Why do the China revenues matter? Stupid question I am sure, but I have lost the forest for the trees. I don't mean they matter because Martin lost credibility claiming them and then having to fess up because it was more important to have an edited report. Even if they can claim the phantom revenues, what difference does it make? The costs of those revenues far exceed the revenues, so its not like they have made money. Is it a cash flow thing? If they can show more revenues, then it will increase their ability to service more debt? Someone please remind me why I should care about Chinese revenues that seem to be associated with more accounting and leasing hocus pocus than a real source of revenue like what they have in Cincinnati.