Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Read again post 23588. He said Monte Waldman was fired fro a company he was doing audit for. He didnt say when he was fired, that could be where i could have got my dates from, but obviously in doing his audit he had to come accross some of CPA Waldmans work.
So what im was saying in my conversation with Mr Labrozzi was Monte Waldman was a connection to two companies he was involved with, GEH as being retained and PHAR using his Company to claim he was already retained and immediatly conducting audit and would be complete in 4-6 weeks and plastered it accross newswire and have left it up for close to 4months willingly and knowingly that was in fact fraud.
GLTA
WRONG WRONG WRONG ON EVERY LEVEL.
NEVER DID I SAY LABROZZI WAS FIRED BY GEH. When i mentioned MONTE WALDMANS name when he inquired about who PHARs CPA was , he stated he was fired by a company he did an audit for.
My previous research as you know already had shown me WALDMAN/GREEN EQUITY/SHELL OWNERS CONNECTION so i just guessed and said GEH. He asked how did you know. He even jokingly asked was i investigating him because i guessed right..
He never mentioned anything negative about GREEN EQUITY or Mr. DIAZ and said he was paid. If they declined to fund Dennis McLaughlin and parted ways with MR. Waldman, they obviously have ethics.
I expect to hear back from you SNIZZLE as you have said some very personal things as far as my not being a truthful person...READ FIRST ORIGINAL POST to clarify.
As ive mentioned before, the telling of truth and facts have nothing to do with PPS tanking of PHAR. Its the non transparent and deep connections to running of the company by known criminals is whats doing it. AND THATS THE PLAIN TRUTH
There you go with LEGITIMATE INVESTORS.
Again prove me wrong and ill apologize to board. But dont think anyone will take the argument of you being suspicious because of GEH audit being engaged at a specific time different from what i understood as being reason enough to disqualify my points about honesty from a CEO to the investors of PHAR.
Puny point anyway in the scheme of the PHAR/LABROZZI pr and whether or not im speaking facts.
Take my challenge and that will answer truthfully once and for all. I will gladly accept whatever punishment, even being banned if that be the case. As i stated, Mr. Labrozzi invited me to call back if i needed anything. If you want i will offer a CC so as to verify our challenges of truthfullness coming from you. That is something i dont take kindly to.
GLTA
As i stated to you in post that you ignored, you are only making your case for all to see based on the simple dates of what i understood Mr. Labrozzi to say as to when his activity was conducted with GEH. He told me, he wouldnt tell me and then get date wrong, so i must have interpreted a while ago as a year or so ago.
He had absolutely NO problem with GEH, and said he was paid. The conversation was initiated with the mention of MONTE WALDMAN and it took life from there as far as GREEN EQUITY. The only topic for dicussion that has any merit is THE OCT 31 PR/CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERS TAKING THE LEAD IN A CC ABOUT SOMETHING AS CRITICAL AS AN AUDIT TO TRY FOR UPLISTING AND HOW HOWARD USED LABROZZI IN A PR WITHOUT HIM BEING IN THE LEAST BIT INVOLVED WITH OR RETAINED BY PHAR.
Those are the only issues, no need to sweep that under rug talking about GEH/LABROZZI audit timeframe. I will take blame for that after an hour long conversation about tons of material and pretty much in shock on details i was hearing.
GLTA
Just out of curiosity, what are you referring to when you sling around the phrase "LEGITIMATE INVESTORS"? Or maybe better put in question form, WHO DO YOU CONSIDER A LEGITIMATE INVESTOR AND WHAT DISQUALIFIES ONE THAT HAS PUT MONEY INTO A COMPANY FROM BEING A LEGITIMATE INVESTOR??
Thanks in advance for clarifying
GLTA
Tell you what,, you obviously are close with PHAR/HOWARD as someone that gets information. You obviously have a way of contacting LABROZZI as you stated on first post you had..
Mr. LABROZZI was pissed for his name in that PR that the completion of his company being retained for the audit to start immediatly and be concluded in 4 to 6wks. He stated, jokingly or not that he was going to bill PHAR or demand a retraction of PR statement.
