Home > Boards > US OTC > Cannabis > UMF Group Inc. (UMFG)

Since UMF Group Inc, and CryptoSecure.com have not

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
ski007 Member Profile
 
Followed By 0
Posts 41
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/05/18
160x600 placeholder
ski007   Friday, 03/23/18 11:53:07 AM
Re: None
Post # of 2695 
Since UMF Group Inc, and CryptoSecure.com have not federally registered their cryptosecure trademark, the rightful claim would go to the company that first started using "the designation as a mark, which creates rights and priority over others. "

In that case UMF Group Inc. would have a claim over the cryptosecure tm because UMF Group Inc. started using "CryptoSecure" designation before Cryptosecure.com. In any case, why aren't the two companies filing lawsuits against each other for infringement. How can we as consumers and investors have faith in any one of these companies if they are not fighting to protect their Name and Brand?



Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist