is this a take out target for a cisco, dell or hp

and where do you expect it to finish by the end of the year

To All The Nay Sayers that criticize on this board and all other boards I post on - I am ALWAYS proven right.

And YES, I am smarter than most people that criticize me on these boards.

The reason I am smarter is due to some very simple Investment 101 factors: (1) anytime a public company with a market cap less than $500 million has to raise capital they will have dilution and that always leads to lower stock price, (2) when a public company does not have funds invested it means the company should not be public, (3) ALL reverse mergers and SPACS have a never-ending stock price decline among a few other Investment 101 factors.

AND YES - I am always right when the top 3 Investment 101 Factors are adhered to.
AND YES - I make a very good living with my business and even more money investing in small and micro cap companies, but most of my profits are through short positions.
AND YES - I have lost money on some of my investments, but I would say 1 out of 10 investments is a loss, 9 out of 10 is a profit.
AND YES - I pay real taxes that include short term profit taxes on investments.
AND YES - I hope to pay twice as much in taxes every year until I die.

AND NO, all the naysayers that have and will continue to criticize me do not bother or upset me. I try really hard when I post on these boards to let people know about their investment and monies that they are likely to lose because of the 3 investment 101 factors.

I like to think I bring value and can save people money.

To All The Nay Sayers that criticize on this board and all other boards I post on - I am ALWAYS proven right.

And YES, I am smarter than most people that criticize me on these boards.

The reason I am smarter is due to some very simple Investment 101 factors: (1) anytime a public company with a market cap less than $500 million has to raise capital they will have dilution and that always leads to lower stock price, (2) when a public company does not have funds invested it means the company should not be public, (3) ALL reverse mergers and SPACS have a never-ending stock price decline among a few other Investment 101 factors.

AND YES - I am always right when the top 3 Investment 101 Factors are adhered to.
AND YES - I make a very good living with my business and even more money investing in small and micro cap companies, but most of my profits are through short positions.
AND YES - I have lost money on some of my investments, but I would say 1 out of 10 investments is a loss, 9 out of 10 is a profit.
AND YES - I pay real taxes that include short term profit taxes on investments.
AND YES - I hope to pay twice as much in taxes every year until I die.

AND NO, all the naysayers that have and will continue to criticize me do not bother or upset me. I try really hard when I post on these boards to let people know about their investment and monies that they are likely to lose because of the 3 investment 101 factors.

I like to think I bring value and can save people money.

To All The Nay Sayers that criticize on this board and all other boards I post on - I am ALWAYS proven right.

And YES, I am smarter than most people that criticize me on these boards.

The reason I am smarter is due to some very simple Investment 101 factors: (1) anytime a public company with a market cap less than $500 million has to raise capital they will have dilution and that always leads to lower stock price, (2) when a public company does not have funds invested it means the company should not be public, (3) ALL reverse mergers and SPACS have a never-ending stock price decline among a few other Investment 101 factors.

AND YES - I am always right when the top 3 Investment 101 Factors are adhered to.
AND YES - I make a very good living with my business and even more money investing in small and micro cap companies, but most of my profits are through short positions.
AND YES - I have lost money on some of my investments, but I would say 1 out of 10 investments is a loss, 9 out of 10 is a profit.
AND YES - I pay real taxes that include short term profit taxes on investments.
AND YES - I hope to pay twice as much in taxes every year until I die.

AND NO, all the naysayers that have and will continue to criticize me do not bother or upset me. I try really hard when I post on these boards to let people know about their investment and monies that they are likely to lose because of the 3 investment 101 factors.

I like to think I bring value and can save people money.

To All The Nay Sayers that criticize on this board and all other boards I post on - I am ALWAYS proven right.

And YES, I am smarter than most people that criticize me on these boards.

The reason I am smarter is due to some very simple Investment 101 factors: (1) anytime a public company with a market cap less than $500 million has to raise capital they will have dilution and that always leads to lower stock price, (2) when a public company does not have funds invested it means the company should not be public, (3) ALL reverse mergers and SPACS have a never-ending stock price decline among a few other Investment 101 factors.

