Same here. But I still read through it to see what they made up. The doctor they interviewed ignored the science and made it all about politics. It's MSNBC so that is not surprising.

Glad to hear you won your battles with covid and your second bout with covid was not as bad. I also got sick from covid but I just got sick once. Never got a vaccine. Natural immunity has been proven by researchers to work better than vaccine-induced immunity in published studies. It makes sense because your body sees the whole virus with multiple antigens rather than just 1 antigen (spike protein) from the covid vaccine. It's sort of analogous to DCVax activating the immune system against multiple antigens instead of a peptide vaccine doing so against just 1 antigen. Cheers!

Agreed. For people in most age groups, C-19 is much less deadly than the flu and the data shows that. But of course they don't talk about that because they want everyone vaxxed and boosted. Natural immunity works best and I'm one living example. Unvaxxed people who got it naturally most likely will not get it again or at least not know they got it again because natural immunity works so much better. Having said that, I will gladly take the safest vax in the world--DCVax.

Well said, ILT. Contrary to what most people believe, the science is far from settled on topics like climate change or experimental vaccines. Most people think the science is settled on these things because the accepted "experts" have told them the "right answer", so people don't do the proper DD which is required on everything these days. If you actively seek them out, there are scientists/doctors who disagree with the mainstream opinions and have the data to back up their claims. The truth is science is never settled because it's constantly evolving. All it takes is one new finding to completely disprove a long-standing theory. That is why it's important to stay open-minded...

Hi ILT, I don't know enough about this EMF protection technology to say too much about it. But it looks like Lifetune's devices don't block EMF according to their website, so unfortunately an EMF meter will not be useful to test how well it works. I have seen several similar devices on the market that harmonize EMF frequencies and supposedly help convert them into something less harmful. With wireless and 5G radiation all around us, it's not a bad idea to use these devices. But I wonder if proximity to the source and intensity of the radiation might affect how well these things work.

Hi Senti,

I'm glad you found that video useful. I think regular headsets are better than bluetooth but I read that the wires can transmit radiation from the phone. If you want to look into a next-level solution for the headsets, there are air tube headsets that don't transmit radiation to the ears. Here is a pretty good website I found on this topic:
https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/bluetooth-vs-wired-headphones-radiation-which-safer/
https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/best-air-tube-headsets/

ILT, it's possible the EMF protection tech reduces the radiation levels, but for me I'm not taking any chances. To prove the protection tech works, you would have to test it with an EMF meter on the earbuds. The problem with Bluetooth earbuds like the AirPods is they emit radiation constantly even without phone calls so the radiation is not coming from the phone. DYOR

Hi ILT, here is a video on RF radiation from AirPods:

I was going through some old posts and came across this discussion on cellphone radiation and the use of earbuds. I personally don't hold my phone to my ear or use earbuds when talking on my phone because the radiation can travel up the wires and bluetooth earbuds can emit radiation by themselves. I believe there are headsets with air tubes that don't contain wires so do not act as antennas for radiation.

Here is an interesting blog post on headphones: https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/bluetooth-vs-wired-headphones-radiation-which-safer/

It would be nice to see a Canadian team hoist the cup at some point...and Team USA men's team win a gold medal in hockey. Been a while.
Go NWBO Go.

I think any discussion of inflation is very relevant since we are on a path towards hyperinflation. I have a little bit of my money in crypto which is not looking great atm but worth watching because the bull market has not peaked yet. I certainly hope the stock market collapse does not happen until the end of year or next year since I have some money in small bios like AVXL. Btw, thank you for your TA on AVXL. Will continue to pray for DJT's return.

If Tom Brady can win a Super Bowl at 43, Phil Michelson can win a Major at 50, and if career politicians can keep winning elections well into their 70s and 80s, there is no reason why LP cannot be CEO for another 5-10 years, if she wanted to. She's got a lot of gasoline left in the tank.

Pure cranberry juice might be a little bit difficult to drink...but it works and keeps the doctor away!

Yes, sadly, it's profit over people. Old, safe, and inexpensive drugs do not make money. I heard about the spike protein issue but it seems like the full story is starting to come out. I hope some of the people who were injured will sue the **** out of whoever are responsible, if they are able to.

Best regards

I agree with you on the curious FDA decisions. Just follow the money and it all leads back to BP. The FDA has also approved lots of drugs that cost a lot of lives like Vioxx. I have never trusted the FDA or the CDC. IMO the FDA exists to help BP make money on pharmaceutical drugs while the CDC helps make money on vaccines.

