Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
EDWY Grab it fast
TAKE A LOOK AT EDWY. Moving rapidly this week
Look at EDWY. Moving rapidly this week
Take a look at EDWY. Moving rapidly this week
Take a look AT EDWY. MOVING RAPIDLY THIS WEEK
TAKE A LOOK AT EDWY NOT PUMPING.......IT'S JUST A GOOD MOMO PLAY
I don't get L2s and the volume was quite high with respect to what it is on a normal day. That and the fact that it was sitting at .41 was what prompted my post.
Hmmm, selling on lots of volume. Wonder what that's all about. The problem with Chinese stocks is ...we are at the end of the news chain.
Not just Michigan, Sulja apparently has ties throughout the entire world. Who has not heard of the infamous Wessal ? There were ties mentioned to firms in Australia and Lebanon to name just a couple. Sulja's involvement with IBP of course opens international if not universal prospects. Why, there has even been talk of an Alpha Centauri venture. LOL
The only way this POS can be labeled "worthless" is if the SEC causes it to be delisted.
I can relate a phone conversation I had with an individual at the SEC. (this occurred about four months ago)
I had filed a complaint and he called and said he was responding to the complaint....(this after a lapse of approx. 6 months) I asked him how SLJB was still trading and he said he did not know. He said the SEC was far behind in investigating and prosecuting scams. He said he was referring it (SLJB) to the Enforcement Division whatever that means. It would appear that they (the SEC)are waiting for the OSC determination and decide where to go from there. Sad comment about the bureaucratic process in this country at this time.
I take it you mean LEGALLY, because it certainly has far surpassed worthless in any other imaginable context.
A very astute observation. Reminds me of the people in Guyana who stood in line waiting for their grape drink laced with cyanide, Valium, Penegram and chloral hydrate. Yummy !
WHY ? There's a whole board dedicated to SLJB-like stocks. First, you do some crack, then you pump some $$$$ into one of these winners.
total posts latest post
The POS Board. (POS) 53 8/15/2009 8:47:39 AM
I can find no reference whatsoever regarding the three types of cacti. I don't know that anyone (other than these people) is cultivating it. In Mexico, they grow and harvest agape (but that's not a cactus) for tequila. I can't find any information on it so I guess I will take their word on this.
That is what I thought also. I'll have to do some more DD regarding these cacti grow.
From the website...
The Company predominantly grows 3 species of cacti which are Mexican Pyramid, Mexican Milpa-Alta, and Mexican Queen.
E mail received re: concerns with presentation...
Dear Ms. Zhou,
Q. First, from reading the latest 10-Q it would appear that the firm has just 387 acres of cactus under cultivation at this time. This seems a pitifully small production area. Has any thought been given to acquiring more acreage to ramp up production ?
**** the 387 acres is enough for production for now, unlike other plants, cactus can be harvested a few times every month.
Q. I see that all of the firm's products are sold in Taiwan and the PRC. Has there been any thought given to export ? Of course pursuing the export market would also entail a production increase, thus my question regarding the acquisition of more acreage.
**** you are right, ckgt products are sold also in Hong Kong. CKGT Longer-term strategy is to expand its market beyond China into South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and other southeastern Asian countries.
one of the purposes that mgmt is in U.S. Is also for biz opportunities in the U.S.
Q. I missed a good portion of your presentation but I heard no estimate of when cigarette production might begin. At what point is the company with regard to the process of production ?
**** in Q4, 09
Q. Given the advent of the new products, is there an anticipation of increased revenue in the next quarter ?
**** cigarette will increase sales by approximately $220,000 in the fourth quarter, 2009
The new patented hog feed is expected to increase 2009 sales by approximately $330,000.
Just for the record Hockmir, why don't you state the position of the "longs" as you understand it. It would save SOOOOO much laborious and ill rewarding reading. OR, maybe you can just state YOUR position re: Mr. Rennie's articles.
LOL O.K. I may haqve overstated "selloff" but the fact remains that they have virtually no idea of how to communicate with the investing public.
STILL time to look for another, better vehicle. All IMHO of course .