So #1 call Mr. LABROZZI, or call HOWARD/CHRIS CHAMBERS /JOESEPH PITTERA AND FIND OUT IS THERE TRUTH IN WHAT IM SAYING. HOW WOULD I EVEN KNOW OF CONFERENCE CALL THAT CHAMBERS HAD WITH MR. LABROZZI.
IF you come back and disprove my statements i will publicly apologize to this board . I respect everyones opinion if its based on facts and not hype and i have no place on board if you can disqualify what ive said.
All i can assure you is that you dont want me to go into more details ,as i said i do have respect for others opinions and actions.
The sad thing for me Earnest is i would much rather put effort into promoting PHAR through posts. Howard/phar has made that impossible over last 7months of silence in the midst of obvious fraudulent statements in many key PRs that if believed just on the typed words , entice many to increase positions. Thats fraud in my books if information cant be validated.
Enough is enough for me.
GLTU
You wont be able to sway me on WRONG,WRONG,WRONG...Doesnt work with me and i want fall into trap of that.
Your picking up a time frame of when i understood his dates he said he did audit for GREEN EQUITY. I, after talking for an hour on many subjects, he went through last 3 filings with me as well,,, I COULD HAVE EASILY MISUNDERSTOOD THE EXACT DATE OF WHEN HE DID AUDIT.
Point is on that non important part of my posting, with PHAR lying in PR ,the most important.. the subject of GREEN EQUITY came up purely by accident. He asked me if PHAR/HOWARD had a CPA and i stated MONTE WALDMAN was a part of team/could still be but didnt know.. HE stated, you have to be kidding me, i did and audit a few (whatever time frame ago) in which he was fired for reasons i wont say.. I answered was it GREEN EQUITY Holdings.
He stated now your scaring me, are you investigating me, how on earth would you know that.
Call me what you wish, doesnt bother me at all, as i only deal in items that can be substantiated. I am an investor thats just not sitting back anymore. I suggest others do the same if you have any hope of recovering money.
Your personal attacks in your posts never get deleted, but i want do any personal attacks but only hope that to come to your conclusion based on the fact i thought i heard a year or so ago or a while ago, others wont overlook point. GET TO THE BOTTOM OF WHAT HOWARD/PHAR AND CROOKS RUNNING THE SHOW ARE UP TO.
The small world comment came from Douglas Labrozzi as he couldnt believe the MONTE WALMAN/ GREEN EQUITY/PHAR/CHRIS CHAMBERS connection to him..
What did you interpret small world to mean ? I wont go into any guesses..
As you stated, in bold print, lets get this straight, shall we? I hope this will help do that, sorry for missing the exact time frame of when he did audit and the day as well of Monte Waldmans firing.
I only deal in facts about subjects this serious. I dont do the rumor thing.
Howard has not come forward in 7 months to address his shareholders so HOWARD/PHAR has willingly left all in the dark.
I will start shedding some light if he chooses to be involved with crooks.
The owners name is Douglas Labrozzi, fantastic guy, very down to earth and open. I had no clue i would here what i heard. As with any PR or missed deadline on promises made , i start digging, and i know how to dig, if i cant get a dam_ peep out of the source that shold be talking to all investors. Its not like things have been going great.
If anyone calls maybe he would share the Monte Waldman story of why he was fired from a company he audited a year or so ago, GREEN EQUITY HOLDINGS.. SMALL WORLD INDEED.
NO RUMORS ONLY FACTS I beg everyone to do there own dispelling of rumors and stop sitting back on issues that ANY investor has the right to know, IF YOU ARE BEING PROMISED THINGS SENT OUT INTO MEDIA TO ATTRACT MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE..
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=49737138
Quote from CEO Howard Phykitt "The Company "COMPLETED" the initial step in the process of becoming fully reporting by "RETAINING" the accounting firm of LABROZZI &COMPANY P.A.
The firm will IMMEDIATLY initiate an audit of PHARMSTAR.
After being outright lied to in the beginning by CEO and allowing myself to trust and proceed against my suspicions, because of the last few months of digging and digging trying to clear Howard of wrongdoing with this fraudulent group, i have failed in doing so .He is right smack in the middle!!
I have lost all confidence in PHAR to come forward..
As far as the AUDIT and it be ON topic and being discussed many times on board..LABROZZI& COMPANY P.A has ZERO involvement with PHAR, has NEVER been retained as CEO stated for entire market media to see, and was very upset to his Company name being used in a fraudulent way....
Mr. Labrozzi had one conversation through a conference call in OCT. that was handled by CHRIS CHAMBERS AND JOSEPH PITTERA. He never spoke directly to HOWARD but he was in on the call.
He stated he was asked about doing some work for PHAR , one being audit, he told them what would be required in an audit. He gave an estimate and was asked if he could work with them on fee. He was told to call back that day, and after several attempts through phone and email with no return response,over several days, he never tried back.. Howard is still so deeply involved with this group and they have no care for an investor, nor any remorse if you loose every dime. THEY PRINT PAPER AND MOVE ON..HOWARD HAS NOW HAD TIME TO BECOME UN INVOLVED IF HE WANTED TO. So im sick of being played.
This is a fact. Not a bash. I am tired of tiptoeing around the issue with possibly being scammed. Every single PR ive worked on has a serious issue with it.
Im sorry if anyone hates the way i seem negative about PHAR, but put the blame squarely where it should have been months and months ago when i begged for all to demand a CC with Howard.
Since Howard/PHAR refuses to answer my calls or return emails,refuses to address shareholders exept through these stupid personal phone/emails to a select few,, i will post any findings on this board.
GLTA
So Snizzle, HOWARD was being untruthful in the OCT 31 PR just for the sake of embellishinging it to make an impression.
" We immediatley have retained LABROZZI &Co. to conduct the audit and will be completed, minimum of 4wks stated to max.6wks stated". Thats 12/15 completed at max estimate. 2 months ago.
I think many are saying its not so much an exact interpretation of SEC regs but how close to just plain old fraud MOST of the PRs have become. And until HOWARD stops this continual fabrication, as GBERT rightly mentioned the funding (scratch needed) will never come about..
IMHO GL
Well put! And IMO on OTC sites to which many pink investors stay tuned to, just the" yeild" or "stop" sign causes many that have been burned but still enjoy some success in pinks,, flat out dont care to look at to possibly take a risk on...
GLTU
I want to first commend you are your statement at the end of your reply.
I want to say your first part factually is true if you are a dont care that you dont practice what you preach Company and CEO. Not to beat around the bush its called lying. And i do believe there is a much HIGHER source than the SEC that HOWARD needs to follow those requirments of honesty.
OCT 31--"I am committed to continuing our policy of transparency and complete disclosure. I have investor interest and investor confidence enhancement in the forefront of my objectives.AND THIS IS IN REGARDS TO FILINGS WITH SEC.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=49737138
He has an ethical,a moral, fiduciary resposibility to his investors, IF HE IS GOING TO QOUTE OUT OF HIS MOUTH OVER AND OVER THIS SAYING,, otherwise he is a liar. My problem is not the fact that he doesnt have to to file, its the fact of abusing the very meaning of "transparency" and "investor interest".. I would way more respect a 75 yr old man with silver hair if he would just tell the truth..UPDATE, SHOW YOU CARE ABOUT INVESTORS..
And my friend, there are serious consequences as to the actions of not filing the QTR report or filing late request. Not from SEC,, but the only people that truly matter, INVESTORS PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE AND THEIR CONFIDENCE IN HIS ABILITY AS CEO TO RUN THIS COMPANY....The pattern of other areas that are being handled just like 10Q filing investors were looking forward to.is seen in PPS range today of .0017 to .002 with a bid sitting at .0014. With 6mil traded, know need for us to think they are all coming from shell crooks... Thats the consequences of PHAR /HOWARD not living up to his words/PRs and absolute lack of transparency.
The higher source he will have to answer to is not the SEC.
I hope there will come a time when i can truthfully post different, but only HOWARD can correct the ethical mentality of the way he is operating.