So on the topic of covid and vaccines, I do not trust most doctors, especially government doctors who are always on TV doing interviews. These doctors probably have never seen a covid patient and yet they are making covid policy? I prefer to listen to the doctors on the frontlines who are actually treating covid successfully and those doing the research. They paint a totally different picture. One of the frontline doctors Dr. Zelenko has saved lots of lives with his covid cocktail. DYOR but the truth is covid is easily treatable with cheap, safe prescription drugs plus zinc especially if treated early. Since the mortality rate is less than 1% and there are good treatment options (if you do the research), that is why I will never get a covid vaccine, even if it is as safe as DCVax. Everyone's situation is different so I respect personal decisions either way. I'm betting on my immune system as I have not been sick in years. I'm also betting on Northwest succeeding and disrupting the cancer industry.

P.S. One ancient remedy for UTI that has always worked for my family is cranberry in capsules. If taken daily, cranberry may work as good as antibiotics for prevention of UTI. Worth looking into.

Good to see so many patriots here. I certainly hope the greatest POTUS of my lifetime will get to return, but I highly doubt the swamp will let it happen. There is a saying that you only get to vote for socialism once. I hope this is not the "once". I haven't heard too much about the audits, only in AZ. Fingers crossed.

In any head-to-head comparison with any drug or shot, DCVax probably not only wins but wins by a mile in safety. Plus there is the 10+ years of history vs shots that have been on the market for months. The VAERS database likely underestimates adverse events because it's voluntary and even so it's not looking pretty for the shots. Regardless of how many people have gotten the treatments, DCVax still wins with a zero percent death rate.

Testing is clearly not what it was near the peak of the pandemic. It is only logical that testing is a lot lower now that many people got their shots. Of course the pandemic is getting better likely due to fact that the virus has gone through the population resulting in natural herd immunity. Shots may contribute to herd immunity but they supposedly only last 6 months. I guess that's good for the manufacturers who will make billions every year. What is not known is the long-term consequences of those shots.

It's very interesting they are using DCs for blood cancers. This sounds like DCVax-Direct in a combo trial with the checkpoint inhibitors that LP talked about a while ago. Good to know the trial is not sponsored by another company...

Even 1 death is too many from an emergency-approved vaccine that is based on a new experimental approach or one that was paused due to safety concerns and then restarted. It does not take a PhD to know there are serious issues with them.

Btw, I have never been hesitant. I would take DCVax in a heartbeat. :)

Good points. There is a difference between dying from covid and dying with covid, but there was financial incentive for hospitals to list all as covid deaths. Case and death numbers have never been accurate. No denying the pandemic is getting better, but one can certainly make a case for natural herd immunity being a major reason.

Yes good to see fellow Golden Bears on here although I have to say as I have gotten older I'm not too into the rivalry with its archrival anymore. They have a lot of smart people invested in this company too. Haha

I guess we disagree on the effectiveness and safety of covid vaccines. DCVax is head and shoulders above them in safety. Nobody has died from DCVax. I think if you look into the VAERS from the CDC, you may think a little differently.

Best regards

Alternatively, a decrease in cases may be due to fewer people getting tested now that people are getting vaccinated so there is no need to get tested. There are plenty of "breakthrough" Covid cases where the people getting Covid had been vaccinated already. If you don’t look (or test) for it, you will not find cases. And of course if you do look for it, you might find cases everywhere.

I agree that fewer Covid-related obstacles is good for Northwest and the journal article/TLD review process.

And just to emphasize how safe DCVax is, DCVax-L has a near perfect safety and side effects profile in contrast to Covid vaccines.

Thanks for the clarification for the laypeople. All stock sounds like the best possible scenario!

I thought the wash sale rule only applies if you sell at a loss and then rebuy it back within 30 days. So if you are selling at a profit, you should have no problem buying back same stock at any time. That's my understanding. Hope I understood what you wrote correctly.

I agree 100%. We pretty much have had a Uniparty in Washington since the beginning of time. It doesn't matter if a politician has a R or a D next to their name. Most of them just don't know how to represent the rest of the country. These bureaucrats make decisions on be half of the rest of the country even though they have no idea what's going on. It should be about personal responsibility and less government interventions.

I agree on your last paragraph. I guess that's why they are trying to raise the LTCG from 20% to 43% for CG of over 1 million per year. I was just a little surprised by how much it will go up. It will probably have a big impact on the stock market if this thing gets passed. We will see.

One thing that is not on your list is crypto which is obviously super volatile and should only be a small percentage of anybody's holdings. IMO crypto is here to stay especially if the government continues to print money out of thin air. Quite a few billionaires are heavily invested in crypto and we will probably see bitcoin reach $500,000 or more at some point in the future. Of course it looks like crypto is already at all time highs. I used to think it was too late to buy bitcoin when it was a few thousand dollars but boy was I wrong.

Did anyone see the news on the proposed increase in capital gains tax from the white house? to almost 40%. Had a feeling it was coming but didn't think it would come this soon...

