Everything I can see in your post is not accurate at all. The experts opinion will be released soon enough.
Well you better call the company fast because the "experts" already released this information.
Lets see.... what did I say....
200 tons mined....That gold you see is called unfeasible gold
So I am admittedly rounding up but I figured everyone who follows the company knows they processed 112 tons and they had another 60 or so to run so it is 172 tons and not 200. If you want to harp on that I am OK with it. It could be half the amount of ore and the same amount of gold and it is still far from feasible.
This was another statement I made
The area of the white was supposed to have at least .05 per ton wasnt it?
The Wolf Vein was discovered as a “line of coarse gold” in the White Channel workings in the 1880’s. It is the only vein in the Ruby workings with historical production. It was worked in the 1930’s by L.L.Huelsdonk from three levels; main (or Ruby Tunnel) level, – 65 level and – 200 level. About 2000 ft. of drifts and cross cuts were constructed on the three levels. Approximately 1,625 ounces of gold was produced from 4,630 tons of ore by the Best Mines Company. The average grade of the ore was 0.35 oz/ton; about half of the gold produced was specimen gold. The average grade of the mill ore was in the neighborhood of 0.13 oz/ton
So yes I seem to be correct here. At least .05 And what did we get? less than 1 ounce from 112 tons so .01 ounces per ton (and I am rounding up on that as well and it still doesnt help).
I also claimed....
the history of the black channels seems to say otherwise
this is because... As a rule, the Black Channels of the district are not as rich as the White Channels, but there are exceptions
Can you supply a link that proves anything in your post?
LOL Sure... it is called the NRBI 43-101 report from the ruby mine
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