GL
With respect, bottom line PHAR/HOWARD has "failed" to file the 10Q according to SEC due date guidelines... Phar/Howard "failed to file a late filing request. That form is as simple a form as ive ever seen, doesnt even have to be signed, all can be computer generated in a minute or two.
This QTR report was one that would have had to shown if PRs promised since fiscal end have any truth whatsover to them. Rollback,etc. That IMO is where the problem lies.. Rollback lies and how to work within reality now that ,that PR was fraudulent in its promise.
My goodness, PHAR is not even producing a product with all the reporting complexities of operation,,what in the H will they do when that happens when you are given 45days after QTR end and you still dont have report ready and not filing a late request means to most investors they dont plan to anytime soon..Just plain common sense.
If these new people you say HOWARD has were ok with not even filing a late request, then he has the wrong people in place, AGAIN. Seems to be repetitive problem with HOWARD, but bottom line, HOWARD is calling the shots as CEO and not filing, not filing a late filing is what causes many to think this is a scam.
GL
I think your right. As of 5:30 est no late or 10q filing had been done by PHAR.
Howard as of today is at PHAR according to Janet,who is receptionist and in charge of Investor Relations. Said he was out to lunch when i called @11:15 and he would return my call. No return call. But i assume he is not on tour based on that. Based on what i asked i dont expect a return call either.
Just wondering if filing regulation due date is end of business day or end of day (midnight). Just dont want to get pissed off too early..
Thanks for your reply
I hope that is the case, and it would be good indeed for all shareholders to see this.
Yea i know about the uplisting methods ,as you say and aggree.
Just my thoughts of the messages being sent about a few weeks ago of aggressively moving up in status and its importance,,going to for no reason backing abruptly up.
But as you say and rightly so, the day is not done and filing may in fact be done.
GLTU
Hey Ryoko, hope you are well.
Im probably wrong but i thought the late filing had to be requested 24rhs in advance of 10q due date filing. So i was hoping to see it today. Not feeling like thats going to happened.
The annual report sort of was a dud and fizzled because many key items were PRd in the last QTR calender, after fiscal end.
Now its time for that report to help investors with some clarity about rollback , audited financials as promised .
Oct 31 http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=49737138
You PR about listing status importance to existing and potiential investors, but they are just words. One month later you do a late filing. Few weeks after you loose you CURRENT status with no explanation to any shareholder. If 10Q is just not filed, with ZERO addressing of shareholders, thats just inexcusable IMO. I get blasted for being negative, but My God, where is the CEO.
Always appreciate your take on subjects, Do you think loosing Current Information status 2weeks ago has a bearing on maybe even choosing not to file at all?
Going from 3 months ago about fast track to get FULLY REPORTING status to now going from CURRENT to LIMITED and if HOWARD just doesnt file at all now AND most importantly does immediately address shareholders as to why,That should speak volumes.
Lets hope filing will come out today and Howard show investors a sign that he cares about doing right by all. Im not talking about whether its a good or bad QTR. its the manner of not treating investors with dignity and a right to know about current status of the company.
Look forward to hearing your opinion.
Have not seen 12b-25 filed for late 10q,,,so im assuming QTRLY will be out at start of trading 02/15.
Anybody know if PHAR getting dropped to "limited" status effects this filing for period ending 12/31/2011. This ended before loosing "Current" status. From a penalty standpoint..
It shouldnt, hope it will be out with the key info that happened between fiscal end and last qtr in calender year.
GLTA
The PHAR 10Q due date is BY the 15th. Is ON the 15th considered late??? With a days notice required for late filing on 10Q should mean should see report Tuesday.
This IMO will be the most important filing to date for PHAR
GLTA
I cant say that i blame you Snizzle for wanting to drop it . Dodging the real subject is EXACTLY what has landed PHAR where it is.
Phar is waiting now on a life saving handout after having through recieving so much money from hardworking investors and not either accounting for or putting an aggressive proffessional business plan in place, with skilled, MGT to guide that business plan .
PHAR/HOWARD has had so many opportunities to come forward and address shareholders i think they have resigned as yourself did. Just drop it and dont discuss and try to resolve anything.
Wish the best
MY point not even close to exactly!!!
