It is a proposed order. It even says so in the title of the document:
STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED} ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR COUPONS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Additionally, there is nothing signed by the judge. Judge's usually write their own orders and don't necessarily sign an order proposed by one of the parties.
That being said, it looks like this is a joint motion to postpone the hearing so it most likely will be granted. PACER is not real time, and seeing that this was filed on the 23rd and it's almost a week later, it probably has already been granted we just haven't seen it yet.
Now, this isn't some hearing with gigantic market moving implications. These are oral arguments in a District Court as it relates to the defendant's MSJ. In fact, I would say the only potential it has to move DSS is downward. Because it's a defense MSJ. It's not an event that can be considered a catalyst unless by some amazing stroke of bizarro-world luck the Rochester court says the MSJ is denied immediately during or after the orals. Which is very unlikely.
So I don't know why everyone even gives a crap about this. A total waste of time and effort if you ask me.
Market Data 
Markets 