AND YES - I am always right when the top 3 Investment 101 Factors are adhered to.
AND YES - I make a very good living with my business and even more money investing in small and micro cap companies, but most of my profits are through short positions.
AND YES - I have lost money on some of my investments, but I would say 1 out of 10 investments is a loss, 9 out of 10 is a profit.
AND YES - I pay real taxes that include short term profit taxes on investments.
AND YES - I hope to pay twice as much in taxes every year until I die.

AND NO, all the naysayers that have and will continue to criticize me do not bother or upset me. I try really hard when I post on these boards to let people know about their investment and monies that they are likely to lose because of the 3 investment 101 factors.

I like to think I bring value and can save people money.

To All The Nay Sayers that criticize on this board and all other boards I post on - I am ALWAYS proven right.

And YES, I am smarter than most people that criticize me on these boards.

The reason I am smarter is due to some very simple Investment 101 factors: (1) anytime a public company with a market cap less than $500 million has to raise capital they will have dilution and that always leads to lower stock price, (2) when a public company does not have funds invested it means the company should not be public, (3) ALL reverse mergers and SPACS have a never-ending stock price decline among a few other Investment 101 factors.

AND YES - I am always right when the top 3 Investment 101 Factors are adhered to.
AND YES - I make a very good living with my business and even more money investing in small and micro cap companies, but most of my profits are through short positions.
AND YES - I have lost money on some of my investments, but I would say 1 out of 10 investments is a loss, 9 out of 10 is a profit.
AND YES - I pay real taxes that include short term profit taxes on investments.
AND YES - I hope to pay twice as much in taxes every year until I die.

AND NO, all the naysayers that have and will continue to criticize me do not bother or upset me. I try really hard when I post on these boards to let people know about their investment and monies that they are likely to lose because of the 3 investment 101 factors.

I like to think I bring value and can save people money.

No revenues means no shareholder value.
You can hold onto the share structure and no toxic and convertible notes, but ne revenues means no profit and that means no market cap.

This company has been in business how many years? and they had $55 thousand in revenues and $83 thousand in losses for the quarter ended December 2024.
CEO's with real Board members would be terminated for failure.

I own my own company, while its a private business and I don't answer to shareholders, I have a much more successful business when compared to BSEG because I do $750,000 in revenues and $410,000 in profit AFTER tax. Having said all of that, my business should not be public and I see no reason to ever go public. but BSEG went public and has not performed.

The non-performance I speak of is based on revenues and profit. I font it hard to argue with my opinion, but lets say you want to argue or debate my opinion, the investment community agrees with my opinion because there is no interest in the stock, which is clear in the trading of the stock, or lack of trading in the stock.

Why is this company public.
That being said, they do have a pubco that does not have toxic financings or convertible notes and that means they should sell the public part of the company to a private business for a reverse merger transaction. Then, and only then, will BSEG current shareholders make money.
BSEG is down from 1-year ago, it's down from 2 years ago and its down from 5 years ago.

Why do you think the company will generate revenues?
What leads you to this belief?

Again, if you work for BSEG or are paid to be positive on this message board, then I understand your wording, but if you are an investors I ask you again, what possesses you to be positive.

If you are being paid by Big Screen then I can understand your posts and being positive on the company and stock.

But if you are an investor or an advisor, you would really have to be out-of-your-mind, or just plain dumb to think this company stock will increase.

JakeFromSF
Why do you think the stock is trading in the 60 cents range considering that an offer has been made public at $1.60?

It is safe to say CNTM took the company public through a SPAC and it has not gone very well.
CNTM management has been slapped in the face with a dose of wall street reality because their stock is declining on a consistent basis.
It would then seem to appear as if the 4 self-described institutional investors either bought their shares from CNTM management at steep discounts to accumulate their current positions in an effort to get some type of excitement about the stock which would have driven the price up and management would have probably then decided not to accept the $1.60 offer, or maybe they were investors in the SPAC and already shorted the company and made a bunch of money and are now coming in with more shares with a deal that will dilute the company to a point that it will be 10 cents if they do not do a reverse split.
With all the press releases the company has issued the charade management concocted has not worked and now the decision must be how can the company move forward as a nasdaq company.

