Not sure what's funny about this.
Even if you assume 32-bit results for the A7 is the more representative of real world performance, you still end up with 1050 points in ST at 1.3GHz. The Core i5 4250U Turbo to 2.6GHz in ST, but let's assume 2.5 is realistic(because I've seen it reach 100MHz short of max except in few cases).
You end up with 2000-2100 for the A7, and 2500 for Haswell. Just a year ago, saying Apple catching up this much would have probably put you in a mental institution.
The fact that it does it in a Smartphone is absolutely amazing. If they get thermally opportunistic Turbo like Core i5, it can probably reach 2GHz - That's i5 territory like it or not. Worst case for Apple, its still kicking Bay Trail. Faster availability, and in S-m-a-r-t-p-h-o-n-e-s. No Intel process needed.
Unless Broadwell and Skylake is amazing, I'd expect Apple to catch up.
I'm talking about Pentium 4 vs Core 2 gains for Skylake amazing, not 15-20% faster amazing. I somehow doubt they will though.
Even if they can't reach Haswell level performance with A8, and all it does is quad core, multi-threading performance will be on par with Core i5 4250U.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
