Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Where's the local yocle, the drive by road side DD dud? Give him a personal invite....oh yeah, "it's staged! " lolololol...
Ifus strong
The boot boys are in trouble. I'm only scratching the surface in the Jersey case. It's another dud case that'll be tossed.
"Who's next!" lol
Actually, me having a copy of the file, the evidence is overwhelming. The boot boys were sunk and they knew it. That's leverage enough.
Nothing made up its fact. SA paid through the nose to keep his freedom.
There is no proof. Only conjecture and supposition. Still no answers to the 3 questions as an example, which would ultimately answer their own questions.
The SA and their Cabal's predictions have netted zilch. Absolutely none have panned out.
I think the 4th paragraph says it all. There'll never be anything posted ever about a notice of default, a court ordered payment schedule or an asset hearing.
Like I said, Ifus owes nothing. Good post
Note the "intl" ....moving to international. That's awesome
Fact is SA lost his a$$ets. He had to pay his own lawyer in the fed case which includes 50% of the judgement. Plus he had to pay his own atty fees.
I think the term "amicably settled" applies here. With the leverage MW had your kidding yourself to think he'd leave the fed case alone. What I think happened, the dullards served the fed case judgement up on a platter rather than have their heads on it.
The state case file is loaded with evidence and I know 100% MW was going to use the dullards illegal actions against them in court. Their depositions crucified them. "I don't know, didn't know" ain't a legal excuse.
The fact is its over. Ifus/mw owes nothing. That's verifiable.
As asked before, please answer the 3 questions I asked before.
Many thanks. Same to you and your family.
I think you'll find Ifus investors quite educated. I think you'll also find Ifus shareholders to be quite successful in life. All that aside and as stated in the original post, VWAP is useless for penny stocks. Too many variables.
Today's useless VWAP information is information the Ifus shareholders don't wanna know. Happy Thanksgiving
Yeah I know mine too. The two guys they sent....Their profile isn't very convincing. H&R Block and the failed accounting firm guy....talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel...hilarious.
New rock group "The Forensics" cracks me up.
Or
The new TV series comedy hit show "The Unforensics!" Sponsored by Dullard Inc.
"BTW, if Walthers had told Adelstein to "Give back the $500,000.00 judgment or I'll expose you to criminal prosecution," that would be extortion."
Actually this is inaccurate. Any settlement discussions are off limits even to the judge because the settlement process is held strictly confidential. No responsible judge would ask for this, they're only interested in the outcome....what's agreed.
Second, no responsible lawyer would even present it this way and even if he did (which I'm 100% sure he didn't), it would never be heard.
Last, I believe the criminal charges were presented in the front end of the suit and the counter suit and this is why MONTHS ago, when confronted with the evidence, the dullards were smart enough to go out and get a CRIMINAL DEFENSE TEAM. Remember them? What's amazing is, the SA Cabal said "MW would face criminal prosecution." Just another SA Cabal prediction that never panned out. The proof has always been that MW hired a civil attorney and not a criminal attorney. The dullards hired both....and for good reason. They were caught, they knew they were caught and their defense....well, lets say "I didn't know" aint going to cut it.
So to even suggest MW committed a criminal act in the settlement process is inaccurate and misleading....
Inaccurate at best. Please show me ONE reference MW was "labeled" anything. No responsible judge would do this and it makes no sense to do this. The judge would never leave an opening for an appeal based on the judge's bias. Never happened or even implied.
Rest easy my friend, as we've previously agreed, IFUS is LIVE money and is making progress. Our CEO is a can do will do and get it done guy who's pulled this company from the ashes and the SA/JS mess left behind. That's all done now and we're moving forward.
Yeah I know....but honestly, even if they could answer these questions, the answers would hurt them more than they think. JS told everyone close to him "we lost" and "we get nothing" so I doubt very seriously this is inaccurate. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer and I think it's just JAZZY! The dullards are singing the Thanksgiving Blues. Can't imagine how they feel. Their strategy to bk MW and IFUS didn't work, which means their legal strategy didn't work. I honestly think they believed with all the legal troubles IFUS faced (also as part of their strategy) the shareholders would pop smoke and evac. Maaan were they wrong......lolol
I am and I'm a major shareholder. I think MW is doing a great job and was and still is the right guy for the job. The site is very active, the court cases are done, no money going to the dullards and that's clear...not interested in the dullards fraudulent patent or any other baggage they represent.
Like you "IFUS STRONG" my friend. Happy Thanksgiving...good times for IFUS ahead.
My comments are in bold:
It seems the new company authorized propaganda line is that "The shareholders don't care!" "Shareholders are delighted with Walthers." Please be specific to which shareholders you are referring to. Not sure ANY agree they don't care!
Really? They don't care that ...
1. That MW had GUARANTEED a $3.5 million payback, but got $0$ and was hit with a 1/2 $Million$ judgment instead? IMO this is inaccurate and very misleading. Please show me proof MW stated this to anyone. The fact is, it was a possibility in the court if it went to trial. There is no proof MW EVER said this to anyone and never will be. First, because he didn't talk about the trial or the case. I think you'll find that every shareholder did their DD and found the information they needed and it didn't come from MW.
They don't care that ...
2. That MW had GUARANTEED the patent would be returned, but it wasn't. Again show me. Show me MW ever said this. This is completely inaccurate and misleading, unsupported with any fact. This is pure supposition on the SA and Cabal's part.
They don't care that ...
3. That MW had GUARANTEED huge profits for years, when the truth revealed in court was that he averaged only $150.00/yr in revenue. Again, misleading and inaccurate. Show me! New responsible CEO would ever say this imo and to be honest, the shareholders would never tolerate it. It would be questioned by the shareholders as soon as it was said. Even looking at the facebook posts, this was never even implied.
