Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
MedLink Announces RHIO Financial Sustainability Model
Press Release Source: MedLink International, Inc. On Tuesday April 27, 2010, 2:43 pm EDT
NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwire - 04/27/10) - MedLink (OTC.BB:MLKNA - News) announced today the establishment of the MedLink Regional Health Information Organization (RHIO) financial sustainability model. MedLink will offer the model through strategic partnership with RHIO's and other healthcare service providers to supplement and lessen the RHIO's need to rely on membership dues and federal and state grants to sustain the rapid expansion of RHIO's.
Ray Vuono, President of MedLink, stated, "We've had a great response from several RHIO organizations across the country to MedLink's RHIO financial sustainability model. Through MedLink's strategic partnerships and partnerships with RHIO's that are experiencing rapid growth, the MedLink RHIO model provides the organization with cash flow opportunities to sustain the continued growth of adding additional Providers to their respective networks to enhance access to patient health information, ultimately improving the quality of patient care by assisting providers in the adoption of Electronic Health Records. A key aspect of the model and the benefits a RHIO provides is guiding the providers towards 'meaningful use' through the sharing of clinical data with the Health Information Exchange (HIE) provided through the RHIO to satisfy some of the requirements to qualifying for the wealth of available federal incentives under 'meaningful use' and the HITECH Act."
About MedLink
MedLink (OTC.BB:MLKNA - News) is a healthcare IT company that provides the medical community with products and services designed to help create, manage, and share medical information. The company's flagship product, MedLink TotalOffice EHR 3.1, a CCHIT Certified® 08 Ambulatory EHR, provides physicians with full EHR and practice management functionality. For more information regarding MedLink's products and services, please visit www.medlinkus.com.
Safe Harbor Statement
This news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements regarding future events, developments, the Company's future performance, as well as management's expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, outlined in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A available through www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Hexaware Technologies Quarterly Report Q4 ’09
http://www.hexaware.com/fileadd/q4-09.pdf
Financial Highlights
Financial year ended December 31, 2009 Revenue from operations stood at Rs. 10,386 mn ($ 214.7 mn)
o Y-o-Y decrease of 9.8% in INR terms and Y-o-Y decrease of 18.3% in $ terms Net Profit after Tax at Rs. 1,342 mn ($ 27.9 mn)
o Y-o-Y increase of 127.5% in INR terms and Y-o-Y increase of 107.4 % in $ terms Days sales outstanding (DSO) improved from 63 days last year to 56 days in Q4 ?09 Total headcount stood at 5,137 at the end of the year 35 new clients added during the year 157 active clients; 4 clients billed more than $10 million during the year
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2009 Hexaware met revenue guidance with revenues of Rs. 2,520 mn ($ 54 mn)
o Q-o-Q decrease of 4.2% in INR terms and Q-o-Q decrease of 0.9% in $ terms Net Profit after Tax was Rs. 360 mn ($7.7 mn)
o Q-o-Q decrease of 12.8% in INR terms and Q-o-Q decrease of 9.4% in $ terms Gross Margin stood at 43.1% and PAT margin was at 14.3% Cash & Cash Equivalents increased to Rs. 4,262 mn ($ 91.6 mn), an increase of Rs. 243 mn ($8.1 mn) over the last quarter 7 new clients added during the quarter of which 5 are Fortune 500 corporations; 157 active clients Days sales outstanding (DSO) further improved to 56 days Global headcount stood at 5,137; up by 131 from 5,006 last quarter
Operational Updates The quarter witnessed an addition of 7 new clients. In terms of verticals, 3 clients were added in Banking Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI), 2 clients in Travel, Transportation, Hospitality and Logistics (TTHL) and 2 clients in Emerging Verticals. The total number of active clients stood at 157.
In terms of the horizontal service offerings, 1 client was added in Remote Infrastructure Management Services (Remote IMS), 1 client in Enterprise Solutions, 2 in Business Intelligence/ Business Analytics (BI/BA), 1 in Quality Assurance and Testing Services.
The Company also signed two outsourcing deals this quarter offering services which encompass multiple horizontal service lines.
Of the 7 clients added, 4 customers were based in North America and 3 in APAC. 67.3% of revenues came from North America, with the European share at 26.8% and the balance 5.9% coming from the rest of the world.
The number of clients registering $1mn+ in revenues stood at 47, with 39 clients in the $1 - $5 mn category, 4 clients are in the $5 - $10 mn range and 4 clients billed over $10 mn each – on a trailing 12 months basis.
In the month of November 2009, Hexaware conducted its exclusive customer meet “Ojas”. The meet was well attended and acknowledged by our customers. In addition to providing a forum for knowledge sharing, corporate networking and relationship strengthening, this meet emphasized Hexaware?s positioning in the market place.
Caliber Point Business Solutions Ltd., a leading BPO service
provider and a subsidiary of Hexaware Technologies
http://www.hexaware.com/groupcomp.htm
Hexaware is a specialized IT and BPO service provider, ranked the fastest growing mid-sized company in India. We have leadership positions in PeopleSoft, HRIT, Airlines, and BFSI. We specialize in Business Intelligence and Analytics, Legacy Modernization and Independent Testing, and have around 5200 staff in 11 countries serving 168 clients globally.
Our experience in the business process outsourcing arena fully complements and strengthens our service spectrum and allows us to operate as an enterprise-class solution delivery company. Our solutions aim to provide high value by optimizing cost of ownership of technology investments for customers.
FocusFrame is a leading provider of Business Technology Optimization consulting services. The firm's specialty is end-to-end enterprise systems validation and optimization for CRM, ERP, and Web based business technologies. This is accomplished with a suite of services that utilizes proprietary process methodology, highly skilled professionals, and third- party automation validation & optimization tools.
http://www.focusframe.com
Caliber Point Business Solutions offers comprehensive Business Processing Outsourcing (BPO) to global organizations. Specializing in IT led Transformational BPO services, Caliber Point covers the Healthcare, Human Resources, Finance & Accounting and Knowledge Services Domains. Our clients range from the largest Third Party Administrators in the US to the largest Consolidators in the UK.
http://www.caliberpoint.com
RiskTech is a majority-owned JV of Hexaware Technologies with access to over 300 resources with significant business analytics know-how and skills in asset management, derivatives and wealth management and a variety of risk and treasury management applications.
AETERNA ZENTARIS INC ( AEZS ) daily prices from 03/19/2010 through 04/19/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
03/19/10 53,544 0.82 0.79 0.8006 0.80
03/22/10 153,043 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84
03/23/10 86,847 0.84 0.817 0.84 0.83
03/24/10 1.80 M 0.91 0.8375 0.88 0.85
03/25/10 481,730 0.86 0.8001 0.86 0.80
03/26/10 345,639 0.8385 0.7999 0.80 0.825
03/29/10 269,239 0.8599 0.813 0.8599 0.83
03/30/10 210,653 0.84 0.8002 0.8316 0.84
03/31/10 147,302 0.82 0.79 0.82 0.79
04/01/10 102,235 0.82 0.7901 0.80 0.80
04/05/10 9.18 M 1.07 0.9216 0.98 0.952
04/06/10 1.21 M 0.9619 0.87 0.96 0.89
04/07/10 1.34 M 0.89 0.841 0.89 0.855
04/08/10 969,710 0.92 0.8634 0.92 0.88
04/09/10 511,820 0.918 0.87 0.88 0.878
04/12/10 3.09 M 1.01 0.8715 0.88 0.996
04/13/10 7.58 M 1.23 1.08 1.12 1.161
04/14/10 8.38 M 1.44 1.11 1.19 1.38
04/15/10 14.53 M 1.82 1.54 1.65 1.65
AETERNA ZENTARIS INC ( AEZS )weekly prices from 04/24/2009 through 04/19/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
04/24/09 120,822 1.24 1.03 1.24 1.14
05/01/09 95,852 1.21 1.04 1.09 1.1101
05/08/09 129,408 1.36 1.11 1.1148 1.3001
05/15/09 138,148 1.33 1.11 1.30 1.22
05/22/09 191,212 1.41 1.21 1.22 1.21
05/29/09 378,927 1.81 1.20 1.20 1.69
06/05/09 1.67 M 3.25 1.89 2.12 1.89
06/12/09 395,917 1.97 1.70 1.90 1.80
06/19/09 2.34 M 2.68 1.76 2.05 1.82
06/26/09 590,034 1.87 1.68 1.83 1.73
07/02/09 1.03 M 1.84 1.61 1.70 1.70
07/10/09 1.05 M 1.90 1.63 1.75 1.74
07/17/09 476,992 1.81 1.72 1.79 1.76
07/24/09 3.89 M 2.23 1.76 1.78 2.14
07/31/09 2.82 M 2.73 2.01 2.26 2.62
08/07/09 2.37 M 2.82 2.15 2.78 2.60
08/14/09 2.76 M 3.01 2.50 2.71 2.83
08/21/09 21.74 M 1.29 0.88 0.92 1.00
08/28/09 5.18 M 1.05 0.87 1.05 0.8948
09/04/09 2.11 M 0.97 0.87 0.89 0.9299
09/11/09 5.79 M 1.19 0.90 0.93 1.1599
09/18/09 10.42 M 1.43 1.00 1.20 1.23
09/25/09 7.14 M 1.48 1.12 1.35 1.23
10/02/09 2.41 M 1.34 1.0999 1.25 1.23
10/09/09 1.15 M 1.25 1.11 1.20 1.19
10/16/09 924,702 1.21 1.13 1.21 1.17
10/23/09 2.37 M 1.22 1.09 1.22 1.09
10/30/09 3.66 M 1.14 0.98 1.09 1.02
11/06/09 969,230 1.13 1.00 1.07 1.04
11/13/09 516,671 1.12 1.03 1.11 1.03
11/20/09 417,799 1.05 0.9513 1.04 0.99
11/27/09 1.71 M 1.15 0.9787 1.00 1.01
12/04/09 3.15 M 1.13 0.98 1.03 1.12
12/11/09 2.08 M 0.95 0.84 0.90 0.87
12/18/09 999,091 0.89 0.812 0.87 0.8153
12/24/09 913,931 0.8338 0.7538 0.812 0.789
12/31/09 581,757 0.82 0.78 0.789 0.8069
01/08/10 683,788 0.87 0.79 0.8097 0.8299
01/15/10 1.41 M 0.93 0.8046 0.85 0.84
01/22/10 1.44 M 0.93 0.8045 0.84 0.93
01/29/10 5.76 M 1.10 0.83 1.00 0.8505
02/05/10 771,229 0.9018 0.81 0.8405 0.81
02/12/10 473,889 0.8694 0.8024 0.83 0.8478
02/19/10 247,735 0.87 0.83 0.8305 0.839
02/26/10 451,878 0.8599 0.8001 0.83 0.83
03/05/10 692,903 0.88 0.81 0.85 0.835
03/12/10 393,594 0.85 0.81 0.85 0.814
03/19/10 417,972 0.82 0.79 0.81 0.80
03/26/10 2.86 M 0.91 0.7999 0.80 0.825
04/01/10 729,429 0.8599 0.79 0.8599 0.80
04/09/10 13.22 M 1.07 0.841 0.98 0.878
04/16/10 52.88 M 1.82 0.8715 0.88 1.25
Diamond Drilling
http://www.miningbasics.com/diamond-drilling
Surface sampling does not give any definitive indication of how enormous – or how mediocre – a deposit lies underneath the surface. Due to this, after surface sampling shows a possible concentration of valuable mineral, diamond
drilling is undertaken.
The only way to be sure of the tonnage (quantity) and grade (quality) of a deposit is to make a circular cut in the rock and extract the continuous cylindrical core sample from the center of the cut. A special kind of drill has been developed, this drill has a rotating core barrel which grinds down through the bedrock. At the end of the core barrel is a cylindrical bit which is studded with the hardest of natural substances, diamonds.