I am keeping my fingers crossed that they do a reverse split with a capital raise through Think Equity investment bank because I would love to short the stock upon the reverse split being done. I am sure some small funds will short it also but I am not a big player in the grand scheme of things. I would short about 50,000 - 100,000 shares based on reverse split numbers. I am predicting a reverse split that will get CNTM stock to $6.00 a share. I would short 50,000 if they do the $6 RS. Its going to go down at least to $4 a share in the first 2 trading days.

The $1.60 offer is not being considered by investors because the stock is trading at 60 cents, which means investors are leaving $1.00 a share on the table.

If the offer was real, I would imagine investors would buy up shares to the $1.30 to $1.40 range and wait for the deal to close and walk away with the $1.60 in cash per share. But since there is not much trading, or demand on the stock, it is safe to say this scheme is not working.

And to go into it a bit deeper, what group of institutional investors would leave the $1.60 offer out there given the company has filed an 8K announcing that past results can not be relied upon due to accounting errors. Any REAL institutional investor would withdraw the offer.

Come on, this charade, scheme, idea to inflate or somehow manipulate the stock is not working.

But please I beg the company to do the reverse split because I would love to make $1.50 per share on a short.
If they RS to $6.00, I will short the stock to $4.75 because I predict a $4.00 stock price very quickly. To be safe I am looking at covering at $4.50.

MoneyMaker 111
You took some pleasure in seeing NMAX go up 8% yesterday meaning my post was wrong.

But if you look at today's trading, the stock went down 9%.

Does that make me right and you wrong, or vice versa? I do not believe so.

Its not about the daily trading and I am not right because the stock declined 9% today, and I am not in a position to gloat or try to make you feel bad, but you need to consider everything about NMAX investment in totality and avoid 8% or 9% daily activity as being an indicator that the stock is good or bad.

So many other factors some of which I posted that support my investment as a short on NMAX.

Today's press release is actually very good. Anytime you decrease debt by 90% is a great thing.

I have 2 things to post about the debt reduction and announcement:

1. What were the terms of the debt reduction. If the debt was converted to common stock I think investors need to sit back and see how many shares were issued for the debt reduction. In other words, how much dilution have shareholders been hit with.
If it wasn't debt conversion to common stock then shareholders need to know exactly how this debt reduction was done.

2. Based on stock price and trading today it seems like no one cares about it. Has Connectm ruined themselves to the point that it doesn't matter what they say, announce or accomplish and there is absolutely nothing that will have a positive impact on the stock price. OR, is their public relations and investor relations so bad that they are not getting any eyeballs to the company.

I am still bearish on this company and even though debt reduction sounds like a great thing, it doesn't mean its positive for shareholders because the terms can be so bad that the debt reduction may be worse for shareholders.

I am not talking about 8% up or 8% down on a daily basis.
I am talking about NMAX dropping about 35% in April - May timeframe and then in June - July another 15% drop.
This is based on Yorkville deal announcement that is done, registration of securities for sale which was done yesterday and next 10Q release. 2 of the events already occurred and the 10Q release will have a negative impact on the stock.
Tack on that advertising spending is being cut in half by most companies and ad agencies, we are looking at a very negative sector that Newsmax is in.
I give management a great deal of credit for taking the company public when they did because that put cash onto their balance sheet during a period over the next 2 years that is going to be very difficult to navigate.

Being up and down daily is not what I am talking about when I say short.
I am talking about results 2-4 months out and even more focus on 6 months.

Newsmax will have self-promotional press releases that will make their business appear to be going well, but the 10Q and future forecasting and proforma numbers will be the reason this is a short.

An 8K that discloses past financial numbers are wrong and not to be relied upon is indicative of a management team that does not understand and know how to run a public company.
Their constant press releases about who owns the stock is going unnoticed. As for those so-called institutional investors that made a so-called offer to buy shares at $1.60, which I do not believe will ever materialize into anything, why would self-described institutional investors keep that offer on the table given the unreliable financial and operating results the company has issued.
Not to mention that not one of the three self-described institutional investors have any verification of being actual institutional investors.

