tanj, thank you very much for this VERY informative post and yes, to answer your question and others that have asked, I will repost the following. ____________________________________________________ Here is the difference in the WaMu case:
THEY WERE CAUGHT...THEY WERE CAUGHT...THEY WERE CAUGHT!!!
WaMu was CLEARLY a SOLVENT CORPORATION WHEN SEIZED
INSIDER TRADING...INSIDER TRADING..."CORLORABLE" by the COURT!
Two Months of MEDIATION...SEALED DOCUMENTS GALORE and MORE!!!
Six years worth of blacked-out worldwide communication!!! _______________________________________________________ Now when the Hedge Funds could have avoided a federally court issued mandate trial for insider trading - does it seem rational that these people would have put their license on the line, their standing in society and potential prison time for a handful of tax attributes in a supposedly fifty cent worthless shell company? The answer is a RESOUNDING NO - They were after FAR MORE and we have basically found what they were really after. I had said years ago it would have to be a VERY LARGE CASH PILE and it appears to be even MORE BILLIONS than I imagined IMHO. ____________________________________________ CREDITOR INVESTORS EQUAL ZERO/FEW TRUST MARKERS ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ EQUITY INVESTORS EQUAL an ABUNDANCE of TRUST MARKERS
HAVE T TOLD YOU LATELY HOW MUCH I LOVE MY ESCROW SHARES?