Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I guess my 468,750 shares will become handy when we near the Dollar mark...
First bought a bunch between 5 and 7 cents, then sold at 50 cents long ago when the price driver was Hydrogen produced by bacteria...
It's been a good stock to me, even though I don't pay much attention to it...
Total Outstanding shares????...
==> Sounds to Good to be True?...
The figures in this case are simple to analyze: both ENWN and PLKT are trading very nicely with good looking charts and SLRE clearly has $6.77/share in assets at today's prices...
The only risk I see is that one of the mergers could get canceled and this why I'd rather buy SLRE than either of the 2 spin-offs, as they have already gone up substantially. BUT, based on the stock price moves of both stocks, so far, SLRE would have no problem finding other shells owners willing to enter into such a merger...
For ENWN, the stock I'm the most interested in, the forward split from 4,250,000 to 42,500,000 is really not an issue, as most shells do this to adjust the final number of shares each party will eventually get and since 30 million shares will be canceled in the process, ENWN will be left with a total O/S of 42.5 million shares...
http://www.d2fusion.com/
D2 Fusion has proven cold fusion technology and has onboard Mr Fleischmann, the man who discovered the process with Mr Pons, some 15 years ago. This process has ben refined to the point where it'll be marketable within 2 years and cause a revolution in the way energy is consumed: is $100 million market cap too much for such promising technology?
See Illustration: http://www.d2fusion.com/education/images/fuel.jpg
While this may seem too good to be true, the fact is that no promotion of the stock is evident and the stock is clearly below the radar of the average trader, as evidenced by the low volume....
==>OT: OMR was reco'ed at $8.32 and it went to $9.45, or a 13% gain in a very short time...
The stock is not done yet and when the mud stirred by Spain clears up, I expect to be vindicated, as Spain really has NO legal claim on the Loot...
Here is a 'no brainer' to chew on:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20203373
http://www.thelion.com/bin/forum.cgi?msg=1125041&tf=wall_street_pit&cmd=read
==> 10Q dated 05/18/07: The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value (the only class of voting stock), as of May 17, 2007 was 21,323,309.
http://www.quotemedia.com/results.php?qm_page=64909
There has been no filing since them concerning additional shares being issued...
==>SLRE looks a safer bet at current prices than either PKLT or ENWN...
==>SLRE @.55, worth a proved $6.77....
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20203373
==>SLRE @.55, worth a proved $6.77....
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20203373
==>SLRE @.55, worth a proved $6.77....
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20203373
>>>@.55 =============> WORTH a PROVED $6.77 per share...
In summary, by mid-July 2007, the assets of Solar will be:
1. 45,000,000 shares of Planktos Corp (PLKT)
2. 30,000,000 shares of Enwin Resources, Inc. (ENWN) (soon to be D2Fusion Corp)
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070605/20070605005386.html?.v=1
Value of SLRE's main assets calculated at the high of today's trading, based on 21 million outstanding shares...
PLKT: 45 million x $1.36 = $61.2 million
ENWN: 30 million x $2.70 = $81 million
Total Assets: $142.2 million over 21 million O/S = $6.77/sh...
While I won't pass judgment on ENWN or PKLT business merits, I have spoken yesterday to the top guy, Russ George about D2 Diffusion and it appears that they will have 1 to 5KW furnace type units available for sale within 2 years at prices similar to existing conventional units, BUT with negligible fuel costs....
So, as of today, 5th June 2007, .55 can now buy you a stock proved to be worth at least $6.77, so far...
==>That's a load of 'Bull' and not surprising coming from Spain...
There is compelling evidence that the Treasure comes from the wreck of the Merchant Royal vessel, one of the RICHEST wreck in the world, as the 3 Odyssey ships have been working the area for the last 2 years...
Shipping records show a period of intense activity at the end of last summer, when all three Odyssey ships - Odyssey Explorer, Ocean Alert and LEspoir - were regular visitors to Falmouth docks [closest port to the wreck].
Pilot Captain David Barnicoat was employed by all three ships on several occasions during 2005 and 2006, steering them in and out of Falmouth Bay. He said: "You couldn't sound the crew out. They were tight-lipped about everything.