The hole depths and the material being drilled is what varies the size of the diamond drill core along with the machine which is being used. However, the sizes which are most commonly used are:
* A – core diameter 27.0mm, hole diameter 48.0mm;
* B – core diameter 36.5mm, hole diameter 60.0mm;
* N – core diameter 47.6mm, hole diameter 75.5mm;
* H – core diameter 63.5mm, hole diameter 96.0mm;
The diamond drill mechanically consists of a power unit which rotates a tubular bit of steel on the face of which are set diamonds. This bit and attached core barrel are rotated under pressure which is controlled by means of hollow steel rods. Water is pumped through these rods to cool off the bit and to remove the rock cuttings.
Under ideal drilling conditions and once the drill bit is lowered to the bottom of the hole and the drill started, the bit will cut a core, which consists of a cylindrical piece of rock. Rotating at a high rate of speed, the bit is forced downward by the action of hydraulic cylinders on the drill. This pushes the core up into the core barrel as it moves through the rock.
The rods are removed at intervals of 5 or 10 feet (1.5 or 3 meters) and the core is removed from the core barrel for storage and examination. The core presents accurate and tangible record of the many rock formations through which the bit has passed.
Sludge samples are also taken at times while the drilling is under way. These samples consist of the cuttings which are made by the drill, they are useful as checks against the samples of the drill cores.
Sludge samples are also taken at times while the drilling is under way. These samples consist of the cuttings which are made by the drill, they are useful as checks against the samples of the drill cores.
Advice on reading drill results press releases
http://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2008/08/advice-on-reading-drill-results-press.html
I had a conversation yesterday with a friend who pointed me towards this press release from Alturas Minerals (ALT.v), an explorer-stage mining company with plenty of exposure to Peru. The PR was on drill results from its Huajoto property, and my friend asked me my opinion of the results (as although he's interested in the sector, he doesn't obsess on it like your wonky Otto). The conversation that ensued is the basis for what's below.
This is a checklist of things to think about when reading a drilling result/assay result/lab mineral report press release. I'm also going to (perhaps unfairly) pick on the Alturas Minerals PR of yesterday to illustrate the points.
1) Firstly, and the most important: I'm not a geologist. Where I'm coming from is a diferent angle altogether, and once the knowledge needed is of the scientific variety I'm the first person to throw up my hands, say "dunno dude" and seek professional opinions from people who know 1000 times more than I do about breccias, skarns and suchlike. If you're not a geo, do the same.
2) One of the first things to do is check the share price action, because if you don't know how to interpret drill results, you can bet your sweet bippy that there are several guys in Canada (for example) who make their living due to the fact that they can. In the case of ALT.v....
....neither the PPS action nor the volume make me sit up and take notice.
3) Next, try doing some calculations for yourself, however rough'n'ballpark they might be, to see what's being talked about here. In the ALT.v case, let's take the headline 2.24% zinc returns (over 48m) as our baseline (which is Utopia in itself for myriad reasons, but this is basic exampleworld). So with other metals being marginal at best, the rock that was drilled is very much dependent on whether there's enough contained Zn to make it interesting. Here we go;
* 2.24% Zinc means for every metric tonne (MT) of rock there are 22.4kg of Zn. This works out as a touch under 49lbs.
* When processing, let's assume recovery rates for the Zn at 85% (which is typical for the whole industry, but a lot (i mean a LOT) depends on a thousand geological or metallurgical factors. If the ballpark calculations pass muster, this is one of the moments I get in touch with a real geologist/metallurgist, and you should, too).
* So we can say that for every MT milled, the company gets about 41.6lb Zn.
* Now we look at the current price per Lb of Zn. Right now that's $0.83/lb. Therefore, that 41.6Lb Zn is "worth" $34.57.
* Now the next ballpark is to guess cash costs per MT of rock. To keep myself on the conservative side I tend to use $55/$60 per MT right now, but it can be lower (example, FVI.v has a non GAAP cash cost per MT of $46 right now).
* So with a potential ballpark revenues of $34.50 per MT, and my potential ballpark cash cost per MT of $60, I'm not salivating about this assay return. Not even with those potential rare earths returns. Sorry guys.
4) Away from the actual factual content of the press release, there are other things we can understand, too. The "way" in which a junior miner releases drill results speaks volumes about their attitude to the market. Back to the ALT.v case, the people are drilling 3,000m of holes in the current program, but are for some reason anxious to immediately release the first 300m worth separately. This gets my red flags unfurled, it must be said. It is impossible (repeat 1000 times 'impossible') to have any good idea about an orebody, project or whatever from a single drillcore. I therefore ask myself, "Why is a whole bunch of geologists who know better than I do so eager to tell me about a single hole?", and unfortunately 99 times out of 100 the answer is a close variant on "They're playing to the retail crowd."
5) Following on from point 4), if it's a "play to the retail crowd" you're up against, you NEVER know how such a junior will drip info to the market. Have a look at this link, which shows the whole target area of the project and the single drill hole reported so far. Now think on this little list:
* It's easy even for a non-geologist to see that there are plenty of other areas that need to be drilled at Huajoto.
* We humble investors, sitting in front of the computer screens, know about 1/1000th that the on-site geologists know about the area in question (OT: which is why I like doing site visits, by the way).
* The company has a very good idea before they stick the diamond bit into the ground which areas are most promising, which are possibles and which are more likely to return dusters.
* Upshot: That first hole might be the best there is on site. It might be the worst. It might be typical. WE DON'T KNOW. However they do. And maybe they want us to read about a mediocre result the first time round on this site so that market expectation is dampened. Maybe they're being totally straight with us. WE DON'T KNOW.
* However at the risk of repeating, it's impossible (repeat 1000 times 'impossible') to have any good idea about an orebody, project or whatever from a single drillcore. I therefore ask myself, "Why is a whole bunch of geologists who know better than I do so eager to tell me about a single hole?".
6) The above five points are a beginning. Once you begin to read more drill results, other important factors start jumping out at you and you learn more (eg type of rock, what the word 'disseminated' means, why the angle and azimuth of the drill hole is important, what 'manto' is, why the depth of the assay return is so important etc etc etc). It's just a case of education, and as so many people have proven over the years, to be educated it's not necessary to be intelligent.
Bottom line: I do feel like I'm picking on Altura Minerals a little unfairly, because there are hundreds of other companies that would serve as equally valid examples. When it comes to junior miners, my job often feels like weeding out the 95% of ho-hum companies to find the 5% or so of companies with real promise and bright futures. And when it comes to reading PRs (and believe me, i read dozens of them every day), if the company doesn't "feel right" I just walk away. Over the years I might miss a few star buys by filtering this way, but I guarantee that it filters me towards the majority of "good ones" much more quickly and efficiently.
Interpreting Drill Results 101
Ralph Kettell
April 30, 2009
http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1242751631.php
One of the biggest challenges facing an investor is trying to understand the news and/or financial results that companies publish periodically in the form of news releases. Investors and analysts attempt to interpret (read guess) how this news will affect the share price, short and/or long term. In the mining and mineral exploration business the most often published and one of the most significant types of news releases are drill results. They are the lifeblood of the business. Fund raising efforts literally can soar or die based on the success or failure of the drill bit to find the “good stuff”. However, how is a layman supposed to interpret the results, especially given the fact that the companies are severely restricted on what they can say in the news releases until after an engineering study has been completed and published? This is not necessarily a bad thing given the historical propensity for people in the mining business to exaggerate a bit at times.
Several weeks ago I read a news release from a gold mining company that sounded extraordinary. I did a quick mental calculation and came up with an incredible result. Normally this means that I have made a decimal point error in my calculations, which is very likely given the atrophy that has set in to my brain since the advent of pocket calculators. So I sat down at my computer and opened up the current version of my pocket calculator, aka an excel spreadsheet, and started entering the parameters. When I completed the first version of the calculation, I discovered much to my surprise that the mental calculations were right on. It truly is an amazing hole. At the end of the article, I will describe the mathematics of how to calculate the mineral resource potential of a drill hole.
As a result, I went and looked at the company’s share price history, read some more info on the company, and perused their website. Then I did the one thing that investors should always do, but rarely end up doing; i.e. pick up the telephone to talk to management about the company. I spoke to the president at length and ask him numerous questions. He suggested that I should also speak to their geologist, which I did. The geo was very informative about the history, technical aspects and progress of the company and it’s properties. As a result of this due diligence process, I concluded that the stock was undervalued and I should buy some.
As odd as it may seem, the company stock went down when the news was released. This is not unusual and can happen for several reasons many of which rarely make sense at first glance. Sometimes they never make sense! I believe that in this case the stock dropped because the grade of the gold mineralization, while good, was lower than what the market expected from earlier drill holes. So rather than looking at the potential scale of this mineralized intersection, investors were focusing solely on the grade. Given the fact that many people don’t understand the math involved, they often misconstrue the value of drill data. Obviously all others factors being held equal a drop in grade is not a good thing. However a hole with an enormous intersection of mineralized material of a lower grade can be very significant, and often times far more valuable than a bonanza grade hole but with narrow widths.
In this case the drill result that caught my eye was in a March 16, 2009 press release by Clifton Star Resources (CFO ; TSX/V) titled “Clifton Star Resources' Donchester Property Intersects 169.0m of 2.12 g/t Au in North Zone”. This is a huge intersection and when I ran my first level calculation, the result was an inference of nearly one million ounces from this single drill hole. I called up the President and CEO of Clifton Star, Harry Miller and asked him if they had an idea of the true width of the vein intersected by this drill hole. He told me they felt it was about 80%. So I re-ran the numbers with an 80% true width and came up with an inferred resource of 497,000 ounces based on this drill hole alone. From the previous 43-101s done by the company there is a resource of approximately 1,170,000 oz. of gold. If my analysis is correct (which I am certain it is close), this hole alone adds another 497,000 oz to their resource or an additional 43%. It also indicates a previously undiscovered “blow out” zone which could contain far more than the above mentioned 497,000 oz.
On the day the news was released, the stock opened at $1.90 and had traded down to $1.65 when I saw the press release and did my calculations. By any metric the stock should have been trading 43% higher based on the news, which would be $2.86 relative to the previous days close. Instead the stock was trading at 17.5% discount to the previous day. I figured this was a bargain and began to buy. The stock is currently trading around $2.80 and so is not the screaming bargain that it was at under $2, but I believe that the company will continue to prove up more gold. Given the company’s results to date and the amount of capital being expended drilling the property those ounces should continue to increase.
I do not want to get into an extended discussion of the prospects of the company as this article is primarily intended to educate investors on some points of analyzing drill data. However, this project seems to me to have great potential to become a lot bigger (in terms of ounces in the ground) than it is currently and also to eventually return to production. Clifton’s website is http://www.cliftonstarresources.com/ , and it has a good deal of information on the property and their results to date. In summary, however, I am calculating (with this drill hole included) that the company currently has approximately 0.07 ounces of gold per issued common share. At a share price of around $2.80, Clifton Star is being valued at roughly $39Cdn per ounce in the ground. Another company in the area, granted one that is further advanced towards production is getting $195Cdn per resource ounce of gold in the ground. I see no reason that more work advancing the project, which is currently being done, will not eventually yield a stock price of 3 to 4 times what Clifton Star is currently trading for.
For those brave souls and the more mathematically inclined of the readers, the following is a discussion of how the author arrived at some of the conclusions presented above.
TECHNICAL DATA
When analyzing the data from a single drill hole, there is a limited amount of information that can be ascertained about a resource. If the hole intersects for example, 3 oz per ton of gold over 10 feet, it is very impressive but doesn’t give any idea of the amount of total resource of gold present in the system. Why because the drill cut through the vein and we don’t know the angle of the dip of the vein, which along with the angle of the hole, and the width of the intersection, we can calculate the true width of the vein. Moreover, we have no clue of the horizontal or vertical extent of the vein system. The vein could run for a mile or more horizontally and thousands of feet in depth or the driller could have gotten very lucky and hit a small isolated pod of mineralization. In any case, this one drill intersection, while exciting, does little to give an idea of the size of the deposit.
For this reason companies have to drill many, many holes to start to get an idea of the size of the resource. After extensive geologic mapping has been done to determine the fault zones in the area and the rock types, the geologists site drill holes based on their interpretation of how the mineralizing events and the pre and post-mineralization faulting and movement occurred. If the geologist is good at his interpretation as well as being lucky, some of his holes will intersect mineralization. After having these results in hand the geologist will use them to fine-tune his or her geologic model and site new holes adjacent to the original successful holes searching for more mineralization. The intent of this exercise is to be able to map out zones of mineralization which will eventually become ore reserves that can be mined. The more holes which intersect the mineralization, the clearer the picture becomes to the geologists and engineers analyzing the deposit to determine its size, shape, mineralization type, and mine-ability.
In the case of the hole from Clifton Stars News release, we still only have one drill hole to go on, in the immediate vicinity. What is different about this drill hole that permits us to know more information about the deposit than the single high grade intercept discussed above? It is the enormous length of the hole which gives us a better idea of scale. It does not tell us the ultimate scale by any means, but it does give us an initial glimpse into the potential size of the deposit. I need to go into a discussion of geometry and the math and assumptions behind these calculations to show why I believe this deposit can potentially be enormous.
Let me go into the basic assumptions behind the calculations. If we intersect 100 feet of mineralization in a drill hole, we can assume that the mineralization extends in each direction by a similar amount. Thus a 100 foot intersection indicates a box or cube of mineralization (at the first level approximation as shown in Figure 1) or 100feet x 100feet x 100feet = 1,000,000 cubic feet of mineralized material. We can assume a rock density of somewhere around 10 cubic feet per ton, which means that our 1,000,000 cubic feet of material weighs approximately 100,000 tons. If the hole had intersected 5 grams of gold per ton (~ 0.16 ounces per ton), the resource potential of the mineralized intersection would be 16,000 ounces of gold
Now having seen this simplistic estimate what are some of the pitfalls of this calculation and what improvements can be made? One potential pitfall which is quite rare but actually more likely than it may at first seem, is that the drill hole ran down the vein. In this case the actual width of the vein is quite narrow and the mineralized material much less than our simple calculation would show. This would mean that we were way over estimating the amount of mineralized material. In the case of core drilling this is less likely, because measurement of intersection angles in the core will show if in fact the drill was chasing down a vein.
Some improvements that can be made to this calculation are primarily the following. First if the geologists have other drill holes in the vicinity and thus have an understanding how the mineralization is laying, they can estimate the true width of the hole. This means that they can approximate the actual length of the intersection of the material perpendicular to the bed of the mineralization. This reduces the size of the cube to a more realistic dimension. Secondly if sufficient testing has been done on the recovered core the rock density will be known to within some range of values and this can be used in the calculation rather than the initial guess value of 10 cubic feet per ton.
To summarize the math involved:
1) Start out with the length of the intersection of the mineralization.
2) Determine/guess the percentage of the intersection which is the true width.
3) Cube the true width of the intersection to calculate the estimated mineralized volume.
4) Determine/guess the rock density (normally 10 to 15 cu ft per ton).
5) Multiply the mineralized volume by the rock density to compute estimated tonnage.
6) Finally multiply the tonnage by the grade to determine the estimated resource.
Some useful numbers for performing these calculations :
1 meter = 3.283 feet
1 foot = 0.305 meters
1 troy ounce = 31.1 grams
1 gram = 0.032 troy ounces
1 cu yd = 27 cu ft
1 cu m = 35.4 cu ft
1 mton (tonne) = 1.1 short tons
So how does this relate to the drill hole from Clifton Star’s March 16th news release.
1) The hole was 169 meters or 554 feet of 2.12 grams per tonne or 0.062 ounces per ton of gold.
2) Clifton Star told me that the true width was approximately 80%, and so I used 80% of 554 feet or 444 feet as the edge dimension of my box.
3) Cubing 444 feet results in 87,473,000 cubic feet of material.
4) Clifton Star told me that the density is roughly 12 cubic feet per tonne.
5) This calculates to 7,289,000 tonnes of material.
6) Finally resulting in 497,000 ounces of gold at the 2.12 grams per tonne grade.
If anyone is interested, I have created an excel spreadsheet which performs these calculations. I will send it to anyone that requests it at my email address below. It allows a potential investor to play some what if games with any drill hole results. As with any computer calculation, this one comes with the usual disclaimer, garbage in will always result in garbage out. It can be one of many tools in an investors due diligence arsenal and should not be relied upon as infallible.
April 30, 2009
Ralph Kettell, II, P.E.
Nevada Fluorspar, Inc.
P.O. Box 806
Burtonsville, MD 20866
nvfspar@gmail.com
Ralph Kettell is the President and founder of Nevada Fluorspar, Inc. He is also a Director of Piedmont Mining Company-OTCBB, SNS Silver Corp.-TSX/V, and Gold Summit Corp.-TSX/V.
Disclosure:
The author is not an investment advisor and this article should not be construed as a recommendation to invest in the discussed securities. The author is merely presenting some possible scenarios and what the potential risks and rewards associated with an investment in these securities could be. The author has not been paid to write this article, either in cash or securities. The author is a share holder of these but will not be selling any within at least 30 days of the date of the article.
Wouldn't a JV be negotiated after the drilling determined how much GOLD is in the ground?
Isn't how much GOLD in the ground the key to moving the stock price?
KAT EXPL INC ( KATX ) weekly prices from 07/10/2009 through 04/03/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
07/10/09 350,669 0.38 0.30 0.36 0.36
07/17/09 184,811 0.35 0.23 0.35 0.29
07/24/09 102,192 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.26
07/31/09 138,417 0.2875 0.17 0.23 0.20
08/07/09 9.99 M 0.17 0.012 0.17 0.021
08/14/09 8.38 M 0.024 0.01 0.024 0.0135
08/21/09 695,310 0.0145 0.0105 0.014 0.013
08/28/09 706,310 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.0145
09/04/09 168,162 0.015 0.013 0.0145 0.0145
09/11/09 3.03 M 0.014 0.0088 0.0135 0.01
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/08/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.0062
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
11/27/09 71.02 M 0.042 0.0162 0.037 0.019
12/04/09 42.15 M 0.027 0.015 0.0204 0.018
12/11/09 29.57 M 0.0249 0.0149 0.019 0.022
12/18/09 30.86 M 0.0285 0.017 0.024 0.027
12/24/09 12.89 M 0.0285 0.0195 0.0285 0.022
12/31/09 10.54 M 0.0285 0.0165 0.0285 0.018
01/08/10 17.76 M 0.022 0.0165 0.018 0.0194
01/15/10 68.48 M 0.063 0.019 0.022 0.055
01/22/10 55.63 M 0.09 0.043 0.059 0.086
01/29/10 37.15 M 0.093 0.0495 0.0925 0.068
02/05/10 16.17 M 0.0835 0.06 0.067 0.066
02/12/10 17.56 M 0.069 0.0465 0.069 0.051
02/19/10 15.25 M 0.065 0.049 0.052 0.0525
02/26/10 11.40 M 0.063 0.052 0.0525 0.056
03/05/10 16.57 M 0.068 0.0545 0.0565 0.059
03/12/10 11.58 M 0.059 0.049 0.059 0.052
03/19/10 8.77 M 0.06 0.051 0.0521 0.052
03/26/10 12.43 M 0.059 0.0525 0.0525 0.056
04/01/10 32.57 M 0.092 0.055 0.056 0.078
KATX: Control Tower this is KATX flight AU79 request for take off
Control Tower: KATX flight AU79 take off on runway 85 left and begin your ascend your 10 thousand feet
KATX: roger
KAT EXPL INC ( KATX ) weekly prices from 07/02/2009 through 03/31/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
07/02/09 408,937 0.40 0.3011 0.3011 0.36
07/10/09 350,669 0.38 0.30 0.36 0.36
07/17/09 184,811 0.35 0.23 0.35 0.29
07/24/09 102,192 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.26
07/31/09 138,417 0.2875 0.17 0.23 0.20
08/07/09 9.99 M 0.17 0.012 0.17 0.021
08/14/09 8.38 M 0.024 0.01 0.024 0.0135
08/21/09 695,310 0.0145 0.0105 0.014 0.013
08/28/09 706,310 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.0145
09/04/09 168,162 0.015 0.013 0.0145 0.0145
09/11/09 3.03 M 0.014 0.0088 0.0135 0.01
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/08/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.0062
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
11/27/09 71.02 M 0.042 0.0162 0.037 0.019
12/04/09 42.15 M 0.027 0.015 0.0204 0.018
12/11/09 29.57 M 0.0249 0.0149 0.019 0.022
12/18/09 30.86 M 0.0285 0.017 0.024 0.027
12/24/09 12.89 M 0.0285 0.0195 0.0285 0.022
12/31/09 10.54 M 0.0285 0.0165 0.0285 0.018
01/08/10 17.76 M 0.022 0.0165 0.018 0.0194
01/15/10 68.48 M 0.063 0.019 0.022 0.055
01/22/10 55.63 M 0.09 0.043 0.059 0.086
01/29/10 37.15 M 0.093 0.0495 0.0925 0.068
02/05/10 16.17 M 0.0835 0.06 0.067 0.066
02/12/10 17.56 M 0.069 0.0465 0.069 0.051
02/19/10 15.25 M 0.065 0.049 0.052 0.0525
02/26/10 11.40 M 0.063 0.052 0.0525 0.056
03/05/10 16.57 M 0.068 0.0545 0.0565 0.059
03/12/10 11.58 M 0.059 0.049 0.059 0.052
03/19/10 8.77 M 0.06 0.051 0.0521 0.052
03/26/10 12.43 M 0.059 0.0525 0.0525 0.056
03/31/10 24.05 M 0.086 0.055 0.056 0.078
Gold that is, black oil, Texas tea, however Canada is the place you wanna be.....
Does KATX need more financing?
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=KATX&read=164
By: MAILMAN1
24 Mar 2010, 08:41 AM EDT
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 164 of 164
Jump to msg. #
surfez
A friend of mine who is a Dr. wanted to help the company with financing so i sent Ken Stead an email and here is his response which i feel is great in my books...........
Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:15 AM
From: "Ken Stead" kstead@katexploration.com
To:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: Financing
Appreciate your interest in our financing matters but we are not in need of Funds at this time or in the near future.But thanks for thinking of us.
------------
Ken Stead
President/CEO
KAT EXPLORATION INC
O-(709) 368-9223
O-(709) 368-9224
F-(709) 368-9213
Email: kstead@katexploration.com
Website: www.katexploration.com
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Hold; LT Rating- Hold)
Sample Task Order (Mexico)
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=6e5040f61bade6d8531b48e916a025bd&tab=core&_cview=1
United States Department of State
Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA)
Global Support Strategy (GSS) for Overseas Consular Support Services
GSS for Mexico
Statement of Objectives
Table of Contents
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1
2. BACKGROUND 1
3. TASK ORDER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 2
4. ESTIMATED WORKLOAD DATA 2
5. ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS 2
6. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT 4
7. SERVICE LEVEL STANDARDS AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION 6
8. SECURITY 8
9. TRANSITION PERIOD 8
10. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 9
11. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE 9
12. HISTORICAL DATA 10
1. Scope of Services
The Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA) within the Department of State (DoS) is executing its Global Support Strategy (GSS) for Overseas Consular Support and seeks to award a performance-based task order to provide support services for consular operations in Mexico.
2. Background
The Bureau of Consular Affairs is the public face of the U.S. Government for millions of foreign national visa applicants around the world. CA must facilitate legitimate travel to the United States while ensuring adequate protection of U.S. border security. These far-reaching consular activities have broad foreign policy and domestic political implications and involve serious legal and management concerns. Responsibility for these functions is vested within the Department of State in the Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs and for their implementation abroad in consular officers assigned to Foreign Service posts.
The posts covered by this task order have employed a patchwork of user-pays information, appointment, fee collection and document delivery services. Although user-pays services have helped posts meet their workload and improved customer service, such partnerships have been entered into on a piecemeal basis; this has led to a lack of transparency and inconsistent costs and service standards. The use of these services has also led to a multiplication of business processes and limited our ability to effectively launch new procedures and requirements. In addition to addressing legal and regulatory concerns, CA sees the establishment of the Global Support Strategy as an opportunity to make significant improvements to the integrity and performance of existing operations.
3. Task Order Performance Objectives
Note: Contract Section C, Scope of Services and its objectives/activities apply to this task order.
Objective 1: Launch a GSS program covering all of Mexico within one hundred twenty (120) days of award.
Objective 2: Provide service package one, which includes information services, appointment services, fee collection services, document delivery services, and offsite data collection services, for all Mexico posts.
The Department of State requires the Contractor to employ best practices, and utilize its expertise to propose creative solutions that will meet the objectives stated above. Contractors shall prioritize the task order objectives in a way that best achieves the Departmental and CA mission and goals in a cost-effective manner. Under a performance-based contract structure, performance metrics and service level agreements (SLA) will be used extensively to monitor the performance of this task order. The Government and the winning Contractor will baseline and monitor progress using agreed-to performance metrics and service level agreements.
4. Estimated Workload Data
The following table provides workload estimates for performance under this task order:
Year Service Package Baseline Workload
Base Year One (1) One (1) 875,000
Base Year Two (2) One (1) 1,300,000
Option Year One (1) One (1) 1,100,000
Option Year Two (2) One (1) 1,100,000
Option Year Three (3) One (1) 1,100,000
Option Year Four (4) One (1) 1,100,000
5. Assumptions and Constraints
Note: Contract Section J, Listing of Attachments, Attachment C, Constraints and Mandatory Program Requirements applies to this task order.
a. General
i. The contractor shall provide a single point of contact to coordinate Mexico-wide GSS services under this task order, as well as a local manager for each supported post. These managers must be available for daily consultation, including (in rare instances) after-hours emergencies, and for at least weekly on-site meetings at the supported post.
b. GSS Services
i. Information services shall, at a minimum, be provided in Spanish via telephone and interactive website.
ii. With regard to document delivery services, applicants shall be able to collect their issued visa, Mexican passport and related documents at one or more distributed points of service (i.e. courier offices). Applicants must choose the preferred location at the time they make their appointment.
i. Also with regard to document delivery services, for revalidation cases (who meet guidelines provided separately), the OFC must collect the applicant's passport and any supporting documentation specifically required by post and deliver that documentation daily to the supported consular section for processing.
i. In the case of Mexico City, Merida, and Guadalajara, posts will then issue approvable visas, paste them in passports, and return all documentation for final delivery to the applicant. If a case cannot be issued, posts will return the documentation to the courier, who will schedule an interview appointment for the applicant and return their documentation to the applicant prior to the interview.
ii. In the case of all other Mexico posts, the contractor will deliver applicant documents (including passports) to posts, posts will adjudicate the case, and for every issued case will return the documentation to the contractor, who will either deliver it or store it securely for delivery with the issued Border Crossing Card (BCC). Posts will give the issued BCCs to the contractor for delivery at a later date. If a case cannot be issued, posts will return the documentation to the courier, who will schedule an interview appointment for the applicant and return the documentation to the applicant prior to the interview.
ii. The contractor must provide a minimum of one (1) greeter per one hundred (100) applicants, based on average daily appointments over the previous thirty (30) day period.
iii. The contractor may propose OFC locations based on population centers, but no OFCs may be located further than two hundred fifty (250) miles from the supported consular section and every location must be approved by the Government. The Government may disallow centers within the two hundred fifty (250) mile distance if the workload does not justify the travel time required to exercise adequate oversight. Each OFC must have its own manager.
6. Government Furnished Equipment
a. Hardware
The USG will provide hardware for offsite biometric data collection, including but not limited to:
• All live-photo capture cameras, accessories (e.g., cables), and supplies for regular maintenance (e.g., lens cleaner)
• All fingerprint scanners, accessories (e.g., cables), and supplies for regular maintenance (e.g., glass cleaner)
• Workstations and servers to be used only for biometric data collection activities and to be used only in conjunction with provided biometric data collection hardware
• Peripherals and accessories for all USG workstations and servers, including:
o Monitor
o Keyboard
o Mouse
o Cables (PSU, monitor)
o 1-D barcode scanners
o 2-D barcode scanners
• UPS devices for USG workstations and servers
Quantities for hardware items above, to include an additional 10% for readily available spares, will be proposed by the contractor in conjunction with their service model and associated staffing requirements. The contractor shall be responsible for notifying the contracting officer when the quantity of readily available spares goes below 10%, 5%, and 1%. If the contractor has not followed proper procedures for notifying the Government when levels of readily available spares fall below pre-defined thresholds, any related service disruptions will not be attributable to the Government.
The Government will manage procurement, delivery/acceptance, initial installation/set up, and periodic refresh of hardware. The contractor shall not be held accountable for adverse performance should the Government be unable to comply with proposed service levels. Notional service levels for USG-provided hardware include:
• The Government will deliver initial hardware according to a mutually agreed schedule prior to the conclusion of the transition phase for a task order.
• A Government representative will be on site to inspect and accept hardware delivery upon its arrival
• All equipment will be set up and operational according to a mutually agreed schedule prior to the conclusion of the transition phase for a task order.
• Equipment will be refreshed based on a four (4) year hardware refresh cycle.
• A Government representative will be on site to inspect and verify proper removal of hardware from the facility
The USG will not provide any other hardware for offsite biometric data collection facilities, including but not limited to:
• Document scanners
• Printers
• Printer Supplies
o Ink / Toner
o Paper
• Telephones / phone lines
• Internet routing and connectivity hardware
• Bandwidth
• Photo copier / fax machines
• Workstations/servers not involved in biometric data collection activities
• Peripherals, accessories, and UPS devices for contractor provided workstations/servers
• CCTV:
o Cameras
o Storage / archival of recordings
o Recording media
The USG will not provide hardware for any non-OFC contractor facility.
b. Software
The USG will pre-image all USG hardware with required software, including but not limited to: workstation OS and custom USG software required for remote collection of biometric data.
The USG will not provide software for any non-USG hardware.
c. Hardware Support
It is the responsibility of the contractor to demonstrate due diligence in diagnosis and repair of suspected hardware-related support issues prior to requesting USG IT support. Failure to do so may result in a negative performance evaluation. DoS will provide a service level agreement to the contractor regarding timeframes to acknowledge, review, and either accept or reject an issue, and incorporate additional service level characteristics as needed. Notional service levels for USG-provided hardware include:
• The Government shall acknowledge receipt of a hardware-related support request within twenty four (24) hours of receipt.
• Following acknowledgement of receipt, the Government shall take no more than forty eight (48) hours to review the request and any accompanying documentation to determine if the issue is accepted or rejected.
The USG will provide remote “level 3” IT support for USG-supplied hardware. The Government may provide workarounds in lieu of remedying the root cause.
The USG shall not be responsible, but may provide assistance, for resolving “Level 3” IT support for incidents that result from contractor negligence, including but not limited to:
• Hardware faults resulting from incorrect configuration of non-USG custom software (e.g., operating system) settings
• Hardware faults resulting from viruses or other malicious computer code
• Loose or mismatched hardware connections
• Hardware faults resulting from poor sanitary conditions
• Hardware faults resulting from contractor error (e.g., immersion in liquid)
The USG will not support any non-USG hardware.
d. Software Support
It is the responsibility of the contractor to demonstrate due diligence in diagnosis of suspected software-related support issues prior to requesting USG IT support. Failure to do so may result in a negative performance evaluation. DoS will provide a service level agreement to the contractor regarding timeframes to acknowledge, review, and either accept or reject an issue, and incorporate additional service level characteristics as needed. Notional service levels for USG provided software include:
• The Government shall acknowledge receipt of a software related support request within twenty four (24) hours of receipt.
• Following acknowledgement of receipt, the Government shall take no more than forty eight (48) hours to review the request and any accompanying documentation to determine if the issue is accepted or rejected.
IT support for USG-provided software will include:
• Analysis and verification of remote data collection software and/or live-photo capture software as the root cause of a suspected issue
• Remote and on-site re-installation, configuration, and testing of remote data collection software to resolve issues and demonstrate performance within USG tolerances.
The USG will not provide IT support for issues related to non-USG software or general IT administration, including but not limited to:
• Network software configuration
• User level access
• Operating system inquiries
• Productivity software inquiries (e.g., Microsoft Office)
7. Service Level Standards and Customer Satisfaction
a. The support services metrics that are applicable to performance under this task order include:
i. For all service packages
a) Service Downtime
b) Service Rework
c) Service Capacity Incidents
d) Service Availability Incidents
e) Customer Survey Response
f) Customer Survey Satisfaction
g) Mean Call Abandon Rate (for all live operator services)
h) Agent Service Level (for all live operator services)
i) Call Duration Incident Rate (for all live operator services)
j) Lost Document Rate
k) Document Delivery to Applicants
l) OFC Appointment Reject Rate
m) OFC Biodata Collection Rate
n) Appointment Wait Time
o) Appearance Wait Time
p) Appearance Service Durations
q) Appearance Throughout
b. The management services metrics that are applicable to performance under this task order include:
i. For all service packages
a) Local Compliance Incidents
b) Call Monitoring Incidents (for all live operator services)
c) CCTV Incidents
d) Data Delivery Incident Rate
e) Document Delivery to USG
f) Fee Deposit Incidents
g) Fee Mismatch Incidents
h) Provision of Management Data
i) Provision of Quality Data
j) Status Reporting
k) Embassy/Post Satisfaction
l) Contractual Requirements
c. The quality services metrics that are applicable to performance under this task order include:
i. For all service packages
a) Mismatched Biometrics
b) Biodata Reject Rate
c) Data Resend Incident Rate
d) Document Resend Incident Rate
e) Fee Collection Error Rate
f) Data Quality Incident Rate
g) Provision of Public Information
d. The security services metrics that are applicable to performance under this task order include:
i. For all service packages
a) Cleared Personnel
b) Audit Compliance
c) Fraud Prevention Program
d) Physical Security Incidents
e) Data Security Incidents
f) Courier Security Incidents
e. If the Government authorizes provision of premium (user-pays) services, the Government reserves the right to impose service level standards and performance and quality metrics that shall be met in regard to such services. The Government reserves the right to withdraw authorization for premium (user-pays) services if the imposed service level standards and performance and quality metrics are not met.
8. Security
a. The Contractor shall comply with and adhere to the security requirements outlined in the umbrella GSS contract. The Government reserves the right to add, delete, and/or modify the security requirements, as necessary or as directed by Diplomatic Security, or other U.S. Government security agencies.
b. The Contractor must receive approval from the Bureau of Consular Affairs and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) for all exceptions to existing security guidelines and regulations.
9. Transition Period
a. Phase-In
Phase-in transition activities shall be performed in accordance with a USG- approved transition plan to be provided by the Contractor. This plan shall describe all activities that must be completed by the Contractor to assume operational responsibility of GSS services within one hundred twenty (120) days of award.
b. Phase-Out
The Contractor’s proposed performance statement of work shall include a task order phase-out period to closeout the task order. The phase-out period will include all activities necessary for a seamless transition upon the completion of the task order’s period of performance. The Contractor shall assume a phase-out period of thirty (30) days prior to the end of the task order period of performance. The Contractor Phase-Out Plan shall be delivered not later than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the end of the second option year or prior to the end of the current period of performance when the government provides written notification that it does not intend to exercise an option year, whichever is sooner.
10. Period of Performance
a. The base period of performance will be twenty four (24) months from task order award with four (4) one (1) year option periods.
11. Place of Performance
a. The Contractor shall perform work within the scope of this task order at the Contractor’s facilities or, in the case of greeter services provided under service package one or service package two, at the U.S. embassy or consulate.
KAT EXPL INC ( KATX ) weekly prices from 09/18/2009 through 03/13/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/09/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.0062
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
11/27/09 71.02 M 0.042 0.0162 0.037 0.019
12/04/09 42.15 M 0.027 0.015 0.0204 0.018
12/11/09 29.57 M 0.0249 0.0149 0.019 0.022
12/18/09 30.86 M 0.0285 0.017 0.024 0.027
12/31/09 10.54 M 0.0285 0.0165 0.0285 0.018
01/08/10 17.76 M 0.022 0.0165 0.018 0.0194
01/15/10 68.48 M 0.063 0.019 0.022 0.055
01/22/10 55.63 M 0.09 0.043 0.059 0.086
01/29/10 37.15 M 0.093 0.0495 0.0925 0.068
02/05/10 16.17 M 0.0835 0.06 0.067 0.066
02/12/10 17.56 M 0.069 0.0465 0.069 0.051
02/19/10 15.25 M 0.065 0.049 0.052 0.0525
03/05/10 16.57 M 0.068 0.0545 0.065 0.059
03/12/10 11.58 M 0.059 0.049 0.058 0.0521
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) weekly prices from 09/18/2009 through 03/13/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
09/18/09 27.36 M 0.031 0.023 0.0275 0.0285
09/25/09 20.11 M 0.033 0.025 0.0285 0.032
10/02/09 32.35 M 0.044 0.0292 0.0325 0.043
10/09/09 61.36 M 0.0585 0.034 0.043 0.053
10/16/09 25.26 M 0.05 0.033 0.05 0.035
10/23/09 27.30 M 0.038 0.0251 0.038 0.0285
10/30/09 21.74 M 0.0349 0.0251 0.0288 0.03
11/06/09 10.05 M 0.03 0.025 0.03 0.0254
11/13/09 19.82 M 0.026 0.019 0.0255 0.0209
11/20/09 18.72 M 0.0285 0.02 0.021 0.0275
11/27/09 6.67 M 0.0275 0.024 0.0275 0.024
12/04/09 19.56 M 0.025 0.017 0.0237 0.0188
12/11/09 16.54 M 0.0229 0.014 0.0189 0.0225
12/18/09 14.28 M 0.025 0.0165 0.025 0.02
12/31/09 8.41 M 0.019 0.0155 0.019 0.0159
01/08/10 13.40 M 0.018 0.015 0.0159 0.016
01/15/10 24.04 M 0.0165 0.0121 0.0165 0.0135
01/22/10 15.60 M 0.0174 0.01 0.0144 0.0128
01/29/10 17.16 M 0.0125 0.01 0.01 0.0105
02/05/10 23.93 M 0.0108 0.007 0.01 0.009
02/12/10 6.21 M 0.0102 0.0083 0.0095 0.009
02/19/10 7.01 M 0.009 0.0075 0.009 0.0084
03/05/10 8.64 M 0.0098 0.0076 0.0098 0.0084
03/12/10 21.10 M 0.0149 0.0075 0.008 0.0139
Corporate lawyer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_lawyer
A corporate lawyer is a lawyer who specializes in corporations law.[1]
As of 2004, there were 67,000 corporate lawyers in the United States, working on average for 50 hours per week, with a mean starting salary of USD64,000, rising to USD93,700 after 5 years and USD139,000 after 10–15 years.[2]
The role of a corporate lawyer is to ensure the legality of commercial transactions, advising corporations on their legal rights and duties, including the duties and responsibilities of corporate officers. In order to do this, they must have knowledge of aspects of contract law, tax law, accounting, securities law, bankruptcy, intellectual property rights, licensing, zoning laws, and the laws specific to the business of the corporations that they work for.[2][3]
The practice of corporate law is less adversarial than that of trial law. Lawyers for both sides of a commercial transaction are less opponents than facilitators. One lawyer (quoted by Bernstein) characterizes them as "the handmaidens of the deal". Transactions take place amongst peers. There are rarely wronged parties, underdogs, or inequities in the financial means of the participants. Corporate lawyers structure those transactions, draft documents, review agreements, negotiate deals, and attend meetings.[2][3]
What areas of corporate law a corporate lawyer experiences depend from where the firm that he/she works for is, geographically, and how large it is. A small-town corporate lawyer in a small firm may deal in many short-term jobs such as drafting wills, divorce settlements, and real estate transactions, whereas a corporate lawyer in a large city firm may spend many months devoted to negotiating a single business transaction. Similarly, different firms may organize their subdivisions in different ways. Not all will include mergers and acquisitions under the umbrella of a corporate law division, for example.[2][3]
Some corporate lawyers become partners in their firms. Others become in-house counsel for corporations. Others still migrate into other professions such as investment banking and teaching.[2]
Some publications read by those in the profession include Global Legal Studies, Lawyers Weekly, and the National Law Journal.[2]
Have we reached peak metals?
Alan Galley, Geological Survey of Canada
http://www.pdac.ca/pdac/conv/2010/pdf/presentations/ts-alan-galley.pdf
From a purely geological standpoint the earth’s lithosphere is an inexhaustible source of metals. In reality, discovery of new primary sources of metal is dependent on locating metal concentrations in regions and at depths suitable for development under reasonable economic models, for the present and foreseeable future. In the past and present, most base and precious metals are discovered and produced in the largest 20% of deposit populations. Although this trend may continue with metals such as copper and gold, a change to a focus on significant, but smaller deposits does not necessarily translate into a decline in remaining economic metal resources.
With the discovery of new deposits and reserves in both porphyry and sedimentary basin-hosted copper deposits, the production of this metal has almost doubled over the last three decades to represent close to 60% of all copper produced. The production of gold from primarily porphyry (40%), epithermal, sediment-hosted and greenstone-hosted deposits (~ 20% each) has also increased in discovery rate by ~ 3 million ounces a year. Despite the production of several billion ounces of silver in the last five centuries, production is still on the increase, principally as a by-product from sediment-hosted Zn-Pb-Ag (Sedex), Au-Ag epithermal and polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. Nickel production has been historically focused in the two super-giant Ni-Cu-PGE districts of Norilsk and Sudbury, but several smaller but substantial new districts, such as Voiseys Bay and Kabanga, give promise to maintaining a primary metal sulphide supply of this metal for the near future.
A disconnect is evident between deposit discovery rates over the last 6 decades and the present increasing abundance of base and precious metal reserves. Much of this is due to expansion in both tonnage and grade of discoveries made up to 70 years ago. Advances in integration of geology, geophysics and geochemistry, in both surface and deep exploration, through a whole mineral systems approach has led to a better understanding of the real potential of all deposit types. This has resulted in more effective targeting of surficial sediment-covered to deeply buried ore bodies. As the known super-giant Ni-Cu-PGE districts continue to be depleted, new hydrometallurgical technologies will result in Ni laterites filling the production gap. A better understanding of the supercontinent cycle over earth’s history and evolution, and paleo-geographic location of metallotects over time, has resulted in the successful targeting of greenfield regions. Increased knowledge of the role of uplift and erosion over geologic time adds to our ability to locate buried resources. The role of seafloor metal reserves is being revisited through better modeling and technological advances. More quantitative and integrated mineral resource modeling and risk analysis has focused attention on both new frontier regions and the third dimension of established mining districts. As with the Voisey’s Bay and McFauld’s Lake discoveries, one cannot ignore a touch of serendipity in the continued discovery of significant new camps.
In summary, we are reaching a paradigm shift in our ability to maintain metal discovery rates through more effective use of geoscience data in four dimensions. As what
happened with the predictions for peak hydrocarbon discovery rates, these advances will push the metals peak further into the future.
KAT EXPL INC ( KATX ) prices from 05/22/2009 through 02/28/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
05/22/09 8,100 2.00 0.15 2.00 0.25
05/29/09 517,068 2.00 0.21 0.25 0.2376
06/05/09 17,224 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.30
06/12/09 716,034 0.53 0.35 0.41 0.47
06/19/09 386,421 0.50 0.20 0.45 0.29
06/26/09 964,048 0.47 0.22 0.27 0.30
07/02/09 408,937 0.40 0.3011 0.3011 0.36
07/10/09 350,669 0.38 0.30 0.36 0.36
07/17/09 184,811 0.35 0.23 0.35 0.29
07/24/09 102,192 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.26
07/31/09 138,417 0.2875 0.17 0.23 0.20
08/07/09 9.99 M 0.20 0.012 0.20 0.021
08/14/09 8.38 M 0.024 0.01 0.024 0.0135
08/21/09 695,310 0.0145 0.0105 0.014 0.013
08/28/09 706,310 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.0145
09/04/09 168,162 0.015 0.013 0.0145 0.0145
09/11/09 3.03 M 0.014 0.0088 0.0135 0.01
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/09/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.0062
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
11/27/09 71.02 M 0.042 0.0162 0.037 0.019
12/04/09 42.15 M 0.027 0.015 0.0204 0.018
12/11/09 29.57 M 0.0249 0.0149 0.019 0.022
12/18/09 30.86 M 0.0285 0.017 0.024 0.027
12/31/09 10.54 M 0.0285 0.0165 0.0285 0.018
01/08/10 17.76 M 0.022 0.0165 0.018 0.0194
01/15/10 68.48 M 0.063 0.019 0.022 0.055
01/22/10 55.63 M 0.09 0.043 0.059 0.086
01/29/10 37.15 M 0.093 0.0495 0.0925 0.068
02/05/10 16.17 M 0.0835 0.06 0.067 0.066
02/12/10 17.56 M 0.069 0.0465 0.069 0.051
02/19/10 15.25 M 0.065 0.049 0.052 0.0525
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 03/27/2009 through 02/28/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
03/27/09 1.63 M 0.02 0.006 0.006 0.0075
04/03/09 20.30 M 0.0115 0.004 0.009 0.007
04/09/09 10.54 M 0.008 0.004 0.007 0.005
04/17/09 13.35 M 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.0065
04/24/09 10.61 M 0.0065 0.0035 0.0065 0.0053
05/01/09 12.12 M 0.0053 0.0037 0.005 0.0041
05/08/09 11.08 M 0.0041 0.003 0.0041 0.0036
05/15/09 34.48 M 0.0042 0.0025 0.0037 0.004
05/22/09 47.21 M 0.006 0.0035 0.004 0.0035
05/29/09 17.89 M 0.0039 0.0025 0.0038 0.0028
06/05/09 19.57 M 0.003 0.002 0.0028 0.0022
06/12/09 7.22 M 0.0024 0.0015 0.0022 0.0023
