Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hello, Perhaps you don't enable the tpm because those solution are driven from the hard drive and you couldn't get to them if the tpm was blocking your ability to get to them.
I am not aware of how or why this is done but have been told that it is done often. I suspect that it allows freedom in trading no matter how the stock is moving and ties into high speed computer trading. Thats my guess. sorry I don't know more but the reasons was to teach me to not take the short interest too seriously as the underlying reasons for creating shorts is more complex than my ability to think about them.
Hello Snackman-
I think I remember about 3-4 million shares that have been short for a long time prior to March of this year, maybe even at much higher higher prices than we see now. I also think that it is entirely possible that there are shorts in the subsequent 4 million shorts that are against long positions. This would diminish the possibility of a squeeze though it would be delightful. If shorts are against long shares held- is that information quantified any where?
The 5 million dollar acct is not Mazda. It was stated that it was an American based international automotive company. Mazda is not American based though it has a division--Mazda North America
It could have been an end of day trade, which is one of the ways that anyone can place an order.
It went through at 1:00.40 so it looks like that is how long it took to process at the end of the day--.40 seconds.
doesn't look anything wrong with it. It sure was a fun day.
Hello-
There was a projection of 5-10 possible by year end. Now there is a statement that there will be 1 completed orders by the end of the year with others Possible. The statement hardened not softened.
Hello go-kitesurf,
Steven has not said that we would do $40 million in 2010. He has said we should do $30 million and could do $40 million if some of the potential big sales came through in this fiscal year.
Hello-
The Last SRA Conference was in April 2010 and there was no subsequent private offering.
Steven has repeated frequently that there was not a need for an offering for operating cash.
Cash on hand has been in excess of debt and increasing for the last few quarters.
ExPatriate- What is it that mobile armor is doing and what resources/ articles show them "at worst close behind Wave"?
HELLO WEBY-
My understanding of close of market sales is that the market makers can choose any of the market close orders (pick the highest lowest or other to meet their own plans) to fulfill their role to balance the market. If correct it allows them a lot of latitude to create the closing price.
The two "competitors" are certainly weakened as they are not hard wired into any machines I know of.
thank you both.
Why do they count it twice? Do the other exchanges count transactions only once? Why isn't 50%= the number of shares changing hands?
Would you please explain how 17000+ shares traded equates to only 10,000 share trading hands?
Snackman's analysis matches what my accountant told me yesterday. He said that the people that shorted can and do in fact hold for extended periods of times. He suggested methods where they can use a small group of shorts to create an impression later that there is doubt about a companies
future prospects by doing a mass sales dump in order to scare weak holders into selling shares.
He also said that the 8 million figure is distorted as it is a june 30 snapshot.
Hello Mr. X,
They are a Lenovo Company. They also have quite a number of seats not yet using Wave.
Did you miss the account signed with one of the big four accounting/ consulting firms signed about a month ago-maybe two-I forget. It was a 60,000 seat contract. The consulting company is international dealing with fortune 500 companies. It could be very helpful if they start showing Wave or recommending it to their clients.
Both the Auto and the accounting firm have additional seats that should be upgraded at some point.
On E-trade the limitation is for both buy and sell orders. I have been informed that the restriction will last 2-6 months with the longer period more likely.
Your description of the cause is very accurate and I don't think the brokerages involved will be more specific publicly.
I have just received confirmation to my inquiries that the " call the broker policy " is due to a dishonest set of trades that used Wave as an ingredient. It was dishonest trading that uses various accounts at different brokerages but in this case it was E-trade that took the hit. The policy implemented is part of E-trades standard practice to insure the safety of customers accounts. The requirement is at E-trade only as thats where the damage was done. The requirement most likely will last for several months.
This is, of course, not good for frequent traders but it is the situation. I will do my infrequent trades through the phone and see how it works.
The issue with trading a e-trade has been going on for a week. It is an internal situation at e-trade likely not at all to do with anything at Wave. It could go on for a while.
I expect Wave will make it to one of the Russell averages but don't know which one. Our price to book ratio is not great and I don't know how the the adjusting algorithm will effect our placement.
Russell list methodology
Please read the rest of the Russell methodology.
preliminary list developed at the end of May and published on June 11
update to list of additions and deletions on June 11 and June 18
Final list established June 25 and released June 28
http://www.russell.com/Indexes/membership/Reconstitution/default.asp
Russell lists are being deliberated. The final lists will be established later in this month.
You seem to like stirring things up with false facts and assumptions. I question your statement that
if a seller(Dell) makes a sale for Wave that it is a Wave-Dell deal. Your statements about comparing 09 and 10 revenues from Dell might be related to the increased contracted rates from Dell. The contract rates were increased in late 08- retroactive to Nov 08. All 09 sales were at the new rate and can be used as a base number.
Hello-
I'm one of the many lurkers but do have a strong interest in Wave. For the stock there are approximately 10 market makers and each has their own book of buys and sells. It is almost futile to see what each is doing and then trying to factor in the computerized trading which shows up all the time on level two.