As you can see from the resultant selloff, there weren't many people impressed by the lack of information. Time to look for another vehicle !
Yep, really a bland presentation. If this is the best they can do, I don't have much hope for them.Maybe they just don't understand investor's expectations.
This is a very good example of why many people are no longer "buy and hold" investors. From a high of over $1.70 a few days ago to today's .91 ........ that's what I call "cratering". There are people who "day trade" who are very good at timing. I am not, therefor I am a spectator sitting on the sidelines. It has happened before and it will happen again. Good luck to the "longs"...I think it will be a long wait.
All IMHO of course. LOL
It is what is known as full transparency. Anyone who doesn't see what's going on deserves what they get........nothing ! Of course this has been true for months and months.
Read the post again. It is not a criticism, it merely states that I received no response from John.
If I were in possession of something so valuable, I would think long and hard about the patent process myself.
Ooops, missed your message before I posted my last message. My bad !~
Good question.....
I sent this e mail to John..
Hello John,
Thank you very much for your reply. First, let me say that I'm impressed with your accomplishments to date. From what I have read, you appear to possess integrity which is something sorely missing in today's market (and society at large)
That being said, I am particularly interested in the P2O process. Someone on the Ihub board stated that he had already signed up for a franchise and while I am not in that position, I DO believe there would be a phenomenal market for municipalities to own and operate a P2O facility. I can't think of a better application than turning the tons of plastic/rubber waste that would otherwise befoul the environment.
I am also intrigued by statements attributed to you concerning future acquisitions.
It would be my hope that you are able to move from the pinksheets to a legitimate exchange in the not too distant future. As I'm sure you're aware, there is a well deserved stigma attached to penny stocks, most of which deserve that designation.
In summation, I guess my only other question/s has to do with any proprietary portion of the P2O process, i.e., is your catalyst something that is patentable ? Do you intend to sell/lease the P2O units in the future ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
John responded but did not address the issue of the possibility of a patentable catylst.
It would appear than any post that reflects concern regarding ANY pinksheet stock is deleted from the TRTN board. Attempting to bring to people's attention how the "buy and hold" philosophy is no longer true in today's markets, allow me to draw to your attention the following.
______________________________________________________________
XXX is an international leader in energy recovery systems, with a primary focus on the Chinese market. XXX’s technology captures industrial waste energy to produce low-cost electrical power, enabling industrial manufacturers to reduce their energy costs, shrink their emissions footprint, and generate sellable emissions credits. XXX has deployed its systems throughout China and in such international markets as Egypt, Turkey, Korea, Vietnam and Malaysia. XXX focuses on numerous industries in which a rapid payback on invested capital is achieved by its customers, including: chemical, petro-chemicals, refining (including Ethanol refining), coke processing, and the manufacture of paper, cement and steel. CCC continues to invest in R&D and plans to build China's first state-of-the-art energy recovery system research and fabrication facility to allow it to meet the increased demand for its products and services.
· Estimated Market Cap
$53,869,772 as of Sep 30, 2008
· Outstanding Shares
26,934,886 as of Aug 14, 2008
· Number of Share Holders of Record
95 as of Mar 28, 2008
The disclosures about our history reflect the Company's capital structure as of the time of the occurrences described and do not take into account subsequent stock splits or other adjustments to the Company's capital structure.
We incorporated in the State of Maryland in May 1998 under the name Majestic Financial, Ltd. From inception to March 31, 2002, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of XXX XXXXXXXX Companies, Ltd. In March 2002, The XXXXXXX Companies, Ltd.'s board of directors approved a plan to spin-off our company to an entity controlled by The XXXXXXXX Companies, Ltd.'s former chief executive officer and to The XXXXXXXX Companies, Ltd.'s stockholders.
In 2002, we conducted a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding capital stock pursuant to which each ten shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the record date of August 31, 2002 was converted into one share of our common stock. We had 27,150,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the reverse stock split and 2,715,000 shares thereafter.
We changed our name to XXXXXXX Development Corporation, Ltd. in April 2002.