06/19/09 41.77 M 0.0055 0.0015 0.0023 0.0035
06/26/09 24.55 M 0.005 0.003 0.0035 0.0047
07/02/09 22.98 M 0.0062 0.0032 0.005 0.0055
07/10/09 17.88 M 0.0062 0.0036 0.0052 0.0062
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
07/24/09 32.50 M 0.0195 0.008 0.01 0.019
07/31/09 36.03 M 0.049 0.0175 0.019 0.0488
08/07/09 53.47 M 0.056 0.0252 0.049 0.03
08/14/09 38.29 M 0.033 0.0166 0.033 0.0205
08/21/09 17.66 M 0.037 0.02 0.023 0.0363
08/28/09 43.57 M 0.0465 0.0265 0.037 0.035
09/04/09 43.71 M 0.035 0.025 0.034 0.025
09/11/09 28.05 M 0.0345 0.025 0.0265 0.0275
09/18/09 27.36 M 0.031 0.023 0.0275 0.0285
09/25/09 20.11 M 0.033 0.025 0.0285 0.032
10/02/09 32.35 M 0.044 0.0292 0.0325 0.043
10/09/09 61.36 M 0.0585 0.034 0.043 0.053
10/16/09 25.26 M 0.05 0.033 0.05 0.035
10/23/09 27.30 M 0.038 0.0251 0.038 0.0285
10/30/09 21.74 M 0.0349 0.0251 0.0288 0.03
11/06/09 10.05 M 0.03 0.025 0.03 0.0254
11/13/09 19.82 M 0.026 0.019 0.0255 0.0209
11/20/09 18.72 M 0.0285 0.02 0.021 0.0275
11/27/09 6.67 M 0.0275 0.024 0.0275 0.024
12/04/09 19.56 M 0.025 0.017 0.0237 0.0188
12/11/09 16.54 M 0.0229 0.014 0.0189 0.0225
12/18/09 14.28 M 0.025 0.0165 0.025 0.02
12/31/09 8.41 M 0.019 0.0155 0.019 0.0159
01/08/10 13.40 M 0.018 0.015 0.0159 0.016
01/15/10 24.04 M 0.0165 0.0121 0.0165 0.0135
01/22/10 15.60 M 0.0174 0.01 0.0144 0.0128
01/29/10 17.16 M 0.0125 0.01 0.01 0.0105
02/05/10 23.93 M 0.0108 0.007 0.01 0.009
02/12/10 6.21 M 0.0102 0.0083 0.0095 0.009
02/19/10 7.01 M 0.009 0.0075 0.009 0.0084
KAT EXPL INC ( KATX) weekly prices from 05/22/2009 through 02/13/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
05/22/09 8,100 2.00 0.15 2.00 0.25
05/29/09 517,068 2.00 0.21 0.25 0.2376
06/05/09 17,224 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.30
06/12/09 716,034 0.53 0.35 0.41 0.47
06/19/09 386,421 0.50 0.20 0.45 0.29
06/26/09 964,048 0.47 0.22 0.27 0.30
07/02/09 408,937 0.40 0.3011 0.3011 0.36
07/10/09 350,669 0.38 0.30 0.36 0.36
07/17/09 184,811 0.35 0.23 0.35 0.29
07/24/09 102,192 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.26
07/31/09 138,417 0.2875 0.17 0.23 0.20
08/07/09 9.99 M 0.20 0.012 0.20 0.021
08/14/09 8.38 M 0.024 0.01 0.024 0.0135
08/21/09 695,310 0.0145 0.0105 0.014 0.013
08/28/09 706,310 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.0145
09/04/09 168,162 0.015 0.013 0.0145 0.0145
09/11/09 3.03 M 0.014 0.0088 0.0135 0.01
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/09/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.0062
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
11/27/09 71.02 M 0.042 0.0162 0.037 0.019
12/04/09 42.15 M 0.027 0.015 0.0204 0.018
12/11/09 29.57 M 0.0249 0.0149 0.019 0.022
12/18/09 30.86 M 0.0285 0.017 0.024 0.027
12/31/09 10.54 M 0.0285 0.0165 0.0285 0.018
01/08/10 17.76 M 0.022 0.0165 0.018 0.0194
01/15/10 68.48 M 0.063 0.019 0.022 0.055
01/22/10 55.63 M 0.09 0.043 0.059 0.086
01/29/10 37.15 M 0.093 0.0495 0.0925 0.068
02/05/10 16.17 M 0.0835 0.06 0.067 0.066
02/12/10 17.56 M 0.069 0.0465 0.069 0.051
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC (EVRM) daily prices from 01/05/2010 through 02/04/10
Date Volume High Low Open Close
01/05/10 3081223 0.0165 0.0150 0.0150 0.0159
01/06/10 1039125 0.0170 0.0155 0.0160 0.0165
01/07/10 2233914 0.0165 0.0151 0.0165 0.0153
01/08/10 2614958 0.0160 0.0150 0.0153 0.0160
01/11/10 3549757 0.0165 0.0141 0.0165 0.0150
01/12/10 1739822 0.0150 0.0133 0.0150 0.0150
01/13/10 1748979 0.0165 0.0135 0.0150 0.0135
01/14/10 6663450 0.0162 0.0145 0.0145 0.0160
01/15/10 10347784 0.0161 0.0121 0.0160 0.0135
01/19/10 6879505 0.0174 0.0115 0.0144 0.0132
01/20/10 2448474 0.0134 0.0100 0.0134 0.0110
01/21/10 4340303 0.0120 0.0100 0.0114 0.0120
01/22/10 1937529 0.0128 0.0110 0.0120 0.0128
01/25/10 1565807 0.0120 0.0100 0.0100 0.0120
01/26/10 2828664 0.0125 0.0105 0.0120 0.0115
01/27/10 3145785 0.0124 0.0100 0.0124 0.0100
01/28/10 3288680 0.0110 0.0100 0.0110 0.0110
01/29/10 6336000 0.0110 0.0100 0.0100 0.0105
02/01/10 2851438 0.0100 0.0085 0.0100 0.0089
02/02/10 2885903 0.0089 0.0077 0.0089 0.0077
02/03/10 11551408 0.0098 0.0070 0.0076 0.0098
02/04/10 5035055 0.0108 0.0090 0.0098 0.0095
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM )weekly prices from 03/27/2009 through 01/29/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
03/27/09 1.63 M 0.02 0.006 0.006 0.0075
04/03/09 20.30 M 0.0115 0.004 0.009 0.007
04/09/09 10.54 M 0.008 0.004 0.007 0.005
04/17/09 13.35 M 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.0065
04/24/09 10.61 M 0.0065 0.0035 0.0065 0.0053
05/01/09 12.12 M 0.0053 0.0037 0.005 0.0041
05/08/09 11.08 M 0.0041 0.003 0.0041 0.0036
05/15/09 34.48 M 0.0042 0.0025 0.0037 0.004
05/22/09 47.21 M 0.006 0.0035 0.004 0.0035
05/29/09 17.89 M 0.0039 0.0025 0.0038 0.0028
06/05/09 19.57 M 0.003 0.002 0.0028 0.0022
06/12/09 7.22 M 0.0024 0.0015 0.0022 0.0023
06/19/09 41.77 M 0.0055 0.0015 0.0023 0.0035
06/26/09 24.55 M 0.005 0.003 0.0035 0.0047
07/02/09 22.98 M 0.0062 0.0032 0.005 0.0055
07/10/09 17.88 M 0.0062 0.0036 0.0052 0.0062
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
07/24/09 32.50 M 0.0195 0.008 0.01 0.019
07/31/09 36.03 M 0.049 0.0175 0.019 0.0488
08/07/09 53.47 M 0.056 0.0252 0.049 0.03
08/14/09 38.29 M 0.033 0.0166 0.033 0.0205
08/21/09 17.66 M 0.037 0.02 0.023 0.0363
08/28/09 43.57 M 0.0465 0.0265 0.037 0.035
09/04/09 43.71 M 0.035 0.025 0.034 0.025
09/11/09 28.05 M 0.0345 0.025 0.0265 0.0275
09/18/09 27.36 M 0.031 0.023 0.0275 0.0285
09/25/09 20.11 M 0.033 0.025 0.0285 0.032
10/02/09 32.35 M 0.044 0.0292 0.0325 0.043
10/09/09 61.36 M 0.0585 0.034 0.043 0.053
10/16/09 25.26 M 0.05 0.033 0.05 0.035
10/23/09 27.30 M 0.038 0.0251 0.038 0.0285
10/30/09 21.74 M 0.0349 0.0251 0.0288 0.03
11/06/09 10.05 M 0.03 0.025 0.03 0.0254
11/13/09 19.82 M 0.026 0.019 0.0255 0.0209
11/20/09 18.72 M 0.0285 0.02 0.021 0.0275
11/27/09 6.67 M 0.0275 0.024 0.0275 0.024
12/04/09 19.56 M 0.025 0.017 0.0237 0.0188
12/11/09 16.54 M 0.0229 0.014 0.0189 0.0225
12/18/09 14.28 M 0.025 0.0165 0.025 0.02
12/31/09 8.41 M 0.019 0.0155 0.019 0.0159
01/08/10 13.40 M 0.018 0.015 0.0159 0.016
01/15/10 24.04 M 0.0165 0.0121 0.0165 0.0135
01/22/10 15.60 M 0.0174 0.01 0.0144 0.0128
01/29/10 17.16 M 0.0125 0.01 0.01 0.0105
Eroche
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC(EVRM) prices from 01/04/10 through 02/03/10
Date Volume High Low Open Close
01/04/10 4.43 M 0.018 0.015 0.0159 0.0159
01/05/10 3.08 M 0.0165 0.015 0.015 0.0159
01/06/10 1.03 M 0.017 0.0155 0.016 0.0165
01/07/10 2.23 M 0.0165 0.0151 0.0165 0.0153
01/08/10 2.61 M 0.016 0.015 0.0153 0.016
01/11/10 3.54 M 0.0165 0.0141 0.0165 0.015
01/12/10 1.73 M 0.015 0.0133 0.015 0.015
01/13/10 1.74 M 0.0165 0.0135 0.015 0.0135
01/14/10 6.66 M 0.0162 0.0145 0.0145 0.016
01/15/10 10.34 M 0.0161 0.0121 0.016 0.0135
01/19/10 6.87 M 0.0174 0.0115 0.0144 0.0132
01/20/10 2.44 M 0.0134 0.01 0.0134 0.011
01/21/10 4.34 M 0.012 0.01 0.0114 0.012
01/22/10 1.93 M 0.0128 0.011 0.012 0.0128
01/25/10 1.56 M 0.012 0.01 0.01 0.012
01/26/10 2.82 M 0.0125 0.0105 0.012 0.0115
01/27/10 3.14 M 0.0124 0.01 0.0124 0.01
01/28/10 3.28 M 0.011 0.01 0.011 0.011
01/29/10 6.33 M 0.011 0.01 0.01 0.0105
02/01/10 2.85 M 0.01 0.0085 0.01 0.0089
02/02/10 2.88 M 0.0089 0.0077 0.0089 0.007
Not Long Ago….Less Than ….3-Weeks (1/15/10)….
The Evermedia Group Reviews 2009 and Offers 2010 Guidance
2009 was a milestone year for the Company, marked by significant progress in establishing ourselves as an emerging leader in biometric security and defense contracting.
Looking forward, we remain positive that Evermedia will continue this growth as demand for multimodal identity and security applications rises over the next five years, particularly in the federal and military sectors
Though task orders in our functional area from the BOSS-U contract have yet to surface, we remain confident this contract and research vehicle will provide us the means to furthering our biometric concepts. It is our understanding that once policy, management and standardization task orders are complete, multiple research and development opportunities will follow as biometric initiatives in the U.S. continue to mature. As with many government contracting timetables, task and purchase orders are unpredictable and subject to delays
Likewise, we predict revenues from defense contracting efforts will increase in upcoming months as task orders emerge. We continue to place bids as either a prime or a subcontractor for logistics, engineering and IT projects to various U.S. federal agencies and the military. Many of our subcontracting agreements and contract awards announced in 2009 have yet to commence. Since most are large, multiyear contracts, we foresee longterm growth to our earnings as we progress and win task orders.
Our near term revenues are difficult to predict accurately, and at present, we can only offer a longterm outlook due to the timing of task orders and nature of government contracting. However, we do expect to hear awards announcements in the first quarter, at which time we will be able to better predict our revenues for the coming year
Now that we have successfully laid this foundation, 2010 will be a year dedicated to revenues.
We believe our company is extremely undervalued and our stock price does not accurately reflect current and/or future value given the state of our technology, the revenue potential of our government related contracts, the implied value of our intellectual property, the resourcefulness of our management and the prominence of our relationships.
TD AMERITRADE Update
Dear XXXX:
I sincerely apologize, but the Research Department that makes such determinations on stocks is not available to speak to clients directly. Please allow me to provide you with a brief explanation of this issue. TD AMERITRADE has restricted certain securities from being traded online. Most of these securities can still be traded by telephone with a TD AMERITRADE broker at the lower online commission rate. This list is subject to change based on market conditions, news and external factors. We will remove the restrictions as soon as possible from any stock we no longer feel warrants the extra precaution.