No place in my post, not one was i applauding or thanking HOWARD/PHAR for the way they are conducting business or ANY filing including late filing you speak of.
I would ask since you may have misunderstand the reason for the post that i had replied to one of your posts,, give it another try at answering and not avoiding real subject of my post.
Why is HOWARD/PHAR to this day almost a year later, involved with and using personell that is deep rooted into many past fraud pink companies of former shell owners.
Not looking for anything other than why you dont see a problem with the THREE Jan. PHAR filings that have THREE different key McLaughlin operators from years ago involved in some manner on each.
How SNIZZLE is that ok, and IMO HOWARD signing just shows me he has to be in close contact with numerous scam players.
Appreciate your giving another shot at answering original post.
GLTU
GETTING TO BE OLD BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Out of the millions of available sources Howard CEO of PHARMSTAR chooses, and obviously is content with association of proven penny stock scam artist.
Late filing= You say "NO" problem if 20 yr McLaughlin associate "KIT" CHAMBERS authored this filing as long as Howards name is typed in, NOT signed. I say"yes" a big problem. Reason= Just plain wise business decision to dis associate yourself in any way with scammers that have such a RECOGNIZABLE name in pinks.
Annual report= You say "NO" problem you scroll down to legal counsel and its JOSEPH PITTERA. I say "YES" big problem that out of millions of choices HOWARD chooses and sticks with a man that has been in several scam companies with McLaughlin over a 15yr run and is putting his approval of truth in the brand new PURATION project with filings.... Again recognizable name in pink scams and investors PHAR needs see it as i do,, a problem...
Articles of Inc. filed Jan. You say "NO problem if ROGER CRABB was registering agent for many of McLaughlins scam companies and he is registering agent here.. I say " YES" it does that out of millions of choices HOWARD willingly again chooses not to dis associate but to involve himself with known scammers in pink stocks. Again recognizable names that turn stomachs on many in the pink trading community..
So, Howards signing of these documents means this.. HE IS OK AFTER A YEAR OF THE STOCK BEING DRUG INTO MUD, TO ALLOW INVOLVEMENT, NO MATTER IN WHAT WAY,, FRAUDULENT scammers that have no remorse stealing from any investor.. Its a game to them.
What possible good can come from this association. Does anyone think HOWARD is just pulling these names out of a hat??
GL
I think its wise to ask WHO IS PATB LLC...
http://www.corporationwiki.com/Texas/Dallas/patb-llc/39356316.aspx
A huge key player in PATB is CHRISTOPHER KIT Chambers, who in Jan Howard used to author a critical filing for PHAR. KIT also simultaneously authored a new spinoff of shell gang going from gas and oil into the AQUA business.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=SWRS&id=71437
Right click on page and select document properties, and you will find same name on PHARS late filing.
Point is based on past patterns, they dont let go, always in background. They fly under the radar by letting Howard willingly sell at deep discount but you can bet they wont risk trying to manipulte stock so as to bring attention to the obvious. They settle easily for doubling the money and its funneled into another scam PURATION. Cant wait to see major shareholders when that one shakes down. New ticker coming soon, maybe on year anniversary of PHAR.
Being honest and open is the only salvation for PHAR. Howard is either a part of allowing this or he is not. Stand up , present sweeping changes to shareholders, otherwise he is guilty by association.
IMHO and GLTU
If you did take some office pics id like to even see those since Howard wouldnt allow you to go inside to the most important part.
So offices at PHAR built and furnished by OUR money are better than nothing.
Be great as well since Howard confided in you about PHAR behind the scenes activity and how the secrecy will make sense,,, should be perfectly fine for you to share with all investors on the board.
Wouldnt you agree that if a person is told not to share about future market changing events from PHARMSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS without all investors knowing thats as close as you can get to some insider trading info. NOT GOOD IMO So giving all the info should be good to go..
Thanks for replying GLTU
What happened prior to that. From .05 to .01 APRIL till Sept.
Phar is running out of other people to blame situation on. Just like someone having been married 5 or 6 times and always blaming it on spouse..