CNTM may have hit rock bottom because their may not be any other shares in the float to drive the stock down. That is the reason I am no longer shorting the stock. It may be done. The trading we are seeing this week and next is a result of shorts having to cover due to the high short position. This trading may come to an end unless management is manipulating the trading to make it appear as is there is liquidity so they can get some type of a deal from ThinkEquity.

NMAX is the new short to make money on now.

NMAX stock is a short.

Their market cap can not be justified, and while I can sometimes overlook a fundamental like market cap, I can not overlook their deal with Yorkville.
Yorkville is a bad investor to have. The equity agreement will drive the stock down because equity agreements are at a discount to market and that makes NMAZ stock a SHORT.

Today, Connectm announces they retained Thinkequity as an investment bank to review the supposed offer they got to be acquired for $1.60 a share so the company can go private.
As many who have read this board I am a shorter of this stock and I think this entire buyout offer for outstanding shares at $1.60 by 3 institutional investors is fake, misleading and possibly criminal. That is just my opinion.

Back in March Connectm issued a press release that they will be presenting at Roth conference and they will be holding meetings throughout Los Angeles. That is called a dog-n-pony or a road show.
I guess that presentation and those meetings did not result in any new investors or a banking deal with Roth because now they hire Thinkequity in New York.

I do not believe the $1.60 offer is real and I am guessing that Thinkequity will probabaly give them a much higher valuation which the company will end up turning down the $1.60 offer, and the entire thing will go away and end up being exactly what I always thought this was. And this whole $1.60 charade is, was and will always be fake, misleading and possibly criminal.

Yet another reason to short this stock, in my opinion. Thinkequity will probably raise them $5 million at some egregious terms with lots of warrants and with reverse split the stock will most definitely be a SHORT.

This company is desperate for guidance. Not only do their press releases bring no value because buying is not occurring after the press releases are released, they are poorly written. On top of all that, the short position on CNTM on March 14 was the second highest in company history.
This management team may not even know they are so heavily shorted, and if they do know and are deciding not to do anything about it they are even dumber than dumb and dumber.
Whomever is advising them, if they have a capital markets, public relations or investor relations team is doing a poor job because if it was me, I would squeeze the shorts based on March 14 short position and the high number of short trading volume.

As my short and overall position and trading comes to an end with this company, it is time for me to move on. The only way I will come back is if I see them do a capital raise and reverse split. That will be the timing for me to get back into the cntm trading game.

Good Luck To All, and to CNTM, goodnight!

Saving Grace
How does your message board post have anything to do with Connectm

Federico Monserrat
If you are offering me a job I respectfully decline.

There are 3 philosophies I go by:
1. God, Immediate Family and Country (U.S.) in that order.
2. It would be nearly impossible for anyone or company to be able to afford me.
3. I have everything I want, and if I don't have it I do not want it, and since the only thing I want more of is time, and that is something that no one can give me so I will remain as is.

Everything in my life is absolute, except the term - nearly impossible for anyone or company to afford me. The only scenario I envision where I would work for someone is if I had a chance to significantly contribute or assist in a drug development. Some biotech company maybe, but not as a clinical trial patient. Very complex scenario that I prefer not to go into on a message board.

All The Best and Thank You for your compliment.

I love the CNTM stock.
It is much easier to predict company stocks that will go lower then company stock increases.
Putting aside the market activity from Tariff issues, most company stocks go down. For example all SPAC;s go down after the deal is closed. That is the easiest short position in the entire stock market.

Most companies that are losing money and when you look at the balance sheet don't have enough cash to support those losses will do a capital raise and those always go down because capital raises for companies that need money are predatory deals that get the company money but the stock gets hammered. The investors in those deals take a short position, which tells you something.

Finding companies on the nasdaq that don't have quarterly or annual conference calls is another sign of a stock that will drop.

Another easy target is companies that issue fluff press releases because their business is not good enough to do well so management thinks press releases will solve their issues. You do have to have a level of intelligence to identify fluff press releases vs fundamental press releases.

Finding losers is easy. There is a reason hedge fund managers over the last 25 years have done so well and that is because it has been and will be easier to find a future loser than a future winner. In my world, I make money off of losers. Losers are a profit for me.

Don't get me wrong, long guys like Warren Buffet are unique because shorting was not a thing 50 years ago, or not a thing like it is today. I am 100% sure that if he was starting Berkshire Hathaway today he would be a shorter.

