How did you know about the website?

I have filed a civil lawsuit against John T Root and UMFG. First hearing is in September. Anyone interested in joining our class action lawsuit that will be forthcoming?

I filed a lawsuit against UMFG recently to find out just that. Who is Sean Ross?

The Cerner and Mckesson's CoverMyMeds deal may also benefit Rite Aid since RiteAid and McKesson just renewed their partnership for another 10 years. It would make sense for a Cerner/McKesson or Amazon/Walmart to acquire Rite Aid. I foresee many different acquisition opportunities for Rite Aid in 2019.



Cerner (CERN) Collaborates With McKesson's CoverMyMeds
Zacks Zacks Equity Research,Zacks 4 hours ago
Reactions Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email
In a bid to enhance prescription price transparency, Cerner Corporation CERN enters into collaboration with CoverMyMeds. Per the deal, Cerner will integrate patient-specific information into the electronic health record (“EHR”).

Notably, CoverMyMeds is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McKesson Corporation’s MCK prescription technology solutions.

Apart from providing detailed price information to the consumers, this latest development will allow healthcare providers to review prescription pricing information at the point of care.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/cerner-cern-collaborates-mckessons-covermymeds-123512628.html

The company is silent because UMFG was hijacked. Sean Ross is not real.

I agree. Anyone know his whereabouts? Or have a document with his signature?

It appears that Joel c Schneider was also involved in a recent umfg scam, perpetrating to be their CEO Sean Ross.

It is also believed that Joel c Schneider ran the UMFG scam, he hijacked the company and pepetrated to be the ceo of umfg, Sean Ross. Anyone that can share his whereabouts would be greatly appreciated. We are looking for him.

Here is the news you all have been waiting for. Announced on the OTC Markets. I hope they all go to jail.

UMFG
UMF Group Inc.

Warning! This company may not be making material information publicly available
Buying or selling this security on the basis of material nonpublic material information is prohibited under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1 thereunder. Violators may be subject to civil and criminal penalties.

Nice try.
I will not be intimidated by your false claims, lies, insults, and bullying. KCPC and investors should be more concerned about your flawed leadership characteristics, poor judgment and bad decisions. I believed in the CryptoSecure concept and as a result I have paid a valuable price and have learned a very hard lesson. I will be respectful and sign off from this board. Best of luck!
P.S. I already have received interesting offers for the transfer of ownership of my CryptoSecure TM filings I want to thank you for that. You would never believe me in a thousand years who just made me an offer.

Please do explain how you were allegedly extorted to everyone.

CryptoSecure is solely responsible and accountable for creating a “Perception of Complicity” to Shareholders. You have only yourselves to blame for the CryptoSecure TM confusion and deception for failing to protect your intellectual property against UMF Group Inc. A responsible CEO who seriously is concerned about protecting their investors and intellectual property would have taken immediate action against them, especially since two companies with similar marketed technology, in beta, with the same name "CryptoSecure" launched at the same time frame, in the same market space. It took you at least three months before you took any action against UMF Group Inc., and you haven’t even gone after the authors whom published the major CryptoSecure news articles related to UMF Group Inc.
Please explain why you would immediately contact me to take down a LinkedIn article I authored, entitled, “Does History Repeat Itself? Is this another CryptoSecure scam?” within hours of posting it, and no crime was committed. Whereas, you neglected to take any immediate action against UMF Group Inc., for actual crimes against your intellectual property, until you were finally pressured in doing so.
Why haven’t you pursued UMF Group Inc., with the same vigor and urgency as you have with me? They have damaged your company’s name and brand, not I. Their website is still promoting CryptoSecure, why aren’t you shutting them down?

I do know something about TM’s because I own the filing for CryptoSecure in the U.S. and you don’t. I also am in the process of expanding to Canada, Australia, and Europe as I have first dibbs now. Show us your filing or shut up. You can’t claim first to use because, UMF Group Inc. was first to promote and use the CryptoSecure TM. However, if you would have done your due diligence you could have easily figured out early on that UMF Group Inc. was a fraud and you could have effortlessly shut them down. So I am going after UMF Group Inc., to finish the job you failed and refuse to do. Why are you going after me and not after UMF Group Inc.?

It’s quiet because they’re out of fake news to pump up the stock and they are off to another scam since this one hasnt worked so well for them.

Your welcome to drop by anytime.

Cryptosecure is misrepresenting themselves because they do not own any percentage of safewindow and or other related bankvault products. On the bank vault site they have removed all references to cryptosecure. The word on the street is that cryptosecure screwed Graeme and he has nothing to do with cryptosecure any longer. Cryptosecure doesn’t even have a claim to their trademark. Their IPO is a failure and all they have is a website. Mcafee turned out to be a ploy to pump the stock. Sorry to disappoint however these are the facts.

Hope so. Some news would be good. It’s strange that there is silence and no news since Feb 9.

The only thing that cryptosecure owns is a website. The safewindow technology is 100% owned by bankVault. Graeme Speak is no longer an advisor to cryptosecure.

