Saturday, June 21, 2014 11:10:55 AM
25 Rules of Disinformation: How to Fight Back
Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth
by H. Michael Sweeney
To open embedded links go to:
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinformation.shtml
Built upon Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression by David Martin, the following may be useful to the initiate in the world of dealing with veiled and half-truth, lies, and suppression of truth when serious crimes are studied in public forums. This, sadly, includes every day news media, one of the worst offenders with respect to being a source of disinformation. Where the crime involves a conspiracy, or a conspiracy to cover up the crime, there will invariably be a disinformation campaign launched against those seeking to uncover and expose the truth and/or the conspiracy. There are specific tactics which disinfo artists tend to apply, as revealed here. Also included with this material are seven common traits of the disinfo artist which may also prove useful in identifying players and motives. The more a particular party fits the traits and is guilty of following the rules, the more likely they are a professional disinfo artist with a vested motive. People can be bought, threatened, or blackmailed into providing disinformation, so even "good guys" can be suspect in many cases.
A rational person participating as one interested in the truth will evaluate that chain of evidence and conclude either that the links are solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need further development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more links can be broken, usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if parallel links already exist or can be found, or if a particular link was merely supportive, but not in itself key) the argument. The game is played by raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably to the point of breaking) these links. It is the job of a disinfo artist to interfere with the evaluation... to at least make people think the links are weak or broken when, in truth, they are not... or to propose alternative solutions leading away from the truth. Often, by simply impeding and slowing down the process through disinformation tactics, a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time and rhetoric.
It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break the chain of evidence for a given solution, revelation of truth has won out. If the chain is broken either a new link must be forged, or a whole new chain developed, or the solution is invalid and a new one must be found... but truth still wins out. There is no shame in being the creator or supporter of a failed solution, chain, or link, if done with honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach. While it is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a given issue, it is really unimportant who wins, as long as truth wins. But the disinfo artist will seek to emotionalize and chastise any failure (real or false claims thereof), and will seek by means of intimidation to prevent discussion in general.
Preamble: DisinformationRule0
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinformation.shtml
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation:
DisinformationRule1: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil
DisinformationRule2: Become incredulous and indignant
DisinformationRule3: Create rumor mongers
DisinformationRule4: Use a straw man
DisinformationRule5: Sidetrack opponents with name calling, ridicule
DisinformationRule6: Hit and Run
DisinformationRule7: Question motives
DisinformationRule8: Invoke authority
DisinformationRule9: Play Dumb
DisinformationRule10: Associate opponent charges with old news
DisinformationRule11: Establish and rely upon fall-back positions
DisinformationRule12: Enigmas have no solution
DisinformationRule13: Alice in Wonderland Logic
DisinformationRule14: Demand complete solutions
DisinformationRule15: Fit the facts to alternate conclusions
DisinformationRule16: Vanish evidence and witnesses
DisinformationRule17: Change the subject
DisinformationRule18: Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad
DisinformationRule19: Ignore facts, demand impossible proofs
DisinformationRule20: False evidence
DisinformationRule21: Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor
DisinformationRule22: Manufacture a new truth
DisinformationRule23: Create bigger distractions
DisinformationRule24: Silence critics
DisinformationRule25: Vanish
Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.
Permission to reprint/distribute hereby granted for any non commercial use provided information reproduced in its entirety and with author information in tact. For more Intel/Shadow government related info, visit the Author's Web site: http://www.proparanoid.com
http://www.freedom-school.com/reading-material/index.htm
Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth
by H. Michael Sweeney
To open embedded links go to:
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinformation.shtml
Built upon Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression by David Martin, the following may be useful to the initiate in the world of dealing with veiled and half-truth, lies, and suppression of truth when serious crimes are studied in public forums. This, sadly, includes every day news media, one of the worst offenders with respect to being a source of disinformation. Where the crime involves a conspiracy, or a conspiracy to cover up the crime, there will invariably be a disinformation campaign launched against those seeking to uncover and expose the truth and/or the conspiracy. There are specific tactics which disinfo artists tend to apply, as revealed here. Also included with this material are seven common traits of the disinfo artist which may also prove useful in identifying players and motives. The more a particular party fits the traits and is guilty of following the rules, the more likely they are a professional disinfo artist with a vested motive. People can be bought, threatened, or blackmailed into providing disinformation, so even "good guys" can be suspect in many cases.
A rational person participating as one interested in the truth will evaluate that chain of evidence and conclude either that the links are solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need further development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more links can be broken, usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if parallel links already exist or can be found, or if a particular link was merely supportive, but not in itself key) the argument. The game is played by raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably to the point of breaking) these links. It is the job of a disinfo artist to interfere with the evaluation... to at least make people think the links are weak or broken when, in truth, they are not... or to propose alternative solutions leading away from the truth. Often, by simply impeding and slowing down the process through disinformation tactics, a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time and rhetoric.
It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break the chain of evidence for a given solution, revelation of truth has won out. If the chain is broken either a new link must be forged, or a whole new chain developed, or the solution is invalid and a new one must be found... but truth still wins out. There is no shame in being the creator or supporter of a failed solution, chain, or link, if done with honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach. While it is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a given issue, it is really unimportant who wins, as long as truth wins. But the disinfo artist will seek to emotionalize and chastise any failure (real or false claims thereof), and will seek by means of intimidation to prevent discussion in general.
Preamble: DisinformationRule0
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinformation.shtml
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation:
DisinformationRule1: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil
DisinformationRule2: Become incredulous and indignant
DisinformationRule3: Create rumor mongers
DisinformationRule4: Use a straw man
DisinformationRule5: Sidetrack opponents with name calling, ridicule
DisinformationRule6: Hit and Run
DisinformationRule7: Question motives
DisinformationRule8: Invoke authority
DisinformationRule9: Play Dumb
DisinformationRule10: Associate opponent charges with old news
DisinformationRule11: Establish and rely upon fall-back positions
DisinformationRule12: Enigmas have no solution
DisinformationRule13: Alice in Wonderland Logic
DisinformationRule14: Demand complete solutions
DisinformationRule15: Fit the facts to alternate conclusions
DisinformationRule16: Vanish evidence and witnesses
DisinformationRule17: Change the subject
DisinformationRule18: Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad
DisinformationRule19: Ignore facts, demand impossible proofs
DisinformationRule20: False evidence
DisinformationRule21: Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor
DisinformationRule22: Manufacture a new truth
DisinformationRule23: Create bigger distractions
DisinformationRule24: Silence critics
DisinformationRule25: Vanish
Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.
Permission to reprint/distribute hereby granted for any non commercial use provided information reproduced in its entirety and with author information in tact. For more Intel/Shadow government related info, visit the Author's Web site: http://www.proparanoid.com
http://www.freedom-school.com/reading-material/index.htm
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.


