InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 821
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/24/2006

Re: BareBaxBo post# 44270

Thursday, 05/01/2014 6:47:31 PM

Thursday, May 01, 2014 6:47:31 PM

Post# of 44374
BBB or anyone else. Now that we are on the pinks again, I was trying to think of what is different for us?

I believe we are not required to file as many SEC requirements, and I am also not sure if financials are required as well. If the company figured this was going to happen, I wonder if there is any way this can be viewed as strategic?

I know there were past arguments about needing to be on a big board for institutional ownership, or for to better our chances at funding, but does that really matter if we do have a sizeable contract or Argus, re-engineered, proves promising? If the NIE results in a multiyear contract for BIB's, I can't imagine funders would not touch us just because we are trading on the pinks.

Also, they say trading on the pinks is ripe for manipulation. I realize that puff PR's and other forms of manipulation can be part of the circus, but from a trading standpoint, do they mean that trades can be less orderly and result in more violent swings up and down?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.