As part of the many systems and processes we implement to protect client assets, we regularly monitor trading patterns in specific securities to identify questionable or potentially illegal trading activity. As seen here and at other firms, certain securities, particularly pink sheets and over-the-counter-bulletin board (OTC-BB) stocks, are more vulnerable than others to manipulative trading activity. In some cases, we have found that brokerage accounts are illegally accessed and unauthorized trades are placed in specific securities from within those accounts.
We strongly believe that it is in the best interest of our clients, our firm, and our industry to take this action to restrict trading on certain securities. We apologize for any inconvenience, and appreciate your understanding and cooperation.
In reference to your specific questions:
Who decides to restrict certain stocks from on-line purchases?
We have a qualified Research Team that specifically works on this task.
What criteria is used?
I cannot provide you with the specific criteria that are used to make this determination other than what I have included above. We also cannot tell you if and when a stock will be restricted or unrestricted, or why we have made a determination on any specific stock.
How often is the restricted stock reviewed to determine if the restriction may be lifted?
This team works on a daily basis, Monday through Friday, reviewing all of the stocks that are currently restricted and additional securities.
Will KATX restriction be lifted? If not, why not?
Right now, I am not showing KATX on the restricted symbols list; however, since this status could change daily, I cannot confirm this until our order room is staffed tomorrow morning morning. If you are unable to place a trade online, please do call a broker at 1-888-871-9007. The broker will be happy to trade the stock for you at the Web rate.
I understand that this is frustrating and am sorry that I can't provide you with further information. We appreciate your business, and want to do anything we can to ensure your account is safe and you are able to trade in accordance with your investment plan. I hope this information was somewhat helpful, and thank you for your patience.
Please let us know if you have further questions. Have a great day!
Sincerely,
XXXX
Apex Client Services, TD AMERITRADE
Division of TD AMERITRADE, Inc.
KAT EXPL INC (KATX) weekly prices from 06/05/2009 through 01/24/2010
Date Volume High Low Open Close
06/05/09 17,224 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.30
06/12/09 716,034 0.53 0.35 0.41 0.47
06/19/09 386,421 0.50 0.20 0.45 0.29
06/26/09 964,048 0.47 0.22 0.27 0.30
07/02/09 408,937 0.40 0.3011 0.3011 0.36
07/10/09 350,669 0.38 0.30 0.36 0.36
07/17/09 184,811 0.35 0.23 0.35 0.29
07/24/09 102,192 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.26
07/31/09 138,417 0.2875 0.17 0.23 0.20
08/07/09 9.99 M 0.20 0.012 0.20 0.021
08/14/09 8.38 M 0.024 0.01 0.024 0.0135
08/21/09 695,310 0.0145 0.0105 0.014 0.013
08/28/09 706,310 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.0145
09/04/09 168,162 0.015 0.013 0.0145 0.0145
09/11/09 3.03 M 0.014 0.0088 0.0135 0.01
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/09/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.0062
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
11/27/09 71.02 M 0.042 0.0162 0.037 0.019
12/04/09 42.15 M 0.027 0.015 0.0204 0.018
12/11/09 29.57 M 0.0249 0.0149 0.019 0.022
12/18/09 30.86 M 0.0285 0.017 0.024 0.027
12/31/09 10.54 M 0.0285 0.0165 0.0285 0.018
01/08/10 17.76 M 0.022 0.0165 0.018 0.0194
01/15/10 68.48 M 0.063 0.019 0.022 0.055
01/22/10 55.63 M 0.09 0.043 0.059 0.086
TD AMERITRADE users purchasing KATX...
Dear Client Services,
KATX is restricted from purchasing (it can be sold on-line)on-line. Who decides to restrict certain stocks from on-line purchases?
What criteria is used? How often is the restricted stock reviewed to determine if the restriction may be lifted? Will KATX restriction be lifted? If not, Why not?
Thanks
Response from TD:
Good morning XXXXX,
Thank you for contacting us regarding restricted on-line purchases. I would like to address your concerns about this with you. I do not show that KAT Exploration Inc (KATX) is restricted from purchasing. I see that you purchased shares of it on 1/20/10.
But regarding who decides to place the restriction and what criteria is uses, when our Research Department came across information, i.e. news or events that determined that a stock may be of more risk to us and our clients, we may decide to place a restriction on that stock. In these instances, we do not prevent you from purchasing, but purchasing online. We only ask that a client call us to verify their identity and intent for trading it.
Thank you for choosing TD Ameritrade. We always look forward to providing you with the best possible trading experience.
Sincerely,
XXXXXX
Apex Client Services, TD AMERITRADE
Division of TD AMERITRADE, Inc.
My Response:
Hi Client Services,
I know it is not restricted from purchasing. My message stated it was restricted from purchasing "ON-LINE".
I also had some other questions that wasn't answered. Based on your response, could you put me in touch with someone in the research department to discuss this matter.
Thanks
Ken Stead is a VISIONARY!
Taken from an Interview conducted by: Lynn Fosse, Senior Editor, CEOCFOinterviews.com, Published - July 17, 2009
http://www.stockstobuy.org/profiles/blog/show?id=3237573%3ABlogPost%3A29049&commentId=3237573%3AComment%3A29064&xg_source=activity
CEOCFO: Mr. Stead, what is the focus of KAT?
Mr. Stead: “Our focus is precious metals and base metals. We want to bring our properties to a level where we can do feasibility studies on the deposits and possibly joint venture with a major company. I have done that quite often in the past with my former company, Cornerstone Resources Inc. We joint ventured with major world companies such as Phelps Dodge, Noranda and others. So I know how the field works and it is to a company’s benefit, to have the backing of major companies to offset the costs of drill programs and even the intense exploration on some of our best projects.”
We have another property called “Rusty Ridge” and by means of an airborne survey and some ground geophysics it too is ready for drilling. There was an interpretation done by an independent geophysics company from Vancouver, on the other side of Canada, who likened many of the signatures that we are finding to that of the Olympic Dam in Australia. That is actually their words not ours. We have two deep targets, so the idea is to get down there and see what those targets are. While it is a costly operation, we will venture it ourselves but would hope to joint venture it with another company. The only thing is, with the Handcamp Gold Property a priority, we are not sure if we will get a drill on the Rusty Ridge this year. If we can find the time to promote it and get a major company to come and use their money, well that will really help. However, if not we will test that deposit ourselves. If it is what we hope it is, it would probably turn this area into a whole brand-new exploration play for major companies because these deposits are kind of rare in that they host nearly all the major minerals. They have base metals, gold, silver and uranium along with rare-earth minerals. If it turns out to be an economical deposit, one can imagine how other companies will take interest in the whole region looking for more of these deposits.
We are excited about that property, but it is a property that if the Handcamp Gold Property starts turning out what we think it might, because of gold prices today, we may just continue with that one and do the Rusty Ridge a little later. Other than that, we have several copper/silver combination properties, and lots more to go if we want to stake what we have been finding. For now, these properties we have in our portfolio, and will hopefully bring in another gold property, which we are now considering that also has great potential. As a new company just coming on, there is overhead, and a higher burn rate in adding more properties to our portfolio, so we will be cautious not to spread ourselves to thin. Therefore, we don’t want to waste money when we can focus in areas of high interest and hopefully areas that will catch the attention of investors because the company has done good work on good properties.”
CEOCFO: How do you attract people to the stock?
Mr. Stead: “The way we work is, we have a group in Vancouver who are engaged in helping fund the company and took us under their wing for an equity stake in the company and managed to take us public. In the meantime, we are attracting people to our stock through marketing, and with media groups like you guys right now, as well as press releases. In the past I had known quite a few major companies and we would hope to take advantage of them as time goes by and hopefully some of these will take an interest in the company as well. Again, we are quite pleased that we have generated so much interest so quickly. We think now with the ongoing programs we have and good management team, we can establish a good investor base and retain our stock through a decent price.”
CEOCFO: In closing, why should potential investors pick Kat out of the crowd?
Mr. Stead: “We feel like we are an exciting company. We have a field crew that knows what they are doing. We have some good past experience. Again, we are not a fly-by-night company; we are located in an area that is under-explored where in recent times have made new economical discoveries. If you were living in Canada and were monitoring province-by-province, you would find that Newfoundland has become one of the most exciting exploration provinces in the whole country. Our economy is a booming economy here in Newfoundland due mainly because of oil and mining. INCO has recently brought the Voisey’s Bay Nickel/Cobalt Deposit into production which is a very rich deposit found in the Labrador part of the province. They are now in the process of building a $2 billion smelter refinery in Long Harbor. So the province itself is very exciting when it comes to new mining and oil discoveries. So KAT Exploration has great plans of moving forward, and we know what we are doing. We have good properties, good prospects, and good mining operations next door to us, so we can sell any discovered deposits. The government is mining friendly with great infrastructure in place. When all is said and done, we see ourselves as having a long prosperous future with all of this at our fingertips. So if investors are looking for a company that is going to be around for awhile, KAT will be around awhile for sure.”
These financials gives us a baseline and snapshot of where the company is positioned. The next report where tell us where the company is headed and at what pace. According to the report we have contracts in place that have not been tasked " Revenues for the third quarter reflect revenues generated by System Technology Solutions, Inc. (STS) and our ability to consolidate their financial statements as an 80 percent owner of the parent’s outstanding and issued common stock. Evermedia Biometrics reported no revenue for the quarter. At present, primary driver of revenues
is expected to come from the BOSS-U contract with EDS. However, task orders within our functional areas have not been tasked yet. Task orders thus far have primarily been policy and procedures and not research and development, our area of expertise.
Revenues were derived primarily from contracts with Cameron, Honeywell and the Detainee Property Warehouse under a Joint Forces contract in Iraq. We have not received any task orders from new awards in the third quarter. Typically, task order bidding does not occur immediately after an awards announcement."
Good growth from a year ago:
Total revenues were up more than 400 percent from the same quarter a year ago for STS and net income is up more than 1000 percent during the same period. The increase in revenue and net income was due to winning a greater amount of awards
and task orders.
http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=27610
louieforpar
Officer/Director Disclosure- CERTIFICATION is a SEC rule. All companies must do it. It has nothing to do with who did the financials. I could not find the exact rul on the SEC web site however here is some background:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/34-46079.htm
I. INTRODUCTION
Our system of federal securities regulation is based on full and fair disclosure. Congress, in enacting the federal securities laws, embraced full disclosure as the best way to permit markets to allocate capital. For this system to function most effectively, investors must have access to disclosure that is clear, accurate and timely.
The Exchange Act requires companies to make information publicly available to investors on a continuing basis to aid in their investment and voting decisions.12 In addition, we permit seasoned issuers (that is, companies that have been subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for an extended period of time) to incorporate information from their Exchange Act reports into their registration statements filed under the Securities Act of 1933.13 Therefore, investors purchasing securities from these companies in public offerings also rely on the companies' Exchange Act disclosure.
Investors depend on companies' quarterly and annual reports to present a clear picture in all important respects of the company's business and financial condition. Investors trust and rely upon a company's management to ensure that these reports are accurate. Unless this belief is well-founded, we risk an erosion of investor confidence in our securities markets.
Our existing antifraud and disclosure rules are designed to elicit full and fair corporate disclosure. Questions have arisen as to whether senior corporate officials devote sufficient attention to the preparation of their companies' quarterly and annual reports and to the internal procedures that generate the data from which they are prepared. We are concerned that investor confidence has suffered because of a real or perceived absence of such participation. We believe that it is important both to the quality of disclosure and investor confidence for senior executives to provide assurance that they have reviewed and evaluated the information contained in their companies' quarterly and annual reports. We therefore propose to require a company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer each to certify that, to his or her knowledge, the company's quarterly and annual reports are true in all important respects and that the reports contain all information about the company of which he or she is aware that he or she believes is important to a reasonable investor.14
Companies also must have internal communications and other procedures to ensure that important information flows to the appropriate collection and disclosure points on a timely basis. Given the growing size, complexity and sophistication of corporate organizations and operations and the increasing importance of timely information, we believe that it is necessary and appropriate, in furthering our investor protection mission, to propose requiring companies to maintain these procedures and to periodically evaluate them. We also believe that management should supervise these periodic evaluations and that the company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and members of the company's board of directors should review the evaluations.15
II. PROPOSED RULES
A. Certification of Disclosure in Quarterly and Annual Reports
1. Reasons for Proposal
Investors require accurate and materially complete information to make informed investment and voting decisions and to ensure that capital is allocated efficiently to business enterprises. While our corporate disclosure system is the best in the world, it can be better. Where it is practicable, existing disclosure practices should be improved to better suit the needs of investors and to ensure the integrity and fairness of the securities markets. We believe that a company's senior management should be intimately involved in these practices and that investors would benefit from seeing evidence of that involvement.