Hedge Funds short often even in positions that they are long.

Shorting is just easier to make money because there are more failures than winners once you take out the Fortune 500 and S&P 500 companies.

I love companies like CNTM FOR SHORTING purposes.

The tariff issues are a whole new topic but I am not in the tariff losses stocks because that means you have to short Fortune 500 and S&P 500 stocks and that is something I have never done or will do. That is dangerous stuff and I ain't smart enough to invest in that way.

On March 13 Connectm announces a share buyback - which they do not have the cash or balance sheet to do.
On April 2 they get a non-binding offer to buy the stock from 3 so-called institutional investors.

An investigation is going to be really bad for Connectm:
Connectm has been selling shares to the 3 institutional investors recently that is how they became shareholders.
These so-called institutional investors are not licensed or known here in the United States and do they even have the cash collectively to make such an offer?

Or is this one big scheme by Connectm management to get the stock price higher to do some type of a capital raise or get stock above $1 so they don't get delisted. We may not know the reason for this nefarious activity right now, but I am sure the SEC or Finra will get to the bottom of all this because once the SEC or FINRA start issuing supboena's to all these 4 parties, at least one will fold and start signing like a canary.

And with the stock increased after the $1.60 buyout was made public, there were many people that bought the stock, drive the price up, AND ARE NOW DOWN ON THEIR INVESTMENT. Those people will all contact the SEC because they will have feel cheated. The SEC will look at the chronological order of everything that occurred, specifically the 13 press releases Connectm issued in March and the so-called buyout offer from these mysterious 3 institutional investors and they will open an investigation because it smells bad, realreal bad.

glenn1919
Why do you send a link to a chart in your message board post.
Everyone, including me, look at the chart before coming onto a board and posting.

I am trying to figure out why you send a link to chart.

maumar
I can not believe you tried to prove me wrong about this stock.
My post was 100% accurate.
Your thoughts, beliefs and reply to my initial post was 100% wrong.

I am way above your intelligence level and even more importantly, I know and understand the stock market to a level you can not even imagine.

This is a short and will remain one for a very long time.

This announcement is questionable and will be scrutinized by and with an SEC or FINRA investigation.

The 3 institutional investors that are making the offer claim to have been past long term shareholders, but they never filed any statement of ownership documents with the SEC previously. Something they may have been obligated to do, but I am not sure based on the documents I read.
The 3 institutional investors received CNTM shares through private placements, which means Connectm CEO approved all transactions. Again, something that will probably result in an SEC investigation.
The press release states its a non-binding agreement, which means absolutely zero. Non binding means the company, 1, 2 or all 3 can legally back out of the deal.

There is a possibility that this press release was issued to spike up the stock price so they can avoid delisting with zero intention of actually a deal ever closing. It's possible!

What I find absolutely hilarious is that a non binding deal was announced at $1.60 a share at 8 in the morning, but at 1:13pm the stock is at 81 cents. What that says is that a deal at $1.60 is highly unlikely. Because if anyone thought this was a real offer would buy the stock closer to the $1.60 range.
If I thought it was a real offer I can buy the stock up to $1.40 and make money on the spread, but I wouldn't and no one else is doing it either.

The shorts, like myself are happy because we can take another short position at 4:00pm et today with a couple days to cover because I expect the stock to decline over the next 5 days. It has already declined today from the daily high which is a bad sign for the company.

I would also expect SEC and FINRA to look into this entire charade and when all is said and done, Connectm will not be acquired by the 3 institutional investors, most investors with a long position will lose money on their investment and the company will probably get delisted.

Another reason I think this acquisition announcement is 1 big lie is WHY would the 3 institutional investors make an announcement at $1.60 a share when the company is on its way to getting delisted. The 3 institutional investors could just wait a few months, let Connectm get delisted, go dark, and buy the company at a much cheaper price.

This looks like California smog and smells like New York City streets.

