Something actually has happened, like the new guy going dark in June and now he's involved with BRKK. Obviously, deals have been in the works for months and it looks like they are accomplishing something. Argue it all you want but I could care less what claims you make on this board.

I guess we now know why. Things are happening BRKK

Post#30305

I am not trying to see who can pee the hardest into the wind here, guy.

I like the enthusiasm here! BRKK

That's what I have been wondering? (seems to be a big deal around here)

According to the Patent Assignment and Technology Transfer Agreement that both parties signed and submitted to the SEC, they should.

On or about February 27, 2017, Christopher Stramacchia, President of iSee Automation, notified the Company that it believes that iSee Automation terminated the Agreement for Services. The Company believes that there is no basis in law or equity for iSee Automation to unilaterally decide to terminate the Agreement for Services and plans to enforce its rights thereunder.

On or about February 28, 2017, Christopher Stramacchia, President of iSee Automation, notified the Company that it believes that iSee Automation terminated the Revenue Assignment Agreement. The Company believes that there is no basis in law or equity for iSee Automation to unilaterally decide to terminate the Revenue Assignment Agreement and plans to enforce its rights thereunder.

You mean like Mike TV in Charlie & The Chocolate Factory?

Again, see the Patent Assignment and Technology Transfer Agreement

LAS VEGAS, NV / ACCESSWIRE / May 12, 2016 / BRK, Inc. (OTCBB:BRKK), manufacturer and distributor of The Blind Repair Kit, sole licensee of the Bas Rutten o2Trainer, is pleased to announce it has purchased all the patents and intellectual property related to "iSEE".

LAS VEGAS, Aug. 25, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BRK, Inc. (OTCBB:BRKK), is pleased to announce that appointment of Christopher Stramacchia, inventor of the Helmet Camera and owner of the RefCam trademark, has been appointed as Chief Technology Officer and Director of BRK, Inc.

Here it is, notice Chris & iSee are the sellers and Brian & Brk, Inc. are the buyers!
BRK, INC. Patent Assignment and Technology Transfer Agreement

I have definitely seen these numbers in the filings but they are only a projection of what they "might" get paid for selling shares from the offering. (if they sell any at all)
I hear a lot of complaints about Daniel's hollow promises, lies, misinformation, etc. but I only see those things from those who are accusing him. I have no idea what Daniel is up to, how much he gets paid, or the inner workings of the company and neither does anyone else, especially those who like to drop "one liners" that say nothing factual or verifiable.

I appreciate the reply but that's still not what I'm looking for. I hear your complaints but I was asking for something very specific. The details I am looking for are facts that can be verified. I'm asking ANYONE that is making claims to know Daniel's salary to post the evidence, not give me the reasons they are upset. I get it, and I certainly don't mean any disrespect but seriously guys, can ANYONE actually post this information? I HAVE LOOKED so please don't act like I don't know what I am doing here. You won't find me making any claims without posting where that information came from. I understand that tensions are high here because of expectations. I'm not looking for anything other than the information to support/deny these claims to actually find something useful. Again, I apologize for the shortness but I ask for something very specific and I get countless opinions and big brotherly advice. I am not looking for anyone's advice or opinions, only something tangible.

Please don't get me wrong here, I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers. I am genuinely sorry if I have offended anyone.

That's a very interesting perspective but sadly not shared by me. I appreciate the opinions but I'd like to see some actual information. You seem to know "solid facts" but I haven't seen a single link to any information in any of your posts. I'll do the math. Thanks for the input though!

Well it seems there are a lot of assumptions without any evidence. I'm simply asking those that seem to know things that no one else does, where they are getting their information. What is it that you are trying to accomplish?

You must be confused about my post

I'm asking where others are getting their numbers for Daniel's salary. I have no information to post because that information isn't available to me or the general public. I'm actually looking for valid information, not opinions or misguided objectives. If anyone has a link to something solid, please post it so it can be verified. Thanks in advance

I'm missing some information here

I see quite a few posting about Daniel's salary. I've seen numbers ranging from $250,000 - $500,000 per year I'm very curious where these numbers are coming from? I can't seem to find this information in the financials or filings. So where is this information coming from?