Would take a good 2500% bounce to get back to April so i sure hope PHAR puts more than just hot air in the PRs to help get a bounce that is sustainable for more than a day.
CEO needs to man up. Way past due
PHAR has been a public company attempting to bring Aquaprin to market for less than a year now.
Less than 3 1/2 yrs ago with PHAR well advanced compared to present, with phase 1 funding complete, a plant equipped, employees being trained AND a $336,000 Grant awarded for the plant and another $10,000 awarded by city to administer grant.
The first link its important to read and not skim through.
http://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/projects/pharmastar/
http://hartiganmanagement.com/ Click on awards
http://www.rockymountnc.us/agenda/prnews_item.asp?NewsID=187
Item 10
As a new or old investor, what in your opinion, or anyone on the board, makes the fact PHAR is public now a more positive sign of success.
Your reading the links posted and replying will be appreciated, or anyone that can help me see why its no problem we dont have a clue what happened just a short time ago TO SUCH AN AWESOME opportunity to get PHAR to market,,and more importantly WHAT signals are present now that success has a better chance.
GLTA
IMO anyone interested in investing in PHAR, anyone thats a previous investor possibly considering re entry, or any current shareholder thats either satisfied with PHAR operation at present or who have legitimate questions should be considered LEGITIMATE INVESTORS.
Hope that helps.
SNIZZLE, just for information to help PHAR investors, what do you consider constitutes a LEGITIMATE INVESTOR?
Look forward to hearing from you. Thats the great thing about IHUB forum ,we can help all investors.
Thanks GLTU
Again appreciate the offer, but im done emailing and calling. I dont like knocking on someones door repeatedly and i know their home, you can see them peeping out, but the refuse to come forward. They know what you want.
If you have info on good news coming Snizzle thats great. But as a business man myself, if HOWARD does have something positive coming, I still ask the question?? What good does it do to not operate in difficult times with strength to not let it sink this far,, only to wait and wait, month after month for a piece of good news . Makes zero business sense at all.
Say that good news spikes SP 300% . Thats a whopping .006 My point is no matter what news comes, if operation continues in same manner,, ends up just another PR.
Appreciate the offer .. im going to stick to non fiction DD so as to obtain the best information as to exactly where the Company stands and what its done with all that money i gave them.
Not sure if anyone else wants to know about PHAR accounting of where it stands today with regards to where it should be standing, but i do. Anybody else interested ?
Good luck, God bless
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=71916672
Im still trying to guess at this . You never replied back. Usually quotes have quotation marks if coming from a specific individual. Could you send a link maybe showing this quote.
I hate guessing games..
Look forward to the link on quote and the source
GLTU
You would think that if the painter had PHARs best interest in mind, the paint strokes would at least be substantial and believable.
A paint more than the price of a Starbucks coffee would have more meaningful impact on other potiential investors if they see a 1k or 2k buy @ higher PPS. Might conclude, whats going on, what does this investor know. Only one conclusion to draw from $11 .
GLTU
Patience is a tremendous virtue. I wish that patience would be the answer as you say. I wish good news from PHAR had impact in MARKET reaction in a positive way, not negative way.
I admire your resolve in patience.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67281100
10,820 posts ago, 4 1/2 months ago PPS right at .01 and now @..0018 PATIENCE for way too many investors is gone. Since then the ROLLBACK PR, the Distibution Agreement, Markiting PR out with very negative impact on PPS. That should be a wake up call that more than patience is needed, and even a trickle of funding will not IMO raise PPS. This needs major surgury or overhaul with a new strategy and a team in place to accomplish goals.
If pressure is not increased on PHAR/HOWARD to cut the crap, stand up as an ethical CEO , and give investors the truth, whether its good,bad or ugly IMO investors at all points in averages will get burnt.
IMO, only salvation, let PHAR know "enough is enough". It will only hit home if ENOUGH of investors participate in a call for,
" What have you done lately" . What verifyable actions and change in strategy is being done to right this ship. No written words of promise and patience, Directly answer questions in a CC between CEO and MGT team and a large group of very unhappy investors.
GLTU and again i admire anyones ability to remain calm with so many reasons for patience to be worn to the limit .