Nice find. He seems to be super active on Twitter and he's really interesting.

Yes, it's been a long time coming. But thanks to all the dd from posters on this board, I have a feeling we will get to enjoy the rewards of our patience very soon!

Yes, that is why I invested in the first place. As a natural health advocate, I believe mother nature knows best. If you look up spontaneous remissions the book, there are lots of cases of people beating cancer naturally. While I believe it's possible to beat cancer naturally, the cancer industry really needs a revolution because it's one of the areas of conventional medicine where the treatment (chemo) is so much worse than the disease itself. DCVax is probably as good as it gets when it comes to conventional medicine. I just don't see another treatment especially a drug that can come close to it.

Whoever said that turns out to be right. The chemical triclosan which is carcinogenic got banned by the FDA. And more and more studies are finding that germ theory might be wrong. There are good bacteria on and in all of us. If you kill of the good guys, the bad guys can come in and fill the void and cause disease. This is the new Terrain theory which is probably correct. But no it does not apply to brain cells and drinking.

Wow, that's amazing. That's the beauty of living in a Red state.

Thanks for your perspective from living in the Swamp. No wonder our tax code is so complicated. I don't blame the wealthy for taking advantage of loopholes because so many do donate their money like you said. Those loopholes could have been closed by Congress already but they haven't done it for a reason. If I were wealthy and I see all the nonsense Washington bureaucrats spend our tax dollars on, I would probably not want to pay high taxes either.

IMO the stimulus has done little for the poor. It just cannot make up for all the nonsensical shutdowns in mostly Blue states. Restaurant, travel, and other service industries have been destroyed in those states. We are poorer today because of big governments thinking they know what's best for the little guys and how to keep us safe from a virus.

There is no doubt the current administration will add to the massive deficit significantly with all the stimulus and infrastructure spending. The most recent stimulus bill contained a ton of reckless spending that had nothing to do with Covid.

It's wishful thinking to think they will only tax the most wealthy. Raising the corporate tax will likely make the middle class bear the brunt of the new tax hike. Everything gets passed down and the middle class gets screwed as usual.

I certainly hope they don't touch the LTCG taxes. But there is still a lot of time for them to do that and more. You cannot keep printing and spending trillions without raising taxes which affect everyone in some way. You think the increase in corporate taxes won't get passed down to everybody? We will pay for it in some form or another. And most politicians don't keep their promises.

I agree 100%. It all depends on Uncle Joe's "managers".

Hi Sojourner55,

You might be right about them calling based on alphabetical order. I got the same call from them early last week and I'm at the beginning of the alphabetical order.

Hi Longfellow,

It's interesting you brought up radiation as a possible cause of GBM. There's definitely evidence to support that, and enough evidence to make the WHO classify all RF radiation (from cell phones, cordless phones, wifi) as a Class 2B possible human carcinogen back in 2011. RF radiation has been shown to cause DNA damage in the lab. There's epidemiological studies that suggest a causative link. Of course there are also studies that suggest there is no link. But just like research studies on nutrition, the quality of the research varies widely and it also depends on who is funding the research whether it was funded by the telecom industry (or big food companies in the case of nutrition research). Plus it takes years of exposure to develop cancer and just because you don't find anything doesn't mean there's no link. I suspect things will only get worse with the rollout of 5G networks. It's best to keep cell phones (and cordless phones) away from our brains as much as possible. I believe a few years ago a poster here or on yahoo msg board mentioned that LP gave him or her similar advice in a conversation.

Here is a review article on this topic:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/

Trailer for a documentary made a few years ago:

Hi GoodGuyBill,
Yes, unfortunately quaker is on the list of products contaminated with glyphosate. Google EWG and glyphosate and you should find the report. Glyphosate is carcinogenic but cancer takes many years to develop so don’t think you cannot reverse the effects by making changes now. Consider going organic on all oat/wheat products or replace them with healthier non-grain alternatives like coconut products or vegetables. A plant-based diet is for the most part healthy and should lower the risk of cancer but not all plants are created equal. There are certain plants and parts of plants that may not be good for us. For anyone who’s eating a plant-based diet or interested in a plant-based diet, I highly recommend checking out the book “The Plant Paradox” by Dr. Steven Gundry. Best regards

Hi Erik007tc,

I like Mercola's Core 5. I personally take 4 out of the 5 supplemnets similar to his even though they are from different brands. The only one I don't take is krill oil. I take a pharmaceutical grade fish oil because it has higher omega-3 content than krill oil. I would probably add fish oil if I were taking krill oil. Both are super great for heart health if they are of high quality. However, most of the cheap fish oil sold in stores are rancid because omega-3 polyunsaturated fats are unstable and easily oxidized. So it's super important to get a high quality pharmaceutical grade that is highly purified since mercury is also a problem. Best regards