On September 24, 2002, we acquired XXX Financial Solutions, Inc. through a Capital Stock Exchange Agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, XXX Financial Solutions became our wholly-owned subsidiary. USM Financial Solutions has no assets and liabilities and has had no business activities since December 31, 2002.
On April 7, 2006, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, XXXXXXX Development Corporation, Ltd., a Delaware corporation, for purposes of changing our state of incorporation from Maryland to Delaware. On the same day, we conducted a 2,184-to-1 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding capital stock pursuant to which each 2,184 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the record date of April 5, 2006 was converted into one share of our common stock. We had 98,285,596 shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the reverse stock split and 45,096 shares thereafter.
Effective June 5, 2007, we changed our name to XXX Media Inc. and conducted a 40-for-1 forward stock split of our issued and outstanding capital stock pursuant to which each one share of our common stock issued and outstanding on the record date of June 5, 2007 was split into 40 shares of our common stock. We had 1,348,050 shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the forward stock split and 53,922,000 shares thereafter.
On August 14, 2007, we launched our website announcing our entry into a new line of business. We sought to capitalize on the explosive growth of mixed martial arts by creating what we believed to be the first comprehensive media company dedicated solely to the sport. We planned to distribute third party and proprietary mixed martial arts media content, goods and services through multiple media platforms such as the Internet, television and print. These media platforms were expected to be secured through acquisitions and strategic partnerships.
On January 24, 2008, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") with Poise Profit International, Ltd. ("Poise Profit") and the shareholders of Poise Profit. Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, we agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Poise Profit's common stock in exchange for the issuance of 41,514,179 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Poise Profit. The share exchange (the "Share Exchange") transaction was consummated on April 15, 2008.
On January 25, 2008, we entered into and closed an Asset Purchase Agreement with XXX Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation, pursuant to which we sold substantially all of our assets to XXX Acquisition Company in exchange for XXX Acquisition Company's assuming a substantial majority of our outstanding liabilities. The transferred assets consisted of letters of intent for the proposed acquisitions of XXX Weekly.com, dated June 9, 2007, and XXXXXXXXX TV, Inc., dated July 16, 2007, and all shares of common stock in XXXXXXXXX TV, Inc. we owned, among other things. The total book value of the assets acquired was approximately $317,000. The assumed liabilities consist of accounts payable, convertible debt, accrued expenses and shareholder advances of approximately $360,000.
Effective February 5, 2008, we changed our name to XXXXX Energy Recovery, Inc. and conducted a 1-for-9 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding capital stock pursuant to which each nine shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the record date of February 4, 2008 was converted into one share of our common stock. We had 85,067,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the reverse stock split and 9,451,889 shares thereafter.
On April 15, 2008, we closed the Share Exchange pursuant to which we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Poise Profit's common stock in exchange for the issuance of 41,514,179 shares of our common stock to Poise Profit's stockholders. Upon the closing of the transaction, Poise Profit became our wholly-owned subsidiary.
On April 16, 2008, we conducted a 1-for-2 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding capital stock pursuant to which each two shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the record date of April 15, 2008 was converted into one share of our common stock. We had 50,966,068 shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the reverse stock split and 25,483,034 shares thereafter.
From inception until 2000, we were engaged in the limited origination and servicing of new modular building leases. We conducted such activity primarily in the State of California and accounted for all the leases we entered into as operating leases. We ceased entering into new leases in 2000. Between 2000 and January 24, 2007, we were a development stage company in the business of providing business management and capital acquisition solutions. As a result of the closing of the Share Exchange on April 15, 2008, our new business operations consist of those of Poise Profit's Chinese subsidiary, HAIE Hi-tech Engineering (Hong Kong) Company, Limited ("Hi-tech"), which is principally engaged in designing, marketing, licensing, fabricating, implementing and servicing industrial energy recovery systems. Poise Profit was incorporated on November 23, 2007 under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. XX-tech was incorporated under the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region, China on January 4, 2002. Hi-tech carries out its operations mainly through Shanghai Hai XX XXXXXX Engineering Co., Ltd. ( XXXXXXX Engineering") with which XX-tech has a contractual relationship. This arrangement reflects Chinese limitations on foreign investments and ownership in Chinese businesses. Shanghai Engineering's manufacturing activities are carried out by Shanghai XX XXXXX Boiler Factory-Vessel Works Division ("Vessel Works Division") located in Shanghai, China through a lease agreement with Vessel Works Division's owner. We are headquartered in Shanghai, China.
