The Question and Answer Board

[Georgia Bard]

This is a moderated site and its not horrible and its the basis for IHUB to stop anarchy. SI through govern by police was anarchy pure and simple. All this banter to undermine the principals and infrastructure of what IHUB is about is only to attempt to win a few selective wars or battles to set precedences that will be shoved down IHUB's throat to get the anarchy and bias or selective admin practices like they had on SI.

But this is not SI and the parking lot is SI and even on this board the examples of deletion are bias. I feel this thread is a prime example of things to come. Selective deletions, selective allowances and of course the eventual undermining of the IHUB principal. Contradictions and mayhem creates anarchy.

Even the absurd examples here tonight are made to establish that every chairman has to do as the other does in a consistent manner. I disagree and if a Chairman deletes a post then according to everthing I know it will take a army to overr rule that chairman. On stock sites that are dedicated to a specific stock where information (ALL NEGATIVE and POSITIVE) needs to be heard but NOT the sly anarchy specialist and word players whose sole purpose is to disrupt the flow of information.

Take Jenna for example, she endures a lot and she gives it back. The concept is to refute (Of course we all know refuting is the concept of SI for hits) and if you refute chances are you will be nailed for personal attack or off topic. That is the historical scenario of SI. Where on IRC the OP (Chair) just boots your sorry backside and will even banned you for petty squabbles. There is no appeal there is no arguement and the OPs decision is final. PERIOD! Where SI is just the exact oppisite where anarchy reigns supreme.

People do NOT want to sift through 100s or ridiculous wars on individuals to get to maybe one post made on topic.

The bottomline is this is a moderated site plain and simple and I am fully aware that little victories will happen and it will take time but as you read this thread you can clearly see that the concept of IHUB is going to always be tested to convert it to a anarchy site. But this basically is private threads ... Every last one of them. The problem is what was fine before now all of a sudden is not and the mid point is attempting to be established.

I for one will war any undermining to the concept and any way to make this site a public forum of anarchy. It is private thread that the public can view easily. Each Chair has full and absolute control. What IHUB needs is a ban button for the Chair NOT some Harass feature.

Sorry for the long post but I am very protect of this concept and I will be an adovcate what why it came into being and protect its right to be the way it was prior to this new attack on its concept.

:=) Gary Swancey