ConnectM is going to have to raise capital. That means one of these mid tier investment banks are going to raise them $5 or more million at such bad terms, that the dilution is going to be so bad the stock will go down so fast because the investors that participate in the capital raise are going to short the stock. you know there will be warrants which is something that never gets out of the way.
You combine that with the reverse split that they have to do, and you are looking at current shareholders getting beat up pretty bad.
You combine that with the 11 press releases the company issued in March and you still have a stock that went down. They issued all those press releases in the hope to get the stock price higher so they would have some leverage in their negotiations with the investment bankers and investors but nothing has worked for this management team. So far it has been a colossal failure, starting with a $10 stock that has gone under $1 a share in such a short period of time.

Management has tried to do everything under the sun to get the stock price higher but nothing has worked since they became public, but now with a capital raise and a reverse split we are looking at a percentage decrease that may be worse than the past 6-months.

This is a short all the way.

How can SGDH grow their business.

1. They don't have a business.
2. They have $3 dollars in the bank.
3. They have no revenues.

Why is this company public and why in the world do shareholders believe or even own a stock that has absolutely nothing.

2 Press Releases today

1 - They will be presenting at a Roth conference.
If you know anything about Roth they are an investment bank that does toxic financings.
The press releases stated they will be presenting at the conference and then meeting with investors in Los Angeles.
Roth is probably doing the old dog-and-pony and we will see a major stock drop after they raise capital for CNTM. The good news for CNTM is that they will raise a couple million with Roth, but the bad news is that the stock is going to drop by at least 25% within a week after the capital raises closes and in the 50% range within a month after that. Roth and the investors Roth puts into these capital raises do the same thing everytime.

2 - Press release about a Nasdaq hearing for listing. CNTM has failed in maintaining listing requirements so now they are appealing. They will basically raise capital to try to give themselves the $50 million market value. What management doesn't realize is that the capital raise and a reverse stock split will not get them to Nasdaq listing requirements. The end is near, but the shorting has begun and will increase once Roth investors do their thing.

This is one big disaster. IMTX has to raise capital at a terrible valuation. Management has messed this entire company up to a point that now they can only do some form of bad deal to bring capital in. Another short that has been good so far but I expect it to be even better as time goes on.
They have a decent portfolio of products but managements stupid approach has not gotten them much money.
for how many years did management not want to raise money because they thought they were worth money than the market cap had them at.

NOW THEY ARE EVEN LOWER MARKET CAP AND RAISING CAPITAL IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE.
Stupid management equals lower stock price which then equals shareholder losses.

Another short sell that will yield big results.

Just bought some IPWR today.
Purely speculative investment.
I am keeping my fingers crossed that all of their investments will bring value to the stock in the next 12-months.

it is a pure spec investment based on technology advancements, balance sheet, starting to generate revenues, partnerships that they've announced, tight float and some pretty large investors like Blackrock, Vanguard and a few others.

Purely speculative and willing to lose money on this one, but if the technology works the stock can react like when a company announces it found a cure for a disease.

ShadowNavigator61
You actually wrote on your post that I was lazy because I reverted to Q3' 24 financials.
THAT IS WHAT AND WHERE YOU LOOK FOR COMPANY INFORMATION - THE LAST 10Q or 10K. That is not a sign of laziness, it is a sign of doing due diligence.
Anyone with knowledge should know that. HOW DARE YOU CALL ME LAZY FOR DOING THE THING THAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO DO WHEN RESEARCH A COMPANY TO DETERMINE IF A PUBLIC COMPANY IS A GOOD INVESTMENT

You also wrote that its just a shareholder authorization.
IT IS NOT A SHAREHOLDER AUTHORIZATION - THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUTHORIZED THE SHARE BUYBACK! Shareholders had nothing to do with suggesting, approving, voting or anything for that matter regarding the stock buyback.
I do not know if you are lazy or not. But I do know you are trying to mislead people on this message board which indicates to me you are an insider of some type at CNTM.

CNTM posted their proxy solicitation today - Why don't you give us your opinion on the SEDA they announced.
Is it good for current shareholders?
What are the exact terms of the SEDA?
What can we expect in the short term from the SEDA?
What is your opinion about the SEDA?
Don't be lazy, do some homework and write down your opinions for all the readers on this message board.

If I am correct and you are an insider at CNTM - the company has even bigger problems than just a declining stock price.

CNTM stock price is sure to go down.