This is the truth... not what you are trying to make it.

You keep saying that BRKK and iSee made an agreement for BRKK to purchase only a portion of iSee. This is very silly as I see it. (no pun intended) The deal that BRKK made was to purchase ALL of the rights and intellectual property from iSee and everything that went with it. This is the reason for the "complaint" in the law suit against iSee. It was for a breach of contract because iSee terminated the Service Agreement and the Revenue Assignment Agreement. There is even an SEC filing showing the transfer of intellectual property. I don't see anything anywhere to support your claims.

Same Article:

The judge agreed to this and they won the case based upon the evidence that was submitted to the courts.

Quote Source

Where is this coming from?

You say:

Here's what really happened:


Then this:

Quote source
Quote source

Thank you Bull Almighty for this post. I had to repost it!

Over the weekend I was doing some DD on trademark law. Specifically researching the difference between "ref cam" and "refcam" as it applies here. Does that space really make a difference? I thought so. Then I dug deeper ... 

https://www.quora.com/Is-a-word-phrase-trademark-for-mycompany-the-same-as-one-for-my-company-the-latter-having-a-space-Do-you-need-to-protect-both ;

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/can-someone-use-a-trademarked-name-if-they-put-a-s-1657688.html ;

Ladies and gentlemen "Ref Cam" and "RefCam" and "ref cam" and "refcam" and "REF CAM" and "REFCAM" are all the same - not according to me - but according to multiple IP lawyers. 

The definition of trademark infringement as defined by the USPTO ... 

Quote:Trademark infringement is the unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark on or in connection with goods and/or services in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, deception, or mistake about the source of the goods and/or services. -https://www.uspto.gov/page/about-trademark-infringement



The only way the space would matter is if it would change the meaning of the trademark. In this case it clearly doesn't. 

BRK Inc. purchased the "refcam" trademark from iSee Automation in May of 2016 ... 

https://www.benzinga.com/content/7976566/brk-inc-otcbb-brkk-acquires-patents-for-helmet-camera-live-broadcast-technology ;

Would you like to see a grocery list of media giants using the "ref cam" trademark sinceMay of 2016? Here you go ... 

1) Rogers Media / Sportsnet is using the "Ref Cam" trademark in broadcasts this year 2018 ... 

;

2) Major League Soccer is using "Ref Cam" trademark in broadcasts last year in August 2017 ... 

;

3) ESPN and the NCAA are using the "Ref Cam" trademark two months ago. 

THIS STORY PROVES VICAREO SYSTEMS IS BROADCASTING HOCKEY GAMES IN APRIL 2018 ... 

https://www.sportsvideo.org/2018/04/06/live-from-frozen-four-ref-cam-stars-as-espn-ncaa-continue-innovative-partnership/ ;

4) LOOK at the title to this particular story. Now it is "ESPN's Ref Cam" !!? Ohhh really?? Remember "likely to cause confusion"??? ... 

https://www.uscho.com/frozen-four/2018/04/03/espns-ref-cam-returns-for-a-second-season-at-the-frozen-four/ ;

5) The IIHF Worlds are using the "Ref Cam" trademark in broadcasts in May 2018 ... 

;

6) The Memorial Cupis using the "Ref Cam" trademark in broadcasts in May 2018. I don't have a link to this. I saw it with my own two eyes on NHL Network a month ago. 

Everyone here has been focused on the patent application. The trademark has been largely dismissed. That is a mistake imo. Big sports media wants to use that "ref cam" phrase. Big sports media IS USING that "ref cam" phrase. I suspect Vicareo Systems gave permission. 

What happens when that "ref cam" trademark isn't Vicareo Systems to give? 

