Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, they have gone through as much as any weed company I have seen.
1. They had a attorney unexpectedly die that wrote their opinion letter.
2. They had a attorney indicted for fraud who signed the opinion letter and they had to quickly scurry around to remove all association from him in a timely fashion.
3. While learning the realities of a public start up and how to release minimal prs and stick to only material events.
4. They have flipped the perception of the shell they purchased to that of a respectable hemp stock which has made massive strides over the few months they have been established.
5. Green Cures employees/staff are only being paid in shares and converting notes to shares due to the fact they know what their building behind the scenes is going to be massive and will provide more gains in the future than notes payable or a salary would.
6. Insiders knew that Green Cures inc was actually a separate entity and to address this issue to provide investor confidence they merged that company with GRCU to form one massive entity that will start a advertising campaign and unveil new products in the near future which will only increase the positive sentiment toward this ticker.
There are so many great indicators that it is evident GRCU is setup for a run to the upside in the near future.
Ericdz
Absolutely, positively certain. Definitely Dec 1st 2014.
Yes, with any news (pr) these levels are gone forever. The company is clearly waiting to get all the details straightened out and then their gonna drop a significant pr, imo. I have a loss but I am long and like the way things are developing. Sitting on my shares and couldn't be happier. Good luck to all.
Green we've missed you!!! Rico Suave coming down the pipe line.
You don't think they will introduce and PR Rico Suave in 2014? I'm thinking within the next 4 weeks.
GRCU has many things going for it and there is much to be excited about but CBD Centers is not one of them. CBD centers was last updated on May 20th which is 6 months on Nov 20th. The trademark registration was refused for for being to general of a term as stated here "Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes a feature, ingredient or characteristic of applicant’s services. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq"
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn86229204&docId=OOA20140520131644#docIndex=0&page=1
CBD Centers can carry on with another name but it won't be CBD Centers. CBD Centers will be dead as a trademarked name for failure to respond on the 21st of November. "responding within two (2) months will give you priority handling; however, you do have the full six (6) month response period, if necessary"
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
Haha, I'm from Boston. Last place is last place but I know it was a rebuilding year.
That guess is about as good as the Red Sox played this season.
Fins tomorrow after 3pm EST and PR by the end of next week.
Yes, I believe they will report on time and I think there is good chance of a PR as well. Meki Cox was removed from the OTC website just before the last fins and then we got a explanation of the termination of her employment in those fins. So I would expect something along the same lines is happening in the upcoming fins with Mr. Weed.
Dick Weed has been removed as legal counsel for GRCU and no longer has any affiliation with GRCU. Strong legitimizing move!
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GRCU/profile
Figured I'd try to contribute something of some significance besides just participating in the chatroom. Tomorrow marks the Publication of the Rico Suave trademark. Hopefully fins on friday and if a PR comes as well that will be just dandy.
Every crook especially a lawyer knows you can't only deal with scams. One scam and have other legit companies (GRCU) that help to get the attention away from the scam (CitySide). Nothing to see here.
Yes typical ihub. 50% was probably over exaggeration but was just trying to make a point. I am all in as well. I am betting on Calkin. When he leaves, I leave.
Yes this is definitely interesting. If they keep Dick Weed on I feel like over 50% here will bail that are here now. If GRCU removes him from every affiliation with GRCU then that 50% will probably double down instead. Make or break moment. Fold, hedge your bets or go all in.
That charge against Rick Weed is definitely a red flag. GRCU and investors must act accordingly. For all we know maybe GRCU knew about this charge and that's why the other legal counsel was recently added. Needless to say I don't think the company should be involved with Mr Weed anymore and if they do decide to let him go I feel like that would be a very strong move that will only increase investor confidence.
The third quarter financials are due on 11/14/14, the 15th is a Saturday. 8 days or 6 trading days away. Most likely they will be posted after hours Friday the 14th.
Alaska is almost there. Once they get to 93% reporting if the yes is 52% plus then I think the yes will be locked in.
http://www.politico.com/2014-election/results/map/ballot-measures/alaska/#.VFnlajCJOuY
98% of the Florida vote is in with 57% to 43%. That 2% left won't change the overall more that +/- 1, so yes.
http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/politics/fl-election-maps-2.html
The company has everything filed and is up to date for the Pinks. Why it might not have all the filings to satisfy Nasdaq requirements or your own requirements, they do however have everything filed to be in good standing as a pink current where they currently are listed.
For dosing maybe you and other naive people should read up before spewing your nonsense rhetoric.
chrome-extension://ecnphlgnajanjnkcmbpancdjoidceilk/http://www.projectcbd.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/CDB-dosing-guide_Project-CBD.pdf
6."Don’t overdo it. Often with cannabinoid therapeutics, “less is more.” Cannabinoid compounds have biphasic properties. This means that higher doses of CBD may not be as effective as low or moderate doses."
As far as the Form 10 or S-1 forms they are not required for the Pinks and thus we dont need to file them. Those forms are only required for the OTCBB or NASDAQ. In fact, Non-Reporting Companies that trade on the Pink Sheets can move up to the OTCBB by filing a Form 10. The Form 10 has virtually identical disclosure requirements as the Form S-1.
http://www.goingpublicinformation.com/Reporting_and_Compliance.htm
Amazon only helps the company but good attempt to try to cast a negative light on it. GRCU paid the same listing fee as Apple and Abby's Apple Emporium and everyone else selling there. GRCU is on Amazon and that is exactly what any shareholders could have wanted to see.
Gerry is involved in the cannabis agricultural development and the advisory committee. So I really doubt either of those jobs requires a lot of face time around the Green Cures offices.