Because the other company has not ceased the use of the trademark, they are still using it. Since neither company has federally filed any ownership claims to the trademark the other company has more of a claim to the trademark because they used it first. If cryptosecure was serious they would file
A lawsuit against the other company and that isn’t going to happen.

I have no affiliation with the other company. That is a scam as well. I agree with you there. The cease and desist was b.s. It will all be coming to light pretty soon.

I haven’t seen such desperation. You are trying to promote the stock on any news and
Pics of mcafee. Folks are on to this scam. This stock ain’t going nowhere.

I’ll wait until it goes down to 10 cents

Your right about the dilution machine, however, the dilution machine is apart of a cryptosecure copy cat scam.


2017-11-30: Key Capital to Enhance Breakthrough Security Solution that Makes Cryptocurrency Private Keys Unhackable (Press Release)

2018-01-19: UMF Group Taps Cryptocurrency’s Need for Security

2018-01-22: Cyber Security and Cryptocurrency: Two Sides of the Same Coin

2018-01-29: CryptoSecure Launches Beta Release for Cryptocurrency Security Platform (Press Release)

2018-02-05: UMF Group Inc. Updates Development of CryptoSecure HD Cryptocurrency Wallet Application (Press Release)

2018-02-09: UMF Group Inc. Discusses the Future of Secure Cryptocurrencies (Press Release)

2018-03-01: CryptoSecure ICO launch 1st round

2018-03-02: CryptoSecure Security Solutions Provider Partners with KICKICO and Launches ICO Today (Press Release)

2018-03-07: CryptoSecure explains its Cryptocurrency Security Platform (InvestorsHub Newswire)

2018-03-14: John McAfee Joins CryptoSecure as a Senior Strategic Advisor (Press Release)

2018-03-20: CryptoSecure to Develop and Co-Develop Mobile Devices enabled with its Platform Security Technologies (InvestorsHub Newswire)

Since the other CryptoSecure company and CryptoSecure.com have not federally registered their cryptosecure trademark, the rightful claim would go to the company that first started using "the designation as a mark, which creates rights and priority over others. "

In that case the other company has the rightful claim over the cryptosecure tm because the Company started using "CryptoSecure" designation before Cryptosecure.com. That is the reason why the cease and desist has had no impact. I have heard that the "Company" is planning on legal action against cryptoesecure.com for infringing on their cryptosecure trademark and brand. CryptoSecure.com needs to demonstrate that it has a claim on their TM otherwise its not looking good for them. If you want the stock to go up prove that the CryptoSecure TM belongs to CryptoSecure. That is the reason why Graeme is distancing himself and the reason why you don't see any mention of cryptosecure on bankvault. He is smart and doesn't want to be caught up in a TM lawsuit.

That may have been true in November but where is he now? A lot can change in a few months. Why isn't there any endorsement or mention of cryptosecure on the BankVault site? I see "SafeWindow" but not "CryptoSecure SafeWindow".

Since UMF Group Inc, and CryptoSecure.com have not federally registered their cryptosecure trademark, the rightful claim would go to the company that first started using "the designation as a mark, which creates rights and priority over others. "

In that case UMF Group Inc. would have a claim over the cryptosecure tm because UMF Group Inc. started using "CryptoSecure" designation before Cryptosecure.com. In any case, why aren't the two companies filing lawsuits against each other for infringement. How can we as consumers and investors have faith in any one of these companies if they are not fighting to protect their Name and Brand?

So who really has the claim to the CryptoSecure TM? UMFG or Cryptosecure.com?


https://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=76884705

CryptoSecure Name Conflict

CryptoSecure advises that it has no relationship or association with Colorado based UMF Group which is developing a wallet that it refers to as CryptoSecure. CryptoSecure has provided UMF Group a Cease and Desist notification with regard to the use of the CryptoSecure Trademark and brand.

I am not sure if you all are following the news, however, it may be good news for UMFG. Cryptosecure.com claimed that they issued a cease and desist to UMFG for infringing on their cryptosecure trademark, however, it appears that cryptosecure.com does not have a claim to the cryptosecure trademark. The cease and desist has had no impact on UMFG. The good news is the way Trademarks work is that UMFG started using CryptoSecure before cryptosecure.com has and they have more of a claim than cryptosecure.com does. So hopefully some good news to be forthcoming for UMFG.

Darcy Johnston is a fraud and has been lying about their trademark. Cryptosecure never issued a cease and desist as they stated. This will be forthcoming very soon with big headlines.

Folks will soon realize that cryptosecure is a fraud.

Wow! you are right...it looks like bank vault/Graeme Speak has removed any mention of cryptosecure on their site...it is ironic that they just mention "safe window" and other product names without cryptosecure. This is a huge blow to cryptosecure. However, on cryptosecure, they are calling it "Cryptosecure Safewindow" This doesn't look good for cyrptosecure.

The best and only source that matters. Do you have a better one?

