Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Curious response. So you are saying blo is beginning the tank and shell3 is saying it’s a signal to family & friends that the climb is going to begin.
If I’m understanding you correctly those invested in Tesla should be worried cause Elon Musk is involved in multiple companies?? Y’a that makes sense. You spit knowledge on here like you’re a Cannabix OG which means you were in around .09 cents, do the math on a 25k or 50k investment til now...
Maybe I’m naive, but the fact that we’re talking about that on a msg board, wouldn’t that be considered insider trading?
A simple explanation from shell3 would help
Agreed.
I’m holding fast that nov 2018 and beyond will be our time to shine!! BLO long
I’m obviously onboard, but that’s a little misleading and taken out of context. The breath sample they are referring to is for alcohol. Amendments being discussed at this moment in time are referring to alcohol impairment.
Wrong and Wrong. Enough said.
Dude you gotta stop spewing on here about HL. Go start a Hound Labs message board if you are so inclined. Unfortunately now you are spreading a lot of false information about said company. It’s not fair to anyone on this board. I agree BLO needs more news, our agreement stops there. In consideration of everyone please stop with the baiting posts about HL.
You do realize that is a breath capture device, the actual breath analysis part is the size of a laptop
I don’t disagree but I think we’ll start the climb around November’ish this year
Lololol yes they have a bells and whistle device that ONLY detects thc presence, no other metabolites!!! What part do you not understand??????????? No driving law will ever be made and no gold standard will ever be set for thc presence alone. It’s not good enough. If it was the oral fluid test would already be the gold standard. Hound has no way of knowing whether you 1 hr ago or 7 hrs ago. Only that there is thc present. Like I said someone who is really really high will have much more elevated thc levels, Hounds can then reasonably assume the 2-3 hr window. However no law has ever been passed on reasonably. I really don’t know how to break it down any simpler without using crayons and a colouring book. Please change your name to Datsun and try to keep up.
Dr. Huestis is team oral fluid test until such time as the CSFS shifts their focus from said tests to breath tests.
That’s a cute piece of fluff, 2 pieces of info: 1)”Legal expert Hadar Aviram of UC Hastings College of the Law wants to see the testing and the proper standards developed.” Emphasis on PROPER STANDARDS DEVELOPED
and 2) which happens to be the only anything about Hound, “As for the breathalyzers, Hound Labs says it’s been working with law enforcement and could have them widely disseminated in 2018.” That’s cute.
All aboard the AMG-Troll-Train!!!
Other than copy and paste regurgitation, You don’t seem to really know too much about science in general and how laws are passed. A pretty prototype rendering is like a top down selfie...you know you’re being deceived right??
So AMG, you really don’t have a position with BLO do you???
I’ve seen d*ck riders before but hound has you wound. Have fun with their chemistry set!!
I’m not really understanding the crystal ball theory theory of my last post. Just crystal clear science or non science as hound is concerned
Hey Dumb Dumb you are very good at reading press releases, do some research on their research. They can detect THC, so can secureTec so ça cannabix. Their research shows that if you’re really high it affects your driving and if you’re really really high it will show up on their machine. Cool ehh!!! What about the person who only has 1 hoot and decides to drive an hour later? I hate to tell you your impairment is affected, but that person will be signing Houndog right past Houndlabs
By the internet standards, yes hound labs is ahead. It doesn’t matter, hound only detects presence of thc, not recency of use. YES hound labs will get to the “finish line” first. Happy with that answer? This does not mean the laws will be written for the first to the “finish line”. In a nutshell, hounds device has virtually the same capabilities as SecureTec’ oral fluid test. I commend Hound Labs on their progress but it’s not enough. With alcohol it’s simple, we have BAC. The equivalent to BAC will not simply be “presence”, it will be “recency of use”. Enter Dr Huestis, this is exactly what she is advocating. She said -“a pot breathalyzer will be difficult”, not impossible. 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol is the key to recency of use. AMG your missing link is staring in the face.
Rinse Dry Repeat
11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol
Dr Huestis
Cannabix
Rinse Dry Repeat
The only scientific word Hound Labs uses is THC, they have a lot of scientific looking words referring to per this per that chem this chem that, other than THC, with the entirety of the plant, nothing nadda. Cannabix was able to detect THC a long a** time ago. Why would law enforcement, etc, spend millions on devices when the much cheaper oral fluid test harbours the same result? Patience. Just some food for thought.
NOT chasing the same tech......hound labs is only confirming result via mass spec
They are using a chemical process not mass spec, only confirmed by mass spec, however it’s a simple yes/no, they are not able to detect 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol, therefore no recency of use
Ok AMG let’s talk Huestis, this bombshell you speak of simply isn’t there. What are you afraid of concerning Dr Huestis? The fact she said a pot breathalyzer will be difficult? Of course it is. What have you learned this week in health class about 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol?? I’ll help you out, it’s a metabolite in which recency of use is determined. Pretty cool ehh?! Ok stay focused now. Hound labs, drager, lifeloc, is anyone using a technique to determine 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol levels?? I’ll answer for you...NO. What does that tell you? Not what does your SP tell you. At this point, basically all those companies can detect the presence of thc, NOT recency of use! The beta 3 DOES separate these metabolites. Starting to understand? Huestis is on team breathalyzer, for now we first have to get through this oral fluid stage, that’s non negotiable, it’s the progression of technology. iPhone didn’t go from 1 and skip to 4. The DDC and the Canadian Gov hasn’t even made their minds up yet about the oral fluid. Once the focus at the CSFS shifts from the swab to the breathalyzer, which IS the next step, you’ll be able to move out of your moms basement and buy as many cheetohs as you can handle!!
