Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thats exactly the conclusion any person with a brain would/should put together.
Jeez I wish I would have listened to you almost 2 years ago when I was first was introduced to this board and they call this board "liehub" The other board won't even let me log in because I didn't bite my tongue on SFOR pump nonsense. Here it is almost 9 months since the titanic sunk no progress to elevate back up and the pumpers are still trying to justify why they're going to be rich and how they're so excited for the bright future and their cult leader Kay...LMAO!!!!!!!!
I agree. Knew it was to good to be true. No long here....should have been a flipper
Definitely appreciate the information. Thanks
This is fraud at its best some governing body needs to be put in place and needs to look in to it and clean up the OTC game. Its one thing to invest in a company thats trying its best to thrive and just fails then its another to just sit in a basement create a scam, thrive and walk away into the sunset with no worries of prosecution while counting stolen money. That just set the tone for more fraud activity
Just confused as to how this is legal with no consequences?
So clowns like these at LEAS can just create a ticker pump it dump it and during the pump pretend like there's a company willing to merge with it show no proof and just disappear with share holders finances and no prosecution this is really legal in the US? How is this possible with no regulation? Is there an office that we can petition to go after these scumbags?
0.0032 from 0.0037 and climbing go SFOR!!! Ha Ha Ha ha
Mark is that you? Ha ha ha ha ha Big deals coming!!! Ha ha ha ha
You called 0.0037 you got it right man cheerleader
Go SFOR!!LMAOOOOO!! Im excited!! Can't wait for Marks annual PR Announcing big deals and the upcoming Reverse Split ha ha ha ha. Oh I forgot your favorite get these cheapies before it goes to $3.00 a share ha ha Haha
And lets stop blaming MM's. I think its clear to see that the desks are being cleaned out and furniture is being moved to storage this train is slowly coming to its final stop which is "Reverse Split station" everyone with shares unfortunately has a ticket
Reverse split is coming. "Mark" my words. Expect another weak financial on August 15th. 3 and a half months wait for yet another let down. Reverse Split will come before the next financial to disguise yet another disappointing quarterly report. Until then expect the PPS to be in this range or lower. R/S is imminent because theres is nothing that can be done to fix this except strong sales. They're all out of PR announcements on twitter and pumping with nice sounding phrases while using specific words that attorneys use not to verbally dig themselves into a ditch and can defend after a prediction doesn't come through later on. Not a long stock just a flipper when the hype is bought in by the hope to get rich quick investors
So because he tweeted it that makes it the gospel?
When and where is the paperwork indicating such progress?
See now this is a perfect example of what Im talking about you make a statement like this and then follow up with no links or proof to back it up. But me explaining this to you I will be considered a basher. So I'm supposed to be naive as and just take your word for it. Make a declaration such as this on a board then follow up with proof or say nothing at all...smh
So what can we do to bring these idiots down and regain our finances? How they able to do this without being prosecuted?
Yep one month ago today LEAS announced on twitter that a big merger was coming. They made a good run for one day then went to penny stock hell the next and never recovered. Fast forward a month later no attorney letter no Pink status. As a sophomore investor Im glad to learn my lesson when Ive been scammed in penny land. It doesn't take long for a legitimate company to go current. I won't sell my shares then can have my money until it goes to 0.000. The clearly needed it more than me to scam my hard working dollars on a dummy ticker good luck with it. Hope they can use the money to buy some good Karma.I just wonder how is it that these guys aren't charged with fraud and are prosecuted they can actually get away with this..smh. Its a land slide this site exposes all the fraudulent stocks the other one are all just pumpers. Im an ihub acolyte from now on.
Sounds like exactly what their doing?
Dilution is not a term I'm comfortable with. I see a reverse split in the near future if those fins aren't up to par. No major income in the next three fins I look to SFOR to close its doors. 18 years is more than enough for a company to get the ball rolling. Court dates aside business should be based on the sales of the product show me fins on an official document then shareholders come. Cant just make twitter posts and call it the gospel. Seems every year is just for buying time
They really thought the words of great Kay from his hibernating cave was going to save the day and the PPS. That pump wasn't enough proof is needed in the form of fins.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA GOOD ONE!!! LMAO!!!
