respondents identified in Section II
hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules
12b
-
2 or 12g
-
3, and any new corporate
names of any Respondents.
IV.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on the questions set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened at a time and place to be fixed, and
be fore an Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 110 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.110].
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as provided by
Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b)].
If Respondents fail to file the directed Answers, or fail to appear at a hearing after being duly notified
, the Respondents, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b
-
2 or 12g
-
3,
and any new corporate names of any Respondents, may be deemed in default and the proceedings may be determined against it upon consideration of this Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true ......"