Indeed the downtrend was brutal on my liver but it looks like green weeks ahead with the elections, the big meeting explanation, vape pen, cbd cap restock, rico suave and many other things coming down the pipeline. Only top shelf from here forward.
I can't find the booth layout on the ICA website and there is no mention of it on the ICA Twitter or Facebook. Do you have a link to the booth layout?
The front page of the Wall Street Journal, haha one can wish right. Most likely we will have details flow in from Twitter and FB updates and we'll hear all the details after ICA is over (thats how the last ICA went for GRCU at least). I'm guessing Tuesday we get a PR if a big GRCU development is unveiled at the ICA. If nothing big happened for GRCU then i'm guessing at the minimum we get a new product this week to quell the bashers.
I think you need to look into how twitter works. The CCI twitter account only tweeted at Whoopi. If it was the other way round and Whoopi tweeted at CCI, then yes that would be true, but that is not the case.
The View is great and all but the fact that Josh Stanley was added in the last 24hrs as a speaker at ICA says way more. Regardless if GRCU was to team up with the Stanley Bros it would be only beneficial and bring great exposure. This weekend will be very exciting. GL to all.
http://internationalcannabisassociation.com/speakers/
My thoughts exactly, most of us here have done our dd and don't need be told what to do with our shares, the smart and aware are holding. Also no one wants to hear the bogus pps predictions where people try to act like clairvoyant godsends of pps movement.
New Site Live.
6 New Products today.
New products weekly.
If they just roll out 1 new product per week we'll have
7 on 9.23, 8 on 9/30, 9 on 10/7, 10 on 10/14, 11 on 10/21, 12 on 10/28, 13 on 11/4, 14 on 11/11, 15 on 11/18, 16 on 11/25, 17 on 12/2, 18 on 12/9, 19 on 12/16, 20 on 12/23, 21 on 12/30. So if they just release 2 new products instead of 1 new product in 9 of the next 15 weeks then we will have 30 new products on 12/30/14. Considering they have released 6 new products today I don't feel like this is to much of a stretch.
GRCU is already up to the plate and just running the count full to wear down the pitcher and then on the 3-2 count their gonna turn on the fastball and go yard. GRCU is using a aluminum bat in the big leagues, no worries at all. I'm guessing we see the website launch at 11 EDT/8 PDT. GL to all.
Thanks, but I think i'll look elsewhere to be educated. I don't need a education from anyone who doesn't think objectively and can't back up their theories with any substance. What was that stock's name and/or ticker?
If they were gonna go ahead with a reverse split they would have done the r/s then released fins and finally rolled out allcbd.com. But instead they operated as a company moving forward from current stock price and trying to build it up. Company's that r/s don't reduce the shares of their company by 300 million. A r/s will not happen.
I was trying to figure out the same thing. I agree the guidelines definitely seem to be a little vague. I looked up similar companies that were just upgraded from Pink limited to Pink Current that had the same financials GRCU had submitted and the most important thing I gathered was that the back log of financials must be up to date to get upgraded. Thankfully we have our backlog of financials up to date and a attorney letter on file that if from within the current year. Take a look at MGON specifically (Just upgraded to Pink Current on August 5th) as it is in almost the same position GRCU is in and also went sub penny as did GRDO as well. It looks like GRCU will be upgraded and from what I found it took 2-3 days for the tier change to take place. So I have my bets on before EoD Wednesday (-500) that we see a tier change upgrade to Pink Current.
If you want to look at the similar stocks that were upgraded in August from Pink Limited to Pink Current I added the links below.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MGON/filings
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GRDO/filings
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TRTH/filings
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SYPT/filings
The site went live just before 3:30 est.
Free shipping and handling on the CBD capsules!!
You can buy the CBD capsules if you add them to the wishlist then go to the wishlist and add them to the cart. Their clearly working out the functionality right now and it will all be working by open monday
I was definitely worried the fins wouldn't be produced today. But Calkin came through and had me feeling like this
Yes I agree. Meki Cox is most likely out of her previous role with GRCU since she is off the OTC and gcbdinc websites listing of employees, which were both updated in the last week. I still think she is around though probably in a lesser role or maybe she moved to CCI completely. We will most likely know by EoD tomorrow. The next 2 days are gonna be interesting.
The website gcbdinc.com was updated yesterday with links to their newly updated twitter and facebook pages. They also added the allcbd sub page to the site which you can see here:
http://gcbdinc.com/project/all-cbd/
And the proof it was updated yesterday:
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 18:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<title>All CBD</title>
<link>http://gcbdinc.com/project/all-cbd/</link>
<comments>http://gcbdinc.com/project/all-cbd/#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 23:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>
<![CDATA[ admin ]]>
</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcbdinc.com/?post_type=project&p=430</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p><img width="454" height="480" src="http://gcbdinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/allcbd.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="AllCBD" /></p><p>http://allcbd.com</p>
]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[
<p><img width="454" height="480" src="http://gcbdinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/allcbd.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="AllCBD" /></p><p>http://allcbd.com</p>
]]>
</content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://gcbdinc.com/project/all-cbd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
Well Mr Power your right and wrong. Yes they have until November 20th to respond so the filing isnt dead in a sense. But your wrong overall due to the fact that CBD Centers was refused for being merely descriptive.
CBD Centers trademark was refused since the description is vague. For a trademark to be passed they would have to file Green Cures CBD Centers which would make it unique. This can all be read in the link I provided again.
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn86226441&docId=OOA20140520132143#docIndex=0&page=1
SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL - MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes a feature, ingredient or characteristic of applicant’s goods and/or services. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.
For this application to proceed toward registration, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may also have other options for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements.