Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I just put on ignore I believe my 10th "compensated awareness" poster for the HHII board today. Had 8 or 9 ignored from before just so that I could observe and read, definitely wouldn't buy any, just watching the devastation of share price the last week or so. But when there is that much bs spam being done, shouldn't touch the stock with a ten foot pole, pretty much ensures that it's just one of the worst scams.
What's the thing got to do now, how many 100's of percent just to get to where the point was when they started the spam campaign? Been just steadily loosing value for some time now (except just a few days in the downtrend). Obvious more dumping will be on the way, with that many garbage posts.
But pretty nice when one sees hundreds of unread posts just to find less than a dozen to read due to the ignore function. Also lets one know what stocks to stay away from considering who is getting ignored. LOL
The stock and promoters just become a joke with that type of idiocy. Just looking for the most naive of suckers I guess, but hopefully the suckers learn fast and many that are limited with their ignores can just learn to ignore the whole stock as far as buying into it, just don't follow the clowns, and go elsewhere with their money.
I guess anything is possible with these shells. Gougers other shell is having a fight between the crooks and past shell owner has filed a law suit against Gouger. Not anything positive for current retail though.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/florida/flmdce/8:2012cv00844/270417/
He also is having problems with the new ticker and RS shares getting through.
But I would think it would be easier and cheaper to just reorg this thing into some other business flavor. Depends though, no normal retail really knows how "clean" this shell is and who are all the people really involved or how much involvement there is behind the ticker. The SEC has tired of no financials with only 8k (and a few other forms) in years and there hasn't been any record of any operations for the company so it's pretty much dark.
In the past, that may have been ripe for some shell business change, but relatively lately, the SEC has been stepping in and nailing some of the people behind doing it. Along with suspending many tickers for lack of current or proper filings. But MXXH has been "dark" so to speak for so long now, it would take a new business. MXXH is never going to make their financials current at this point, and only some supposed "new" people or RM, etc to get some junk unaudited filings at the OTCMarkets for the last couple of years may be the only possible option. But then they may have all the scrutiny of the SEC at their heals also and may have to remain dark for awhile longer.
Gouger isn't taking care of any oil wells, new drilling or old dead ones. Can't even be sure there is even any involvement at all with him here anymore.
Absolute zero transparency and pretty much a dead ticker for now.
Video Interview with Michael Chertoff, former Department of Homeland Security secretary.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/michael-chertoff-cyberattacks-biggest-risk-facing-america-165803529.html
Michael Chertoff: Cyberattacks Are The Biggest Risk Facing America
By Stacy Curtin | Daily Ticker – 2 hours 11 minutes ago..
There have been a number of high-profile cyberattacks on multinationals in the last few years, including Lockheed Martin (LMT), Northrop-Grumman (NOC), Sony (SNE), Google (GOOG) to Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA), among others. (See: Cyberattacks: A National Security Threat Largely Being Ignored)
A new, first of its kind report by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), estimates cyberattacks jumped 650% from 2006 to 2010.
Sixty percent of U.S. companies reported security breaches, according to the annual report which was commissioned by President Barack Obama last year to assess the country's ability to respond to natural disasters and other natural security threats. Fifty percent of "high-priority facilities" like those that manage the country's electrical grids reported having been attacked.
Cybersecurity was the biggest area of concern for state and local governments with only 42% of officials believing their capabilities adequate enough to respond to such a threat and 45% of officials said they had no formal program to prevent or fend off an attack, according to the report, which was released on Thursday.
Cyberattacks: "Biggest Threat We Currently Face"
Ahead of the release of this report, The Daily Ticker's Aaron Task sat down with former Department of Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff to discuss the threat of cyberattacks on the U.S. and corporations.
"This is the biggest threat we currently face," says Chertoff, now the chairman of The Chertoff Group, a private sector company that advises businesses on cybersecurity-related issues. "Not only is there a concern about our critical infrastructure… but we are losing billions of dollars of intellectual property every year that is being stolen and it is resulting in job losses and damages to our economy."
Such illegal activity put nearly $400 billion in research spending at risk between 2009 and 2011, according to a National Counterintelligence Executive report issued last fall.
The biggest threat from cybersecurity, he believes, is coming from China. "The Chinese government has a national policy of economic espionage in cyberspace. In fact, the Chinese are the world's most active and persistent practitioners of cyber espionage today," Chertoff wrote in a WSJ op-ed earlier this year.
Due to the growing prevalence of cyberattacks, it seems cyber-warfare and espionage could become the new frontier for global combat as well as economic competition, as Aaron points out in the accompanying video.
"For many nations, they view the economic well-being of the country as part of their national security strategies. They will use their intelligence agencies as a way to enable their companies, their national champions, to compete in the market place," Chertoff says. "We don't do that in the United States. We keep the free-market separate from government, but as a result sometimes we have our rivals overseas stealing our assets."
Politics of Cybersecurity
There is an ongoing debate in Washington about how fight the impending threat from cyberattacks.
"This [threat] is not going away unless we do something about it," says Chertoff. But that may be easier said than done because, as usual, Democrats and Republicans cannot seem to agree on the best way to address the issue.
The House of Representatives recently passed the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), which would make it easier for companies to share information about cyberattacks. The Senate has yet to vote on this legislation, but when it does, the bill is not likely to pass. And if it should get through the Senate, President Obama has threatened to veto the bill because he does not believe it goes far enough to protect critical infrastructure. The White House is also concerned CISPA encroaches upon civil liberties.
There are also two different bills floating around the Senate, but only one both Obama and Chertoff support, and that is the legislation proposed by Senators Joe Liberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine). This bill would give the Department of Homeland Security the authority to monitor the nation's critical infrastructure and set mandatory security standards.
Many Republicans oppose the Lieberman-Collins bill because it would give the government authority to increase regulations, which conservatives argue hinders economic growth and job creation. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the largest special interest group in America, is also lobbying against the bill.
"I like Lieberman-Collins because it has not only the information sharing but it also requires that our critical infrastructure raise its standard," says Chertoff. 'That being said, I think it is important to at least get the information sharing done. I'd rather see some of this pass than none of it."
.
I was just wondering if Melissa is related to Melinda, both with the last name Rice. Melinda Rice was acting president of Cal-Bay and connected to Roger Pawson, Dale Baeten, and others.
"I'm pretty familiar with Melissa Rice who was named in the litigation"
Is she any relationship to Melinda Rice, Melissa seems to be hanging out with some of the same people as Melinda did.
It worked just fine for the Panamanian business that put it on. They made out like fat cats. Quite brutal to the normal retail though.
Before that, if I remember right, they were in the business of buying a casino somewhere (different ticker letters and a reorg or two before). But take your pick, one flavor is as good as another as long as it is the "flavor of the day" and it has the right paid promo to it. LOL
Business names and flavors long gone, but giving the newer Peterson name to it. But Peterson wasn't involved with those businesses. The listing is mixing different businesses at once also. Would have to go back and check, but I believe different shell owners came about in the middle of some of those business flavors, then the shell went dark for some time before the new flavor and "out of nowhere" current P&D to where it is now with the Peterson name.
Bloomberg is just a erroneous place to get info off of for these penny stocks especially. It could have anything up on it for any company; old, erroneous, or just plain wrong or non factual data.
That happens to be old information from some of the old business flavors of the day before the ticker went through the last pump and dump to NO BID and zero volume before the RS and newer "gold flavor" and Panamanian Pump and Dump this time around.
Volume data for month of April - BMRK. Up from last month, but more than half done in two days. April 3rd and 10th with 1,757 and 2,859 shares traded in those two days respectively.
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/tradeact_mv.asp?SearchBy=issue&Issue=BMRK&SortBy=volume&Month=4-1-2012&IMAGE1.x=2&IMAGE1.y=8
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=historical&symbol=BMRK
We've heard everything already! Including your last statement. I was only stating that I've been right when it was claimed or pretended I wasn't. What's your point? I could care less who holds, it's only statistical and when pro traders come in they count on it. That's how pro trading is done with CRWV, keep the hopeful hoping so their shares don't get in the way of any selling volume and go in and out in a day or a little more. Nothing new, that's for sure. Neither is the fact that this stock has scammed people out of their moneys, has quit even putting out erroneous financials or fluff "news". Been restricted by the DTCC and STOP sign put on at the OTCMarkets.
Anyone can hold all the way to SEC suspension, absolute ZERO volume, .0001, NO BID; good luck with that. Again, just discussing on a discussion board for CRWV about CRWV. Who holds or not, what has been said before, yada yada makes no difference with what it is.
Sorry, but been pretty much RIGHT on everything so far and basically just have stated the obvious FACTS. A few million shares (if that, other than intermittent trading days) for a double zero stock is pretty much zero in relative stock market terms. It is barely holding above the trips and has gone to the trips and there has been days of mearly a few thousand shares traded in a day. In FACT it is a matter of record that CRWV has had ZERO volume days this time around. It is as I've said, still ahead of the last time this stock did the very same thing before it went to complete zero volume and NO BID before the last RS and the Panamanian promoters took it over and did their dirty deeds (in time span anyway, it took over a year to do it last time).
I don't really care in what anyone puts credibility in, doesn't change what it is, a POS stock that took shareholders money and has nothing but bag holders with horrendous losses with only diminishing misplaced "hope" of every seeing those losses returned with this stock. But anyone can pretend that I and others haven't been right and continue to "hold" since there really isn't much value now to hold onto and is only in the mind and dreams there is. CRWV in REALITY WORLD has gone to exactly what I have claimed in the past would do and continues to.
Streak of lower volume and NO BID continues. Whoooo.
Lets see, 5 month streak of lower monthly volume and about a 60 DAY streak of NO BID. Great streak, you betcha. LOL
So at .0001 the total amount of about $2500 traded all last month (which would all be at loss for any normal retail), about the same as what a trip zero stock should be trading in a couple of hours (not the whole month). Streaking joke is what this is. LOL And we can be pretty certain that some if not many of those shares went for less than .0001, it just shows up as .0001 with the NO BID status. About 5 months since any news pump and with almost a year old state status. Yep, a streak alright, a streak right into and under a rock.
UPDATED HISTORICAL VOLUME REPORT
I thought this was kind of interesting to take a look at the trading volume of our Therma-Med shares. I rounded the numbers to the nearest million just to make things easier to read.
August 2011 - 2 billion 595 million. This is when Zayjay Trujillo became CEO.
September 2011 - 903 million
October 2011 - 1 billion 49 milliion
November 2011 - 399 million
December 2011 - 907 million, this is when the LOCK by DTCC was imposed.
January 2012 - 365 million
February 2012 - 41 million
March 2012 - 36 million
April 2012 - 25 million
It's pretty easy to see that interest in Therma-Med has declined ever since DTCC stepped in and did it's thing.
All you have here with CRWV is just every once in awhile some traders come in and manipulate the stock just to trade it. Longs (or bag holders) statistically don't sell when the opportunity presents itself "hoping" it has some recovery to some pps that is long gone and will never happen. The fact that CRWV is DTCC restricted to much of the market and it has no real business, and all it has become is some low level liquidity for the most part with intermittent trading activity.
In reality it's just some dwindling nothing ticker with no business, no real or accurate financials, no gold to fulfill the past dreams of the stock. Overall long term trend is still just lower lows and lower highs with each sporadic trading opp (or pop) going into lower and lower trading ranges.
Not much to see or talk about. Most of the money involved has long gone to Panamanian companies or individuals that have moved on to other scammy endeavors.
Just a note. This last case of Fraud connected right back to the same people with connected cases and individuals in IPWG dots that I posted. Yep, lets see IPWG or any of these scammy restricted stocks bring forth some record of transactions and any more dots that can be exposed.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
A. Prior Commission Action Involving Similar Unlawful Scheme
24. On September 24,2009, the Commission filed a civil injunctive action in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Stephen W. Carnes ("Carnes"), Lawrence A. Powalisz ("Powalisz"), and others alleging that they violated Section 5 of the Securities Act through the unlawful sale of purportedly unrestricted stock, including stock acquired under wrap around agreements. K&L International Enterprises, Inc., e t aI., 6:09-cv1638-GAP-KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 24, 2009) ("K&L"). Linton wrote at least two legal opinion letters on transactions that were alleged in K&L to have violated Section 5 ofthe Securities Act.
25. On September 29,2009, the K&L Court issued preliminary injunctions that enjoined Carnes, Powalisz, and other defendants and their "agents, directors, officers, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation" with them from violating the registration requirement of Section 5 ofthe Securities Act. Id., Docket No. 14 (Sep. 29,2010). Pursuant to a settlement, the Court imposed permanent injunctions against Carnes and Powalisz in 2010. Id., Docket Nos. 53 and 59 (May 14 and Aug. 18,2010).
26. By their plain terms, the preliminary and permanent injunctions in K&L against Carnes, Powalisz, and their "agents, ... attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with [them]" extended to Linton, who had issued some of the opinion letters for the K&L defendants.
B. Defendants' Scheme to Evade Section 5 of the Securities Act
27. Defendants employed a scheme to acquire and sell large quantities ofpurportedly unrestricted stock under wrap around agreements that closely resembles the methods involved in K&L.
28. Two ofthe defendants in K&L, Carnes and Powalisz, had retained Linton to write legal opinion letters related to the issuance and sale ofpurportedly unrestricted stock under wrap around agreements. Linton issued at least two legal opinion letters for Carnes and Powalisz on transactions that were alleged to have violated the federal securities laws in K&L.
29. In addition, Scucci was employed by a business colleague of Carnes and Powalisz, who also participated in wrap around agreement transactions and had hired Linton to write legal opinion letters for him. While employed in that context, Scucci participated in these transactions by, among other things, (1) communicating with Linton to obtain legal opinion letters, (2) communicating with at least one transfer agent about the issuance of purportedly unrestricted stock on behalf ofher employer, and (3) obtaining and transmitting documents requested by Linton and/or the transfer agent in furtherance ofthe transactions.
30. Shortly after the Commission filed K&L and the defendants were enjoined, Scucci and Beach formed Protege and Capital Edge, respectively, to engage in nearly-identical transactions involving wrap around agreements to obtain large quantities of purportedly unrestricted stock, which they sold in unregistered transactions.
31. Scucci formed Protege in January 2010, and Beach formed Capital Edge in May 2010. Scucci and Beach were the sole managing members oftheir respective companies. Scucci and Beach caused Protege and Capital Edge to enter into wrap around agreements involving several Issuers.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2012/comp-pr2012-80.pdf
Personally I think there is a lot going on behind the public scenes between the SEC and DTCC. Meaning they have something up their sleeves in order to expose a lot of this OTC shenanigans.
As for the 3 attorneys, at first I thought the same thing, but remember this is the OTC, how many people are willing to hand over theirs files here to have them looked over. Remember if there exists any illegal actions they are required to turn them over to the SEC for further investigation. The attorneys are not representing the security they are representing the DTCC upon request of an issuer. I do not know many scams lining up to hand over their TA files.
Add to that fact I am certain some of the Legal Counsel that often write these “opinion letters” are requesting that issuers not approach the DTCC for such actions. I mean this is exactly what the DTCC was requesting at the roundtable, being able to see everything at the TA level in these share issuances.
I simply think it is minimal requests due to not willing to risk exposure, the few that have not done anything wrong can get their services restored and go about doing their business but I doubt the scams are going to even entertain this process.
There sure is a lot of irony with a lot or most of these suspensions. Not what is expected, but when it would be expected. These tickers haven't had any volume for quite some time, just haven't been trading at all (years even). Two of them (Berman Center and Java Detour) were already part of a SEC Fraud complaint about a year ago and seems like they could be suspended then for some technicality or reason.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2011/comp21865.pdf
and has been DTCC services suspended and locked.
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/dtc/ope/0503-11.pdf
The other one (CYKN - Cyberkinetics) has even had a black scull on it on the OTCMarkets and
"Investors are advised that OTC Markets Group has been unable to contact or confirm the location of this company. If you have current contact information, please complete the Update Company Information Form or send an email to info@otcmarkets.com."
in bold and red for some time (that place is really right on top of things, right? LOL)
One almost wonders by this time, why even bother. Just so they can be on the Greys not trading I guess. Any "protection for investors" has long faded away.
Trading Suspensions: 34-66869 Apr. 27, 2012 Berman Center, Inc., Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, Inc., and Java Detour, Inc.
www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2012/34-66869.pdf
See also Order
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2012/34-66869-o.pdf
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions.shtml
Was listed under it's old name. DTCC has done quite a bit of that for some reason, listing restrictions under old names and CUSIPS (probably original names when out of custody), but it is listed under Mindenao Gold Mining Corp which went through the name change to Grand Pacaraima Gold Corp in 2006. But it is in the notice for National Stock Transfer with Cusip 602661100 for non-transferable and all physical services (Deposits, WT's and COD's).
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/dtc/ope/1270-11.pdf
Swiss banks to hand over staff names in U.S. tax row: report
ZURICH | Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:55am EDT
ZURICH (Reuters) - Switzerland will allow banks to hand over the names of any employees and other third parties who helped wealthy Americans evade taxes to U.S. prosecutors, a Swiss newspaper reported on Saturday.
Eleven Swiss banks including Credit Suisse (CSGN.VX) and Julius Baer (BAER.VX) are under investigation in the United Stated for aiding U.S. citizens suspected of dodging taxes.
In the latest attempt to end the long-running dispute, Switzerland's Federal Council has now authorized banks to hand over email traffic in connection with such clients to U.S. prosecutors, the Tages-Anzeiger newspaper reported.
This includes the names of employees and where applicable third parties, such as external wealth managers, lawyers and trustees, but not client data, the paper said.
It said Mario Tuor, a spokesman for the Swiss secretariat for international financial affairs, confirmed this in a statement. He could not immediately be reached for comment.
U.S. authorities suspect tens of thousands of Americans have used Swiss banks to squirrel their savings away from the tax inspectors.
Switzerland is trying to get the investigations dropped, in return for the payment of a hefty fine and the transfer of names of thousands of U.S. bank clients. It is also seeking a deal to shield the remainder of its 300 or so banks from U.S. prosecution.
In an interview published on Friday, Swiss Finance Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said she expects to clinch a solution with the United States this year.
(Reporting by Caroline Copley; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/14/us-swiss-tax-us-idUSBRE83D05H20120414
Parts of Interview Regarding United States (english translation)
April 13, 2012, Neue Zürcher Zeitung
We have obtained not blackmail us».
Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf is expressed to the tax disputes with the Germany, the United States and the EU
.....
To the tax dispute with the United States. One gets the impression that the conflict in the United States not as in the Switzerland is seen as staatspolitisches problem, but as legal and tax technical problem. Could the Switzerland top-level US heard is too little?
In fact, the case in the United States as a legal, technical and tax conflict is perceived. We feel that in the negotiations. We had contacts at the political level on several occasions. I have the opportunity to influence yourself at a technical level. US Treasury Secretary Geithner does not have this possibility. He the experts of the tax administration were emphasized, responsible and in the Department of Justice, it is not a political issue. Next week I will be holder and expected within the framework of the IMF meeting with Minister of Justice talk with Treasury Secretary Geithner. I'll try again to show that it needs a political solution.
The State Department has seemingly not much to say.
In the United States, the judiciary has a different weight. Even Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it was not possible to influence her.
The planned agreement will contain a solution for eleven banks especially in the crosshairs of the US justice system or only for the rest?
The proposed solution has two Ebnenen. In an intergovernmental agreement, we want to settle the framework for the eleven banks standing in the line of fire of the United States. In a second agreement, which can be also an intergovernmental agreement or a treaty, we will look a solution for the remaining 300 banks so that our as financial center every year again is covered with new accusations. It is important here to set a flat rate sum. We can not negotiate the individual compensation for the eleven banks. Banks have to deal directly with the US authorities. We make the framework that creates the conditions for a definitive solution.
The negotiated by you to frame for the eleven banks thus covers no framework amount of Atonement payments?
The Americans have their ideas. But not we negotiate about this sum, but this is calculated as the individual agreements of the eleven institutes. The total discussions in our negotiations with the United States concerning the payments for the other institutions.
What are still the biggest differences because in the governmental negotiations?
There are already still the amounts you discussed.
What does the this week published Bundesverwaltungsgericht judgment that halted a request for administrative assistance regarding Credit Suisse clients?
On the one hand, it is gratifying that the Court confirmed its judgment of March 2009, according to which Group requests are generally allowed. In his new decision, but the Court complained about, that for a certain category of customers, the criteria were not precisely formulated and covered may not only tax fraud, but also tax evasion. The Americans must thus more accurately set the criteria for this category of customer.
Will this cause not that the volume of delivered data is lower, as the US authorities had hoped for, and is thus in the United States once more the impression of solidified that the Switzerland brake and Terminal, where she could only?
The tax administration has already done plenty of US requests. Many conclusive decrees have been also undisputed. The ruling concerns a specific set of cases. It is sure, that can be tackled at closer definition of the criteria for the acceptance of mutual assistance requests of less requests in this way. Also means, however, that the Americans should have every interest to finally to implement the new tax treaties. This agreement allows for even in cases of tax evasion requests for mutual assistance.
But again, the judgment does not a setback for the Swiss negotiations with the United States?
The judgment is well developed. But, there is room for discretion. The question is what to do with a request, which includes assistance enabled fraud cases and other cases, but provides no exact demarcation criteria. The tax administration, must examine cases in which there is fraud or tax fraud at the end, or it says the application is so indeterminate to the extent that the criteria would have to be taken more closely? The Court has decided for the second version.
In this whole conflict, the sword of Damocles of US legal penalties against local banks about the Switzerland and their financial centre depends on constantly. Do you have the nose full of this game and the impression of the Erpressbarkeit, which emits the Switzerland for several years not slow?
We let us not blackmail. We have made, what you can do as a rule of law. We can not go up further concessions towards the United States like the other also to Germany, because it would be acceptable with our law. But exploring the legal and political possibilities is one of them. It is always to think about what would be for example the consequences of a negotiating crash. The alternative to negotiations must be at least equally good or better. With Germany, we are at the point at which we say if the partner does not wish this agreement, the status quo is the better alternative than continue to negotiate for us. Also in negotiations with the United States, there is a threshold that we can not exceed as a sovereign State.
Then would you be willing to take a criminal proceedings against Swiss banks in buying after the fall of Wegelin?
At that time, we have saved the UBS due to their systemic relevance. Wegelin was, however, not system-relevant. We can put into question not all principles alone to a bank to save.
Also not the Bank Julius Baer, the Basler Kantonalbank and the Zurich Cantonal Bank?
Again, Man can throw all principles of the rule of law into the sea to save a single Institute.
This means that you would throw the law principles overboard only when a complaint against the system-relevant Credit Suisse?
No, I generally throw the constitutional principles not overboard. But the question is how far a State can invest themselves and should vary, depending on what are the consequences of the sinking of a bank.
What prediction can you give for the continuation of the conflict in US?
We still assume that we bring the planned solution across the stage this year. It is not, to defend the banks. We must defend our rule of law. At the moment, it is so that the United States extra-territorial want to enforce their rights. However, you must defend itself as a State. Would we find no solution could banks be might be tempted to seek itself a solution, which violates our rules.
Why do you choose no preventive block command against potential data delivery?
It was and is much in discussion.
In other words, such a decision may come soon?
I can say only this: it is not the case that we focus only on a solution. We think in alternatives.
What alternatives?
Furthermore, I can provide no information. Also, when we are criticized, we were ideenlos and had no strategies....
http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/politik/schweiz/wir-haben-uns-nicht-erpressen-lassen_1.16414192.html
I agree. Taking a look at the "environment" in which the numbers are in and who is responsible, would do wonders. It is public money being "managed" (using a really loose term there) by certain individuals. Those individuals should be looked at and scrutinized and if there were indications of abuse, don't let them do any more "managing" (IE; don't let more P&D or phony "businesses" continue).
All lending practices should be monitored and controlled, the pink lending especially. These enormous percentage profits for insiders/lenders have become the "business" and it leaves no room or reason for any actual Real business.
Yea I remember, just didn't have that recorded back that far. We'll see what happens Mon, it may just go right back to the 9 where it went less than a minute after the close. When it does start actually trading, any normal retail could have some real risk. It definitely can go either way, just don't know what kind of dumping or shenanigans that can happen by insiders or third parties.
On that example given it went down quite a bit from about $.20 to about 4 or 5 cents before the real P&D up to the high of .12-.13 ( which only lasted about a week and then just quickly and viciously dumped and plummeted down to nothing). There is more examples, even in real stocks an IPO may go down after the normal public gets it (even if its for a short time). With the dirty pinks, anything goes (many times just "crash and burn"). The insiders shares are relatively free.
But yes, authorities definitely would have plenty to find I think if they were to put some resources on it. It isn't just one stock, but connections to large amount of monies that regularly gets taken (or scammed) away from the overall economy and sure doesn't supply any "JOBS" or real worth or equity. Just pads a few dubious characters pockets with cash.
I not sure if a whole lot can be surmised. There are common instances that erratic bids happen before a shell really comes out for any real volume or trading. Just for example this one below. Had bids up to .80 (with no volume or actual trades), then trades from $.15-.51 (but only 600 shares traded). But it quickly plummeted on the P&D and now 8-9 months later is barely holding above trips (very minimal liquidity) with only a couple of spikes now and then.
Yes, a little bit different shell, had already done a P&D to zero volume and pps, then RS, and went dark for some time with nothing going on with the shell until our friends in Panama got a hold of it and put some "gold" flavor and some officers names on it and again sent it to where it is today (a POS dubious ticker with a STOP sign, DTCC restriction, and currently struggling to stay above the trips).
The B&A so far for GTCP (previously YKMN) (no volume or trading yet)
Another article on that subject (a pretty good one in fact)
http://www.thestreetsweeper.org/undersurveillance/Sunpeaks__SNPK___Will_This_Hot_Stock_Go_up_in_Flames_
and the corresponding link inside the article for the connections to GTCP and Panamanian P&Ds, but who knows this thing could just as easily sit and do nothing for a another few months at this point.
http://www.thestreetsweeper.org/uploads/LongSNPK.pdf
"Barch controls another public company, Georgetown Corp (GTCP). GTCP, so far a shell company, was created in Nevada in May 2010. On 30 November 2010, Barch paid the CEO, Pamela Tesluck, $383,000 for 1 million shares of stock, or 74.07% of the outstanding. Tesluck resigned, and Barch became sole officer and director. The company then did a 400:1 forward split. It also issued a promissory note to Karev Corp. in the amount of $15,000. In this case the relevant exhibit is not missing. Karev is a Panamanian corporation; its president is Evelyn Quintero Gonzalez, who also happens to be the president of Whetu Inc. GTCP has yet to trade; Barch's plans for it are unknown."
Yep pretty sad. There should be a lottery on guessing without going over "how many jelly beans" are going to be in the jar (IE: THRA shares sold for the month of April).
I admit that this "company" beans (shares) are pretty old and rotten, but at least guessing at monthly volume will be more action than what this thing is doing.
My guess: 14,849,200 (but that will probably end up being over, but just giving a little excitement for any shareholder that believes that a couple of hundred dollars or less is a "train" LOL).
Chart looks like total crud, one day flash, then back to drizzle volume with a bunch of EOD paints many times just obscuring the technicals or changing a candle on one or two worthless trades at EOD. CRWV does that so many times, I've lost count, but it still doesn't change the lousy overall trend and the fact it just isn't getting much liquidity (except the one trading day like last week, but if one wasn't quick, just became more losses).
Last week made a total of two whole trading spikes since the big dump after the DTCC restriction. And in both volume and dollar volume last week was less than the first and didn't show any strength for changing the overall negative trend down.
Most of the trades today so far (about 75% of what few there are), the pps was about 50% down from the close of the one day trading push last week.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&symbol=CRWV
"Are they expecting more weather problems?"
LOL Don't really think it matters, no real business, now not even phony financials for weather to give problems.
As we talked about, last Wed was only a pro traders selling day before the STOP sign got put on (was watching the six month mark for no info on OTC Markets, and maybe some others were too) and it was a little less volume than the little hump back in Feb. and a lot less dollar volume (about $50k less total). The whole thing happened in one day unlike spread out over a few days like last Feb., but back then volume still totaled more than last weeks one day wonder. In fact the last three spikes for this year have gotten nothing but less and less money action (last week was the smallest yet).
see this post for last Feb
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72163570
But all one had to do was watch the tape to see what happened last time and this time, but it was only a flash in the pan and the pro traders took profits even quicker this time. Like I've stated before, one has to be quick and better to have a day trading account for CRWV action that might come every now and then and hand on the button at all times. But all it was is dine and dash for just a few CRWV traders and now it's just back to a drizzle, lucky to get a few million in a day (only did a little over a half a million today).
But this was an example of the momo action of last Wed for the one large volume day (at least one page of it).
Of course the overall trend is still down and I imagine will wait for the next little poofer to make any trading money. Hope some took advantage of the day last week. The highs and lows just keep getting lower with the overall trend, but maybe more momo traders will not wait another two months for the next little spike. Problem is, some have to lose the money that the pro CRWV traders make and it keeps taking more and more shares or volume just to match the previous monies (in which factually by the numbers is not doing).
Of course all of that doesn't change the whole farce the "company" is or that the ticker is still just a POS. No real mining, just a another Panama pumped and dumped ticker selling iron pyrite. The pps is still down about 50% from the last traders spike in Feb and down about 70% for the year. Still going faster than last time the stock went to zero , no bid, and the RS that it did.
At least it would maybe get a trade today. LOL I was wondering if anyone had their shares yet in their accounts. This thing is lucky to get a trade or two in a day. No oil, no profit, and no real liquidity going on. Just some letters stuck up on the board. I'm sure one could find something else that at least traded.
The SEC has that right. CRWV was just one on the list of "moving on to another scam". Money is made quick by the perps creating just as quick of losses for any shareholder that believes in the "story".
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73395583
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73387853
There is more links of course that connect the same people that are connected with CRWV doing the same thing over and over. And many of the connected stocks are already on the DTCC list. Even though the DTCC restriction and subsequent effect is after the fact of the main P&D, it does work as a quicker liquidity action and restricts many losses of these dubious stocks like CRWV a bit better than the very long term SEC actions.
"The idea that if someone is committing securities fraud means they will end up in handcuffs is hilarious and far from realistic. From the start of an investigation to filing an actual complaint takes on average 18 months for the SEC. So even if there were gross negligence here it is not going to result in the CEO being placed in handcuffs immediately because they broke regulations. Further not all actions result in jail, in fact the majority of pinky crimes end with disgorgement of ill gotten gains and trading/participation restrictions on any security."
The shareholders or public will not know if anything is going on until long after the "crime" has done it's damage. Years in fact. Over and over we see cases come public now and currently that have been taking place in 2008-09 or even before. And like you stated the "handcuff" thing is "far from realistic" and only used as fodder for the stock boards.
1manband had a good description also;
"On average for "formal" investigations, perhaps. But keep in mind the SEC has two levels of investigations. "Informal" is first. During that process, the Commission Staff obtains background information and evidence necessary to prepare a recommendation to the Enforcement Division supervisors that a "formal" investigation is warranted. The informal investigation can last years. Even formal investigations can proceed for several years, but 18 month average once a formal investigation is opened sounds about right."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72831861
And this can be confirmed in many places on the SEC site. Mostly in cases of many SEC and Federal court actions with different stocks or companies, but for example one can actually get general confirmations;
"All SEC investigations are conducted privately. Facts are developed to the fullest extent possible through informal inquiry,......" then with descriptive "...... With a formal order of investigation,....... Following an investigation, SEC staff present their findings to the Commission for its review. The Commission can authorize the staff to file a case in federal court or bring an administrative action. In many cases, the Commission and the party charged decide to settle a matter without trial."
http://www.sec.gov/news/newsroom/howinvestigationswork.html
Then in SEC papers where both investigations are described
"ARTICLE: A PRACTITIONER'S GUIDE TO THE SEC'S INVESTIGATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCESS"
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_enforce/mclucas.pdf
But of course all take years and years of "investigating" and putting anyone's money on any "handcuff theory" for CRWV is just impractical and definitely not very realistic. Along with everything else, a lot if not most of CRWV money went to Panama and would require international actions to put some of those culprits in "handcuffs". Wouldn't hold any breath for that to happen, that's for sure.
Was wondering if any volume would come about on a daily basis. Of course when one is dealing with trip zeros, a million or so is not very much, but the "common" occurrence (as far as for MXXH) has been about 10 times in about six months where volume has been about a million or more (not quite an average of twice a month). Not a whole lot can be deducted from that. Could be sporadic retail, lunch money for insiders, combination of things. Volume or liquidity just too minimal and intermittent for any real worth.
Guess no financials or not even another 8k coming out for the time being. STOP sign being put on at OTC Markets. Not that the OTC tiers are worth much, but just confirmation of no reporting, no transparency, or any operations or business to shareholders.
Six Month Volume Chart
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MXXH/quote
Again only ONE trade today for total number of trades. Seems like common occurrence. Just keep this thing barely on the board so it doesn't get removed for lack of activity I guess (that's if one wants to call a trade or so "activity"). This stock traded better when it was a total empty shell with no officers or "company" as BNPD. Funny, Gouger and friends stocks are always reduced to the sound of one hand clapping. LOL Why should anyone expect anything different with TOMI.
No oil, no profit, no anything to be worth anything and certainly isn't worth the pps that Gouger is trying to put on it. Just a bunch of insider convertibles to sell to anyone that would get fooled by the bs.
In Wake of Groupon Issues, Critics Wary of JOBS Act
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304023504577317932455874856.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
A little-noticed provision in the new JOBS Act would allow companies to iron out disagreements with regulators behind closed doors before they go public—a provision that might have prevented investors from finding out about Groupon Inc.'s GRPN -16.92% early accounting questions until after they had been resolved.
A little-noticed JOBS Act provision that would allow firms to privately iron out issues with regulators prior to an IPO is drawing flak after Groupon's problems, Mike Rapoport reports on Markets Hub. Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images.
The provision, part of the bill passed by Congress and expected to be signed by President Barack Obama this week, would enable companies to submit confidential drafts of their initial-public-offering documents to the Securities and Exchange Commission before they file publicly.
Critics say that measure would allow a company like Groupon, which had well-publicized disagreements with the SEC over its accounting last year, to resolve such issues under the radar, without investors learning of them until later although still before any IPO.
The provision is getting increased attention in the wake of Groupon's disclosure of further accounting problems. The company, which offers discounted deals to consumers, said Friday it was revising fourth-quarter revenue downward and that it had a material weakness in its internal controls, the policies and procedures designed to avoid financial error.
"I find it amazing that Congress would allow any firm to work behind closed doors on any accounting or auditing issue," said J. Edward Ketz, an associate professor of accounting at Penn State University. "We learned a long time ago that sunshine is the best antiseptic."
A spokesman for Groupon declined to comment on the JOBS Act provision.
Supporters say the provision is needed to help small companies, and they insist there was no intent to allow a company like Groupon to duck investor scrutiny.
"Nothing's under the radar. Nobody's pulling anything over anyone's eyes," said Kate Mitchell, who chaired a task force organized by the Obama administration that made many of the recommendations making it easier for companies to file publicly that are in the JOBS Act, which stands for "Jumpstart Our Business Startups."
"We don't want poor-quality IPOs out there," she said.
Groupon said Friday after the market close that its executives failed to set aside enough money for customer refunds. Jason Child, Groupon's chief financial officer, said when the announcement was made that the company remains "confident in the fundamentals of our business."
Enlarge Image
Associated Press
Andrew Mason, founder and CEO of Groupon, attending the company's IPO last year.
Groupon hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing.
The company went public in November, raising $805 million. In February, it reported a loss of $37 million for its fourth quarter in its first earnings report as a public company. The accounting changes announced Friday will reduce revenue for the quarter by $14.3 million and widen Groupon's loss by $22.6 million, or four cents a share. Shares fell about 6% in after-hours trading Friday to $17.29.
The JOBS Act eases a variety of accounting and disclosure rules for "emerging growth companies"—those with less than $1 billion in annual revenue and $700 million in market capitalization that have been public for fewer than five years.
Under the confidential-filing provision, emerging growth companies could file a first-draft version of their registration documents with the SEC without making them public immediately. Those confidential documents would have to be publicly released 21 days before the company's "road show" in which it tries to persuade prospective large investors to buy its stock. The documents would be exempt from any Freedom of Information Act requests.
The provision's supporters have indicated it would allow young companies to avoid disclosing potentially sensitive information to competitors and other parties early in the IPO process.
Ms. Mitchell, a managing director of Scale Venture Partners, said the need to disclose sensitive data is "a big disincentive" for companies seeking to go public—especially as the majority of companies that file ultimately decide not to do so.
Related Reading
Groupon Forced to Revise Results
Deal Journal: BofA Cuts Groupon
MarketBeat: Groupon Shares Slump
Deal Journal: JOBS Bill Opens Door to Hedge Fund Advertising
Deal Journal: New Bill Creates New Funding Opportunity for Small Biz
Deal Journal: Higher Limit on Private-Company Shareholders Too Late for Facebook
Joel Trotter, an attorney from Latham & Watkins who was on the task force, said the 21-day provision ensures that investors would find out about any such situations well before an IPO happens. "Three weeks is an extremely long time in assessing information relevant to an investment decision," he said.
Backers of the jobs bill said the SEC could write rules requiring companies to disclose the contents of their confidential filings when they register publicly with the SEC, which is normally well before they conduct such road shows.
An SEC spokesman couldn't be reached for comment.
Enlarge Image
Getty Images
Rep. Eric Cantor supports the act.
Task-force members acknowledge that Groupon would have been able to take advantage of such a provision before it filed to go public last year. At the time, the company was under $1 billion in annual revenue, though it has since surpassed that level and currently wouldn't enjoy the bill's protections.
Groupon had to change its accounting twice before the IPO in response to SEC concerns, under public scrutiny.
The company initially used an unusual metric called "adjusted consolidated segment operating income," which excluded its marketing costs to land new subscribers. That enabled the company to show a profit even though it was generating losses under standard accounting rules. Groupon later scaled back its references to that measure after the SEC raised questions about it.
Before its IPO, Groupon also revised the way it booked revenue from a gross figure to a net figure. Initially, the company counted as revenue all the money it took in from its daily-deal offers, but it changed that to deduct the portion of that amount that it shares with merchants. That slashed the company's reported 2010 revenue from $713.4 million to $312.9 million.
Plaintiffs lawyers pounced on the Groupon news on Friday, issuing releases within hours saying they were examining the situation.
We always hear the constant complaining against the DTCC and its actions against doing business with these cruddy low grade stocks. One either gets that the actions "don't mean anything" or "the actions are illegal" and "they have no right to not deal with high risk dubious stocks" and "they are wrong", "lets sue". Most if not all of which only turns out to be circus fodder for the ones who want to ignore the real issues about these stocks (or want others to) and what the DTCC actually does.
But there is so many of these stocks that are getting nothing but SEC and Fed actions against them along with other in house brokers and other entities that don't want to deal with them either.
But here is just another day of more SEC actions against more previously DTCC restricted stocks.
In the Matter of :
: ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
ADUDDELL INDUSTRIES, INC., : AND REVOKING
CALYPSO WIRELESS, INC., : REGISTRATIONS BY DEFAULT
CAPITAL MARKETS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., : AS TO FOUR RESPONDENTS
CHALLENGER POWERBOATS, INC., and :
CLX MEDICAL, INC.
"Please be advised that effective close of business Sept 02, 2011, NSCC has exited positions from the Continuous Net Settlement System (CNS) in the following CUSIP’s and future trades will be designated trade for trade."
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/a7275.pdf
"This notice is to inform participants that DTC has coded all securities serviced by National Stock Transfer as non-transferable. In addition, the issues have been chilled for all physical services (Deposits, WTs and CODs). The chills are effective September 8, 2011 and the impacted CUSIPs are listed below."
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/dtc/ope/1270-11.pdf
CUSIP SECURITY NAME
000803106 AC/DC COMM INC
00758W103 ADVANCED LUMITEC
007623101 ADVANCED POWERLINE TECH
00826G106 AFFORDABLE HOMES
02145E200 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
02363M207 AMERICA ASIA ENERGY
02971E209 AMERICAN SPORTS HISTORY
02971E910 WT0297AMRNSPRTSH
030574206 AMERICANA PUBLISH
001775105 AMR GOLD RESOURCES INC
032353104 AMTEX MACHINERY INC
03839D201 AQUAPLAN, INC
04276W207 ARROW MANAGEMENT
05442Q107 AVONDALE RESOURCES CP
05603X107 B-TELLER INC
076110105 BEDFORD ENERGY,INC
08265R103 BENTLEY SPORTS INC
084630300 BERKSHIRE COLLECTION
Non-Confidential 2
CUSIP SECURITY NAME
089751101 BIG BREW HOLDING
09057M104 BIO-ETHICS INC
093704203 BLOODHOUND SEARCH TECH
10921P109 BRIGHTEC INCORPORATED
133905109 CAMOMILE CORP
14761Y105 CASINO TECHNOLOGY
149500100 CAVALCADE OF SPORTS NETWORK
169907102 CHOICE SPORTS NETWORK
18063R106 CLARITY RESOURCES INC
190744201 COATTEC INDUSTRIES
20461U103 COMPOSITE HOLDGS
66199D996 CONTRA NORAM GAM
218676104 CORE INTEGRATION
222479107 COUNTY LINE ENERGY CP
23247R204 CYBERKEY CORP
23247S103 CYBERKEY SOLUTION
23768P108 DATA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
247347107 DELSECUR CORPORATED
25389C101 DIGITAL REACH CO
255990970 DIVINE INC
25658N101 DOGMATIC INC
25685Q101 DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT
27874Q108 ECHELON INC NV
27922K202 ECOTIMBER INTL
26854B107 E-INTERNATIONAL
29078T102 EMAX HOLDING CORP
29078T995 EMAX HOLDINGS CP
26875D108 E-MED FUTURE INC
294907100 ENVIROMENTAL DEV
29407C101 ENVIRONMENTAL CA
29407B103 ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH
297646101 ETHICAL CORP.
29765P108 ETHOS CAPITAL
29880U107 EUROWORK GLOBAL
302060207 EXIM INTERNET GROUP INC
30232J105 EYES HOLDINGS CORPORATION
30734M101 FAR VISTA INTERACTIVE CORP
34633Q106 FORM 59, INC.
37945P104 GLOBAL TRADE PORTAL
38100T105 GOLDEN ENERGY CORP
39530P309 GREENLAND CORPORATION
40051G108 GTRADE NETWORK
Non-Confidential 3
CUSIP SECURITY NAME
42215Q105 HEALING HAND NET
428048102 HERZOG INTL HOLDINGS
476867106 JESMOND BIOCIDES INC
49381A103 KIDS STUFF EUROPE
50101U205 KRIFTER HOLDINGS INC
515865103 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE
501795306 LBU INC CLASS A
52464H201 LEGAL ACCESSTECH
53222L203 LIGHT ENERGY MNGMT
55276P105 M45 MINING RESOURCES
561136201 MALERS INC
570397109 MARK ONE GLOBAL INDUSTRIES
57456N108 MASADI RESOURCES
594834202 MICRO ECONOMICS
602661100 MINDENAO GOLD MINING
60671V202 MITOPHARM CORPORATION
607053105 MOBICLEAR TECHNOLOGIES
60740Y104 MOBILE SELF STORAGE INC
612184101 MONTAVO INC
62856K100 MYNEWPEDIA CORP
635990971 NATIONAL COMMUNICATION
637882101 NATIONAL STORM MGMT
637882200 NATIONAL STORM MGMT B
63867Q102 NATIONWIDE SAFE T PROPANE
637822990 NATL STORM B RSTD
644276206 NEW ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION
65338M107 NEXIS INERNATIONAL
65541C102 NORAM GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT
658657101 NORTH COAST PART
670991637 NUTRI SOURCE IND
68243G108 123 INTERATIONAL
698021102 PAN AMER SECURITIES
70499K916 PARTISAN CORPORATION
70335M209 PATRIOT ENERGY
70336A105 PATRIOT ENERGY CORPORATION
70976W102 PEOPLE DYNAMICS HOLDINGS
714004108 PERIPHERIAL CONN
72346H104 PINNACLE FINL CORP
74138A107 PRETORY USA INC
74290B109 PRINCIPAL CAPITAL
743167918 PROFIT FINL CORP
747933109 QUANTITATIVE MET
Non-Confidential 4
CUSIP SECURITY NAME
747933208 QUANTITATIVE MET
74912T108 R&A CAPITAL CORPORATION
785158106 SABER CAPITAL
78641T206 SAFE IDEA, INC
81202B200 SEAIR GROUP INC.