Ever since the Mcafee news, KCPC has been going down, down, down. I wonder what Mcafee is going to do when he discovers he has been lied to and that cryptosecure is a fraud.

My friend at the USPTO office says the closest TM name to cryptosecure is cryptosecurities... and says that there is no claim to the cryptosecure TM name.....and there is no cryptosecure patent..... don't take my word for it....search for your selves....

I am glad you have figured it all out. I wish no ill will toward KCPC whatsoever. I hope it thrives. That is not what this is about. It is about weeding out the scammers, so that KCPC can trade without manipulation and this is on the level. That is what everyone is waiting for if you haven't figured that out yet. The best strategy is to ride it out a bit. Scammers will move on as they are realizing investors are on to them. I'm ready to execute a huge order once I know we are on a level playing field. The sooner we get rid of some of these folks the better it is for all of us.

It is interesting that the SafeWindow App has no mention of cybersecure branding. If you go to BankVault, you can't find cryptosecure mentioned anywhere. In the white paper everything is branded as CryptoSecure Safewindow, CryptoSecure SafeVault Lite, etc.... Why is that?

Thats a great plan because this is all an illusion.

It looks like the cease and desist is working.

I wouldn't believe everything you read. They are just digging themselves in a hole and I will enjoy to see how they dig themselves out of it. Cease and desist, what a joke.

It is the same group of criminals that terrorized the other cryptosecure company.... same pattern... they use the first headline to pump up the stock, and continue the momentum with the second headlines making everyone believe this is the real deal. Shortly after the second headlines comes out which should be any day now, they will dump the stock and move on to their next scam. I would not invest in this because of news. Ponder this before you invest:

What motive is there for a Trademark owner not to pursue legal action against entities which clearly have violated their Trademark laws? In the process many consumers were fooled and lost significant investments because of the Trademark confusion and deception. One motive is for the Trademark owner and others to profit from the Cryptosecure confusion and deception. I think there is another motive as well. If this is not true than why not sue and protect your intellectual property and investment? This question is key and KCPC and others affiliated should at the very least be respectful of their investors and explain.

BOULDER, Colo., Feb. 09, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- today provided this discussion highlighting the predicted future expansion of the cryptocurrency market.

“2017 was a breakout year for cryptocurrencies, but this pales in comparison to the potential growth that lays ahead as even more consumers, businesses, and governments get active in the cryptocurrency market as users, developers, and regulators,” commented Sean Ross, President of UMF Group Inc. “With cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and many others already dominating the public’s imagination, 2018 will likely be a continuation of this volatile growth as new adopters and innovators harness decentralized blockchain technologies to transform the world in fundamental ways that are still waiting to be fully realized.”

Several key industry expert predictions for the future of cryptocurrencies through 2018 and beyond, include increased adoption by consumers and traditional vendors, increased institutional investor participation, continued coin price volatility, and expanded government regulation.

Another primary concern for the growing cryptocurrency market is the need for increased speed and security for storing, transacting, and trading a rapidly growing list of coins. Many new transaction speed and security innovations are expected, but for the average cryptocurrency user, a highly-secure wallet application is the most effective way to protect digital currency assets.

UMF Group’s CryptoSecure application, developed by subsidiary BitBao Group, is a next-generation Hierarchical Deterministic (HD) cryptocurrency wallet designed to more securely manage, transact, and store a variety of digital currencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. CryptoSecure enables digital currency owners to stay in charge of their own money, while helping them to navigate complicated cryptocurrency ecosystems with the assistance of our best in class support team.

The CryptoSecure HD Wallet app is currently in the late stages of development and beta testing. The Company anticipates launching CryptoSecure in the next few weeks for Android, iOS, Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

For additional information about CryptoSecure, visit www.umfcrypto.com.

Sean Ross, President

UMF Group Inc.

seanross@umfgroupinc.com

sham1002 lets test you crytosecure IQ. Which cryptosecure company do each of the statements belong to? You see, confusion, deception, misrepresentation is intentional all part of this wicked game.

"cryptosecure is integrated with mobile device applications"

"The cryptosecure wallet aims to help currency owners stay in charge of their own money, while helping them navigate cryptocurrency infrastructure. The wallet helps users buy crypto coins, secure their funds, and store their assets without worrying about others stealing their money."

"With Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) hardware encryption, app sandboxing, and keychain and code signatures, cryptosecure represents a security advance over web and desktop wallets and other mobile platforms"

"CryptoSecure provides four layers of security ensure that coin holders' funds are safe at all times"

"The CryptoSecure mobile wallet is not only accessible and practical, it also incorporates other layers of security to ensure users' currencies are not compromised."

"Cryptocurrencies are particularly vulnerable to security breaches. New coins are entering the market on a nearly daily basis. Fast growth exposes vulnerabilities in the underlying infrastructure. End users are often careless or lack skills in cyber security. If their digital wallets aren't totally secure, their cryptocurrency wealth can vanish in an instant."

"CryptoSecure's aim is to ensure all cryptocurrency transactions are secure and private keys, wallets and accounts are protected"