Realist
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
In the 10K the company had this paragraph:
As previously reported by the Company on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2022, on February 15, 2022, the Company entered into the February Purchase Agreement with institutional investors named therein, pursuant to which the Company issued, in a registered direct offering, an aggregate of $5,000,000 of Preferred Stock (split evenly among Series F and Series G, the “Preferred Stock”)). The shares of Preferred Stock have a stated value of $1,000 per share and are convertible, following the date of the issuance thereof, into an aggregate of 12,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company upon the conversion of Series F and into an aggregate of 12,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company upon the conversion of Series G, at a conversion price of $0.20 per share each. Though the Preferred Stock and the underlying shares of common stock were offered pursuant to the Second Form S-3, in a concurrent private placement, the Company also issued to such investors unregistered warrants (the “February Warrants”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 18,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.251 per share.
I hope you people that keep thinking the stock will go up understand how many shares and warrants the investors ill receive in this preferred deal and at what price (7.5 cents a share). The reverse split that was recently approved will allow the investors that participated in this round of capital raise to further dilute the common shareholders while the company gets back to Nasdaq listing requirements being $1 a share.
No chance of providing a ROI to investors for the mere fact that they have so much convertible notes due and anytime the stock gets a small spike the debt holders will convert or sell their current shares.
$115 million in total debt is no laughing matter.
Based on Fiscal 2021 results CRVW will need 322 years before they can pay their debt off
They can not allocate money for a buy back because they have debt.
They pushed back their debt repayment for the mere fact that they need time to take care a convertible note.
A buy back is not smart, nor will the covenants in their convertible note allow them to use cash for buy back.
I met john Simmonds in Massachusetts at an investor presentation about 10 years ago. I forget who he was raising capital for and I don't even recall all the details, but just speaking to him he sounded like a man that had to try and show off his intelligence.
he sat in a chair with his belly sipping on red wine and bragged about his father, he bragged about his horse racing business and he was telling everyone in the room about buying gold and shares of his stock in some wireless company (i do not remember the name of the company he was ceo of, but the canadian authorities seized it well before the whole fanotech issue.
simmonds was a bag guy then and he continued to be a bad guy which is how and why he ended up in jail.
karma is not something you want to run into when you wrong many people.
The reason the stock keeps going down is because they have issued many shares at steep discounts to market.
Some of those shareholders that got those shares at discounts can sell the stock all the way down to 10 cents and still make a profit.
Management has mismanaged this capital structure and put the public company on a course of self destruction.
The business may do good, but the stock will do poorly.
Management does not know what damage they've done when they sold shares and issued warrants.
Bad management team EQUALS bad stock performance.
CVLT is a take-out target.
Based on revenues and strength of balance sheet I am expecting this company to be acquired by either an APPLE, Microsoft or even Cisco.
The vertical integration for all of the above and others is vast.
The company is NOT debt free
They have $18 million in debt of which $4.5 million in warrant liabilities which if you know anything will cost them even more.
Don't tell me they have $31 million in cash because for the 9 months ended September they LOST $22 million which means they will have about a $29 million loss in total in 2021.
That $31 million they have in cash will not even last them through 2022 so that means they will have to raise more money which means more dilution.
Your statement about the stock going to 61 cents is a hope and wish
My statements regarding balance sheet, cash flow and cash on hand with 2021 losses for 9-months ended Sept is a fact.
When a public company issues warrants, they issue it with a value that will be converted at the strike price. simplicity management had to issue warrants at $1.00 which means that is all that a fund manager would value the company at. In really really simple terms, simplicity management and warrant holders value the company at $1.00
Who would dinvest in an IPO at a price above 99 cents since there are $1 warrants outstanding.
Why would any fund manager invest in a company that has no light at the end of the tunnel for profitability and not one of Simplicity competitors has been successful. Take a look at GMBL and that has been a catastrophe. It was so bad that the capital raise they did was so bad only the investors that participated in the capital raise made money because they shorted the stock to give them a guarantee return on investment.
And why hasn't the IPO and uplist been done yet.
It is a dog with fleas
The dog is panting and will be out of water very shortly.
Investors that can short WINR will make money because even management thinks the stock is worth $1 a share.
Simplicity business deals do not matter anymore. On friday they filed an 8K with the S.E.C. and it shows that they did a bunch of finance deals with a bunch of sharks. The sharks lent Simplicity money and they will get shares at $1.00 to pay off the debt.
