is...
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you for pointing that out.
I was distracted by more alarming items in the 10-Q.
Shouldn't the board name reflect this name change?
Can you point me to the SEC filing for the name change?
Same CUSIP as Regnum Corp?
Why is Anne Kirby signing filings as CEO, Regnum Corp ?
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1716324/000147793222000165/rgmp_8k.htm
Don't see what you're talking about.
Interesting. So, does this mean that if a Form 144 is filed and the sale does not happen...you DON'T have to file a Form 4?
I'm trying to do some DD on this ticker....
Their D&B entry has a website listed....
https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.regnum_corp.f493da72bb378fe76f3f6c54f0faa85b.html
Which points to http://www.regnumcorp.com/
Has anyone found the "Investor Relations" link on there....I found a bunch of OTHER STUFF....and kept looking for the IR info....but....I kept finding OTHER STUFF....
And did you know that Sevenscore / Regnum is headed up by the same person operating out of the same shared office space in NYC ?
Anyone know anything about the CEO, Director, Janitor, etc of Regnum?
Anne Kimberly....she's like 40yo and was a Pfizer saleslady....
Any idea how big this can go with only 2K shares volume?
No options...no calls...no puts....????
Still, Form 144 is "intent of sale" and Form 4 is "documentation of sale/purchase". And I'm still trying to figure out how Dr. Deborah Kelly ended up with more shares declared on Dr. Scott Kelly's Form 4 after the supposed sale on 2/01/21. Thoughts on how that happened ?
Nice knowing she made some money. Putting kids through nice colleges is expensive when your income bracket precludes you from financial aid.
I'm trying to still figure out where this RGMP is going.
Did anyone take the time to compare the 10Q originally filed 30Jun21 to the amended one filed on 30Sep21 ?
http://edgar.secdatabase.com/1709/147793221008762/filing-change.htm
RED = Old, GREEN = Revised, WHITE = Unchanged
The 30Jun21 filing on its own:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001716324/000147793221006045/0001477932-21-006045-index.htm
The 30Sep21 filing on its own:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001716324/000147793221008762/0001477932-21-008762-index.htm
On 30Jun21 it was doom & gloom. No end in sight. Serious concerns of continued operation. Some other drug - SSP-002?
Then 30Sep21 it was all cherries and whipped cream....and sprinkles too. Big outlook turn around....and pretty much the two main factors were:
- Leronlimab the only drug they market for
- Cancellation of Sevenscore merger with Regnum being survivor
Not sure how the price continues to stay inflated....with Hopenium?
I prefer this reference:
https://www.piedmontinternalmed.com/dr-deborah-kelly.php
She is easy on the eyes.
Very good point.
That would be Dr. Deborah Kelly.
...because I'm pretty sure there are no "DEBROAH Kelly" individuals out there.
[late add]
It could also be under these aliases:
Deborah C Kelly
Deborah Celeste Kelly
Deborah C Bonner
Deborah Bonner Kelly
Deborah Kelly
I stand corrected to myself. There seems to be a "DEBROAH P Kelly" in Minnesota.
Not sure the Form 144 actually document that a sale was actually executed.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/form144.asp
All references out there, including the SEC in Rule 144, use the words "proposed" or "intend". It does not say anything about execution.
If I personally were in her shoes....I would have had to file multiple Form 144s because I "intended" to sell a stock...I entered the order with my broker...the price didn't hit...and did not do so for over 90 days....therefore my stock never sold because I never received my funds nor received a trade executed statement.
Show us a Form 4 documenting insider sale of CYDY or a trade executed statement, then minds might start listening.
Not sure which checkerboard one gets to play on and declare "checkmate"...typically one politely asks "king me".
Which Dr. Kelly are they referring to? Everyone should know that Dr. Kelly is married to Dr. Kelly.
Sounds like another mystery needs to be solved.
Quick !!! To the Mystery Machine !!!
Good question. So, where's the Form 4 showing a "D" for all the indirect shares that "spouse" owned?
Find that and I'll be convinced.
No proof. No happen.
Since AF claimed she sold...then was forced to change that to "intend"...and then never following up on that?
I guess my sarcastic sense of humor using good 'ole Fartstain as an authoritative reference escaped a few....maybe I need to try harder by marking everything with [sarcasm] followed by [/sarcasm].....
...but that would take all the fun out of it....
Wouldn't that be documented on a Form 4 somewhere? Just like the shares gifted to their children?
Any Form 4's anywhere? Anyone got a Form 4 to share?
Sorry....please point me to a Form 4 that shows Deborah Kelly's (aka "spouse") sale of shares.
Everyone would feel more likely to believe if Fartstain had followed up his series of botched edits that finally reflected truth of "intent" to sell shares with that Deborah Kelly did indeed sell shares.
No. I'm only using the number of shares marked "I" for indirect on the Form 4 with "spouse" as the holder.
Yes. "NOTICE OF PROPOSED SALE OF SECURITIES".
How is that she wouldn't have to file a Form 4 for this sale? Wouldn't selling of shares, either restricted or unrestricted, require filing of an "insider sale"?
If so, why hasn't the SEC arrested her?....OK.....Fined her....
But as a designated "insider" she would have to file a Form 4 upon a sale. Where is that Form 4?
Also, there is not any explanation of why she had *MORE* shares after 02/01/21
....waiting....
[late add]
Anyone remember this Fartstain article that had to be revised several times to reflect the truth?