GLTU
Dont know. I know in rollback Howard spoke of trying to increase shareholder value as part of rollback benefit, even though it hasnt been filed with Sec. of State.
Hadnt seen the latter part of the quote in any document or PR, so im guessing your saying HOWARD,and ive just missed that part of quote. I normally read and reread but miised it if thats from him.
But i do agree, every stockholder should want that. Its the matter of what strategy gets it to that point.
No Snizzle i have , absolutely no responses.
Yes i do have a lot of past and present knowledge of key PHAR players now that even after a year have some involvent other than shareholders in business matters , no matter how small. Thanks for compliment, i sure have spent countless hours digging to see the powerful impact this group has over others that allows them to fly under SEC radar and suck the life out of faithful investors that unknowingly dont realize this group never lets go of their shells. The shell is the trap.
It would take a strong determined CEO to stop this activity in its entirity, not just continue trying to hide or be non transparent about involvement.
As you mentioned my knowledge of this group, you do seem to have a lot of inner knowledge of PHAR so it would be helpful to here some facts about why its a good business practice to stay even in the slightest way close enough to this group that they can handle some key business functions. Appreciate in advance your facts,filings, emails that you can share with me that give me info that i can use to combat the facts im finding, as well as many others.
GLTU
The audit which is key should have been complete 2 months ago and form 10 completed and filed. Do you know if this has been done?
This, In one of HOWARDS key opening statements,"I am continuing our policy of transparency and complete disclosure" should be itching for a CC to give updates on these very critical steps to gain this OTC status.
This is good Snizzle on print, and thats my beef that im persistant on pointing out.
Notice part of last paragraph that quotes HOWARD." ALL package engineering,product stability, shelf life testing, quality control testing has been done".
Testing cant be done for current operation at WILSON plant. If packaging engineering complete with the ability to produce packaging at WILSON plant you would not ever risk relabling someone elses packet. You would not crush up parts of the ingrediants and mix it with others to produce samples, if you could produce a batch needed to run the claims testing that HOWARD says is complete. These testings have to come from batches produced at the WILSON plant or the have no validity or will have to be fully repeated when and if a batch is produced in its entirity at WILSON production facility.
So when you post this its glaring that HOWARD is not being transparent, and to be honest with you ,THATS all im looking for in HOWARD right now .
GLTU
As well IMO from just the standpoint of name recognition that might hinder raising needed funding through attracting shareholders Howards pet monkey SNOOP would be better than the man thats in the link below that HOWARDS allowing to be involved with Company.
Snoop might want a bananna or two, but his name doesnt scare investors away. KIT ,on the oher hand is after a boatload of something and i can assure you, its not banannas.
http://www.corporationwiki.com/Texas/Dallas/kit-chambers/30423195.aspx
GLTU
Useless information, but thanks for not answering questions about PHAR. And i wouldnt loose a lot of sleep thinking ill get a satisfactory answer from HOWARD as to why PATB man KIT Chambers is handling these filings, no more than i expected an answer to the questions.
So . good debate, agree to disagree.
GLTU
Hey Vladimirr,, your right ,that could indeed be the reason..
But IMO ,whats happened to PHAR has been a collection of things. This is just another thing that can hurt market reaction to PHAR at a time when its on the brink. Whats the excuse for letting it get to having to come up with a reason, is my frustration..
Whats going to happen im afraid is maybe Friday/Mon a late filing request made for first QTR.,after just doing a late filing request. As well, maybe Pittera can get letter filed as well shortly to correct OTC status. Just dont like legal counsel for DM handling this type thing for PHAR. Bad way to conduct a public company if your trying to raise capitol using same counsel. Being late now and not following needed requirments in a timely manner is just inexcusable when your not even producing product ,meaning the time frames allowed to complete these requirments should be sufficient.
Take care GLTU
Who authored this document? Please post his name.__________
Does his reputation in the stock market running fraud/scams shed a good light on PHAR ? Do you think its wise for HOWARD to continue dealing with these individuals that screw every investor in sight on every company in their 3o company lineage?
Look forward to your answer to the 3 questions. Your right , HOWARD signed it.