Exactly my point. Why not?

Actually your wrong. As I went to the Parish and visited the tax office, the permit office is right next door. There are special permits that have to be obtained for this property. If you knew the people you say you do, you’d know that already

That’s exactly right, especially if there are any legacy issues. There is known wildlife on the property and that’s always been a concern. Lastly, if trees are ANY migratory animals, potential nesting grounds, spawning grounds or the like, those are major stopgap issues that have to be addressed.

That’s ridiculous. I remember you posting doubts they’d even be able to get pink current. Now that they are, “it’s not too difficult and not too expensive.” You know what I don’t see? Absorbeez or any of the other SA flunky companies pink current. If it’s that easy and not so expensive, why aren’t they?

PM’s from CDF are even better lolol. I expect to see something out on this soon. As I said before it’s best to pr when the deal is signed, closed and registered. Removes the ambiguity.

SA and JS created a clone company and has tried to bury IFUS in the process. You’ll never see Absorbeez at .047. And hairdresser JS being a scientist really cracks me up. For SA to pull off that gag….

That’s a dumb idea. Why go through the trouble to create a pump n dump nowadays? The painful process to get a company current, then break the law? Better read what the new penalties are.

So? IFUS loyal know it’s happening. So relax.

SA paid for garbage.

I guess we’ll see. I don’t expect a post unless the deal is inked and through the process. Commercial real estate is a bit different

Actually I do know some of those who’s been there.

That irrelevant. Many of the longs ate up the cheapies. Their payday is coming

But you didn’t answer the question. Who posted?

Oh really? Tell who that poster is? Who’s strapped for cash? ACRA? Not a chance. IFUS? With ACRA, again, not a chance. That’s a “committed” investment group, and you won’t see the same behavior as the boot brothers.

I did. Why do you think they call them “longs?” As I said before, many can still do this, they know IFUS will be a money maker in short order.

So? IFUS longs are not moved by this.

Have you been there? If you haven’t then what is there to report?

Those charts look better than the Boot Brothers. JS is scootin around on his rascal with his bottle of Ol Grandad. He’s not been seen at the track or casino lately, probably broke (again). SA is too busy, up to his neck in lawsuits (another layer to his character flaw). Him being “vetted” still cracks me up. “Vetted” for what? Criminal activity would be correct.

As for Schaefer, you make him out to be broke? What a laugh! I’m told this man owns prime real estate in 4 countries, Russia, Kazakhstan, Spain and several in the US. Being from the oil and gas sector myself, my contacts tell me Schaefer gets paid more than anyone I’ve ever known for his consultation, at the tune of 3,500 Euros per day plus expenses, minimum. My contacts tell me the Qatari government is offering him full autonomy and mega $$$$ to oversee the QP and QG expansion projects. Soooo, broke? Not hardly.

Says who?

I understand decision day is now set, waiting for it to be posted.

That cracks me up. You mean hairdresser and scientist? And maybe boot polisher and saint? Lololol

Do tell us then. And then tell us where the money came from.

BB1 is a walking lawsuit. That’s his angle. Engage with perspective investors, take their money, burn them, then file suit against them! He’s not hard to figure out.

You keep forgetting that suit is dropped?

Ridiculous. The equipment to make the product cost more than $250k alone. Think about it

IFUS is just getting warmed up. BB2 is out of the picture. BB1 keeps strumming the guitar and he’ll ge El Kabonged lol (for some of the old timers)

Nothings changed. There would have been a pr

Meaning whom? SA? The shareholders really would abandon ship

We’ll see this week.

Oh really? SA will get what’s coming to him and it won’t be $$$. He will not bother IFUS again soon

Why stunning? Every shareholder knows SA has been an anchor to the company

I suppose there’ll be no answer to this

Hmmm it’s actually recorded in the record. SA hid their relationship. If what you say is true then why hide the shares under a different name?

Where’d you dig that up? ACRA can drop MW anytime he wants…oh! Just as SA did with JS

The game changer is coming. That score will make the difference

First debunk of this is the case is dropped without prejudice, meaning Schaefer can refile and get an immediate injunction. Second, Schaefer can file charges. I see at least two criminal charges. Third, if Schaefer was working with IFUS, logic dictates Schaefer will not pursue MW, his target is SA.

I have the court transcripts. Please tell me which page and paragraph, not to mention the context it was said. Hint. NOWHERE. I’m fact, it’s not even IMPLIED.

I’m tempted to post those transcripts on here to squelch these lies.

That’s absolutely correct. No misunderstanding with this either.

This is a joke right? Powerful lawyers? First of all there’s one lawyer representing SA and I know her personally. She couldn’t give a compelling argument to a bedtime story. Have you seen her filings? Laughable. Have you seen her court record? Not good. The cases she closed in September, she’s humiliated. The links I posted before tell the real deal in court cases and yes there is case history.

As for what you and SA disagrees, who cares? It really doesn’t take a genius to figure out SA has no legal standing. I re read the mediated settlement and the federal case was named BY NAME and BY CASE NUMBER I’m paragraph 2.

Ok, set that aside. Have you seen the ACRA case posted? ACRA went after SA hard in this case. His reasoning exposes to the public now that SA and his associates released MW from ANY further court cases in federal and state courts.

Combined, those are deal killers. I spoke to a legal professor who was also a federal judge. Here’s a quote: “if SA waltzed into my courtroom with this, him AND his lawyer would face serious sanctions.”

And lastly, ACRA did dismiss his case, but only dismissed their case “without prejudice,” (according to court records) meaning Schaefer has the right to intervene again immediately. I’d say Schaefer is waiting to pounce for violating their agreement, which is clear in their filing.

Not true. The reason why is stated in the court filings. Read it.