Loch Harris (Old)

[preen2222]

Lmorovan:

I was hoping you would not only read, but also comprehend my latest post to you.

Let's assume for arguments sake that Loch shareholders will not be able to trade CDEX stock until October and CDEX will be registered in early August (very optimistic prediction by you).

For 2 months difference in trading time you are willing to put Loch shareholders back to square one by obliterating the spinoff.

Why do you want to throw Loch shareholders under the bus? Simply call MP and request that CDEX agree not to trade until Loch shareholders are in a position to trade. If he doesn't agree, simply go one step further.

Why are you working so hard on killing the Settlement Agreement? Why are you so blind to the possibility that CDEX has and continues to work against and without regard to the basic protection sought supposedly by you for Loch shareholders that they trade when CDEX commences trading?

Not only are you not willing to find fault with or remedy from MP, you are willing to appeal the failure to get the ridiculous relief you want?

So let me get this straight. You object to the settlement because we will not have our shares in time, but you're willing to expand this gap of time by taking an appeal.

Now we know by your own admission, that you have and continue to talk with MP (oh yes, mostly on religious matters) and that your efforts are being financially and emotionally funded by those he11 bent on seeing our investment go down the tubes.

In light of all the foregoing, do you really still wish to claim you are working for and on behalf of Loch shareholders?