"Other vessels would spot them off the Isles of Scilly flying "keep clear" signals, but they were working a huge area and you couldn't begin to guess the wreck location.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23397252-details/%C3%BD%C3%BD250m%20pirate%20treasure%20'...
==>Odyssey has now been permitted to excavate the HMS Sussex by both the Spanish and UK authorities and will complete operations in about 3 months and well before the end of 2007. HMS Sussex wreck is believed to contain up to 4 BILLION of treasure to be split 50/50 with England...
Initial target $16+ with $50+ by the time Essex is successfully excavated...
==> I gave you the tip about the Treasure Hunter OMR because I know you and the other 'investors' conned by the BS Propaganda issued by HYPF are losing your shirt on the stock and needed a break...
OMR closed at $8.32 on Friday and I'd be surprised if it doesn't double in the next 3 trading days...
But, this is an OT subject, so I'm done posting about it...
==>Why don't you read the ENTIRE DD before making a fool of yourself? Initial target is $16.00+, with $50.00 within a couple years...
http://www.thelion.com/bin/forum.cgi?msg=1118162&tf=wall_street_pit&cmd=read
As for your 'standard alternator' question, it shows you haven't the slightest clue what you're babbling about...
The average 60 Amp car alternator actually only provide about 1/2 as much for continuous use or 375 Watts at 12.5 Volts. To run a loaded Golf engine at full throttle while producing only 1 liter of Hydroxy per Amp, you'd need an alternator with a continuous output about 8 times larger than the 'standard' alternator and would require a trailer to put it in...
==>Any input/comments on the DD posted?...
==>What is it that you don't understand about this simple post?...
1 liter per Watt/hour CANNOT operate a car, as I have explained in past posts and this is why we're not hearing any more about the Golf GTI...
To operate the 1900cc motor of the Golf, using its standard alternator to provide electrical power to the reactor, one needs to produce around 8 liters per Watt/hour: all the video will show you is an electrolytic device producing 1 liter of gas per Watt/hour, which is useless to power a car and way below production levels obtained by state of the art technology...
Even if Hypower ever produced this amount of gas, it still would need to make it work on a fuel injected engine, where injectors and exhaust would quickly rust due to the water vapor produced and finding a way to bypass the car's ECM (engine control computer) is a must!...
In the meantime, this company's market cap is around $90 million, reflecting a large number of very gullible 'investors'...
As I have said numerous times, you guys have been HAD by the HYPF misleading Propaganda, because none of you understand the technology involved, while I do...
==>I was right all along about HYPF's prospects of success and I believe I'm right about this one too...
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=19792518
==>OMR will become a $50 stock within 2 years: current target $16.00+...
http://www.thelion.com/bin/forum.cgi?msg=1118162&tf=wall_street_pit&cmd=read
==>I know a great deal about this technology, that's why I can write about it without fear of being contradicted...
Official state of the art is 5 liters per Watt/hour by Russian professor Kanarev. Unofficially, it's much more...
http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Kanarev_Electrolysis
The HHO gas output in liters per Watt/hour is extremely important, as it measures the efficiency of the system and is very easy to check out...
If Hypower ever gets close to producing 8 liters per watt/hour, we'll know, as the MIB's employed by the Oil and power generation industries will blow up the company's premises and may even get rid of the principals, as they did with Stan Meyer and many others...
http://pesn.com/2006/06/02/9500276_Water_fuel_experimenter_threatened/
==>1 liter per Watt/hour CANNOT operate a car, as I have explained in past posts and this is why we're not hearing any more about the Golf GTI...
To operate the 1900cc motor of the Golf, using its standard alternator to provide electrical power to the reactor, one needs to produce around 8 liters per Watt/hour: all the video will show you is an electrolytic device producing 1 liter of gas per Watt/hour, which is useless to power a car and way below production levels obtained by state of the art technology...
Even if Hypower ever produced this amount of gas, it still would need to make it work on a fuel injected engine, where injectors and exhaust would quickly rust due to the water vapor produced and finding a way to bypass the car's ECM (engine control computer) is a must!...
In the meantime, this company's market cap is around $90 million, reflecting a large number of very gullible 'investors'...
==>NO DEMO on 28th!... I tried to warn you, but my posts were deleted...
==>O/S 363 million, Float 82 million...
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=HYPF
There are 2 problems to consider with this technology:
+ It's virtually impossible to patent, due to the extensive 'prior art' existing...
+ Big Oil and Power companies will suppress it, if it's any good : here the list of suppressed technologies in similar fields...
http://www.befreetech.com/suppressed_inventions.htm
In addition, the US government has the power to stop an invention from becoming public, if it feels it would be a threat to the economy, for instance...
==>Yes, Meyer had achieved success using a different process than pure electrolysis: it's called "Water fracture" or "dielectric breakdown", which produces a great deal more Hydrogen and I am currently researching the process...
This is a dangerous subject, not only because H2 explodes fairly easily, but because most people succeeding in the field happen to DIE in mysterious circumstances: just imagine the collapse of the Oil and distributed power generation economy and you'll understand the magnitude of the interests involved...
http://befreetech.com/energysuppression.htm
==>The Golf GTI WILL RUN at the appointed date, no question about it. However, not in a way that would make H2R a viable commercial proposition...
The Golf GTI was chosen for its high power in relation to its low weight, as the motor will have to swing a huge alternator. Here is the scenario:
- Turn on the ignition key and wait about 30 seconds before starting the engine, to allow a few liters of Hydrogen to be produced under battery power. Btw, the battery will also have to be very large to match the alternator...
- Engine runs and the Press can't believe its eyes, even though it has been done many times before, dating back all the way to 1934:
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/garrett.htm
http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html
- Car runs with engine flat out to about 30 mph top speed...
Doug Bender comments: "This new technology, used in conjunction with this vehicle is to us like the Kittyhawk was to the Wright brothers. It didn't fly very far but it was a start and paved the way to modern aviation as we know it today,"
The demo shows that the technology is not viable and it takes another 15 to 20 years to perfect it - if at all feasible - so that no more than .20 watt is used to produce 1 liter of Hydrogen, instead of the current 1 Watt. At that point, the car will still need a 10Kw alternator to run at top speed, but it will have become commercially feasible...
To make money in this stock, buy sometime in mid-January at no more than 20 cents/share and dump it the day before the trial is scheduled...
==> I have only commented on the technology - which is a long way in the future before R2P is commercially viable - NOT on the price of the stock, so don't get you panties in a wad...
Further more, I have been constructive by sending a copy of my post to Doug Bender AND Professor Kanarev, suggesting they get together to speed up the process..
You want more companies that do the same as HPP? NO Problemo!!...
* Get Hydro Power (.com) - Next generation hydrogen boost technology announced, with present performance in range of 15% to 50% improvement in fuel economy. Latest innovation may boost that to between 50% and 100% mileage improvement.
* Hydrogen Technology Applications Inc - HyTech (nickname for Hydrogen Technology Applications Inc) claims a process of converting H20 to HHO, producing a gas that combines the atomic power of hydrogen with the chemical stability of water. Tightly related to Brown's Gas (http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/RhodesGas) technology.
* Hydrogen-Boost (http://www.hydrogen-boost.com/index.html) System is a gas mileage enhancement system (http://www.hydrogen-boost.com/november2001.html) that includes an on-board hydrogen gas generator, fuel heater, fuel vaporizor, fuel/air mixture adjustment, engine lubricants and driving tips.
* HydroStar Electrolysis Conversion Kit - Plans being sold for installing what is essentially a Brown's gas unit on car, to run H/O mixture into air intake, enhancing fuel combustion for mileage enhancement. Questionable dealer site claims and wording, data lacking.
* Oxy Hydrogen (http://savefuel.ca/oxy-hydrogen/) - Add-on unit increases fuel economy by an average of 15 - 28 %.