KAT EXPL INC ( KATX ) prices from 05/22/2009 through 11/21/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
05/22/09 8,100 2.00 0.15 2.00 0.25
05/29/09 517,068 2.00 0.21 0.25 0.2376
06/05/09 17,224 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.30
06/12/09 716,034 0.53 0.35 0.41 0.47
06/19/09 386,421 0.50 0.20 0.45 0.29
06/26/09 964,048 0.47 0.22 0.27 0.30
07/02/09 408,937 0.40 0.3011 0.3011 0.36
07/10/09 350,669 0.38 0.30 0.36 0.36
07/17/09 184,811 0.35 0.23 0.35 0.29
07/24/09 102,192 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.26
07/31/09 138,417 0.2875 0.17 0.23 0.20
08/07/09 9.99 M 0.20 0.012 0.20 0.021
08/14/09 8.38 M 0.024 0.01 0.024 0.0135
08/21/09 695,310 0.0145 0.0105 0.014 0.013
08/28/09 706,310 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.0145
09/04/09 168,162 0.015 0.013 0.0145 0.0145
09/11/09 3.03 M 0.014 0.0088 0.0135 0.01
09/18/09 2.38 M 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.0085
09/25/09 4.74 M 0.0085 0.005 0.008 0.0052
10/02/09 3.22 M 0.008 0.005 0.0052 0.007
10/09/09 1.47 M 0.005 0.004 0.0045 0.0042
10/16/09 6.58 M 0.0065 0.004 0.0042 0.0065
10/23/09 48.99 M 0.0093 0.0042 0.0075 0.006
10/30/09 13.77 M 0.008 0.0045 0.0065 0.0045
11/06/09 33.02 M 0.0045 0.0014 0.0045 0.0029
11/13/09 42.59 M 0.0067 0.0028 0.0029 0.0044
11/20/09 118.00 M 0.032 0.0037 0.0044 0.031
http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kat-exploration-inc/katx/nao/historical-prices?tf=ytd&gran=w
EVERMEDIA GROUP Price/Volume verses Public Float
Based on the information below EVRM has closed higher at the end of the trading week for the past 6 weeks. We also broke all the previously weekly trading volume levels.
The increase in volume is moving reasonably with the increase in stock price. The previously highest volume week also had the highest stock price.
Approximately 444 million (public float 413 Million) of EVRM shares traded above one cent from 7/17/09 – 10/09/09 (13 weeks )
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 07/17/2009 through 10/09/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
07/24/09 32.50 M 0.0195 0.008 0.01 0.019
07/31/09 36.03 M 0.049 0.0175 0.019 0.0488
08/07/09 53.47 M 0.056 0.0252 0.049 0.03
08/14/09 38.29 M 0.033 0.0166 0.033 0.0205
08/21/09 17.66 M 0.037 0.02 0.023 0.0363
08/28/09 43.5 M 0.0465 0.0265 0.037 0.035
09/04/09 43.71M 0.035 0.025 0.034 0.025
09/11/09 28.05M 0.0345 0.025 0.0265 0.0275
09/18/09 27.36M 0.031 0.023 0.0275 0.0285
09/25/09 20.11M 0.033 0.025 0.0285 0.032
10/02/09 32.35M 0.044 0.0292 0.0325 0.043
10/09/09 61.34M 0.0585 0.34 0.043 0.053
Based on current trading stats EVRM shares trading above one cent exceeded the public float yesterday 10/8/09. This was done about 3 weeks faster than below one cent a share suggesting an increase interest in the stock. I will next evaluate shares trading above the ten cent level.
Approximately 337 million (public float 318 Million) of EVRM shares traded below one cent from 3/27/09 – 7/16/09 (16 weeks)
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 03/27/2009 through 07/17/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
03/27/09 1.63 M 0.02 0.006 0.006 0.0075
04/03/09 20.30 M 0.0115 0.004 0.009 0.007
04/09/09 10.54 M 0.008 0.004 0.007 0.005
04/17/09 13.35 M 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.0065
04/24/09 10.61 M 0.0065 0.0035 0.0065 0.0053
05/01/09 12.12 M 0.0053 0.0037 0.005 0.0041
05/08/09 11.08 M 0.0041 0.003 0.0041 0.0036
05/15/09 34.48 M 0.0042 0.0025 0.0037 0.004
05/22/09 47.21 M 0.006 0.0035 0.004 0.0035
05/29/09 17.89 M 0.0039 0.0025 0.0038 0.0028
06/05/09 19.57 M 0.003 0.002 0.0028 0.0022
06/12/09 7.22 M 0.0024 0.0015 0.0022 0.0023
06/19/09 41.77 M 0.0055 0.0015 0.0023 0.0035
06/26/09 24.55 M 0.005 0.003 0.0035 0.0047
07/02/09 22.98 M 0.0062 0.0032 0.005 0.0055
07/10/09 17.88 M 0.0062 0.0036 0.0052 0.0062
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
Retired USAF MSgt
Intelligence Motto – “In God We Trust All Others We Monitor”
EVERMEDIA GROUP Price/Volume verses Public Float
Based on the information below EVRM has closed higher at the end of the trading week for the past 5 weeks and is projected to do so on Friday. We also should break the previously 8 week’s volume levels.
The increase in volume is moving reasonably with the increase in stock price. The highest volume week also had the highest stock price.
Approximately 411 million (public float 413 Million) of EVRM shares traded above one cent from 7/17/09 – 10/07/09 (12 weeks and 3 days)
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 07/17/2009 through 10/07/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
07/24/09 32.50 M 0.0195 0.008 0.01 0.019
07/31/09 36.03 M 0.049 0.0175 0.019 0.0488
08/07/09 53.47 M 0.056 0.0252 0.049 0.03
08/14/09 38.29 M 0.033 0.0166 0.033 0.0205
08/21/09 17.66 M 0.037 0.02 0.023 0.0363
08/28/09 43.5 M 0.0465 0.0265 0.037 0.035
09/04/09 43.71M 0.035 0.025 0.034 0.025
09/11/09 28.05M 0.0345 0.025 0.0265 0.0275
09/18/09 27.36M 0.031 0.023 0.0275 0.0285
09/25/09 20.11M 0.033 0.025 0.0285 0.032
10/02/09 32.35M 0.044 0.0292 0.0325 0.043
10/05/09 8.58M 0.045 0.0385 0.043 0.0448
10/06/09 10.84M 0.05 0.041 0.043 0.05
10/07/09 9.33M 0.055 0.049 0.0499 0.051
Based on current trading levels EVRM shares trading above one cent should exceed the public float today, 10/8/09. This was done about 3 weeks faster than below one cent a share suggesting an increase interest in the stock. I will next evaluate shares trading above the ten cent level.
Approximately 337 million (public float 318 Million) of EVRM shares traded below one cent from 3/27/09 – 7/16/09 (16 weeks)
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 03/27/2009 through 07/17/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
03/27/09 1.63 M 0.02 0.006 0.006 0.0075
04/03/09 20.30 M 0.0115 0.004 0.009 0.007
04/09/09 10.54 M 0.008 0.004 0.007 0.005
04/17/09 13.35 M 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.0065
04/24/09 10.61 M 0.0065 0.0035 0.0065 0.0053
05/01/09 12.12 M 0.0053 0.0037 0.005 0.0041
05/08/09 11.08 M 0.0041 0.003 0.0041 0.0036
05/15/09 34.48 M 0.0042 0.0025 0.0037 0.004
05/22/09 47.21 M 0.006 0.0035 0.004 0.0035
05/29/09 17.89 M 0.0039 0.0025 0.0038 0.0028
06/05/09 19.57 M 0.003 0.002 0.0028 0.0022
06/12/09 7.22 M 0.0024 0.0015 0.0022 0.0023
06/19/09 41.77 M 0.0055 0.0015 0.0023 0.0035
06/26/09 24.55 M 0.005 0.003 0.0035 0.0047
07/02/09 22.98 M 0.0062 0.0032 0.005 0.0055
07/10/09 17.88 M 0.0062 0.0036 0.0052 0.0062
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
Retired USAF MSgt
Intelligence Motto – “In God We Trust All Others We Monitor”
EVERMEDIA GROUP Price/Volume verses Public Float
Approximately ? million (public float 413 Million) of EVRM shares traded above ten cents from 10/?/09 – 10/?/09 (1 week)
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 10/?/2009 through 10/?/2009
Approximately 402 million (public float 413 Million) of EVRM shares traded above one cent from 7/17/09 – 10/06/09 (12 weeks and 2 days)
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 07/17/2009 through 10/06/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
07/24/09 32.50 M 0.0195 0.008 0.01 0.019
07/31/09 36.03 M 0.049 0.0175 0.019 0.0488
08/07/09 53.47 M 0.056 0.0252 0.049 0.03
08/14/09 38.29 M 0.033 0.0166 0.033 0.0205
08/21/09 17.66 M 0.037 0.02 0.023 0.0363
08/28/09 43.5 M 0.0465 0.0265 0.037 0.035
09/04/09 43.71M 0.035 0.025 0.034 0.025
09/11/09 28.05M 0.0345 0.025 0.0265 0.0275
09/18/09 27.36M 0.031 0.023 0.0275 0.0285
09/25/09 20.11M 0.033 0.025 0.0285 0.032
10/02/09 32.35M 0.044 0.0292 0.0325 0.043
10/05/09 8.58M 0.045 0.0385 0.043 0.0448
10/06/09 10.84M 0.05 0.041 0.043 0.05
Based on current trading levels EVRM shares trading above one cent should exceed the public float in the very, very, very near future.
Approximately 337 million (public float 318 Million) of EVRM shares traded below one cent from 3/27/09 – 7/16/09 (16 weeks)
EVERMEDIA GROUP INC ( EVRM ) prices from 03/27/2009 through 07/16/2009
Date Volume High Low Open Close
03/27/09 1.63 M 0.02 0.006 0.006 0.0075
04/03/09 20.30 M 0.0115 0.004 0.009 0.007
04/09/09 10.54 M 0.008 0.004 0.007 0.005
04/17/09 13.35 M 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.0065
04/24/09 10.61 M 0.0065 0.0035 0.0065 0.0053
05/01/09 12.12 M 0.0053 0.0037 0.005 0.0041
05/08/09 11.08 M 0.0041 0.003 0.0041 0.0036
05/15/09 34.48 M 0.0042 0.0025 0.0037 0.004
05/22/09 47.21 M 0.006 0.0035 0.004 0.0035
05/29/09 17.89 M 0.0039 0.0025 0.0038 0.0028
06/05/09 19.57 M 0.003 0.002 0.0028 0.0022
06/12/09 7.22 M 0.0024 0.0015 0.0022 0.0023
06/19/09 41.77 M 0.0055 0.0015 0.0023 0.0035
06/26/09 24.55 M 0.005 0.003 0.0035 0.0047
07/02/09 22.98 M 0.0062 0.0032 0.005 0.0055
07/10/09 17.88 M 0.0062 0.0036 0.0052 0.0062
07/17/09 33.90 M 0.02 0.0055 0.006 0.01
Stocksgonewild
I tracked below 1 cent, above 1 cent, and will track above 10 cents next.