830703104 SKINVISIBLE INC
85231M103 ST. JOSEPH INC
854990819 STAR DOLPHIN INC
865998454 UNITED E&P, INC.(RSTD)
866174105 SUMMIT NATIONAL
875054108 TAMARIND INC.
87663T101 TATONKA OIL & GAS INC
87816B205 TEAM LABS SYSTEM
880872106 TERMINUS ENERGY, INC.
89151X107 TOTAL MEDICAL ELECTIVE
891549206 TOUCHTUNES MUSIC
89271V106 TRAFALGAR RESOURCES INCORP
893781104 TRANSNATIONAL RESOURCE
89578R105 TRIAD COMPRESSOR
89579B208 TRIAD INNOVATIONS INC
904346103 UNDERSEA RECOVERY CORP
904670106 UNIDYN CORPORATION
91020R105 UNITED E&P INC
910990688 UNITED E&P, INC.(RSTD)
913854204 UNIVERSAL SYSTEMS INC
903326205 US BIOTECH, INC
920990967 VANADIUM INC
92824K403 VIRTUAL GAMING ENTERPRISES
92845F102 VISUAL INDUSTRIES INC
92999AAA5 VUDATACORPCONVS
93369T106 WANDERPORT CORPORATION
968990937 WILDCAT ENTERPRISE INC
98147Q100 WORLD HOMES INC
Questions regarding DTC’s Important Notice should be directed to the Operations Regulatory
Compliance Hotline at (212) 855-1780.
The following is a link to an SEC release:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2011/lr22083.htm
Now actions by the SEC and yet another "due to a
lack of current and accurate information" common stated reasons, but is not limited to those reasons for any future litigation by the SEC or Fed authorities.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2012/34-66708.pdf
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2012/34-66708-o.pdf
Again I apologize for NO OPINION, it does seem that the lacking of any opinion and just FACTUAL recorded numbers really bothers some and my "opinions" are so desired that I get thanked continuously for them even if I don't give any. LOL So I will in the future try to give some more "opinions" to satisfy the need. Have to warn though, I use a lot of factual numbers and real facts in order to make my opinion or trading and investing views. Sorry about that, but again I'm not the one responsible for the documented numbers, and smart trading and investing, especially when it comes to stocks like CRWV, uses the documented numbers and facts. So even with some real opinions, still can't change the numbers or those facts, and I'm not responsible for all the losses and pain that has occurred (or will occur), CRWV is.
Also, there will be time restraints due to that I have other interests, and trade and invest in real companies and profitable stocks.
(warning; for anyone that doesn't want to hear about real facts or numbers, please turn away or cover ears)
That takes time consuming research and REAL DD in, yes that's right, documented numbers and facts. I have already put in plenty of time with research into this POS and old P&D, and have seen all that is necessary to see what garbage this stock is or the lack of abilities to trade or invest in it are(there's an opinion for the kitty LOL). Obviously the negative numbers and facts just continue for this stock and just keep proving my opinions and projections right.
But like I said, I will try to get some more opinion out for this stock just to appease all the gratitude and "thanks" I get so that at least I can take credit for them instead of things that have nothing to do with me. But they will involve stating just the numbers and facts of this stock, my abilities and personalty just require that.
So let me say in advance, you're welcome.
Sorry, but didn't give any "opinion" or "interpretation" with the post you're referring too. No thanks necessary, I didn't do anything but state the numbers the market gave. It was only the documented trades and pps they went for, facts and strictly the numbers given not by me, but the market. I didn't make them, I didn't do the EOD $6 trade. I wasn't the one that did only 10,000 shares traded on Thurs, the stock did. The company pps hit .0009 for the 52 week low, not me. The stock has continued to go lower and lower in pps, liquidity, dollar volume, etc. No "interpretations" or "opinions" involved, just the documented numbers. Anyone can ignore them all they want, doesn't make a bit of difference to me, still does't change them.
Now I have given opinions or interpretations on what this thing was going to do in the past with previous numbers, and now even those opinions and projections have turned into fact. A few people gave their opinion and experience that indicated where this stock has now gone. Ignoring those people didn't change it either.
Ignorance in the market place that CRWV is in doesn't do anything but lose money for most investors and traders. Paying attention to the facts, paying attention to the numbers, and learning from mistakes though can be used to benefit profit instead of losses like what has occurred with CRWV. I don't make that fact either, just the whole stock environment does, and there will always be ones who ignore it. That is what POS stocks and "companies" like CRWV count on.
Because I want investors to know the proper selling
There wasn't one opinion with that, just factual numbers and the results of a "go figure". And if one want's to jump up and down with a 5,000 share trade of .0012 at EOD over a .0010 70,000 share trade and it took a good 15 minutes to do that, that's fine. But a $6 trade is all it was to make that close, just fact. And it isn't bouncing off those trips it's punching through to them with the .0010 being some emotional "line in the sand" (what little it is). Facts are that the pps keeps making those lower trade levels over and over and is just a continuance of that. A $6 trade of 5,000 shares doesn't mean anything but painting a chart, the bulk of what one can get for what they have is the bottom line.
But like I said with only 10,000 shares traded yesterday, and CRWV lucky to get a million or so volume makes the whole thing pretty irrelevant.
Still doesn't change the fact that it is just continuing to diminish in pps, volume, liquidity, and dollar volume. It is what it is; just the factual numbers and no opinion will change what has already become fact.