This stock is heading to $1 and I am sure it will go under $1 because I am guessing there are provisions in the debt deals that guarantee the sharks additional shares for repayment if the stock goes under $1.
And if anyone thinks Simplicity will pay off the debt deals with cash you will need to show me where the cash from the operations will come to pay off the debt.
I was holding out and believing in this company in the hopes that their brick and morter places would do well, but it looks like this dog has fleas.
I don't mean to sound like a naysayer on TBLT, but the facts are undisputable.
The CEO does not care about the stock price. never has and never will.
He owns less than 2% of the company.
He has constantly diluted the company through these onerous capital raises that are not with investors, rather with traders.
He announces a capital raise
The traders (which are investors, just not investing in TBLT) get the shares at a discount, and they sell the shares immediately. If they do not sell immediately they lock in a hedge by shorting the EXACT amount of shares they received from the capital raise to ensure a 15-20% guaranteed return on the capital they invested in the capital raise.
This ensures the company gets capital but it also ensures dilution because of the structure of the deal.
the CEO does not care because he doesn't have any stock ownership. He makes his money through his $460,000 annual salary and I am sure he expenses many things to the company.
If anyone thinks the stock will go up - I would need to be educated on how why and if it will go up because the due diligence I conducted on this company and based on the facts that i disclosed in this post state otherwise.
They may be considered criminals by shareholders, but the doki's and all their partners have not been convicted of anything and that means in the eye of the law they are not crinminals. They own shares of RLBY and that means even if they lose in arbitration they will still be shareholders with no influence on the management team. But as shareholders they will be legally allowed to sell shares into the open market and because they own such a high percentage of RLBY their ownership position will mean the stock will never go up.
This company may operate successfully, but the stock will never go up.
What would be a good reason to own the stock right now
Does this company have any business other than selling shares into the market and paying employee salaries.
The dilution has been never ending at the expense of retail investors that are buying the stock on the open market. I dont understand why anyone would buy ENDV considering they have no shares, balance sheet is rittled with debt and the company is losing money with no end in sight and no sales to justify a viable company.
Can someone that bought shares recently explain to me WHY they bought shares
Barwicki is someone that has been with Anavex for some time now. Maybe started with them back in 2018. Barwicki has worked with Disney, Cassava and a few other big companies. AVXL was around $2 a share when Barwicki first started and he has done a good job I spoke to him about 3 or 4 times over the last year.
yerboss
i am almost and borderline laughing so hard that you are looking to invest in this company. are you out of your mind. you do see convertible notes - you do know what convertible notes are.
as for craig and you stating you know lots of people - if you are posting on an endv message board you may know lots of people but they ain't if any importance.
as for me -i have lost more in the stock market then i made, but i have learned many lessons in the last 2 years and over the last 2 years i have made more more than lost and that is becuase i stay away from toxic financings like convertible notes and standby equity agreements.
as for me - i dont know many people but i am also not someone that sits in his basement.
and the only reason i am on this message board is out of sheer and utter curiosity reading stupid people post stupid things about a stupid company
sometimes i just need a laugh and reading what stupid people write. i do this for laughs and self gratification
To Retired Early and in response to your post that you expect ENDV stock to rebound - I would be willing to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge for $5,000 cash.
I just started following the company about 2-weeks ago. I just read a press release today about the film. Does anyone have information about the company that can help me figure out if this is a good investment for me.
The buying last week looked like it was one investor not a group of investors. The transaction chart shows large blocks being traded and that means one investor was doing the buying. If it was Stock Guru recommending the stock the transaction chart would have shown many different buys and sells in the transaction chart with smaller blocks being bought and sold. Also, when you calculate the total transactions epecially from the large blocks being bought and sold, it comes out to $50,000 almost to the dollar. That means someone took the time and started buying and decided to invest $50,000.
Unless that person decided to buy more this week, we can expect a drop in the price this week because we will have investors selling this week because of the rise from last week. Penny stock investors have a tendency to sell once they hit their mark and that mark is usually 50% profit.
The opening of a new store and incorporating a new business shows that Tesoro is expanding and I am just wondering how many more shares they will issue to raise money for the expansion.
wanna-be-rich
with respect to your previous post:
1. I agree with you and rmm that the company sold shares and raised capital. But you have to understand how that works: The company probably sold the shares to an investor for capital and then that investor sold shares into the market. Those shares that were sold into the market were bought by other investors. For a sale to occur, a buyer has to be willing to pay for the shares. Regardless if it was a result of dilution or not does not matter. Someone bought the shares.
