Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just a few local cases:
https://public.courts.in.gov/mycase/#/vw/SearchResults/eyJ2Ijp7Ik1vZGUiOiJCeVBhcnR5IiwiQ2FzZU51bSI6bnVsbCwiQ2l0ZU51bSI6bnVsbCwiQ3Jvc3NSZWZOdW0iOm51bGwsIkZpcnN0IjoibWFyayIsIk1pZGRsZSI6bnVsbCwiTGFzdCI6Im5ld2JhdWVyIiwiQnVzaW5lc3MiOiIiLCJEb0JTdGFydCI6bnVsbCwiRG9CRW5kIjpudWxsLCJPQU51bSI6bnVsbCwiQmFyTnVtIjpudWxsLCJTb3VuZEV4IjpmYWxzZSwiQ291cnRJdGVtSUQiOjkyLCJDYXRlZ29yaWVzIjpbIkNWIl0sIkxpbWl0cyI6bnVsbCwiQWR2YW5jZWQiOnRydWUsIkFjdGl2ZUZsYWciOiJBbGwiLCJGaWxlU3RhcnQiOiIwMS8wMS8yMDEyIiwiRmlsZUVuZCI6IjA1LzMxLzIwMTciLCJDb3VudHlDb2RlIjpudWxsfX0=
This one is still active with quarterly filings:
https://public.courts.in.gov/mycase/#/vw/CaseSummary/eyJ2Ijp7IkNhc2VUb2tlbiI6Ik5ETXlNVFV3TnpFeE1EWXdPamM1TkRjM05EVXhOR0k9In19
They do not go into detail, but Mike the Pike is listed as co-defendants on most of them.
If the above links do not work, try this one and enter Mark Newbauer into the search and limit to civil cases:
https://public.courts.in.gov/mycase/#/vw/Search
Wikipedia? Really?
You do realize, don't you, that anyone can create/edit entries there? While it has its good points, it is not as reliable of a source as everyone believes.
EDIT: Scroll down on that page and you can see that the last edit was about a month ago.
Also, if you actually read the article, you will see that all versions of that division have been closed. The last being 'GS Capital Partners VI' which was closed on April 23, 2007.
Sorry....
Not only is it part of the name, it is a CRUCIAL part of the name. Otherwise, companies would not invest hundreds of thousands of dollars just to get each and every one, and that much again annually to protect them.
Any document signed without the 'LLC' is not binding to the company, and the individual signing is personally liable for its contents.
EDIT: In addition, when it comes to the legality/responsibility factor, the same would apply to the 'GS' - 'Goldman Sachs' issue. They would not be considered even related, inside any courtroom.
A few years back, I looked into the buyback restrictions because of BS rumors at EESO. At that time, not only could it not be outside of normal hours, it could not happen in the first nor last hour of normal trading. If I recall correctly, it was to assure that the bid/ask values reflected true market sentiment. Since at open some MMs seem to open slightly delayed, and some companies like to drop news at open or close.
I don't have the link anymore, but I'm pretty certain it was on the SEC site. That was my preferred source for such matters.
It is not that your broker is interested in supplying false data, it is just that they have no clue. So they just give you an estimate, based on past filings, as to when to expect them. If you want to take everything your broker tells you as gospel, then by all means believe what you want.
Show me where they told them any date, and no, a screen print or e-mail from your broker doesn't count. If it didn't come directly from the company, it is called hearsay.
What delay?
Banro NEVER said today was the day, your broker did. And they just used the same date that Banro released last year's first quarter.
This board is getting ridiculous, whining about every little thing, political posts, followed by personal attacks regarding the political posts,.....
It actually has gotten to the point where Key-man is the only sane poster here.
Those shareholders eligible to vote, have had their proxies for a few weeks now. They have until Tuesday, I believe, to enter/change their votes.
NAH....
I'm saying almond butter is his substitute for Vaseline....
Almond butter....
It is confusing, but the ex-date is the first date without the divi. Which means close of trading the day before is the cut-off. This is based on the old T+3 trading schedule, meaning that it supposedly takes 3 days to fully process trades. This will soon be changing to T+2, but it may not affect ex-dates until later.
No, today is the Ex-dividend date.... too late this go-around.
That may be, but there will be a drop after the RS, a lot of money is waiting until then to pick up any more.
There is always some future event that keeps new money on the sidelines. The big unknown at this time is when and how drastic will the RS be? The vote was for up to 10:1 but no time-frame.
Finally actually stopped EESO....
Only took, what, 7 years or so?!?!
I agree, Russia will condemn. But I think they realize that Syria went too far, and that falls on their shoulders.
Might explain it....
U.S. Launches Missiles at Syrian Base After Chemical Weapons Attack
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-launches-missiles-at-syrian-base-after-chemical-weapons-attack/ar-BBzm5Ct?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=DELLDHP
D@MN, I just saw the headlines!!
That is like when someone talks about threefold or fourfold, that is not the same as times. Think of actually folding a piece of paper, it is 2^x.
They probably figure that we will all be at the meeting....
Goldman cut their rating to a sell, which means they are buying. But a lot of retail believes them, so they sell.
Most brokers show best guesses of release dates based on prior company history.
They like to make sure they can give each client 100% attention.
This divy won't be effected, as it will be paid prior to the vote. But my guess would be future amounts may be reduced. Normally they would adjust the divy to match the proposed RS, and the total payout would be the same. One option would be for them to adjust the divy partially, that way they could save some cash while still having a decent yield.
IE:
RS @ 1:10 = new share price $27.00
Adjust divy @ 1:5 = new divy $.525
New yield = 7.8% compared to old yield @ 15.6%
This example would save them 50% cash and still be an attractive yield.
Oh come on!!!!
This is at least the twelfth incident in the last year or so.
September 17, 2012
Surely, someone's interest would be piqued with the use of an image of B.O. to shill a scam.
Have no clue if it is illegal, but it looks more like a red beacon than a flag.
And, of course, the 'true' professionals trade at night.
Let me guess...
The law firm is going to short it, then try to file a class action suit because the price dropped when they shorted it....
Um.... He is current. Of course it was just paid today.
Looks like you may get your wish.
Sorry guys....
That just authorizes him to open one, doesn't say anything about it actually being opened.
Let me guess, it is overdrawn already.
Actually it will improve the eps we have seen lately. A -$.04 per share becomes -$.01 (approximated of course).