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/05/wife-of-cytodyns-chairman-sold-2-6-million-in-company-stock-ahead-of-covid-19-drug-study-results/
First it was she sold....then AF must have been taken to the boss' office for a little "education" of what a Form 144 is...maybe a lawyer or two were involved...then the article was corrected...that sounds more like how some supermarket checkout stand tabloids operate...
To remind everyone of the Form 144 filed:
If she "sold" the 357,875 shares shown on the Form 144, she would have then resulted with 333,333 shares ...but as shown on the other Form 4 items cited, on 02/05/2021 she ended up having 782,408 shares.
https://www.secform4.com/filings/1175680/0001807094-21-000001.htm
Not seeing any "sale" here....
Where again did Deborah Kelly sell shares?
Well, did some more reading...avoiding wrapping presents....and found that Sidley/CytoDyn already understands all the entities, their relationships, AND the people behind it....just had to read closer....
Pay particularly close attention to Paras 9-16. Sidley is already on top of things....we're just late to the party and the beer is already warm.
And this earlier filing demonstrating that different officers with NSF International and NSF Health Sciences spoke on behalf of "NSF" with promises to resolve the issues between Amarex and CytoDyn.
Ha !! Those are all the old offices/entities in the State of Florida.
I hope everyone knows they are incorporated in the State of Delaware.
Very interesting tangled web woven of corporate holdings subterfuge going on here....
"Holmes, you've cracked the case!" -Dr. Watson
"NSF International" has more divisions than Carter has pills. NSF International has a HUGE number of sister-wives.
Reading the press release on the NSF website:
Interesting.....
Seems that maybe Amarex is left holding the bag all on their lonesome.
Shouldn't be difficult to add the correct "NSF" to the "Amarex clinical Research, LLC et al".
I guess the "NSF International" mail got delivered to the wrong person at 789 N Dixboro RD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA. That little old lady sorting the mail may need some new glasses.
Nice update on leronlimab/Virologix:
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/vaccines/vyrologix-leronlimab-antibody
Interesting....why should Sidley limit *WHICH* "NSF" organization they go after? There are so many more located at the same address and I bet the same little old lady in tennis shoes (bless her heart) in the mailroom opens all the mail sent to that address.
I dunno....my bets are on "NSF Cook & Thunder" because I'm thinking Dr. Kazempour has been cooking up something wacky in the kitchen that's gonna blow up in his face.
Make note of how NSF International refers to themselves in the filings. No mention of "NSF International Holdings".
Leave it up to the Amarex/NSF International's attorneys to forget who they're representing.
"A toast to the things for which there are no substitutes: good friends... happy days... and... victory." -Perry Mason
Well, we shall see if the audit of Amarex's work for CytoDyn turns up anything worthy of substantiating NP's claims.
That should happen sometime after Feb 10, 2022.
The earliest start of the audit is after Feb 1, 2022 and lasts a maximum of 7 business days. No official holidays in there to delay anything.
Not sure how there's going to be a way that NSF can disavow any type of proof or paper trail of Amarex ownership....it's sort of all over both of their websites and the private equity firm that negotiated the deal.
That's what makes the "discovery" part of a legal proceeding so interesting...never know what you're going to dig up....or you DO know and you use the paperwork to hang your opponent with their own words...
The private equity firm that funded Amarex since 2015 that helped negotiate the deal between Amarex and NSF - representing Amarex on the "sell-side":
https://cascade-partners.com/transactions/amarex-clinical-research-has-sold-a-majority-interest-to-nsf-international/
The announcement on Amarex's website announcing they've sold a majority interest to NSF International:
https://www.amarexcro.com/news/investment-nsf-international-amarex
And the announcement on NSF International's website of their acquisition of a majority interested in Amarex Clinical Research:
https://www.nsf.org/news/nsf-int-expands-health-science-consulting-services-acquisition-amarex-cro
Doesn't get more obvious than that....Maybe I should ask my screen name to be changed to "Captain Obvious"....
I guess when you "buy" something ....you're really not "buying" it...
I think Cascade Partners was Amarex's investment firm providing capital backing. They were the "Sell-Side Advisor" of Amarex to NSF.
This article details the story more about how Amarex went shopping for a sell but Kazempour wanted to remain as CEO.
https://cascade-partners.com/transactions/amarex-clinical-research-has-sold-a-majority-interest-to-nsf-international/
Isn't very odd that the filing by NSF/Amarex disavows that:
A double-edged sword on wanting to know more about the HIV-1 BLA (BLA 761144) submission. Seem that a certain individual is also curious....and the dreck associated with this person never smells good....
https://www.fda.gov/media/154586/download
This is from the "November 2021 FDA FOIA Closed Logs" which are FOIA requests submitted to the FDA that were completed and the reason they were closed. The status "Withdrawn Closed w/o Charges" means that the requestor withdrew their request and was not charged any fees by the FDA in the process of fulfilling the request.
So, what's a "Form FDA 356h" everyone asks?
Hook,
I am very sorry to hear the news of your brother's passing.
My condolences and prayers to your families.
Godspeed.
Would this be the PR everyone is talking about?
https://ir.stockpr.com/cytodyn/news/detail/591
I just want to make sure that I'm not looking at last week's news.
Here....LMGTFY....Here we go...
It is a standard phrase in almost every pre-revenue publicly traded company's SEC filing.
The phrase, or very similar phrasing, of:
"Since our inception, we have been insolvent and have required debt and equity financing to maintain operations."
Occurs 39,300 times on the sec.gov website. I can assure you that they're *ALL* not bankrupt or "under investigation".
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asec.gov+Since+our+inception%2C+we+have+been+insolvent+and+have+required+debt+and+equity+financing+to+maintain+operations