2. Your words in your previous post; "Of those 2 billion trades only about %5 of those were buys"
Your statement that 5% were buys is wrong. Someone bought 2 billion shares. That is how a trade occurs. for someone to sell, someone has to buy it.
2 Billion shares traded. That means 2 billion shares were sold and 2 BILLION WERE BOUGHT.
3. The company has 306 investors that are Non Objective Beneficial Owners. These are people that have a stock certificate in their name and possession.
There are thousands of people that own Tesoro stock but it is in street name. Street name means that the shares are held in a brokerage account. These investors are officially referred to as Objective Beneficial Owners and the company does not have their names and information.
I agree that a press release would help and not hurt, but the company does not have the money. I want them to use what ever money they have to put into the second store.
Remember: 2 Billion shares traded in the last 6-months.
Investors sold 2 billion shares, and investors bought 2 billion shares. That is how a stock is traded and counted when looking at liquidity.
rmm243
You wrote that all the shares that traded in the last 6 months were dilution. I don't know what that means.
Shares traded and that means a seller was selling and someone WAS BUYING.
If the shares that hit the market were a result of a capital infusion into the company and resulting in dilution, then that is factual but the other fact is that people were buying the stock so that means new investors were coming in and buying. Yes there could be some investors averaging down but usually when you have this many shares outstanding and thousands of investors in a company, usually very few current investors will buy more stock in a sub-sub penny stock.
I agree with your opinion that there has been dilution, but dilution or not, people were buying Tesoro on the open market.
At the end of the day, it is up to the company to run the business so the market-cap goes up. If management further dilutes the company and issues another billion shares, the stock can stay flat at 0001 and yet the company becomes more valuable because the market cap goes up. This is obviously not good for me, but that is the dangers of investing in a cash-poor company with losses and negative cash flow.
If you were looking for a company to go from 0001 to 0010, then a retail seller like Tesoro is not the company.
Companies that see that type of increase in stock are growth companies and companies with a home run potential like internet companies, bio tech, software, etc.
Retail sellers of floor products is not a sexy business and that usually means 500% jumps in the stock price are unlikely.
rmm243
You are complaining that there is no trading in Tesoro stock. Did you notice that 2 billion shares traded in the last 6 months. That is more than the entire outstanding share count.
The probability of Tesoro stock going up is by management growing the business and limiting dilution.
As for having enough money to buy a store or open a store.
Opening a new store can be done with good negotitations with a landlord. You can sign a lease and defer payment or simply make it a monthly payment with minimal to no initial payment. The products that go into a store can be invoiced or done on consignment.
As for buying a company-this too is done with good negotitations. Tesoro hasnt bought a company so I don't think it should be of concern right now, but if management can negotiate good terms, defer payment and include some backend compensation packages and payouts, yes an acquisition can be done cheaply.
wanna-b-rich
I don't know if the stock is going to go up. The increase in stock will be based on their sales numbers and if they can somehow become profitable and cash flow positive then yes stock price will go up. The major problem is that they have 1.6 billion shares already out so i don't know how high a stock price will go when you have that many shares. They will need to do a reverse merger and limit the issuance of more shares.
It is really in managements hands.
buying shares at 001 and selling them at 0003 is great deal.
the brianless on this message board think that the company should spend the money and issue a press release so you get the opportunity to sell your stock.
you have the legal right to issue a press release on your own. if you think that a press release will bring in new buyers then do it, issue a press release
as for the company issuing a press release to tell everyone what they are doing or what they plan on doing:
- what they are doing. they opened a new store. most shareholders already know about the store opening.
- what are they are going to do. they have already issued their intention of buying a company and opening more stores
where should the company come up with the money to issue a press release. are you brainless or did you take the time and read the company's last financial filing on pinksheets. they have no money
swiwnbike
The BIG QUESTION is going to be Tesoro's growth. Is this second store going to add to the bottom line results or will it be meaningless and just allow the company to putt-along as a small little business?
The company has many issues facing its future and although it is dark I too see some potential. The outstanding shares is the big issue right now. PinkSheets has 1,674,678,199 shares outstanding.
