News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122802
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: NP1986 post# 180154

Monday, 07/07/2014 9:53:01 PM

Monday, July 07, 2014 9:53:01 PM

Post# of 257262

PTLA—what are your specific concerns about the commercial viability of andexanet alfa? Are you skeptical about whether there is truly an unmet need for an antidote, or are you anticipating that PTLA's collaborators are developing their own antidotes?

There is an unmet need for a FXa antidote, but I don’t think it’s an especially large commercial opportunity. Moreover, my sense is that the Big Pharma companies with FXa inhibitors (PFE/BMY, Bayer/JNJ, Daiichi Sankyo) are reluctant to make the availability of an antidote a focal point of their marketing campaigns because doing do would suggest that the drugs are unsafe. Any of the above Big Pharma could easily afford to munch PTLA if they thought it was strategic to control of the first FXa antidote, so we’re left with the inference that they don’t think it is.

Your question about competing antidotes is also valid. We know that JNJ (#msg-89624322) and Daiichi Sanyo (http://www.perosphere.com/content/news/httpwww.perosphere.comcontentnewsreleases042513.htm ) have done some work in this area.

--
Overall, the biggest concern I have with PTLA is not about Andexanet alfa, but rather is about Betrixaban, the company’s own FXa inhibitor that is a day late and a dollar short (#msg-89332292, #msg-89332563).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now