Yesterday they announced a stock buy back of $10 million. Absolutely misleading since they do not have $10 million. In fact, they are debt ridden so them making that announcement is wrong on so many levels. Not to mention they are losing money which means a stock buyback is really unheard of and makes management look like fools trying to fool investors.

Today they issued a press release that an institutional investor has filed statement of ownership with the S.E.C. I did an online search on the institutional investor but I found nothing, in fact, other than this CNTM filing, the institutional investor has never filed with the S.E.C. No history or anything came up on this so-called institutional investor. Putting that little thing aside, how did the institutional investor get those shares. Did he buy them on the open market or get them through a private stock transaction. If he got them directly from CNTM, what were the deal terms? Did he get some type of a deal that is going to drive the stock down further? Does he have those convertible notes that will surely bring CNTM to $0.0001 a share?

I find these 2 latest press releases very suspicious especially with a delisting from Nasdaq occurring. Safe to say my SHORT on CNTM is proving itself very well.
This short is so easy that even if they tried to squeeze me management is so inept that they wouldn't even be able to do that properly.
No good public company management team allows a stock to go from $10.00 to less than $1.00 in 6-months.

The dilution that occurred with the deleveraging was significant.
Dilution hurts shareholder value.

The press release states they will be debt free by Q2 2025 - No Chance of that occurring.
If you believe that statement then you have a different approach then I do when it comes to investing and knowing what debt is.

If they want to grow their business they will need cash to fund operations - not give cash to shareholders.

It's a misleading press release with management making a lot of statements that do not make sense, all in the hope to get a higher stock price and somehow use that to raise capital.

Legitimate companies only do stock buy backs when they can afford it. Connectm can not afford a stock buyback and that is 100% clear.

As for using a Q3 2024 financials - it is where you go get information and that is what I did. When they come out with their 10K I will gladly add insight and educate you about their financial and operating position. Based on your post that replied to me - you are expecting them to have less than $10 million in debt - that is false and very misleading unless they have 200 million shares outstanding.
And I am sure you know if they diluted themselves that much they will be a ten cent stock in a matter of months.

Perfect company to short right now.

Balance Sheet and past finance deals have this dog with extra and costly fleas. The OTC is where this company belongs so it can die a slow death.

JetBlue needs to pursue a small regional carrier to acquire or a mid size company to merge with. The current operations are not working for the future. Either your one of the big boys or just a company with a stock that has no upward movement.

How is the company doing a buyback with less than $1 million in cash, $40 million in debt and losing $12 million a quarter?
This press release is so misleading it is disgusting.

The simple truth is that they are hoping people will buy the stock so they can raise capital. The end result will be big time dilution and a reverse split.

The stock buyback is misleading and a blatant lie that can come happen based on cash, balance sheet and quarterly loss. IMPOSSIBLE.

For the quarter ended September 2024 BSEG had a loss of $57,892. THAT IS A REPORTED LOSS ON THEIR FINANCIAL STATEMENT.

For the Fiscal Year 2024 they had a profit of $82,475. That is $.0007 a share profit based pm 113,516,548 shares outstanding.
If you take that .0007 and give it a multiple of 10 - the stock can be fairly valued at $.007.

They announced a capital raise in September. I do not know if they were successful, but if they were successful they would have issued a press release. Nonetheless, if they did a capital raise they would have had to issue stock and that means DILUTION which means more shares hit the market which means less value for every shareholder right now.

I hearby swear not to post on this board further. I hope all of you the best. I tried to save you people from a bad investment but all I can do is try.
I find it disturbing that people on this board criticize me for posting an opinion but yet the CEO of the company even after 19 years in business is failing and shareholders have lost money. Yet criticize me for an opinion and love the CEO.

We live in a society of acceptable failure. I have 2 children and I am happy with their accomplishments because failure is for the weak minded.
Nothing wrong with making an investment and losing money on that investment as I have done in the past because there is no guarantee but to think BSEG based on past performance is anything close to a good company is just accepting failure.

I am sure the losers - the people that accept failure - are glad I am leaving and will probably post something mindless and critical of me. I will look at this message board over the next couple of days just to see their infinite wisdom, I will not respond, but I will shake my head and laugh at people that think Kimberly is a good CEO and this company is a good investment.