With a $.0001 stock price, TSNP has a market valuation of $167,467.
Lets just say the stock increases 5 fold. At $.0005 the market cap would be $837,339.
Is Tesoro worth $837,339 with
- No Money in the Bank
- $400,000 in annual sales
- $300,000 in annual losses
- More debt than assets
- Negative Cash Flow
- A company that is probably going to have to further dilute to raise more cash.
I am not sure the positives outweight the negatives, but I will say that they do have a real business and if this second store bring in real sales and if they can buy another company on the cheap and through a bank loan and not issue stock, then the potential is here for a stock that can increase.
Lots of IF's
If - IF's, ANDS and BUTS were NUTS & CANDY, it would be Christmas every day.
These people on this message board blasting the company for not issuing a press release need to go back to school and get a real job or try to figure out how the stock market really works.
I bought in a few weeks ago. They need to concentrate on expanding and looking for acquisitions while not getting caught up in only the current business model.
I like that the company has started a major advertising plan that reached thousands of potential customers but I think they need to get a grip on expenses.
I have a call into the company's CEO and will await his reply
Is there a chance that Drinks America can sell themselves. The business model is not working and Patrick Kenny is not one that I believe can run an organization with any professionalism. He has burnt through millions of dollars and continues to screw up everything he touches.
wash3 makes a great post.
The people on this board are so upset at the company for not issuing a press release that they lost sight of the truth.
If Tesoro stock goes up it is because the business is growing, not because of some press release. And as the case is with most press releases most of the people that read the press release are people that already own stock in the company. Tesoro press release is not going to get picked up by a major news service or a periodical.
The people that want the PR to be issued are the same people that will sell the stock as soon as it hits 0003 and will then drive the stock down again.
I dont know if Tesoro is a buy or a sell, but I have been following it because they are one of the few companies trading on the pink sheets that have a real business. The problem is that sales are small, the company loses money every time they issue a financial statement and they are cash flow negative so they have to issue more shares to bring money in and that dilutes shareholders. The one thing that is positive is that they want to expand buy making acquisitions. The devil is in the details but that gives this stock hope.
The people on this board that are complaining about the lack of press releases need to get a quick education on pick sheets:
1. They bought Tesoro stock. They should have know that the company was losing money and they had no monye n the bank and that means raising money through private stock transactions and that means dilution.
2. Tesoro posts their financials on PinkSheets website and they should know, or are too stupid to know that the company does not have money in the bank to pay for a press release.
3. Why issue a press release? The only people that would benefit are the sellers, and these sellers are the same people that will drive the stock back down.
why should the company spend money on a press release so a few people can sell their stock and drive the price down.
4. Who is going to read a Tesoro Press Release. what do these people think is going to happen, Wall Street Journal picks up the press release and puts it in their paper.
Tesoro is a play that needs to make a major acquisition and that will make the price go up. Yes the chance to make a boat load of money is there, but they need to expand.
I am sure this post will intimidate the brainless, but the brainless are the same people that bitch about something that they don't understand.
Watch for the post that reply's to my post. That is King Brainless.
Does the company have any contracts that are guranteed
When will the legal battles end and when will the funds come into the company
I see are speaking with insiders.
PinkSheets has Tesoro with almost 2 Billion shares outstanding. Is this correct? With 2 billion shares the market cap is $200,000. Are they still issuing shares? How many shares do insiders have?
How did they pay for the new store? If the store cost $100,000 to open and they had to issue shares to pay for it, the share count may hit 4 billion.
Do they have money to pay for press releases or will they issue shares. I just looked at their financial filing with PinkSheets and the company has zero in the bank.
Any insight would be helpful.
Does anyone know how DKAm is financing their company. Since they have no cash and their accounts receivables have gone down, how are they paying bills. Are they issuing 504 stock at a 50% discount?
Ikopsaftis
Intelligence with details usually overwhelm the uneducated and those that lack common sense.
Write your comments, but back them up with facts or elaborate on your opinions
If you choose not to, you are simply a person that has a vocabulary of 4 letter words.
If you think my post is a crock, then you think giving valuation and analysis on a public company is a crock.
My post did not say Coates was going to generate X in revenues and have Y as a stock price and Z as a market cap.
I was simply giving a formula that I would use to determine a stock price. How can a formula be a crock?
I know of George Coates past and did a great deal of due diligence already on him.