Dr Huestis’ comments were completely misconstrued, the focus now whether you like it or not is on the oral fluid device, no bearing whatsoever on a breathalyzer, we just have to wait it out and let them finish this process, then it’s our turn. As much as you don’t understand, her comments were a HUGE boost and push and nod to Cannabix.
11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol!!!!!!
11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol!!!!!!
11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol!!!!!!
Well said
It’s been less than 3 months since Jan 23 nr, swab was at least 6 months before any testing results came out, I know everyone is panicking, but there’s nothing to report. A nr stating testing is progressing is worthless. Gov and company officials, can’t talk about something that’s not there yet. They need many months to satisfy the gov. It’s not as simple as beta 3.0 complete, couple good tests and we’re done. This is a long drawn out process and we’re in the home stretch. We need to remember, they are amending the criminal code, that doesn’t happen overnight, and let’s not forget our wonderful government left c45 & c46 til the 11th hour. They’re not going to rush, no matter what they say about July 1. Period.
NOT MY POST
“OPP Approach to SWAB
As a police officer, I can confirm that the OPP are not purchasing saliva testers due to the fact that they are unreliable as a screening device. Management are waiting for a handheld device (like the current alcotest that is used for alcohol) that can detect pot. We have about 3500 alcotests in the Province and I imagine around the same number of pot testers will be purchased.
I am sure some police forces will go ahead and purchase the saliva testers but they will switch to the better systems once they are court approved.
OPP are relying upon DRE and SFST officers in the meantime in order to deal with the pot drivers. I persoanlly have no concerns about this whole swab issue. In the end, the more efficient technology will always end up being purchased. Courts will eventually dictate that through case decisions.
I am invested in BLO and will hold long until this device comes online, court approved and being used by a vast array of police forces.”
News on nov 7, 2017 says they do have a patent on interlock
What’s his attire this trip?
Actual completion was more than likely achieved some time before January 23, just a guess
From the digging I’ve been doing it would seem that 6 months is a popular timeframe for approval of drug screening devices
https://www.csfs.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Approval-Standards-for-Drug-Screening-Equipment.pdf
We know the swab test doesn’t hold
In court, but mr Goodale seemed, very confident, about July 1. Ace up his sleeve?!
5 minutes in does Mr Goodale have a Freudian slip saying devices?(plural)
Do you see 10$ as the ceiling?
Excellent post, primary objective for next 2-4 months is making their device bulletproof. Yes the last couple weeks have been depressing, but in the words of someone famous from Batman the night is always darkest before the dawn....and the dawn is coming!
I know everyone is different, but my advice is don’t let share price (now) get you too worked up and making decisions for you.
What was smoki’s post? I can’t seem to find it
Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but I tend to disagree, my interpretation of latest nr is they have a hand held device which has positive corresponding data with big ms machine in the lab. That’s good. That’s very good. They are essentially saying they have a device matching the standard held by the current bac testing method. Not the methods of this so called “batmobile”. The science from ms for detecting thc in breath is there, yes? If so, make a handheld machine that spits out same data as big ms machine (which we know and trust), apparently this has also been achieved as per latest nr regarding 3.0. If this is all correct information, the formality of the gov testing, licensing, etc should be a piece of cake no?
The BAC breathalyzer is simply a trusted device used on the side of the road to allow a police officer to confidently say I believe you are intoxicated, you are under arrest for dui, at the station he or she will perform further tests on “big machines” to corroborate their findings on the side of the road. Long winded I know l, but apparently our device does everything I just described. Just a thought.
Nothing will be legal in Canada until they have a method for detecting real time impairment, same as alcohol. Swab/saliva is a media bandaid until the summer. Then all bets are off until real time device. Trim away all the fat away from legalization in Canada, only variable missing from the equation is a way the enforce impairment. Nothing happens til then.
Am I crazy for loading up more bth?
I’ve heard from multiple rcmp that their drug units started working with dot (started summer 2017) focusing on commercial vehicle drivers, doing randoms at scales, they’ve all used the term marijuana breathalyzer
I’ve been told breathalyzer looks like beta 2.0, black, no markings or logos other than test unit #1,2,3 etc
As I said before, take it for what’s its worth
According to some rcmp buddies, SK, AB, BC and QC they have been testing a unit since the summer, all of them are using the term “marijuana breathalyzer”, take it for what its worth, they haven’t mentioned which company, and trying to get a picture of device is rather difficult, but they keep saying specifically MARIJUANA BREATHALYZER, fingers crossed but it has to be cannabix!!!!!!! Love this ride!!!
If all goes well how high should one expect stock to go?