Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Those runs were based on pure bullshit.
____________________________________
As is everything this company does. Anyone in doubt? Just look at the track record. It's all talk. No substance. No performance. No achievement. Credit where credit is due but there's nothing due here.
Quote: this gonna run finally or what
_______________________________
'Or what' is likely your answer.
Quote: But in this promotion we’ve heard about the 1715 fleet and Juno.
2 sites in 2 days.
_________________________
And the farmer hauled another load away. They just might do better in the horse and bull fertilizer business. Shipwreck and treasure discovery certainly doesn't seem to be there calling.
Reiterated the Toy works, and we’ve been told a site can be scanned in one day.
______________________________________
That for which they're now so famous. The old smoke pipe up ones 'ars'. What else are they going to say at this point in time, that it doesn't work.
I'm starting to get a great view coming up from the so called hot air balloon in your words! Don't worry I'll buy you a pitty beer!! Jmo
Bullish
___________________________________________
Good for you. Hope you're wearing your parachute. As for the pitty beer, keep that in reserve for your own consumption. I have a strong feeling you'll need it.
Looking forward to tomorrow’s hype fest.
________________________________
More hot manure gas for the balloon. All talk and no substance.
Quote: I would love to see this get back over a penny. Let's gooooo.
_________________________________________________
There is nothing of substance here. Never has been.
Hot air balloons only stay aloft for just so long.
Quote: Perhaps the ships name is "El Premio Gordo"
_________________________________________
By appearances, perhaps that may be the CEO's nickname.
Quote: OMG you’re gonna loves this. $15B valuation…..
explained.
_______________________________
So that's where the 15B valuation came from. Absolutely incredible bullshit speculation.
Don't know the name of the ship. Don't know the nationality. Don't know when it sank, and of course no treasure registry. All based on fairy tale speculation in a sit down with the Fisher's. Are you aware of the fact that in any serious studies based on Atocha marketing verifications; auctions, treasure tour marketing and private sales, the probable amount definitely falls under one hundred to one hundred fifty million. I just loved the statement 'Fisher somewhat famous'.
The numbers this CEO yarn spinner is throwing around is unsubstantiated 'bait' and down right borders on fraud. I can see his way out of that is 'Well that's what the Fisher's said'. What a crock.
Quote: Maybe he meant the academic world, but…..
the business model they’ve put forward isn’t feasible. Nor does it/will it impress the academic world.
They virtue signal to the academics yet claim 2 wrecks may have $19B in treasure.
They put out YouTube videos with BILLION$ in the thumbnail, but if they recovered it they say they wouldn’t sell any.
The crap they come up with is beyond absurd.
_______________________________________
Short and to the point. Academics loathe treasure hunters as do most governments, especially Spain. This company is no imposing threat to either in so much that they don't know how to find shipwrecks, have never found one, never worked one, and have never recovered anything worthy of mention in over fifteen years. Pathetic.
Quote: Kyle is clueless if he thinks the……
scientific world and the treasure hunting world are worlds apart.
_____________________________________
Clueless indeed. How correct your statement is .....'worlds apart from the treasure hunting world'. Totally (intentionally) ignoring the existence of 3D sub-bottom profilers and side scan sonar. Totally ignoring advanced marine magnetometers. Totally ignoring marine ferrous non-ferrous metal detectors - diver and from the surface operated. All of these remote sensing instrumentations are what have FOUND shipwrecks and treasure while his toy hasn't found jack crap. Only the unknowing would believe such a statement as he made.
Quote: The industry is shaking in its boots…….
____________________________________
Another load of horse shit for the unknowing.
Quote: I shared this elsewhere. A certain affiliate…….
is trying to suggest it’s STUPID to say a fully reporting company would have to disclose finding billion$ in a timely manner and could just wait until they could retrieve it all.
______________________________________________________-
Thats pure horse shit. I know what the diving and treasure hunters community is all about. The news would be all over the place. Watching the pattern of disclosure of this company clearly indicates they're desperate to show and announce anything. Their total lack of success rather spells this out.
Quote: They tout when they have nothing to……
tout. Kyle claimed years ago the Toy gave them 100’s of new targets. So what are these targets if it sees all and knows all?
_____________________________________
Its all a hot air balloon ride. No performance no achievement. I'm inclined to believe the cheerleading squad posting here are also aware of it but certainly won't admit it. After all this time they just can't be this naive.
Quote: If it only takes a single day to scan……..
a site, where’s the data? And if the data shows they’ve have located treasure isn’t that a material event that requires disclosure?
____________________________________
The answers simple. They have nothing to show. They never do.
Quote: I guess it only takes a single day…….
_____________________________________
Notice how the cheerleading squad here prefers to ignore that just like they ignore the fact that the 1715 'Concepcion' was armed with 32 iron cannon. If the wreck had been there in their Melbourne area, the magnetometer survey would have detected them (even one) in a flash. The 'just-you-wait- and-see' Timmy Toy is what pipes the hot air into the SFRX balloon for now even though it's never found anything worthy of mention. Oh, but just you wait and see.
Quote: Up 20% in a day!!!! Any idea what that means to actual shareholders? Yep that's right moving higher. Of course it means nothing to none shareholders! I'll make sure to wave from the ship SFRX as it sails to those left standing on the dock! Lolo jmo
__________________________________
Dream on. Nothing wrong with that. You've been doing it now for years. Hot air balloon profits the name of the game here. Shipwrecks and treasure unimportant.
Topic for the next episode? No R/S……
Quote: until they uplist to the NASDAQ?
The big ole ballast pile?
Government grant?
They made the Florida Master List for a partial wreck find?
So many choices.
Happy Saturday!
__________________________________
As the saying goes - 'and the farmer hauled another load away'.
With this so called treasure hunting company the laughs are unending, while the chief comedian pulls 360 grand a year.
Quote: Well lookie lookie! Nice move higher today! Of course when you have shares it looks even better!!! 20% higher in a day!!
nice!! Jmo
___________________________________________
Yes, well lookie, lookie, a new no substance hot air balloon ride. No shipwreck, no treasure and no technology proven to do what it's supposed to do. All talk.
Amazing what creative media can do. Taking that old turd and putting it in the fancy candy bar wrapper and the ballon rises one again for a while. There are always going to be a new bunch of naive suckers to be reeled in as a result of creative media which is proven here. Of course if you own shares thats what it's all about. Finding shipwrecks and treasure becomes secondary.
Quote: It was just white noise on a message board.
___________________________________________
Better said as outright bull shit. Very common place here. As I stated, performance says it all and this company just doesn't perform and produce. All talk.
Quote: The Baer’s reports say Melbourne is just flotsam, and only an amateur might believe the Juno (ahem) treasure is miles from the ballast pile.
________________________________________________
You know (and they all do) that I labeled the Melbourne location as flotsam long before Baer put the same label on it. Assuming this is part of the 1715 Concepcion, I had even provided verifiable research quotes supporting why it would be flotsam, the main wreck site definitely not in that given area where they have been playing now for years. That was all ignored and swept under the carpet as the saying goes. As to Juno. Not even worth the time to do repeat quotes as I have previously done. That's a joke as is the company with its poor judgments and assessments. It's not necessarily what I say as the performance record speaks for itself.
Quote: Any of these folks stand out?……..
What successful projects have they been a part of?
_____________________________________________
You can't knock enthusiasm but they don't have any veteran treasure hunters on their team, As I have observed on going, this has been one of their problems. Inexperienced people including the CEO. Amateur hour.
This was a really good one…….
_________________________________
That is hilarious. To date, the truth is everything they say or do turns out hilarious. Particularly the 'shield the company' posts done by their cheerleading squad.
Quote: Once Treasure Found is announced,
_______________________________________
I believe that begins with the finding of a treasure bearing shipwreck which SFRX has yet to do. As I recall most fairytales begin with that word once like in 'Once Upon A Time' there was a CEO who raked in 350 K a year for producing jack squat in over fifteen years and the fairytale goes on.
Quote: $4B and $15B but not one trinket.
___________________________________
I'm just amazed that virtuous shareholders here are alright with this. Statements of four billion and 15 billion. Outright fraud bait. Without actual treasure manifests and projected marketing methods to produce those numbers, it's fraud. In the case of the Juno site, they don't even know the name of the ship, the date it sank and thus how could they know what her manifest was? Deplorable as is their just-you-wait-and-see horse shit technology.
When I heard the naive (ignorant) statements as made by Reynolds and Kennedy in their interviews it was clear they know nothing about finding shipwrecks or working shipwrecks. They've never found one and I doubt they ever will.
They tell us it can see silver and gold……
in the promos, but there’s been NO proof provided to confirm that claim.
Quote: But if it actually sees silver and gold on site they shouldn’t say anything before they confirm it?
#wereonthewreck
#quartermilefromarea2
#baseofahill
_____________________________________________________-
There are two or three posters (stockholders) here of apparent intellect that do everything to divert attention from recognition of the incompetence this company displays in just about everything they do. There are never facts to substantiate anything they do from A to Z.
#brockmcfly
Quote: There are known sites holding treasure and SFRX could prove it worked in a matter of days. For some reason affiliates suggest they prove it works where a positive ID hasn't even been made.
____________________________________
That's just the point I suspect they really don't want to do that on the basis that it doesn't work.
How many times have I posted here describing how simulation tests can be set up on a Spanish shipwreck site. As a diver I had been involved in doing one of these simulation tests on a 1733 shipwreck site in the Florida Keys. Does Tim Reynolds lack the common sense to understand this procedure? On the other hand I really have to wonder. I believe they reached the conclusion that wouldn't be wise. Like turning up the cards in a poker game once the bluff's been called.
Quote: SFRX has developed a successful new technology
___________________________________________
Really. A successful new technology? Successful one what basis?
Quote: I believe it does work and I am waiting patiently for the evidence which I believe is forthcoming.
___________________________________________
Good for you. Nevertheless, what you believe and what is factual are two very different things.
I stand by my comment saying neither he (Reynolds) or the CEO know anything about shipwrecks and treasure hunting. Their on record statements confirm that. Enjoy your wait.
Quote: I want to know if our armchair technologists still think SeaSearcher is a con like they have maintained for years. Where are your absolute statements that Episode three is just one big lie from start to finish based on your background in technology and knowledge of what SFRX is doing. All the other aspects of treasure hunting are really secondary if their technology does not work. Is it possible you were wrong all this time?
_______________________________________________
On my part I've never stated or even implied SeaSearcher is a con. I have tabled it as a pretty non-performing toy. If I'm wrong then correct me and tell me what it has done successfully - clearly documented with facts? What it supposedly does is already being done by surface towed and diver operated systems. The blind leading the blind when it comes to Reynolds and Kennedy respective to what they know about treasure hunting. Anyone with any real background in the field readily realizes this in short order by the very naive statements they make. Actually not surprising when taking into consideration the fact that neither of them have ever found or worked a Spanish Colonial period shipwreck. Allot of nonsense.
Quote: I also don't understand why anyone would be here that doesn't own shares in sfrx?. Jmo
___________________________________________
You say you don't understand? The answer is very simple. Watch dog process to cite misrepresentations, false statements and incompetence in hopes it might give the naive observer the fair opportunity to do their own due diligence and come to their own conclusions.
This has been an on gong all talk and no performance company for going on two decades. Between the CEO the Timmy Toy inventor it's the blind leading the blind. Neither of them knows anything about shipwrecks or treasure. How could they. They have never found one or worked one.
Quote: I will take a source that is known and on the record over an anonymous poster.
Bullish
______________________________-
So good for you. 'A source' known of what merit in the treasure hunting / treasure finding business? Hardly creditable.
Quote: Well Timmy just told shareholders to……
ease up on the high expectations in Episode 3. Think long term but we’re getting there, he said.
Multiple shipwrecks over decades of time.
__________________________________________
Once again creative media fashioning the old turd into that fancy candy bar wrapper. To the naive viewer it's impressive but to the experienced not so. Reynolds obviously knows little to nothing about shipwrecks and the proven methodology used to 'proof' a new found site. Not months or decades. The Timmy Toy is pretty but here again the naive viewer is not aware of the fact that there are 3D side-scan and sub-bottom profile instrumentations that does the exact same thing that the Toy allegedly does. I just love seeing that during Reynolds interview, one can recognize the real tool that FINDS SHIPWRECKS, that being the Geometrics G-882 Cesium magnetometer. Hilarious. On further comment, the Atocha site was not found by mistake as Reynolds stated. Where he came up with that who knows.
Quote: Not because such an item wasn’t on the manifest, but because someone else told them Torres was full of ship.
How could professionals fall for such a hoax? Seems to be a pattern with the company and it’s affiliates. The company claims to have been defrauded repeatedly.
____________________________________________________
Never in the history of modern day treasure hunting has there been a clown show such as this one.
Quote: You sure you're math is accurate since sfrx started working Melbourne? Heck next month I think it could be 30 years since sfrx started searching Melbourne! Just my opinion of course. 40 years by January!!
____________________________
Actually it's not even relative. Be it 15 years or 50, this company is a repetitious failure wherever they are. That's a clearly established track record. Incompetence.
Quote: 23 years in at Melbourne and they haven't gotten past the first question while ignoring the third one. At least the lights came on with the folks HTQ.
_________________________________________
By performance in evidence, this not a professional outfit. Never had been and I seriously doubt it ever will be.
Quote: And then let's all see some proof of it functioning in the wild, not just the lab!
______________________________________________
"AMEN"
"RIGHT-ON"
QUOTE: I'm glad that Seafarer has decided to put this information out there as such. It should get alot more awareness of SFRX and who and what they are. When Treasure is found, this should really help propel the PPS upward with alot more eyes on it, IMO.
___________________________________________________
Awareness of what an embarrassment.
'When treasure is found'? How does a company find treasure when they can't even find a shipwreck carrying treasure?
Quote: SeaSearcher will be discussed next week.
_______________________________________
Will they discussing the Timmy Toy's successful track record over the past two years? Looking forward to it. The SFRX turd in the fancy candy bar wrapper.
Quote: If they’ve moved on from Melbourne, then that……
would be progress, but Timmy said in Episode 1 they were tracking a 1715 wreck.
It will be interesting to see which direction they went, if true.
_________________________________________
Apparently the creative media promo putting the SFRX turd in the fancy new candy bar wrapper hasn't had very much influence.