Although I am not standing up for GC and saying he is an upstanding citizen, the important thing to remember is that his mind and knowledge may be worth more to me than his honesty.
Just because he did something wrong or illegal, does not mean he can not make and manufacturer an engine and generate sales and profit.
I dont care what he did and his actions were not bad enough for the SEC to ban him being involved with a public company. As for Coates stock, if he makes an angine that is good, his personality, presence, and all the other things about him personally will not matter.
What matters is that someone very large will probably buy Coates and that is where I and all other shareholders will make money.
As for him being honest with me - He will know my name and who I am.
I will respectfully warn him that lies from an officer of a public company are illegal and there are many ramifications.
I have no intentions of being disrespectful or 'showing toughness' but my presence and kind & articulate words send a very strong message that can not be misunderstood.
I dont tolerate lies and I do take it very personal.
RadicalHabits
There is no set formula to fairly value companies.
Companies that are generating revenues, cash flow and profits typically get a P/E of 12 - 25, depending on the growth and future growth as well as balance sheet.
Companies that don't have revenues, cash flow or even have a weak balance sheet are given a completely different formula to calculate their market cap. Companies like biotechs, technology and Coates true value would be based on future sales and EPS.
Different formula for each company and industry, in Coates scenario, I need to know what sales are going to be in 2011 and 2012. What the profits are going to be and how many shares are going to be outstanding.
For example, if Coates sales in 2011 are going to be $200 million and profits for the year-end are going to be $20 million (10% of revenues) and the company has 200 million shares outstanding, then I would calculate that fair value for the stock would be $1.50.
With 200 million shares outstanding and $20 million in profit, that equates to 10 cents earnings per share.
I would give Coates stock a P/E of 15 which equates to $1.50 a share which is fair value.
If by chance 2012 has better numbers than 2011 then we can give COTE a P/E of 20 which equates to $2.00 a share.
At $1.50 a share and 200 million shares outstanding, it gives Coates a $300 million markep cap which is probably fair and I am guessing that a large company car company, engine manufaturer, or someone else would pay $300 million to acquire Coates.
The above numbers are all hypothetical.
Now you know why I need to speak with management.
As for me telling 46,000 people about Coates and them buying the stock and driving the price to $1.50 a share. I am not doing anything illegal.
I would invest $150,000 in the stock which is my average investment and if I get in at an average price of 30 cents a share I would own 500,000.
If I sell my shares at $1.50 a share I would have net proceeds of $750,000 which equates to a Net Profit of $600,000
My cost to mail post cards and send emails is set at $12,000.
$600,000 minus $12,000 = $580,000 profit
Government gets 35% which equates to $203,000 for them and $377,000 for me.
It's 35% because its short term capital.
Depending on how long it takes me to buy up the shares (usually 6 weeks) and then once post cards and email goes out usualy only takes me 2 weeks to sell the stock.
As for the post card and emails - nothing illegal. I don't say anything that the company hasnt already made public or told to me. I simply use my fair valuation and show people that the company is worth more than the current stock price shows.
As for Dan Dorfman? I dont know who he is.
As for you being embarrassed for me. Don't be. You live in New Jersey and continue your life and as long as you dont step on my toes I won't step on yours. Nor will I ever be embarrassed for you. What you do, Who you are, and How you make a living is your business.
I do 4-6 deals a year. I own a deli that does $600,000 a year in revenue and after all expenses and taxes gives me a $175,000 annual profit. Combine that with stock profit of about $1.2 million a year I am getting by.
I no longer have to work at the deli but I go in almost everyday to check up on things.
I am a 'radical' and aggressive person that when confronted will use my resources to get the truth and if lied to or deceived I will retaliate.
I dont hide behind emails, posts or anything else. If someone is man enough to want to meet with me then I will do so. If they dont want to meet with me and I determined that I have been lied to or deceived, I will find the person. People (message board posters and emailers) do not typically realize that finding a person is very easy.
Criticism on these boards is acceptable to me.
CEO or someone from a public company lying to me is not acceptable and requires a visit.
My friends, family and associates make money along side me.
These same people also are the ones that assist me finding the person that I need to find.
Coates has some answers to give me before I invest, before I tell my people to invest, and before I send out post cards and emails.
George and his people better not lie, or a visit from me will occur.
Hurricane Rick
I have invested in more than 200 penny stock companies. I have met more than 300 ceo's of penny stock companies at conferences and presentations.
