InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 5520
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2009

Re: pantherj post# 45807

Wednesday, 11/23/2016 3:21:52 AM

Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:21:52 AM

Post# of 82117
"BTW, if Walthers had told Adelstein to "Give back the $500,000.00 judgment or I'll expose you to criminal prosecution," that would be extortion."

Actually this is inaccurate. Any settlement discussions are off limits even to the judge because the settlement process is held strictly confidential. No responsible judge would ask for this, they're only interested in the outcome....what's agreed.

Second, no responsible lawyer would even present it this way and even if he did (which I'm 100% sure he didn't), it would never be heard.

Last, I believe the criminal charges were presented in the front end of the suit and the counter suit and this is why MONTHS ago, when confronted with the evidence, the dullards were smart enough to go out and get a CRIMINAL DEFENSE TEAM. Remember them? What's amazing is, the SA Cabal said "MW would face criminal prosecution." Just another SA Cabal prediction that never panned out. The proof has always been that MW hired a civil attorney and not a criminal attorney. The dullards hired both....and for good reason. They were caught, they knew they were caught and their defense....well, lets say "I didn't know" aint going to cut it.

So to even suggest MW committed a criminal act in the settlement process is inaccurate and misleading....