Exactly valid questions with no answers. Very good read you just posted. Makes me thinks the mods on the other board are in on this as well. Any valid argument is looked upon as a bash.
Same question I asked on the other board in reference to someone discussing a deal with Gallaghar that supposedly went live but said company didn't reference SFOR along with the announcement. A partner should know that a OTC/Pink company thrives on announcements of successful mergers and signed deals. When said partners goes live with deals and doesn't mention the partner what exactly is the point and how does that help SFOR's PPS if they do not receive some sort of public boost showing progress? If a deal is successful shouldn't the CEO do a PR or at least a statement via a social media platform to announce a successful transaction? And if an NDA is the answer to this question then wouldn't the same apply to not discussing it on financials therefore back to square one not being able to discuss revenue progress. How does that help the PPS?
It would be a question that won't be answered. The answer will come in the form of a deletion
Do you mind if I "retweet" this on the other board? Those guys are clowns who hate reality...LMAO!!
Exactly This is why since Tuesday people with half a brain can see thats why the PPS is stagnant and hasn't reflect any movement since this so call any DDS deal
Completely agreed
Wait let me get a pump with fake news first. So I can buy back in cheap at 004 when no facts to support the pump deflates the balloon....lmao!!
I never looked at it that way. That could definitely explain things. Im thinking their pumping is a paid service. I can post a comment that doesn't first the status quo at 4:15 in the morning and it would be deleted within minutes of posting. That sounds like all around the clock security to me
If you call losing money because announcements weren't fulfilled. And listening to CEO who never comes through on his announcements being a girl then where's my dress I prefer one that goes above my knees. We do our DD and look for honesty when buying a stock if thats too much to ask then send me a few of your hard earn dollars so I can blow it on a useless stock.
Seems like this is the board I should have been on. Sometimes a reality check is needed to awaken common sense. Dreams of being a millionaire are just that dreams. This is a trade stock and nothing more. Over a year and all I saw was pumps with no facts. The PPS jumped but no substantial information to sustain the spike. This has turned me into a full fledge stock flipper. No more long holdings. SFOR didn't hold there end of the bargain I understand litigation isn't in their hands but they have been screaming "deals done" for over a year and the results on the quarterly reports in at least the past quarters have showed nothing indicating such. I feel like a wrestler turned heel. So disappointed. Its a graveyard on the other board no more pumping but they still find time to delete post...SMDH
I just enjoy the dialogue that comes from all of this even though most if it is competitive information that still needs to be researched with DD. Some information is fact some is opinionated. But when it all said and done no one really knows the outcome.
I don't believe SFOR is a pump and dump. I think the owners of this stock really believe that this stock can thrive into something big. Me personally I'm in the middle based on what I've seen in the last year and a half. It looks like it can go either way. Its pretty much buyers beware, we are all legally just gambling and etrade and others are just the casinos. Even the longs can benefit from a PPS upswing by just dealing some of the profits and not letting go of all it while still staying true to the belief of longterm progress if people on the outside see potential that brings more buyers which benefits longs and shorts
So are you indicating that even if the reversal goes in SFOR's favour within the next 60 days or less that this will now drop back down to a lower court? Further delaying settlement talks and dragging it out longer? But even if thats the case the reversal alone would raise the PPS until whatever SA next course of action would be at that point. So with that being said according to your post isn't that what we as traders or longs would hope for is a PPS in the green?
PS. I never said that it did give me an advantage. I was not replying to your message in order to have a back and forth about who is the best position of advantages. I merely stated that I was there..you took it in way of competition not my fault. If we are not dealing with a computer specific issue then shouldn't SA just win the case and we move on from there?
To be totally honest I was hoping for it. But a close insight into the investment was satisfying as well
In that context the SA defences argument is a moot point. Cause we in fact are talking about computer issue. P.S. I was at the actually hearing yesterday
Can you elaborate with facts as to why you feel this way?
In your opinion what would give you the inclination that this is not positive news for this stock moving forward?
Got a point there
Heard that in 2017.