Gen 2 Technologies Inc (MNIZ)

[Don Beasley]

This is the truth... not what you are trying to make it.

You keep saying that BRKK and iSee made an agreement for BRKK to purchase only a portion of iSee. This is very silly as I see it. (no pun intended) The deal that BRKK made was to purchase ALL of the rights and intellectual property from iSee and everything that went with it. This is the reason for the "complaint" in the law suit against iSee. It was for a breach of contract because iSee terminated the Service Agreement and the Revenue Assignment Agreement. There is even an SEC filing showing the transfer of intellectual property. I don't see anything anywhere to support your claims.

On July 25, 2016, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K, disclosing, among other things, that pursuant to the terms and conditions that certain Patent Assignment and Technology Transfer Agreement (the “Patent Assignment and Technology Transfer Agreement”), dated May 6, 2016, by and between BRK, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and iSee Automation Inc., a federal Canada corporation (“iSee Automation”), the Company purchased U.S. Patent Application No. 15/079,847, “Helmet System” (the “Patent”) and related technology for a helmet camera system, including intellectual property covered by the Patent. The Patent covers technology designed to wirelessly transmit video images from a small, mobile camera to live broadcast (the “Helmet Camera and Broadcast Technology”)

Same Article:

On or about February 27, 2017, Christopher Stramacchia, President of iSee Automation, notified the Company that it believes that iSee Automation terminated the Agreement for Services. The Company believes that there is no basis in law or equity for iSee Automation to unilaterally decide to terminate the Agreement for Services and plans to enforce its rights thereunder.

On or about February 28, 2017, Christopher Stramacchia, President of iSee Automation, notified the Company that it believes that iSee Automation terminated the Revenue Assignment Agreement. The Company believes that there is no basis in law or equity for iSee Automation to unilaterally decide to terminate the Revenue Assignment Agreement and plans to enforce its rights thereunder.

The judge agreed to this and they won the case based upon the evidence that was submitted to the courts.

Quote Source