Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Amazing.
Glad to see Iain come out strongly.
Sad to see that all of NeoMedia's much-touted involvement with GSMA , OMA and MC2 (Mobile Codes Consortium) has gotten us nowhere and seemingly given NeoMedia no credibility or consideration in the space.
What happened to all the great things which were supposed to come out of our involvement with Tim Kindred's creation and the other members in it?
Where are Chip's fingerprints other than on the NeoMedia safe which he burglarized? (All who got Chip's b.s. megalomaniac email will know exactly what that means.)
What happened to how great the below was supposed to be for NeoMedia? NeoMedia didn't seize anything , NeoMedia has had seizure after seizure.
Mobile Marketing Seizes the World: Global Mobile Industry Bodies GSMA and OMA Commit to Push Worldwide Mobile Barcodes Standards
Monday December 17, 2007 6:26 pm ET
ATLANTA, GA and AACHEN, GERMANY--(MARKET WIRE)--Dec 17, 2007 -- NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (OTC BB:NEOM.OB - News), the global leader in camera-initiated transactions for mobile devices, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Gavitec AG - mobile digit, both co-founders of the Mobile Codes Consortium (MC2), today announced that the MC2 initiative has convinced the GSM Association (GSMA) and the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA), two of the global mobile phone industry's representative bodies, to drive the global adoption of mobile marketing using 2D barcodes.
Up $1.13 on over 200K shares with no news
I think perhaps the production in the DOGGR FTP table for June is sinking in?
Or some of the shorts are quickly trying to get into 'compliance' with the SEC's tougher stance?
Or both?
Whatever it is , that's a good day!
jonesie
Great stuff clawmann, thanks for posting.
Very relevant to NeoMedia.
"as it may force hedge funds to reveal that they are violating no-shorting provisions in their contracts with their clients."
Wow, think YAGI might have been doing a little bit of that? Noooooo, how could that BE!!?? lol, they are our FRIEND. People said they could NOT do that because it was in the contracts that they couldn't. LOL
Amazing this is now becoming a bigger issue during this financial meltdown. Some deep-pocketed well-connected friends of Washington must be losing some money and aren't happy? Poor guys.
Yep , he went through a re-exam
Had claims rejected in a non-final , talked to them some more , had a few canceled and most approved , possibly after making some amendments to various claims.
Is Hunter 'wit us or agin us' in something like this? Is he doing this kind of thing on his own , or does it have anything to do with NeoMedia?
Kevin Hunter
Ft. Myers FL
Current: Consultant at Independent Consulting (Self-employed)
Past: NeoMedia Technologies; Symbol Technologies; Pitney Bowes; Bell Laboratories
Primary technical person involved in NeoMedia’s patent strategy, both in the development of NeoMedia ... Chief Scientist at NeoMedia Technologies ...
Transaction History is interesting
Date Transaction Description
09-10-2008 Issue Notification Mailed
08-19-2008 Dispatch to FDC
08-19-2008 Application Is Considered Ready for Issue
08-18-2008 Issue Fee Payment Verified
08-18-2008 Issue Fee Payment Received
05-22-2008 Mail Examiner's Amendment
05-22-2008 Mail Notice of Allowance
05-21-2008 Notice of Allowance Data Verification Completed
05-20-2008 Document Verification
05-12-2008 Examiner's Amendment Communication
05-09-2008 Paralegal TD Accepted
03-03-2008 Terminal Disclaimer Filed
04-15-2008 Date Forwarded to Examiner
03-03-2008 Response after Non-Final Action
02-28-2008 Mail Non-Final Rejection
02-04-2008 Non-Final Rejection
09-20-2006 Information Disclosure Statement considered
11-16-2006 Information Disclosure Statement considered
07-24-2007 IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete
07-24-2007 Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU
11-16-2006 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
11-16-2006 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
09-20-2006 Reference capture on IDS
09-20-2006 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
09-20-2006 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
03-13-2006 Preliminary Amendment
03-28-2006 Application Dispatched from OIPE
03-28-2006 Application Is Now Complete
03-13-2006 Payment of additional filing fee/Preexam
11-08-2005 Claim Preliminary Amendment
03-13-2006 Small Entity Statement (37 CFR 1.27)
03-13-2006 Applicant has submitted new drawings to correct Corrected Papers problems
01-13-2006 Notice Mailed--Application Incomplete--Filing Date Assigned
11-18-2005 Cleared by OIPE CSR
11-16-2005 IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security Review
11-08-2005 Initial Exam Team nn
Nice catch krays ...