Vicareo is still using RefCam and they have some large deals. It's stolen technology that has enabled these contracts. What else is there to say, really? This alone is big enough... but this is just the beginning.
All of this has already been proven but some could use a reminder

IMTDragonFly Powers Vicareo RefCams at 2019 College Football Playoff National Championship

Full Article

LIVE FROM THE 2019 CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP

Full Article

Very cool indeed!
Awesome to see that there are deals to go after. It's been proven that BRKK bought the rights to the RefCam(s) and the actual hardware was never delivered. It's also proven that Chris took this technology and hardware and made a deal to partner with Tom to form Vicareo after he had sold the rights to BRKK. Chris's picture used to be right by Tom on the Vicareo website but has since been removed, gee I wonder why.
It is, yet again, proven that BRKK has won a judgement based on the above statements for $2.4 million dollars. It sure seems like Daniel has more than enough "proof" to do what he has stated he would do. Also seems like he's got a lot more to gain long term by persuing these companies that have been using stolen technology than diluting this company into the ground.
Still looking forward to seeing what happens because there are numerous signs that are pointing towards very large potential.

It's 3.6 million dollars, not the apocalypse.
What happens if they get the 2.4 million dollar payout? What happens if they sucessfully sue GoPro for trademark infringement? How much would that be worth? What if, instead of a lawsuit, GoPro bought the company for less than they would be sued for to obtain the trademark? What if they merge with Vicareo and collect on current and future contracts? What if they hired a firm that specializes in marketing their patent pending, trademarked technology to corporations across the globe?
All of these things are possibilities. Are they likely? Who is to say? The point is that 3.6 million dollars is a drop in the bucket when compared to any one of the possibilities that could exsist. No one here can say what is or isn't possible for sure because we don't know. We also don't know that Daniel will sell any shares from the 1A, now do we?
Just because 9 billion shares were approved, they still have to sell them to buyers outside of the open market. So who really knows what will happen? Certainly not me and not any of you either. I do know that 9 billion shares aren't just going to pop up on the ask.

Sounds like someone paid more than .0004 to me.

The truth is where you find it, not where you expect it to be. It is very apparent that most have expectations and little to no truth. It's hard to believe that any one individual can be responsible for the closing price today. Somehow it's all Daniel though,right fellas? Anyone been watching the FINRA Reg/Sho Report? Has anyone ever wondered how a mm's really play the game? Can anyone of you control what the other shareholders do? You see, there are far too many variables that are uncertain to be so sure Daniel is worthy of all of this blame.

The story of Frankenstein is a tale about the ability we posess to create the very thing we are afraid of and our laughable thought that we can control what we don't understand.

You keep blaming him for not pleasing you and/or exceeding your expectations, for your own personal gain, might I add. You complain when he gets a paycheck but you want him to hand deliver yours on a golden platter. What part do any investors play in actually accomplishing anything? We facilitate, through monetary compensation, our own sense of what WE want. Guys it's real simple...

The actual truth is that no one here knows all of the details and inner workings of the company, even if they have owned a public company. So the ship is pointing in the direction that you choose to steer it. It doesn't change the truth just because you are looking in the wrong direction.

Holy Tater Tots Tiny Tim...
You guys are cracking me up with this nonsense. Q: I want to play... who's team do I get to be on this time?
A: Well, that just depends on who is winning at the moment.

The company is run by people with names. They are easily found in a number of locations. I'm interested which one of those individuals "shoukd" be "lockepup" in "solirary"? I'm really interested to know which of these individuals is the largest "moron"? I have a feeling I know who it is but I'd like to hear your opinion. Anyone have any ideas?

Always bad... hmmm?

That was a very informative reply there.

Holy T Trade Brkkman! Needs explination...
T Trades are not some great golden unicorn in the realm of pennyland. It's interesting to see all of the puffy britches over something they don't even understand. Can you assume it's negative if you don't know what it is?