I am not here to make friends with anyone, I am here to make money. It is the only thing I care about. I am not here to save the world or create something out of nothing. I know who I am and I know my capabilities.
If coates has an engine that has the capability to revolutionize the world, then I want to invest because I want to make money. I am not one that will create the engine and I am not one that will make the engine better. I am looking for an investment in the company.
As for other CEO's or other companies that I invested in and their business went down the tubes then so be it, but I do have the right to complain.
If a ceo ruins his business, goes out of business, files bankruptcy or whatever, his track record speaks for itself. My opinions are just that - opinions. The ceo and management team need to face their failures.
I get more than 40 emails every day from someone promoting a stock.
I get at least 5 pieces of mail delivered to my home from someone or some company promoting a stock.
I give everything serious consideration and if I think there is something that can make me money than I look into it further.
As for Coates, I got stuff about the company in the mail a long time ago and I gave it the necessary attention, but I always waiting for an engine to be delivered and now that it has been delivered or shipped out now I am looking even further.
As for what George wants or doesnt want - it is meaningless to me.
Coates is a public company and that means for him to succeed he must have revenues, positive cash flow, strong balance sheet, earnings per share, investors buying the stock (including me) and not have a toxic finance in place that will ruin the stock price.
Hurricane - learn investing, then make comments that mean something. Don't belittle me because you don't know me and my simple posts prove that my investing knowledge is far superior than most, including yours.
And if you feel compelled to reply to this post - do it with intelligence, not criticism.
RadicalHabits
I have no clue what you are trying to say in your last post addressed to me.
What top tier and middle market tier firms do with and for their customers means nothing to me.
As for my telling my friends, family and associates to buy a stock I am not one that throws darts at a dartboard.
I find companies that are good, we (friends, family, associates, and myself included) buy the stock and then we have an email database of 40,000 investors that we send an alert to and we also send out 6,000 post cards through the mail telling people to buy the stock.
It's a simple process that works - we buy low, we tell people to buy (we disclose that we own shares) and out of the 46,000 people that get the email and post card every single time the stock goes up, we make anywhere between 300 - 1,000% ROI.
If Coates wants to convince me through a telephone conversation that they are a good company, and if I believe them, then cote stock will be our investment and buy recommendation.
In case you are wondering, NO the company can not pay us to do this. There are so many scam companies out there that if they need to pay for us to issue a buy recommendation to our 46,000 email and 6,000 post card recipients then it is safe to say that the company is not a good investment.
I still don't know what type of a company Coates is and unless they answer my questions, they will be in the 20 cents range for a long time.
To King 1
Being secretive on their technology & patents (secret sauce) is OK with me. I want to know more about Almont Energy Company. I cant find any information on them on the internet. I want to know about Almont's ability to pay the amount they have outstanding and I would like to know how much money Almont has already paid to Coates for the licensing agreement when it was signed.
I did call Almont today at 403-262-2950 but no one picked up.
There website kind of reflects their entire business is based on Coates products. If this is the case then I am wondering if Coates set-up Almont by either investing or loaning money to Almont.
I also want to know if the engine that they sent was a sale, or was it given as a demo.
Do they have any licensing agreements in the U.S. or anywhere else in the world.
In the last quarterly filing with the SEC Coates had no money. I would like to know how they plan on paying for the manufacturing of the engines.
Do they plan on getting a bank loan or an equity capital raise. If it is an equity capital raise I want to make sure its not a death spiral like a NIR, Cornell or Dutchess deal.
I would like to know the deal terms.
I am very interested in getting an understanding of the business.
I think Coates has really pissed off past and current investors, but that may provide new investors with an opportunity to make money as long as everything is in order and I get the answers I want to my questions.
If management wants to be secretive on public information, then I won't buy the stock or suggest it to my associates. And it will also mean the company is hiding something and that is never good.
I want information, if they don't want to provide it, then they dont want new investors.
This is great news and since the press release stated that the engines were shipped it can be booked as a sale and will be reflected in the next quarterly filing with the SEC.
The incoming payments and outstanding balance is also going to give the company a boost on the balance sheet.
This is great news.
Can anyone give me their concerns or any problems that can occur.
I want to call the company and get some information about the future of the company and I want to ask as many questions as possible.
I own this stock and think the settlement will do well for us
What are the specifics on the $2 million debt financing