My comments are in bold:
It seems the new company authorized propaganda line is that "The shareholders don't care!" "Shareholders are delighted with Walthers." Please be specific to which shareholders you are referring to. Not sure ANY agree they don't care!
Really? They don't care that ...
1. That MW had GUARANTEED a $3.5 million payback, but got $0$ and was hit with a 1/2 $Million$ judgment instead? IMO this is inaccurate and very misleading. Please show me proof MW stated this to anyone. The fact is, it was a possibility in the court if it went to trial. There is no proof MW EVER said this to anyone and never will be. First, because he didn't talk about the trial or the case. I think you'll find that every shareholder did their DD and found the information they needed and it didn't come from MW.
They don't care that ...
2. That MW had GUARANTEED the patent would be returned, but it wasn't. Again show me. Show me MW ever said this. This is completely inaccurate and misleading, unsupported with any fact. This is pure supposition on the SA and Cabal's part.
They don't care that ...
3. That MW had GUARANTEED huge profits for years, when the truth revealed in court was that he averaged only $150.00/yr in revenue. Again, misleading and inaccurate. Show me! New responsible CEO would ever say this imo and to be honest, the shareholders would never tolerate it. It would be questioned by the shareholders as soon as it was said. Even looking at the facebook posts, this was never even implied.
They don't care that ...
4. That MW had GUARANTEED the state case in December was a SLAM DUNK for IFUS, yet he threw it away and settled without getting a dime. I have a copy of the file from the courthouse, that I spent my time and my dime to go and get. First, the statement is inaccurate and misleading. MW NEVER said or implied this to anyone. I said it as a matter of fact, having a copy of the file in hand and the evidence laid out and quite clear that ANY reasonable jury and/or judge would find the dullard boys to have possibly committed the crimes as stated and this would have been handed over to the authorities for investigation and potential prosecution. The preponderance of the evidence against the dullard boys, there was little room for doubt. There depositions with answers to the interrogatories (as previously posted) were "we didn't know this was a crime," "how is this against the law," and "we didn't we were breaking the law." So with this, both the evidence was substantial AND there was no reasonable defense.
Do they really believe that ...
5. That the judgement ordered by a FEDERAL JUDGE AGAINST MW (our sole officer and director) - had no value and was meaningless and had no effect on the state case? As stated, please show me one single bit of evidence there was a payment schedule endorsed by the court; please show me anything relative to a hearing where MW would have had to divulge asset information; and last, show me any hearing allowing SA to go after these assets, either by attachment or to seize (from a default order of course).
I think the majority of the 576 shareholders of record care plenty. We do, but we do not listen to misleading and inaccurate statements. And i guarantee that investors not already mired in the IFUS swamp care even more I'm amazed that others try to speak accurately for the shareholders. I am a shareholder, I associate with what I believe to be the majority shares-shareholders and NONE feel "mired" at all.. They are not going to throw their money down the IFUS drain Agreed but one caveat. Shareholders don't feel like we're investing in a company that's going bust....drain! We believe in IFUS and in MW...simple as that ... just as they haven't for the last 2 1/2 years.
So, PLEASE SIR - JUST answer 2 simple Questions
A. WHO pays WHOM in this amicable settlement? No one pays
B. Did IFUS receive their patent back in the amicable settlement? Looking at the information presented under oath to the Patent Office, not sure IFUS would be interested in the patent the dullard boys have. They lied under oath to obtain it and it's clear on the form they submitted. From a shareholder's perspective (speaking for myself in this answer), don't want it and don't need it. Why would anyone want a patent obtained under fraudulent conditions? Why be a part of the problem and not the solution? Why put the company at more risk for future business? It's inaccurate and misleading to think IFUS would want this garbage from JS and SA, when ALL we've done in the past 2 1/2 years is to get rid of them.
AI
