Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,098.73
(
-0.38%
)
US TECH 100
25,802.40
(
-0.58%
)
Dow Jones
49,368.83
(
-0.16%
)
Brent Oil
91.97
(
-0.74%
)
Bitcoin
75,803.58
(
2.63%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 28910
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

otc_buzzard

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 180
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2006

otc_buzzard

Re: silverfox1155 post# 847

Wednesday, 04/05/2006 6:28:18 PM

Wednesday, April 05, 2006 6:28:18 PM

Post# of 28910
I want to know why STTK didn't refute any specific claims in their stocklemon pr today?

If anything in stocklemons report was libelous they certainly had the right, and shareholders certainly deserve, a full rebuttal.

I don't think I need to remind anyone here that it is STTK's fiduciary duty to protect their shareholders from libelous statements. So why didn't STTK refute anything today?

It should have been pretty easy to disavow most of what stocklemon reported today.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent TREP News
More TREP News