There can be negatives but there can also be positives, you can't define them without knowing the motives for hiding the trades during the day. There are far too many scenarios to consider to automatically assume a T trade to be bad.
I don't consider the fact that these shares are actually being purchased, regardless if they are reporting when they occur, a bad thing!

Quote source

I thought the PPS was just supposed to go up? BRKK

I just can't wrap my head around the idea... Stock prices are only supposed to go up! Companies are only supposed to make me money and if they are not making me money, they must be a scam. Companies aren't supposed to use investors' money to make deals that will ultimately make the company more profitable in the long term. Companies are supposed to take my money and triple it in just 2 weeks. If I don't get my money back in 2 weeks, then they must be lying, no good, dirty rotten scoundrels! The CEO, Daniel, is supposed to work for me, NOT some company! Geeeez, why haven't any of these companies figured this out yet?

Does this sound ridiculous to anyone here? It sure seems to be the attitude of a few that like to post the "doomsday" scenario. Sayings like "bag holders","pump and dump", and "scams" are just a few. Let's address these, shall we?

"Bag Holders" - So the idea that everyone will buy in at the bottom and never go RED in a position is absolutely ridiculous. Have you ever been RED in a position? I know I haven't! I only buy at the bottom and the only bags I hold are at the grocery store! LOL

"Pump & Dump" - So a stock runs up and then it goes down because some individuals decide to sell for a profit automatically makes it a P&D? That's right... stock prices are only supposed to go up, remember! These companies work for me and if I'm not making money they are P&Ds. I didn't authorize any businesses raising of money, in the form of dilution, to further their company growth? LOL AGAIN!

"Scams" - If you are a "Bag Holder" and you think all stocks that fluctuate in price are "pump & dumps" then naturally they must be "scams" as well. I mean, it's just known in the investment industry that prices are only supposed to go up! For real, it's on Wikipedia. It says that an investment is for ME to make money off of the labors of a Company that I do not own and that a CEO is supposed to work for my sole benefit. That's how this is supposed to work... LOL EVEN LOUDER!

Here's a fact that you did NOT post!

Now that's something else! BRKK

That's simply not true, and we all know it! There are many facts posted on this board and I have posted some myself. So when someone posts that they got a text from Daniel saying that news is being released at a certain time and low and behold, news is actually released on the day that Daniel stated, is what... Fact or Coincidence? Or, was it not a fact until after the fact? All this talk about facts... Here's a fact for you to ponder over, Daniel has done everything he has said he was going to do and he proves himself time and time again. This is a fact and if you think otherwise, I'd like to see where you are getting your facts!

I see... BRKK
Lovely to see a certain few only posting when we're red. Very interesting! #initiateminus

I'm pro truth and truth is backed up by evidence, not claims of truth. Real truth isn't selective. When it is, it's not the truth.

Have they signed paperwork or released news for a deal? Nope, therefore there is not a legitimate claim here now is there? NOPE

Where are all of the board mods at?
You can't advertise other stocks here man. Read the rules!

It's not clear to me, without proof! Birdies chirping isn't proof of anything. I'm not saying that you didn't believe they were fake but I didn't see anything because I don't use any social media, aside from this platform (not really sm though) Black to me could be blue to you, so how do we know anything from outside perspectives without multiple sources backing up any claim or statement?

You just stated that there were fake documents without any proof whatsoever, so how does that justify this... callin'em like I see'em

So tell me who I'm supposed to believe again! LOL

The facts remain! BRKK

Prove it, bud! BRKK

Fake documents, huh! Sounds like there are scare tactics alright, but not by fake documents!

Are we done trading? Did you just predict the future? So you know for a FACT where we are going to close today? Do tell more!!@

Thank you, someone had to do it! It's beyond laughable how the pps police all want us to be safe while providing us an unsafe investment environment!

It seems you don't understand why I posted that! Read some more posts and you'll see who I was talking to

Great find, btw! BrKk

Who replies to their own post anyway?

Nope, I own the float!