News Focus
News Focus
Followers 209
Posts 14569
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: tanjazielman post# 401796

Friday, 08/01/2014 2:20:47 PM

Friday, August 01, 2014 2:20:47 PM

Post# of 749756
tanj, thank you very much for this VERY informative post and yes, to answer your question and others that have asked, I will repost the following.
____________________________________________________
Here is the difference in the WaMu case:

THEY WERE CAUGHT...THEY WERE CAUGHT...THEY WERE CAUGHT!!!

WaMu was CLEARLY a SOLVENT CORPORATION WHEN SEIZED

INSIDER TRADING...INSIDER TRADING..."CORLORABLE" by the COURT!

Two Months of MEDIATION...SEALED DOCUMENTS GALORE and MORE!!!

Six years worth of blacked-out worldwide communication!!!

_______________________________________________________
Now when the Hedge Funds could have avoided a federally court issued mandate trial for insider trading - does it seem rational that these people would have put their license on the line, their standing in society and potential prison time for a handful of tax attributes in a supposedly fifty cent worthless shell company? The answer is a RESOUNDING NO - They were after FAR MORE and we have basically found what they were really after. I had said years ago it would have to be a VERY LARGE CASH PILE and it appears to be even MORE BILLIONS than I imagined IMHO.
____________________________________________
CREDITOR INVESTORS EQUAL ZERO/FEW TRUST MARKERS
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
EQUITY INVESTORS EQUAL an ABUNDANCE of TRUST MARKERS


HAVE T TOLD YOU LATELY HOW MUCH I LOVE MY ESCROW SHARES?

Unleash the power of Level 2

Spot liquidity moves with access to US order books.

Sign Up