.... from the uspto site:
"Patent 7,430,588 is scheduled to be Issued on 09-30-2008"
Isn't that something?
Two last trades, 450,000 shares each, one at .0050 then one at .0049
With what seems to be a lot of time in front of us before anything meaningful can happen , I wonder how long this price range will hold up?
From the time the CC was first mentioned and today , NEOM saw lows of .0022 and highs of .0077. (Tell us thank you YAGI , that must have worked well for you)
The PPS spent a lot more time below .005 than it did above it ... and we kindasorta had something to look forward to during that time.
During that time we heard all the 'good' news about:
NeoMedia and Papa John's Deliver FREE Pizza on the Go
NeoMedia and Format Dynamics Join Forces to Integrate Innovations in Online & Offline Advertising
NeoMedia Shareholder Conference Call Information Released
NeoMedia Secures $8.7 Million Financing Commitment to Accelerate Implementation Plans
Easy Access to Mobile Content on the Go - NeoReader for the iPhone
NeoMedia's Patent Review Moves to Next Phase; Focus Is on Jumpstarting the Category
neo@ogilvy Gets NeoReader and NeoSphere
One seeming difference between Iain and Chip:
Iain isn't averse to putting out PRs which do nothing for the stock price.
Chip seemed not to like doing that , as we went around 9 months with essentially no PRs at all under Chip.
Perhaps that's why YAGI made the change , hoping that a little more PR-pumping would help the price? If so , they must be a little disappointed.
Who knows.
JMO
jonesie
With TIV showing ~ 870 BOEPD in June ....
.... as Geo pointed out , including all 'confidential wells' , what does that say about TIV's past PR's touting 2000+ BOEPD being 'clear and unequivocal'?
What do you now think about "the premise of (my) post that there is "uncertainty" or doubt about these numbers" ??
What happened to "TIV $15 by August IMO." ??
What happened to "How can they say it? Because it is true, if they were lieing(sic) they will go to jail."
Will you be checking on the Visiting Days schedule?
Just messin' with ya , but it does just go to show .....
jonesie
Well Banks , you actually said ....
.... "The CC won't be over 15 minutews"
Everybody knows a minutew is twice as long as a minute , so your prediction was understood to mean 15 minutews or 30 minutes.
Anything to keep you from getting arrested in Times Square lol
NASCOW , nothing wrong with dreaming! ;)
As to "fair play ... take out the corruption ... make the playing field equal for all" .... it's 'fair and equal' for those with the money.
The otcbb is the rigged game that siphons money out of average Joes' pockets and puts it into the pockets of the Chas's and YAGI's of the world , along with their lawyers.
The best thing Joe can do is play along with them , be quick about it , and never buy into a story.
You know the only reason NEOM bothers with paying people to do all the SEC filings is so they can stay on the otcbb. It's the only way they can run their game. Go 'non-reporting' and they hit the pink sheets , fewer people 'play' there , and fewer people will buy the shares YAGI and execs dump. I think one of the requirements in the YAGI financings is that NEOM has to do the filings and stay on the otcbb.
Don't forget Table A in the Info Box on the board linked to in my signature. YAGI clients don't show much green over time , just red. NEOM is the poster child.
JMO
jonesie
You didn't miss much.
A third of the promised time.