They don't care that ...
4. That MW had GUARANTEED the state case in December was a SLAM DUNK for IFUS, yet he threw it away and settled without getting a dime. I have a copy of the file from the courthouse, that I spent my time and my dime to go and get. First, the statement is inaccurate and misleading. MW NEVER said or implied this to anyone. I said it as a matter of fact, having a copy of the file in hand and the evidence laid out and quite clear that ANY reasonable jury and/or judge would find the dullard boys to have possibly committed the crimes as stated and this would have been handed over to the authorities for investigation and potential prosecution. The preponderance of the evidence against the dullard boys, there was little room for doubt. There depositions with answers to the interrogatories (as previously posted) were "we didn't know this was a crime," "how is this against the law," and "we didn't we were breaking the law." So with this, both the evidence was substantial AND there was no reasonable defense.
Do they really believe that ...
5. That the judgement ordered by a FEDERAL JUDGE AGAINST MW (our sole officer and director) - had no value and was meaningless and had no effect on the state case? As stated, please show me one single bit of evidence there was a payment schedule endorsed by the court; please show me anything relative to a hearing where MW would have had to divulge asset information; and last, show me any hearing allowing SA to go after these assets, either by attachment or to seize (from a default order of course).
I think the majority of the 576 shareholders of record care plenty. We do, but we do not listen to misleading and inaccurate statements. And i guarantee that investors not already mired in the IFUS swamp care even more I'm amazed that others try to speak accurately for the shareholders. I am a shareholder, I associate with what I believe to be the majority shares-shareholders and NONE feel "mired" at all.. They are not going to throw their money down the IFUS drain Agreed but one caveat. Shareholders don't feel like we're investing in a company that's going bust....drain! We believe in IFUS and in MW...simple as that ... just as they haven't for the last 2 1/2 years.
So, PLEASE SIR - JUST answer 2 simple Questions
A. WHO pays WHOM in this amicable settlement? No one pays
B. Did IFUS receive their patent back in the amicable settlement? Looking at the information presented under oath to the Patent Office, not sure IFUS would be interested in the patent the dullard boys have. They lied under oath to obtain it and it's clear on the form they submitted. From a shareholder's perspective (speaking for myself in this answer), don't want it and don't need it. Why would anyone want a patent obtained under fraudulent conditions? Why be a part of the problem and not the solution? Why put the company at more risk for future business? It's inaccurate and misleading to think IFUS would want this garbage from JS and SA, when ALL we've done in the past 2 1/2 years is to get rid of them.
That would make sense until the criminal charges were introduced and which the dullards were confronted with. It's clearly referenced in the file and no way they would the two turkeys want to go to trial with those hanging out there.....there'd be no escape from criminal prosecution and the dullards knew it....was the reason they went out and hired a criminal defense team.
A: Same answer as before. SA Cabal needs to answer the same 3 questions.
B: TBD
More like lose out and I win out. Ifus is live money.
Ifus strong
Irrelevant questions without clarification questions answered. Shareholders don't see the importance
Completely inaccurate and misleading with nothing to validate.
As stated before and will state again, the questions are mute to the shareholders. We don't care...why? We know the truth. It's the SA and cabal who won't accept it.
In addition I've noticed the SA cabal still hasn't answered 3 valid clarification questions.
As a shareholder who's very interested but thinks legal and logical shoe me proof mw said any of this.
VWAP is useless for pennies imo. But if there are people selling at this rate next week I have several people who've done their DD on Ifus who'll start buying. We'll have at least 7 new shareholders.
The other side, SA and that Cabal is not interested in the truth. Deliberate false statements of debt, and (who cares nonsense) the matter of who pays who...ridiculous fodder for the blogs.
Straight answers (truth) aren't good enough. No one pays and the patent .....TBD.
So your right. Shareholders don't care about any of it. Speaking for myself, as a major shareholder I care about the company moving on. There's life beyond the court cases...and the blogs.
Ifus strong
Show me a court ordered payment schedule. Please !
Interesting. I think I'll call the patent office and see how they feel about a patent applied for and lied about under oath. Or maybe the DA about tortious interference. Or maybe people I know in the US Atty office...get their felling...very easy to do.
Now I wish Marc had not settled. Just let them rot in jail.
Oh well. They'll be there soon enough. JS is still facing the coward's cage....beats his wife and daughter like a dog....and SA who's got 22 + felony indictments. Oh yeah they're crystal clean. No chance they'll go....to jail. Nope. ..
Poetic justice really. They did it all themselves. Just like they did with Ifus.
I think the shareholders think for themselves. I think you'll also find that not one shareholder in here thinks they've been "bilked" out of anything. So this is is an unsupported and inaccurate statement.
Not accurate. Why won't the SA cabal answer my 3 questions?
Both inaccurate. The terms of a settlement are clear, no open disclosure.
I've posted 3 questions for the sa cabal to answer and they won't answer. Nice try at entrapment but getting MW to answer would be illegal....SA Cabal...aint answering either....
Truth is they weren't allowed in the fed case...minor oversight. But in the state case...different story. And if this were true (what you've indicated) ,then why go through several motions to have it removed? (All of which were unsuccessful)
There's plenty of evidence. The site activities alone dictate selling....
They were and potentially still are on the hook for jail time. Not sure how it's figured they weren't. They broke the law....oh and just because the fed judge wouldn't include it in the fed case, doesn't mean it wouldn't be heard in the state case.
I agree. The work that 3 distributors will pit out is incredible news for the company.
Ifus strong
Se questions 1-3. Btw SA and cabal can answer. They're good at communicating confidential information.