The energy recovery systems that XX-tech and XXXXXXXX Engineering produce capture industrial waste energy for reuse in industrial processes or to produce electricity and thermal power, thereby allowing industrial manufacturers to reduce their energy costs, shrink their emissions and generate sellable emissions credits. XXX-tech and XXXXXXX Engineering have primarily sold energy recovery systems to chemical manufacturing plants to reduce their energy costs by increasing the efficiency of their manufacturing equipment. XXX-tech, through XXXXXX Engineering, has installed more than 100 energy recovery systems throughout China and in a variety of international markets.
From a high PPS of $12.82 (two years ago) to it’s current PPS pf $1.42
zardiw....
Thanks for the reply. While I am totally intrigued by what I see, I have reservations. I've been down this road before when everything looked totally kosher, the PPS was ascending, there was mounting enthusiasm and then pfttttttt. Take ARSC for example. While there may not be exact parallels (in that TRTN has revenues and ARSC didn't) the formula is similar.
What I'm speaking of is.......take any given moment in time and whatever concerns there are, be it energy, water, housing, etc. there is always an entity or group of entities that will rapidly come to answer that concern. 99 out of 100 times, the concerns are a bust..... you might make money on the initial interest (if you sell) but then the interest wanes.
I'm not attempting to throw cold water on this venture....I am just a bit of a skeptic. I sincerely hope this thing gets off the ground and succeeds. I am watching intently.
zardiw,
If you reread my post you will see that I acknowledged the fact that the data recovery is presently the main contributor to the revenue. My question was/is, does the P2O program take a back seat to the data recovery or will it become the more prominent of the two operations ?
Another question..... is the P2O process proprietary ? In other words, is anything other than the "catalyst" something that is patentable and for that matter is the catalyst patentable ??
TIA
The data recovery portion of the business is pretty cool. The question I have is..... how much emphasis/resources are going into the oil recovery process ? While the data recovery process is a great contributer to future revenues, it seems to me that the bread and butter portion would be in oil recovery as time progresses. Is John available to answer these types of questions ? ?
Hey Jim,
You knew me by another moniker a while back but that's neither here nor there.
Take a look at TRTN and let me know what you think. This one might be legit. Stranger things have happened ....but not recently !
On the Yahoo financial page, the quote for SLJB reads as follows....
SULJA BROS BUILDING (SLJB.PK) On Jul 22: N/A 0.00
(- 100.00%)
MORE ON SLJB.PK
There is no data available for SLJB.PK.
Does anyone have the slightest idea what is going on ? Has SLJB been delisted ?
Anyone ??
Although the OSC has been apprised of the pumpers activities, to the best of my knowledge, they have not been contacted. Personally, I have some rather severe concerns regarding how the OSC operates. Their past history does little to bolster a belief that any justice will be had when they reach a very belated conclusion. Regarding your question, please read this reply from the OSC....
To Mr. XXXXXXX
Thank you for the series of e-mails you sent to the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) forwarding copies of some chat room exchanges you have had about Sulja Bros. and comments attributed to me. Thank you also for your follow-up telephone call.
As mentioned during our telephone conversation, the Internet is a highly unregulated medium. As a result, as a general note of caution OSC staff suggest that all users verify the authenticity of information obtained from various sites, chat rooms, and emails, before taking any action, including making investment decisions. Warnings and comments that the true identity of those surfing the internet and their purpose in posting is not always as so indicated have been the subject of various media reports over the years.
I appreciate that in e-mailing me and calling me you were trying to verify the authenticity of information you read in a chat room. OSC staff are not permitted to comment about ongoing OSC proceedings and I may not confirm or deny any information about OSC proceedings, even comments which may have been attributed to me.