They can't seem to follow through on the simplest of statements.
Say a CC is going to take place in August , then change it to September ... prompting of course all sorts of speculation as to 'oh me oh my , why would they be doing that , it must mean something great!' lol
Say a CC is going to last 75 minutes , prompting all sorts of speculation about 'oh me , what great news they must be having to share with us , 75 minutes is a long time!' Then actually talk for 26 minutes and forget to even introduce the boilerplate guy David with a title. Here's David!
If they can't stick to even the simplest of original statements like those ........
jonesie
That's possibly true.
'Stock manipulation' is generally overcome via successful execution of a sound business plan , and/or the reasonable expectations of the market about the likelihood of that happening. Even then , stocks are subject to minor manipulations such as being taken down to take out stop loss orders , or taken up on low volume to entice buying ... but in the face of strong execution that all takes place within the context of a generally rising share price.
Until NeoMedia proves pending success to be the case via revenues-generating activities and constructive partnerships , NEOM will most likely remain subject to erratic fluctuations benefiting those holding the keys to the cash register , e.g. , the MM's and YAGI , and benefiting the penny stock traders who play the swings.
JMO
jonesie
You're correct , I remember that ...
.... pretty much all predictions have fallen by the wayside over many many months. All predictions about which new team was doing great things and were going to do more , which great resume meant that great things were afoot , whose horsepower was going to drive us to huge equity stake partners .. on and on lol.
Oh well.
Hey cloud3
I am not holding myself out as a trading expert in sub-penny stocks , I threw out an idea or two with clawmann.
And offered an answer to you when you asked how can trades go off below the bid or above the ask.
You're right , it could have been any number of things. It could even have been drmyke talking an MM into filling his buy order at .003.
;)
jonesie
I think you'd be right clawmann ...
... without that trade restriction some would have sold at a higher price. Forcing that sort of 'large' sell into on AON order means the price you're going to get could be way on down there in a weak stock like NEOM.
Somebody just wanted to dump. Even YAGI would have a hard time making money selling at .003 , wouldn't they? I mean, how low has the PPS been in the last 30 days?
jonesie
YAGI gets to convert ....
.... meaning in this case to acquire shares , at a discount to the lowest price in the last 30 days , and then sell at a higher price.
Let's say NEOM trades at .0025 on Oct. 1 , and on Oct. 30 is trading at .005. On 10/30 YAGI can convert some of their preferred shares at a discount to that .0025 price and start trying to sell them at .005.
Instant profits , and the dumping by YAGI dampens any and all upsurges in the PPS.
jonesie
The way that is done Clawmann ...
... is to announce in a CC and PR at the same time. It's done all the time. PR hits the wires just before the CC , then they can talk about it in the CC , everybody is happy.
Those who expected anything worth anything to come out of this CC or to be announced in conjunction with it must be disappointed.
jonesie
Here's one we can scratch off ...
... a prediction about this '75 minute CC' we just heard
"One would think that what ever they have to say must be substantial" "I'm thinking that what ever it is, it has to be something big"
Same ol' same ol' in NEOM-land.
Good summary TVDirector ...
... nothing in that CC implying any revenues any time soon.
When stocks are in that situation the PPS drifts , and usually downwards.
There will be 'buying opportunities' and 'flipping opportunities' for any so inclined.
So , should we go back over some of the predictions made as to the blockbuster news that was certainly going to be made public during this CC?
LOL
jonesie
What happened?
Well , it was exactly as we initially said when those PRs came out ... they were short-lived bursts which TIV PR'd at the highest possible short term output ... and we knew that , because even TIV called them 'tests'.
"Maybe the other 4 wells they drilled (drilled 8 total?) are held confidential/not reported"
Nope. DOGGR has to put them all on the FTP site , I have that in writing from DOGGR. If it isn't on that list I just published , it didn't produce in June.
It is what it is.
jonesie
What a crock.
Thank you clawmann.
No R/S is good. We'll see.
Is it over? What happened to 75 minutes?
LOL , that was the most bs non-CC CC I ever heard.
Yorkville funding ... milestones ...
'on track' with milestones
what was that about the reverse stock split? what did he say?
"Trust us"
LOL
I suppose David is the new CFO? Maybe not , as he wasn't even introduced with a title. If he is , I just hope he doesn't have a handler like Tatum behind him and cost us $33,000 a month lol.
I wonder if Iain will have the guts to address all the 'sell NeoMedia' verbiage in his employment contract ... and then will he honestly address how much money YAGI would get first and how that could leave us with nothing ... and leave Iain with $1MM in commission on a minimum sale.
Hey , I'm hearing what I said we would hear ... the "we need" speech. Lots of 'it needs' , 'we need' , etc etc.
'presence in China' LOL
'instrumental' in other entities' white papers ... lol , yeah that puts revenues on the table.
'first to release barcode scanner for iPhone' ... well that's a flat out lie as we know.
SEC Tightens Short-Sale Rules, Calls For Firm Close-Out
Last update: 9/17/2008 10:01:06 AM
By Judith Burns
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Securities and Exchange Commission announced measures Wednesday to curb abusive "naked short sales" by imposing a firm close-out requirement on short sellers and their brokers.
Short sellers and brokers must deliver securities borrowed for short sales on the trade settlement date, three days after the transaction, or face penalties if they do not, the SEC said.
The tighter delivery requirement was adopted by the SEC as an interim final rule, and will take effect for all public-company securities starting at 12:01 a.m. EDT on Thursday.
Additionally, the SEC finalized two other changes it had previously proposed. One eliminates an exception from the close-out requirements for options market makers, making them subject to the same rules as everyone else. Regulators said that change will take effect five days after it is published in the Federal Register.
The SEC also approved a new anti-fraud rule targeted to short sellers who lie about the ability to deliver borrowed securities. That change takes effect immediately, the SEC said.
Short sellers aim to profit from declining stock prices by borrowing shares to sell and replacing them later at a lower price. So-called "naked" short sellers do not borrow shares before engaging in short sales and may never do so, a practice that can have punishing effects on a stock's price.
SEC Chairman Christopher Cox said in a statement that the changes "make it crystal clear that the SEC has zero tolerance for abusive naked short selling."
cloud, the bid and/or ask isn't ....
.... just all about the price.
It's also about the quantity of the order relative to the quantity on the bid or ask , and also about the terms of the order , such as 'all or nothing' , etc.
When someone is motivated to dump quickly ....
.... obviously they have to dump below the best bid.
The best bid might be for a relatively small number of shares.
Someone was motivated to sell , and someone was bottom-fishing , or a MM bought them figuring there will always be another little run where they can profit.
Well , isn't that exciting
.003 going into the CC
DOGGR Tables showing June Production
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/monthly_production_reports/2008/06-2008.pdf
TIV JUNE PRODUCTION NOW ON THE DOGGR FTP SITE
Including the wells at Oxnard.
At first glance it appears something besides actual oil & gas production revenues must have been included in the 2Q08 Oil & Gas Revenues which showed in TIV's 2Q08 10-Q.
I say that because when we took those total revenues , then backed out the known April and May production numbers for all wells (including the 'C' wells) , it was possible to calculate that the quarterly revenues could have predicted as much as 54,000 bbls of June oil production from Pleasant Valley (Oxnard).
However , in this DOGGR report , it appears that Oxnard had total June production of 17,740 bbls.
I don't have time to do much analysis at the moment and can only say that:
- Total Gas Production for June , 25,668 mcf , appears to be lower than our estimate of ~36,000 mcf. That estimate assumed that June gas production would be the same as May , and actually June production turned out to be lower than May.
- Oxnard production , 17,740 bbls , was less than a third of a revenues-based estimate I made of ~54,000 bbls. On a positive note though , June's Oxnard production was nearly double Oxnard's May production of 9,696 bbls.
It's a head - scratcher ... where did all of those 2Q08 O&G revenues come from? It really doesn't look like it was solely oil and gas production , what else got thrown in there?
JMO
jonesie
Excellent prognostication , TVDirector
Remember those clear double-walled glasses with the sealed outer 'layer' filled with liquid ... but the glass was actually empty?
Now we can hope for a surprise.
jonesie
p.s. Be still , grasshopper lol
Wow ....
.... we're rocking and rolling now.
CC (Cynical Communication) tomorrow?
jonesie
Sad trading action.
I'm sure Iain is a perfectly good magician , like all the predecessors. Able to make money magically disappear out of others' pockets and reappear in theirs LOL.
lesnshawn, I'll try to do as you suggest tomorrow. Headed out the door , be back late this evening.
Good luck to us all! Apparently we really need some!
jonesie
As I recall ....
.... you first brought up the "differences between corporate officers and non-corporate officers" when it was pointed out to you that your comment "TG is not a VP" was false , and irrelevant to the original simple statement that if she and a few others were buying , we would know it via filings. It was a minor point which certainly didn't need all of the unproductive and unsuccessful attempts at refutation.
I don't think anything went over anybody's heads at all. Most here (and certainly most in the market at large) seem to have a good grip on the fact that it is only wild speculation to say Chip accomplished anything at all , and that aside from a trial and some more of those old 'strategic partnerships' which seem to fade away , nothing much has been done in years ... except pay high CEO/CFO salaries and bonuses and get us deeper and deeper into highly dilutive debt.
I will give NeoMedia kudos on what seems to be best-efforts on the patents front. Whether anything comes out of that or not remains to be seen , but they are doing their best there , IMO.
jonesie
Thank you clawmann.
So my original statement was correct, which was simply that Iain , Terry Griffin (VP of Marketing) , JJ Keil , and Christian Steinborn all could buy NeoMedia shares via a structured 10-b-5-1 plan so as to negate 'insider info' problems , and they all bear titles requiring SEC filings to be filed should they buy or sell shares in any manner at all.
Apparently this statement in which someone tried to refute the above "Additionally, TG is not a VP nor a corporate officer" is wrong on the first count and irrelevant on the other count as regards my original statements about Terry , because , as NeoMedia said , "Terry Griffin has been appointed as the Vice President of Marketing for NeoMedia Technologies" and your links take care of the rest , who cares whether she's a corp. officer or not and nobody said she was.
And , as regards "SW .... has already been replaced" , that is indeed material inside information as I said:
"That's material info. Whether or not Neomedia has hired a CFO is definitely material info. Anybody who knows that while it hasn't been released publicly is in possession of material information while flaunting FD regulations. That means the people on both sides of that conversation."
And I can't seem to find in any of my later comments where I said that a Corporate VP equates to a VP of marketing , so I don't understand why someone would try to say that I did. I was simply talking about who is a VP and who has to file if they buy or sell shares.
re: "Sieve still leaks? More nonsense." That's pretty funny when a recipient of leaks already posted that he knows something material (THE HIRING OF A CFO FOR CRYING OUT LOUD) which hasn't been publicly announced.
"90% claims being bogus? Maybe under CJ and MC's watch."
My 90% bogus claims comment obviously referred to 90% of the claims made by recipients of prior leaks and who were compelled to reiterate them via postings on this board , via telephone calls , and in private emails. I didn't mention bogus claims made under any particular watch. Just the leaked 'claims' , and the fact that 90% of the leaked claims turned out to be bogus.
I can't seem to find in my post anything about 'being p####d' or blaming anyone for anything or rehashing anything SS (Scott Shafer?) said or , hmmmm , I thought it was actually Tobin Smith who 'whistled' to sell. Why is it so difficult for some to converse logically and stick to facts and address the comments , rather than steer off into irrelevant areas? I just don't get it. This board is for discussing facts , simple facts like who is a VP and could buy and would have to file , and who is still posting material inside info before it's made public. It's really very simple. I would think someone would either address those simple statements logically or simply not respond. Responding with inaccurate statements and flat falsehoods merely wastes a lot of time and is extremely unproductive.
Thanks again for your links. I've been busy with other things and really haven't had much time to wade through any more misstatements of facts and nebulous arguments against statements which I never made.
cya tomorrow.
jonesie
p.s. So , back to one of the original thought in this thread ... as to who's left within NeoMedia to buy a little stock at a ridiculously low price and thus show a little confidence in the company ... plenty are left to buy , and they are not buying. I'm not demanding that they buy , I'm simply noting that there are some "left" who could , and they're not. Please don't anyone respond unless they have logical thoughts which directly and accurately relate to those statements LOL.
A VP is a VP.
There are lots of VP's of this and that at lots of public companies, and every one of them file their trades. I've been in one for years that has 6 VP's , representing various departments , and all file. I imagine Terry thinks more of her status as VP of Marketing than a peppermint. Simply stated , your comments don't stand up to the test of reality.
I stand by my comments on any unpublished knowledge of whether or not NeoMedia has replaced Scott Womble being material information. It's material information and shouldn't be disclosed to individual shareholders. Thanks for letting us know the sieve still leaks , it makes the company look bad and represents an ongoing problem and an ongoing mindset of willfully flaunting SEC rules. It certainly justifies my continued efforts in the area of bringing any miscreants , past and present , to justice. With all the comments about having the SEC look into various aspects of NeoMedia , I should think it might be better to leave out those kinds of conversations , rather than mentioning them in an effort to seem more 'plugged in'. Certainly past efforts to seem 'plugged in' to the manholes have ended disastrously , there must have been broken toes from kicking so much unrelated fiber , and with 90% of the claims turning out to be completely bogus .... enough already.
Conveniently address anything you like.
Spell check doesn't catch words like whoose , which would seem to be a misspelling of whose ... when in fact, the correct word would have been who's , a contraction of 'who is'. You make a far bigger deal out of it than I did lol , but literacy still applies , not typos.
Y'all have a good Monday. Hopefully NeoMedia has something legitimate to say in their one-way 'CC' later this week.
jonesie
Nah , it's simply literacy.
Did something change after this?
"Terry Griffin has been appointed as the Vice President of Marketing for NeoMedia Technologies."
http://www.neom.com/86.html?&tx_ttnews[backPid]=17&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=254&cHash=1bc16b94a4
I haven't read anything about Scott Womble being replaced.
Is that the inside info chatting thing again? That's material info. Whether or not Neomedia has hired a CFO is definitely material info. Anybody who knows that while it hasn't been released publicly is in possession of material information while flaunting FD regulations. That means the people on both sides of that conversation.
Next...
jonesie
NOTICES TO DRILL, RE-WORK, ABANDON
(TIV , or DOGGR , put this in on 8/30 even though they had it in the 8/23 report already)
1 notice to drill for Tri-Valley for week ending 8/30/08
Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Company
"Carneros" 480WI
030-37230
30
28S
21E
South Belridge
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/weekly_summary/2008/08-30-2008.pdf
No notices for Tri-Valley for week ending 9/6/08.
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/weekly_summary/2008/09-06-2008.pdf
Good point , personalizit.
As to "What is wrong with people" ... the market in general prices things fairly efficiently , most of the time , especially in these sub-penny toxically financed vehicles which , while providing trading profits via manipulation , pumps , dumps , runs on rumors , etc etc ... seldom pan out. I suppose the few people who think NeoMedia is priced incorrectly could be right , and the rest of the market , the huge part of the market that is NOT buying ... could be wrong. Maybe in this particular case the market isn't a forward looking mechanism , and isn't really thinking NEOM shares will be worth somewhere between zero and a penny 6 months from now. Maybe YAGI really thinks NEOM will be worth a lot more down the road , but goes ahead and sells tens of millions of shares every chance they get because they don't really want the bigger profits they would garner if NeoMedia hit .04 to .07.
As to "whoose left" , or perhaps more correctly put , "who's left" ... uh , maybe those 25+ employees that NeoMedia was hiring at "breakneck speed". Maybe a few of those. Iain is left , and he could buy with a structured plan regardless of inside knowledge. JJ is left and he could do the same. Terry Griffin is a VP right , she could buy with a plan and we'd know about that. Dr. Steinborn could buy with a plan , and we'd know about that as well. Scott Womble , former CFO who apparently left out of frustration based on his knowledge of what is really going on , owned the huge sum of 200K shares when he left as I recall. Perhaps if Scott had thought this was the market inefficiency deal-of-the-century , he might have collected a few more shares along the way. 200K would have to put him near the bottom of the list of holdings of nearly anyone still paying attention to this stock and/or posting on this board.
Just one alternate reality to consider.
And JMO
jonesieHopingForAPopIntoTheConferenceCallThat'sNotReallyAConferenceCall
You are absolutely right clawmann , well said (lol)
YAGI makes a killing doing that , over and over. Managers and directors who accepted the terms , and those who continue to play this game of turning the company over to YAGI chunk by chunk in return for their handsome salaries and bonuses , feel no pain at all. And they seem to be too arrogant/scared to take one question from common shareholders.
Speaking of which , your post about a pre-recorded CC was a hoot. Listen closely for any sounds of Bena tinkling champagne glasses in the background.
I hope the wait (having it in a later month than Iain originally said) will be worth it.
Welcome to the NeoMedia Pre-Recorded Conference Call.
For your listening pleasure we will first have 20 minutes of boilerplate Safe Harbor CYA verbiage before you can make your selections.
You will not be allowed to ask questions of management because we don't want to answer any , we don't care what you think or say , you suckers have paid our salaries by buying shares from YA this long , what are you going to do about it now?
Press 1 for the 'we want, we need' speech.
Press 2 for the 'visions and goals Part Deux' speech.
Press 3 for a moving reading of the 'my fingerprints will be all over the new non-radioactive NeoMedia/Ecosystem conglomerate' email , with the reader standing on a giant.
Press 4 to hear the song "YA Is Our Friend" sung to the tune of Kumbayah.
Press 5 to hear about the latest in SP's , LOI's and MOU's which contain no protein , carbohydrates , fat , calories or revenues.
Press 6 to hear how we're going to accomplish the YA mandates for obtaining the 2nd and 3rd funding tranches with less and less money and no CFO.
Press 7 to hear a European vacation summary from Chas your ex-COB/CEO who cashed in millions in stock , even after selling you his and his dad's worthless company for more millions , all approved by JJ Keil.
Press 8 to hear recommended phrases you can use in various discussion forums but which we don't dare say in PRs because even we don't have the gall to do that.
Press 9 to hear the 'I feel very grateful to everyone that has supported NeoMedia and will make sure that the company succeeds moving forward. I understand the frustration of the shareholders and I know what that feels like. But please notice that I did not say anything about YOU people profiting in any way' speech.
Press 0 as a reminder of what we think you common shareholders are.
Press 00 for a reminder of how many zeroes there are after the decimal point in our share price.
Thank you for your continued support. Our families , attorneys , boat dealerships and cruise directors all appreciate it very much. The next conference call will take place whenever we feel like it , but that is a forward looking statement and actual results may very significantly.
LOL krays , I probably would too ...
.... especially since I like messing around with new technology anyway.
3 trading days (after today) to the Conference Call! Or Audio To Shareholders, whatever a conf. call that isn't a conf. is called. Hopefully we'll hear something even better!
jonesie