* Hotsabi's e-Cell is a Joe Cell variant - Uses an electrolysis process to inject hydrogen into the air intake of a vehicle, resulting in improved fuel economy of around 50%.
* HyZor (http://www.eagle-research.com/fuelsav/hyztechld.html) by Eagle-Research replaces some fuel with water.
* HyPower Fuel (http://www.hypowerfuel.com/) - The design of the HyPower Pak® makes it easily installed on any internal combustion engine, regardless of the fuel source. It is a closed chamber unit that produces hydrogen and oxygen on demand.
* H2 N-Gen (http://ihsresearch.com/) by Innovative Hydrogen Solutions.
o IHS Preparing After-Market Hydrogen Supplement Device for Vehicles (http://pesn.com/2005/11/25/9600207_Innovative_Hydrogen_Solutions_Inc/) - Innovative Hydrogen Solutions, Inc. of Canada has been developing an electrolysis unit that extracts hydrogen and oxygen from water and adds it into the air intake of a vehicle, to increase fuel economy by anywhere between 10% and 30%. (PESN; Nov. 25, 2005)
* Hydro-Gen™ (http://www.savefuel.ca/) users report an average 21% improvement in their gas mileage.
* Hydrogen Innovations (http://www.burnh2o.com/) - The HydroGen system provides a cleaner, leaner burn, which gives you a 15% to 40% increase in fuel efficiency.
* Canadian Hydrogen Energy Company (http://www.chechfi.com/) - CHEC HFI hydrogen injection system for large diesel engines.
* Hy-Drive Technologies (http://www.hy-drive.com/) - Claims a significantly more efficient electrolysis process.
* Liberty Hydrogen (http://www.energistx.com/energy/libertybooster.html) H2O Hybrid Mileage Booster.
* waterpoweredcar.com (http://waterpoweredcar.com/hydrobooster2.html) - How to make a Hydrogen Booster Yourself
* Hydrogen Car & Multi Fuel DVD (http://www.knowledgepublications.com/hydrogen_car_dvd/h2_car_dvd.htm) teaches how to hydrogen-boost your engine.
* BingoFuel Reactor (http://jlnlabs.imars.com/bingofuel/html/bfrhowto.htm) is an underwater carbon arc. It produces COH2 gas that can burn very cleanly in air as fuel for an internal combustion engine. May be higher efficiency electrolysis. The Carbon Arc looks very promising as providing excess energy (http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/SparkGapExp/SparkGapExp.htm)
* H To Go (http://www.htogo.com/) - MAPSOE electrolysis units produce Hydrogen from water on board a vehicle, enhancing the fuel economy of gasoline, diesel or bio-diesel internal combustion engines and minimizing emission levels. Test data shows up to 73% more mpg with the hydrogen unit. Distributed in New Zealand by Vision Energy (http://www.visionenergy.co.nz/). See also Hydro-charger (http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage6480.html)
* Go Green (http://www.gogreenfuel.com/) onboard hydrogen generation technology
* HydroGen Automotive Parahydrogen Generator (http://cgi.ebay.com/Hydrogen-Generator-Save-Fuel-Gas_W0QQitemZ5846858996QQcategoryZ294QQssPageNameZW... requires no electrolyte.
* The hydro boost device you can build yourself (http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/hydroboost.htm)
* Dynamic Fuel Systems (http://www.dynamicfuel.com/) - The Jetstar™ is a transportable hydrogen generator retrofit targeted for use in the heavy tractor trailer industry.
* Energy Enhancement Technologies (http://www.energyenhancement.ca/) has developed a plate device, using Nanotechnology that enables it to produce significantly more Hydrogen and Oxygen while not having to use dangerous, caustic solutions.
* HydroGator (http://www.hydrogator.com/page/page/3567720.htm) - Hydrogen fuel saver add-on supplement provides 12->35% average (highway up to >50%) fuel savings.
* HydroCharger (http://www.hydrocharger.net/) - A bolt-on hydrogen fuel generator module (size 12x12x12") that can be placed in a car trunk, truck bed, back of SUV or even mounted in engine compartment if desired. Designed to passively utilize your computerized fuel manangement system to increase gas mileage, clean engine.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Fuel_Efficiency_Hydrogen_Injection
==>The RPP is a proven device sold by a bunch of other companies, particularly for DIESEL engines in Canada and, in the right circumstances, one can get as much as a 20% increase in mileage...
http://www.chechfi.ca/product_ltseries.htm
But, most are a lot cheaper than those sold by HYPF....
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=h....
==>RPP is fine, but H2R is many years away from becoming a practical to power vehicles and is unlikely to be patentable because of prior art. In fact Doug Bender clearly says so himself, if you paid attention...
Management is quick to point out that these are preliminary laboratory results using prototype H2R units and will require considerable improvements before any practical transportation application can become a reality. The company plans to host a number of live demonstrations in early 2007 with independent experts in attendance to monitor and verify resulting data.
"This new technology, used in conjunction with this vehicle is to us like the Kittyhawk was to the Wright brothers. It didn't fly very far but it was a start and paved the way to modern aviation as we know it today," exclaimed Doug Bender.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/061212/20061212005962.html?.v=1
>>>BIG PROBLEM: About 1/2 the power produced by the engine will be devoted to swing a HUGE alternator to make enough electricity to produce the staggering amount of Hydrogen required:
1 Kilo of H2 = 1 gallon of gasoline
1 Kilo of H2 = 11,100 liters of H2 (H2 = 0.9 gram per liter)
If a car averages 30 miles/gallon of gasoline, it will consume 2 gallons at an average speed of 60 miles/hour in one hour and require 22,200 liters of Hydrogen...
Doug Bender claims that his electrolysis process is 2 to 2.5 times more efficient than conventional and that 1 Watt/hour produces 1 liter of hydrogen. Hence, 22,200 Watts/hours will be expended in one hour in the above example...
To convert to Hp: 22,200 Wh over 746 = 29.76 HorsePower
Even though a vehicle may have an engine rated at 150 Hp, in practice, at cruising speed it only uses a fraction of the nameplate Hp, say around 60 to 70 Hp: so, effectively, about 1/2 the car's Hp will be devoted to produce Hydrogen...
This is hardly feasible with Bender's current technology, as for the car to obtain the same top speed as it would with gasoline, the engine will need to have double the HorsePower and triple the weight when the size/weight of the alternator is also taken into account...
So, to reach top speed, the size of the alternator would have to approximately double, from 22.2 Kw (able to supply 22,200 watts/hour) to around 50 Kw: here are the pictures of 50 Kw generators to give you an idea of the problem:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=50%20kw%20generator&btnG=Google+Search&ie=UTF-8&....
To work out, this technology needs to produce 1 liter of Hydrogen using 1/10th of a Watt and this just happens to exist and it is patented by Mr Kanarev:
http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/electrolysis/index.html
PS: I have copied this post to Doug Bender for comments and will let you know if I get any...
Patent coverage is unlikely to be obtainable on the Hydrogen reactor, as other similar processes have already been patented...
http://hytechapps.com/aquygen
To produce Hydrogen though conventional electrolysis is at best 90% efficient, meaning that you have to add 10% more energy to just break even, making it impossible to power a car...
http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/electrolysis/index.html
The only way to create more energy that is consumed in the process, is by using pulsed current at a frequency designed to resonate water: unfortunately, this is already covered in a number of patents...
Here is another one, which is so old that the technology must now be in the public domain:
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/oxyhyd1.htm
==>You'll have to do a lot better than that to prevent the coming FHAL price collapse...
==>CSVU O/S: 23.3 mil + 35 mil = 58.3 million at the very least...
On June 10, 2005 Mr. Harris made an Acquisition and Business
combination offer to Waatle Holdings Corp an Arizona Corporation with
10 subsidiaries and 250,000,000 million dollars in tangible and intangible
assets for 35,000,000 million shares of the corporation (CVSU). On June
17, 2005 Waatle Holdings Corp shareholders approved the merger by a
unanimous vote.
https://www.otcstockinfo.com/repository/658329/658329_FR8.pdf
==>All SMOKE & MIRRORS: here is another example of a Paul Harris financing and the good it did to the company in question:
Excerpted from CVSU 15c211 filing:
https://www.otcstockinfo.com/repository/658329/658329_FR8.pdf
Rufus Paul Harris, Chairman (37) Mr. Harris has been Conversion
Solutions, Inc. (OTC: CVSU) President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer
and Director since June 7, 2005. Mr. Harris is a self-employed business
consultant, specializing in high end corporate financing. From June 15, 2004
to June 7, 2005 Mr. Harris was Chief Executive Officer and Director of
Waatle Holdings Corp an Arizona corporation. From August 1, 2002 until
December 16, 2004 Mr. Harris was the Chief Executive Officer of Broadband
Wireless Corporation. He is also the founder, director, and CEO of
Enhancement Holdings LLC from May 25, 2001 to present. Mr. Harris is also
the Co-Founder of GHW Group, LLC from November 1, 1999 to present. Mr.
Harris from July 2004 to present is the co-founder of Songwi Trust.
I looked up Enhancement Holdings LLC, which provided financing to BBAN according to this 10KSB/A filing on 8/20/2004...
On February 28, 2003 BBAN received a 100 Million USD Insurance Guarantee
Bond from Enhancement Holdings, LLC which was to be held in Custodian
safekeeping by Republic Bank and Trust in Norman, Oklahoma for credit
enhancement purposes. Enhancement Holdings, LLC along with Stanley Holdings
Business Trust are engaged in the business of corporate financing, business
consulting, debt instrument financing, international trade and asset
enhancement. Paul Harris is the Chairman and CEO of Enhancement Holdings, LLC
and Ben Stanley is Chairman and CEO of the Stanley Holdings Business Trust.
Under the agreement Enhancement Holdings, LLC will receive 3 board seats on the
BBAN board and a ranking equity position upon liquidity.
If this financing was for real, BBAN should have thrived; yet it's now BBANE trading @0.0035...
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=BBANE.OB
Also Paul Harris was CEO of Waatle Holdings Corp, which allowed him to carry out this "sweet" non-arm length little transaction:
On June 10, 2005 Mr. Harris made an Acquisition and Business
combination offer to Waatle Holdings Corp an Arizona Corporation with
10 subsidiaries and 250,000,000 million dollars in tangible and intangible
assets for 35,000,000 million shares of the corporation (CVSU). On June
17, 2005 Waatle Holdings Corp shareholders approved the merger by a
unanimous vote.
Can't you guys tell when it's just TOO GOOD to be TRUE?...
==>Our attorney is co-lead Plaintiff and I'm confident that we'll end up getting in excesss of $10.00/share: OIL is going up all the time and CHAR's fair share price will be determined at the conclusion of the legal proceedings, when OIL could well be close to $100.00 a barrel...
==>NNLX NEWS: Successful production of Methane-free Hydrogen at Welch's: GREAT NEWS that should see this stock going over the resistance it previously met @.50...
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060510/clw505a.html?.v=1
==>NNLX NEWS: Successful production of Methane-free Hydrogen at Welch's: GREAT NEWS that should see this stock going over the resistance it previously met @.50...
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060510/clw505a.html?.v=1
==>NNLX NEWS: Successful production of Methane-free Hydrogen at Welch's: GREAT NEWS that should see this stock going over the resistance it previously met @.50...
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060510/clw505a.html?.v=1
==>NNLX: Successful production of Methane-free Hydrogen at Welch's: GREAT NEWS that should see this stock going over the resistance it previously met @.50...
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060510/clw505a.html?.v=1
=OT=>There still are some existing leases in Egypt, according to the news I had missed yestersday, but the CEO seems intent to continue filling his pockets at the expense of the shareholders: why does it get 3% of the deal?...
=OT=>No use, when you lose part of the leases because you stop spending the funds you're obligated to expend under the terms of the lease. The next tranche of $4 million was never paid, hence, at least 25% of the lease area is now gone, which has never been disclosed...
==> No real resistance till the 0.045/0.065 area, as far as I can tell...