As a communications specialist employed by a securities regulator, I understand and respect the restrictions under which I perform my responsibilities. I can only re-iterate that all users should be sceptical of any information they obtain through unregulated websites.
Sincerely,
XXXX XXXXXXXXX
Senior Inquiries Officer
Ontario Securities Commission
Let's do a hypothetical. Say you own 30 million shares of a scam stock and despite your best efforts, it continues to languish. What options do you have ? You can take your hit but it will take you approximately 150 years of IRS $3000/yr capital loss allowance to recoup your lost $450,000 "investment" OR you can sit, sucking on your hookah and dream up scenarios with names of RM candidates and dates of the "great redemption" hoping that people buy into it. It's called grasping at straws.
If you had no scruples, which path would you follow ?
With regard to PV's court appearance, it would be no surprise if his attorney asked for another continuance. That is a normal tactic employed by a criminal attorney. Delaying tactics are all part of the game they play.
As for the accusation that you would be "pounding" the board if you knew PV's case would be unfavorable to SLJB..... you must consider the source of the criticism. The only "pounding" I see are those who expound the virtues of this scam and all those who are complicit in it's execution.
Now there is an investment strategy I hadn't considered before. You can invest in a penny scam so you can write off a $3000 loss in April. Why didn't I think of that ? Shrewd investment strategy !
SLJB will provide a loss for many. The problem is, if you do nothing other than invest in scams, you're a bit out of luck eh.
You can do essentially the same thing by placing a sign in the window of your car that says, "STEAL ME", leave the keys in the ignition and just wait. That qualifies as a capital loss if you don't have comprehensive insurance coverage.
What happened to those stalwart hearted who were holding shares clutched to their heaving breasts ? The ones that Elmira HQ said would never part with their precious holdings ? Is there dissension in the ranks ? Is there disbelief creeping into the minds of the true believer crowd ? Did some think SLJB has reached it's zenith with the .001 PPS and decided to get out with enough money to buy a Big Mac ? Interesting events are taking place. And just think, four and a half months to go until it all ends in a giant vortex and whoooooosh !
Not to mention the passel of burned shareholders waiting in the wings to file a lawsuit at the mere hint of any substantial asset(s) coming into the SLJB fold.
Apparently you missed the opinion rendered by an eminent legal mind when he stated ex shareholders have no case against SLJB. Why would you not believe such a highly qualified individual ? He has also made clear the ownership issue of SLJB NEV., and has even clarified what steps will be taken to make SLJB a thriving "security" once again. All of that "nothing" will turn into all of that "something" guided by the sure hand of Murtaza Gurmani. After all, there is so much value to be gained by resurrecting Sulja Bros. that the ubiquitous "they" would be foolish not to follow that path. OR, the "insider six" will stage an investor "coup" and wrest control of this once mighty giant of the building supply world and THEY will resurrect it. So say the very astute investor/legal minds on this board.
And then the question would be, what agency is responsible for the FD regulation ? You cannot find a government agency that will even step in and enforce their area of responsibility !
I wonder why Steve Sulja would make such comments to the Windsor Star reporter. His motive must have been to mislead "bashers" into believing their perception of the SLJB scam was correct. His plan was then to rescue his shareholders somewhere down the line which would make him a saint among men. All that was required was for the "true believers" to hold the faith...for just a few years (a real act of faith). Yeah, that's the ticket. It was all a rope a dope plot. I'm certain he will spell it all out in his next PR which should be coming any day now along with the long awaited financials.
On one hand you criticize Sulja for his actions re: allowing the corporate registration to be revoked while conducting another business but you feel he responsibly bears the burden of seeing that his loyal shareholders are rewarded ? Hmmmmmm
Bumbling scribbler ? That's the second time you've referred to Rennie in that manner. That's somewhat subjective wouldn't you say ? It more aptly describes someone who scribbles inanities on a financial board. Because Rennie wrote the truth about the SLJB makes him some sort of hack ? I think not !