What happens if they do not get the funding?
Does that mean the company remains generating $60,000 a quarter in revenues with losses. Because if that is the future, BSEG can actually go to $.00001.

I have to remind you that they issued a press release back in September about raising capital - have they raised any money?
I would be remiss if I didn't point out they issued 19 press releases in 2024 meanwhile the stock is down with little to no trading whatsoever.

Even if you are a paid promoter or an employee of the company, how can you with a good conscience be positive or try selling something that is unsellable.

Have you seen Kimberly speak? Have you seen some of the people that she claims are working for her? I wouldn't trust those people to deliver a newspaper to my house.

You are waiting patiently, but while you wait you are losing money because BSEG is and has been going down, meanwhile the stock market continues to hit all time highs across the board. I told you in my May 2024 post on this message board buying just 1 share of Apple Stock will do better than owning 100,000 shares of BSEG.

How can BSEG make films, with or without using AI, when they only have $40,936 in cash.
Please do not tell me about their $565,031 in accounts receivables because that has been there for many years and it has not been collected. I am somewhat surprised BSEG auditors don't make them write it off.

I know BSEG made an announcement last year about some type of a capital raise and some posters on this message board thought the funding would come in, but based on the most recent balance sheet Kimberly has failed at that.

These are not my opinions - $60K in quarterly revenue after 19 years is bad.
$40K in cash is bad.
Unable to raise money is bad.
Stock decrease every year is bad.

These are truths. In a real company a CEO would resign for failure or in most cases in a real company the Board of Directors would terminate the CEO for failure.

Just look at the stock chart and all past 10Q and 10K filings - failure is everywhere.

Stop the madness and as Mr Wonderful says many times - take this thing behind the barn and shoot it.

BSEG has no business.
Look at their revenues. Why do some people think there is any value in this company.

Where is the value. What type of a ROI can anyone expect from a company that has little to no operations.
Do you people not recall Kimberly Bates presenting on Emerging Growth virtual conference - she embarrassed herself because she didn't do it live. She did a taped show that was so bad it can be considered criminal that she is the CEO.

Here is a link:
https://www.google.com/search?q=emerging+growth+conference+youtube+%28otc+bseg%29&sca_esv=ff21b54c5ea83dff&udm=7&biw=1738&bih=836&ei=9xiaZ_bpJpGA5OMPkv2-kAU&oq=emerging+growth+conference+youtube+%28OTC+BSEG&gs_lp=EhZnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzLXZpZGVvIixlbWVyZ2luZyBncm93dGggY29uZmVyZW5jZSB5b3V0dWJlIChPVEMgQlNFRyoCCAAyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAFI0U1Q7wdYgxlwAXgAkAEAmAFToAHABaoBAjEwuAEDyAEA-AEBmAILoAL3BcICBBAAGB7CAgsQABiABBiGAxiKBcICCBAAGKIEGIkFwgIIEAAYgAQYogTCAgYQABgWGB7CAgUQIRirApgDAIgGAZIHAjExoAefKA&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless-video#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:a9c42b00,vid:QEFWx2s01qg,st:0

Lets forget my opinion for a second - they have been in business for 19 years and for the quarter ended Sept 2024 they did $60,000 in revenues. Most pizzerias throughout the United States do more revenues. 60,000 in revenues and someone on this board thinks AI is going to help this company.
That 60,000 is revenues. They lose money every year.
Do you realize people that make minimum wage make more money than BSEG makes.

Go back to my post 5493 that I made on May 2, 2024 and see what that post said about BSEG. Again, put opinions aside and look at that post because that one post says it all.

How can you put Michael Ovitz into this conversation where he has absolutely nothing to do with BSEG. And when you say BSEG has great talent, good products and content and a favorable structure - 0K in revenues, losses and a CEO that embarrassed herself at a virtual conference.

Lets see how much and how the stock trades.
Investors decide the value of a stock so lets sit back and watch how important and valuable today's new is.

You think the news is big
I think the company is a bad investment

Our opinions mean nothing - let us sit back and watch what investors think

We can reconvene tomorrow on this board and avoid giving opinions